That is the way it looked to me.I only saw the replay once... looked like Jones wasn't touched until after the ball crossed the plane, am I right?
I just don't get it. How does this always happen to the Lions?NFL coaches so scared to go against convention
Quinn has a third & 1, been gashing them all day
Punts it to give Stafford a chenxe
M-V-P
Wearng my Stafford jersey in Central Park running around like a lunatic
... and the announcer thinks we are in shock. No, not shocked...same old, same old.I just don't get it. How does this always happen to the Lions?
I just can’t believe you destroy an incredible ending to a game.....because they are looking at a slo mo HD replay.....and saying...well it kinda looks like he was touched....but...maybe not....meh....overrule it.That is the way it looked to me.![]()
Very close play at the goal line. Ref called it a TD. Then there is some rule that if a challenge goes from a stopped clock to a running clock it's a 10s runoff. The refs reversed the very close play at the GL so they weren't allowed to have their 4th down play.What the heck happened? I had another Stanford TD, then didn’t, and a run off?
Been saying it for years, replay is trash.I just can’t believe you destroy an incredible ending to a game.....because they are looking at a slo mo HD replay.....and saying...well it kinda looks like he was touched....but...maybe not....meh....overrule it.
BS.
IT was seen on the field by the line judge.....TD. In human speed. In real time. In the moment. In the freaking moment.
Why are we not playing the game and letting humans make calls anymore? I mean just ****ing review every play....just do that.
Where is the sport anymore? Where?
Is that true? They had 8 seconds and were already at the 1 yard line.Seems like everyone is piling on the 10s rule but it seems right. If they had correctly ruled Tate down at the 1 there wasn't enough time for them to get another snap off. So you'd rather the clock stoppage to correct the call give them a free play that they wouldn't have gotten otherwise?
![]()
We’ve learned a lot about the obscure rules over the years watching the Lions invent new ways to loseVery close play at the goal line. Ref called it a TD. Then there is some rule that if a challenge goes from a stopped clock to a running clock it's a 10s runoff. The refs reversed the very close play at the GL so they weren't allowed to have their 4th down play.
ThisFriends were all jumping up and down, dancing, hugging. Then we had to stop to be like "don't get excited we have to see the replay". It just sucks all the fun from it.
I think officially they ruled he was short and confirm.ed it.Very close play at the goal line. Ref called it a TD. Then there is some rule that if a challenge goes from a stopped clock to a running clock it's a 10s runoff. The refs reversed the very close play at the GL so they weren't allowed to have their 4th down play.
No. They ruled TD on the field.I think officially they ruled he was short and confirm.ed it.
You can get a play off with 8 seconds. They were right at the end zone, nobody had far to go to get lined up.Seems like everyone is piling on the 10s rule but it seems right. If they had correctly ruled Tate down at the 1 there wasn't enough time for them to get another snap off. So you'd rather the clock stoppage to correct the call give them a free play that they wouldn't have gotten otherwise?
![]()
I thought they did, but then I thought the ref said they confirmed the ruling he was down at the half yard line.No. They ruled TD on the field.
If he did, he misspoke. It was absolutely ruled a TD by the refs.I thought they did, but then I thought the ref said they confirmed the ruling he was down at the half yard line.
Pretty sure the ref said the ruling was changedI thought they did, but then I thought the ref said they confirmed the ruling he was down at the half yard line.
It sucks when the replay goes against you but I'd rather get it right on replay than wrong on the field.I just can’t believe you destroy an incredible ending to a game.....because they are looking at a slo mo HD replay.....and saying...well it kinda looks like he was touched....but...maybe not....meh....overrule it.
BS.
IT was seen on the field by the line judge.....TD. In human speed. In real time. In the moment. In the freaking moment.
Why are we not playing the game and letting humans make calls anymore? I mean just ****ing review every play....just do that.
Where is the sport anymore? Where?
Very close play at the goal line. Ref called it a TD. Then there is some rule that if a challenge goes from a stopped clock to a running clock it's a 10s runoff. The refs reversed the very close play at the GL so they weren't allowed to have their 4th down play.
Sure there was enough time. That's the point. The run off is a stupid rule. Honestly I don't see why it's there to begin with. Most rules gone bad at least have a moderately understandable reason.Seems like everyone is piling on the 10s rule but it seems right. If they had correctly ruled Tate down at the 1 there wasn't enough time for them to get another snap off. So you'd rather the clock stoppage to correct the call give them a free play that they wouldn't have gotten otherwise?
![]()
Yep, score reflected it on the screen.No. They ruled TD on the field.
True it needs to be the same on all plays.This is what is so dumb about the NFL's rule about going to the ground:
If the ball had came loose there when he went to the ground in the end zone, it's an incompletion, but because he went to the ground and completed the catch IN THE END ZONE, it's not a touchdown.
How about the offensive pi that put them at 1st and 30?Ball never should have been on the 1 in the first place. That pass interference on Trufant was BS. completely unwatchable ball
Agree 100%. BS rule, but it was the right call. My beef with it was he was ruled down with 14 secs left, they never freaking reviewed the time aspect. Not sure why Caldwell didn't push for a review of the time. DumbThat's a really tough pill to swallow.
His arms got extended on the defenders back. Call it every timeHow about the offensive pi that put them at 1st and 30?
Hindsight is 20/20. It was such a bizarre ending I am not sure how anyone would have caught it. And I think it was more like 11 seconds at best.Agree 100%. BS rule, but it was the right call. My beef with it was he was ruled down with 14 secs left, they never freaking reviewed the time aspect. Not sure why Caldwell didn't push for a review of the time. Dumb
It really looked like his knee was touching but with the camera being elevated it could have been misleading. The camera was right on the goal line, so the angle on the ball was good.I still can't believe they over turned it. Looked pretty inconclusive if he was down or not based on the moving video.
Only the Lions man.
Now if we had a camera at exact ground level and an ###-load of lasers to measure the microscopic distance between the pants and the turf, we could be really conclusive.It really looked like his knee was touching but with the camera being elevated it could have been misleading. The camera was right on the goal line, so the angle on the ball was good.
That would be cool.Now if we had a camera at exact ground level and an ###-load of lasers to measure the microscopic distance between the pants and the turf, we could be really conclusive.