Ditto, kid has 6 INT's alreadyI would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.
Jairus Byrd would have to be considered for the Defensive Rookie of The Year, which is a separate award. I will edit the title to reflect Offensive ROY.I would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.
Ditto, kid has 6 INT's alreadyI would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.
agreedToday: HarvinEnd of Year: Crabtree
ummm except his poll is about offensive ROTY so ... yeah ... bird doesn't belongDitto, kid has 6 INT's alreadyI would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.![]()
He has 7 interceptions. Darren Sharper tied him last night by picking off a pass on a hail mary...Ditto, kid has 6 INT's alreadyI would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.
The "offensive" part was added after our posts.ummm except his poll is about offensive ROTY so ... yeah ... bird doesn't belongDitto, kid has 6 INT's alreadyI would vote for Sanchez. That said, is it really asking too much to at least list Jairus Byrd as an option? He deserves more consideration than half of the guys on your list.![]()
I went with Harvin and I don't even think there is a close 2nd so far.

I was going to say this. I wouldn't say that Harvin doesn't have a chance strictly on offense, though. I think the other choice would be Hakeem Nicks, who actually has fewer receptions and fewer receiving yards (and zero rushing yards), although Nicks does have one more TD so far.I don't think Sanchez should even be in the conversation here. This isn't the offensive "Solid for a rookie" of the year award. It's the offensive "exceptional for a rookie" of the year award. And Sanchez hasn't even been solid for a rookie- Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Matt Leinart, Vince Young, Ben Roethlisberger... just a few of the many names of QBs who have been better as rookies than Sanchez has so far.Does Special Teams play even count toward "Offensive Rookie of the Year" voting?If not, Harvin doesn't have a real chance. He's been decent on offense, but his major contributions have been in the return game.
There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
Agreed. A few weeks ago I think Moreno was in the mix, but he has slowed significantly. He could still make a strong push, but it's easily Harvin's to lose at the moment. For Crabtree to have a chance, he'll have to finish VERY strong to make up for the time missed and the sour taste he has no doubt left in the mouths of the voters. It's possible, but not likely, especially with Harvin showing no signs of slowing down (in fact, it appears he's just getting warmed up). Nicks could also make a push, but he would have to substantially outproduce Harvin's receiving numbers (which isn't likely) to be considered since he doesn't have the added element of return duties. Ditto that for Maclin.AhrnCityPahnder said:Crusaderfan said:I went with Harvin and I don't even think there is a close 2nd so far.![]()
Well, he is officially on the roster as an offensive player. I'm not sure, but I think that pretty much seals his fate. I suppose someone could argue that ST isn't part of the offense so he shouldn't get credit for it. I doubt it though. Regardless, he is having a good season as a WR.There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
Are you being serious? Do you really not think the voters will take his special teams accomplishments into consideration? How could they not?There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
I think Harvin does enough offensively to win ORoy. Crabtree might pass him on merit but I ultimately think the voters will penalize (punish) him for his holdout. Wells or Moreno could steal it with strong 2nd half showings.Well, he is officially on the roster as an offensive player. I'm not sure, but I think that pretty much seals his fate. I suppose someone could argue that ST isn't part of the offense so he shouldn't get credit for it. I doubt it though. Regardless, he is having a good season as a WR.There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
:( I thought this poll was schtick; I am suprised anyone thinks it is a debate.OK, we can go infinite directions with what ifs for the next 8 weeks; but the first 8 were clear cut.Crusaderfan said:I went with Harvin and I don't even think there is a close 2nd so far.
you're kidding right?There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
You really think a QB completing 53% of his passes, with 8 TDs and 10 INTs, is the best offensive rookie, going away?Sanchez should be winning this going away.
Why's it so crazy? Devin Hester was a first-team AP All Pro returner as a rookie and set pretty much every single-season returning record in the book. He didn't get a single vote for DRoY. Now, I know that Harvin is more involved on offense than Hester was on defense that year, but if special teams accomplishments were weighted as heavily as actual offensive/defensive accomplishments, Hester would have been a runaway winner. I think it's fair to question whether, when crunch time arrives, voters will actually give full consideration to his special team accomplishments, partial consideration to his special team accomplishments, or no consideration whatsoever to his special team accomplishments.Are you being serious? Do you really not think the voters will take his special teams accomplishments into consideration? How could they not?There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
Yes I do. Considering that 8 of his 10 INTs came in 2 terrible games and the rest of his starts he's been solid to good(8 TDs and 2 INTS plus 3 rushing TDs) at the most difficult and valuable position in the NFL. If you were a GM would you trade away Sanchez right now for Harvin? No way I would. Sanchez has been the most impressive offensive rookie this season, the OROY.You really think a QB completing 53% of his passes, with 8 TDs and 10 INTs, is the best offensive rookie, going away?Sanchez should be winning this going away.
but made absolutely zero impact on defense (or offense) and he didnt look good out there when he did actually play defense (not to mention ryans was a flat out stud that year as a rookie abd probably had every single vote). Harvin has had a clutch 3rd down catch pretty much every game and he has looked great catching the ball, breaking tackles after the catch and his route running has been getting better every week. He is going to end up with a TON of total yardage AND probably around 60 catches.Why's it so crazy? Devin Hester was a first-team AP All Pro returner as a rookie and set pretty much every single-season returning record in the book. He didn't get a single vote for DRoY. Now, I know that Harvin is more involved on offense than Hester was on defense that year, but if special teams accomplishments were weighted as heavily as actual offensive/defensive accomplishments, Hester would have been a runaway winner. I think it's fair to question whether, when crunch time arrives, voters will actually give full consideration to his special team accomplishments, partial consideration to his special team accomplishments, or no consideration whatsoever to his special team accomplishments.Are you being serious? Do you really not think the voters will take his special teams accomplishments into consideration? How could they not?There's an ORoY award, and a DRoY award, but no STRoY award. I could see someone arguing that you can't factor ST accomplishments into ORoY or DRoY voting. I mean, if he plays a snap at CB sometime (a la Randy Moss or Tony Scheffler in obvious hail mary situations), are we going to give him the DRoY award, too, based on his special teams accomplishments?It's got to be Harvin. Just what he is doing on ST is enough for him to win rookie of the year. He isn't having a bad season as a WR either (for rookie standards).
How many Jets games have you watched this season?Yes I do. Considering that 8 of his 10 INTs came in 2 terrible games and the rest of his starts he's been solid to good(8 TDs and 2 INTS plus 3 rushing TDs) at the most difficult and valuable position in the NFL. If you were a GM would you trade away Sanchez right now for Harvin? No way I would. Sanchez has been the most impressive offensive rookie this season, the OROY.You really think a QB completing 53% of his passes, with 8 TDs and 10 INTs, is the best offensive rookie, going away?Sanchez should be winning this going away.
You're exactly right. Hester made no impact on defense, and the voters didn't even consider his special teams accomplishments, so he didn't receive a vote. The key here is the part where the voters didn't even consider his special teams accomplishments.I'm not saying that Harvin doesn't deserve the ORoY. I'd give it to him based solely on his performance on offense so far, with no attention paid to his special teams work. I'm just saying that I think it's fair to question how much voters will weight his special teams work when it comes time to vote.but made absolutely zero impact on defense (or offense) and he didnt look good out there when he did actually play defense (not to mention ryans was a flat out stud that year as a rookie abd probably had every single vote). Harvin has had a clutch 3rd down catch pretty much every game and he has looked great catching the ball, breaking tackles after the catch and his route running has been getting better every week. He is going to end up with a TON of total yardage AND probably around 60 catches.
Return yards and TD's are intuitively looked at as offensive statistics. It makes sense that Hester's special teams accomplishments would not do anything toward making his case for DRoY. Were he a WR his rookie season who also returned punts/kicks, I think he'd have received a few votes for ORoY. Special teams may be separate from offense, but punt/kick return yards and TDs have to be, at least intuitively, considered offensive stats given that 1) return yards give the offense more favorable field position, and 2) return TD's put points on the board.You're exactly right. Hester made no impact on defense, and the voters didn't even consider his special teams accomplishments, so he didn't receive a vote. The key here is the part where the voters didn't even consider his special teams accomplishments.I'm not saying that Harvin doesn't deserve the ORoY. I'd give it to him based solely on his performance on offense so far, with no attention paid to his special teams work. I'm just saying that I think it's fair to question how much voters will weight his special teams work when it comes time to vote.but made absolutely zero impact on defense (or offense) and he didnt look good out there when he did actually play defense (not to mention ryans was a flat out stud that year as a rookie abd probably had every single vote). Harvin has had a clutch 3rd down catch pretty much every game and he has looked great catching the ball, breaking tackles after the catch and his route running has been getting better every week. He is going to end up with a TON of total yardage AND probably around 60 catches.
Trading a QB for a WR is a bad comparison, as it never happens; their values are completely different (a QB is almost always more valuable than a WR). As for his two bad games, they are probably the reason why a team with a defense that is 2nd overall in total defense and a running game that is first in the NFL is only 4-4. Yes, he has played well at times, and could have a bright future ahead of him, but I just don't see him being the best offensive rookie so far this season.Yes I do. Considering that 8 of his 10 INTs came in 2 terrible games and the rest of his starts he's been solid to good(8 TDs and 2 INTS plus 3 rushing TDs) at the most difficult and valuable position in the NFL. If you were a GM would you trade away Sanchez right now for Harvin? No way I would. Sanchez has been the most impressive offensive rookie this season, the OROY.You really think a QB completing 53% of his passes, with 8 TDs and 10 INTs, is the best offensive rookie, going away?Sanchez should be winning this going away.
when the play starts and you have the ball and all 11 guys on the other team are trying to stop you and seem to struggle to do it on a regular basis, you are an offensive weapon. I dont think this even close right now. harvin and the sanchez for now. If the jets continue to lose, well then not sure sanchez gets to many votes.Resident A said:Does Special Teams play even count toward "Offensive Rookie of the Year" voting?If not, Harvin doesn't have a real chance. He's been decent on offense, but his major contributions have been in the return game.
Sanchez is more important to his team, so if Sanchez could lead the Jets to the playoffs, he is probably the most valuable rookie to his team. Harvin has been more spectacular, and excells at his position much more than Sanchez. Harvin is a dangerous player who can score from anywhere, while Sanchez is a lower tier QB. Harvin is a much better WR than Sanchez is a QB, so Harvin will get many more votes.You really think a QB completing 53% of his passes, with 8 TDs and 10 INTs, is the best offensive rookie, going away?Sanchez should be winning this going away.
That's how it went last year, and Harvin isn't having a rookie year anywhere near as productive as what Chris Johnson did last year.dcgator said:So the one rookie who will probably make the pro-bowl (Percy) will come in second to a guy who won't? (Sanchise)