What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Barden or Hixon? (1 Viewer)

SCGiants

Footballguy
I seen the talk by Coughlin that Hixon was/is the 3rd WR when healthy and Barden the 4th. Hixon is slated to be able to play tonight but will he take the place of Nicks or will he just be the 3rd on field in 3WR sets and Barden be the Nicks replacement... or.... will Hixon take Nicks place and Barden be the 3rd wr in 3wr sets?

 
I seen the talk by Coughlin that Hixon was/is the 3rd WR when healthy and Barden the 4th. Hixon is slated to be able to play tonight but will he take the place of Nicks or will he just be the 3rd on field in 3WR sets and Barden be the Nicks replacement... or.... will Hixon take Nicks place and Barden be the 3rd wr in 3wr sets?
excellent question :blackdot:
 
wrong forum guy - see this at top of Shark Pool

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SHARK POOL

Threads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum

 
wrong forum guy - see this at top of Shark Pool

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SHARK POOL

Threads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum
oh come on now...this is a valid question, and is not phrased to reference his team.
 
wrong forum guy - see this at top of Shark Pool

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SHARK POOL

Threads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum
If you're going to tell people what to do based on a post, you might want to actually read the post.
 
wrong forum guy - see this at top of Shark Pool

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THE SHARK POOL

Threads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum
The OP didn't ask who to start. He asked who the Giants were starting to take the place of Nicks. This is a completely relevant and important question.
 
I don't think anyone's gonna know until the game happens. Sadly. I'm too afraid of hixon starting so barden on the bench for quizz.

 
I would consider Hixon and Barden to both be starters. The Giants use three-WR sets extensively. I think you'll see Hixon and Barden on the outside with Cruz in the slot.

When there are only two WRs on the field, I think Hixon and Barden will rotate opposite Cruz.

(When Hakeem Nicks comes back, that's when you have to worry about the pecking order between Hixon and Barden, because that's when only one of them is likely to be on the field.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would consider Hixon and Barden to both be starters. The Giants use three-WR sets extensively. I think you'll see Hixon and Barden on the outside with Cruz in the slot.When there are only two WRs on the field, I think Hixon and Barden will rotate opposite Cruz.(When Hakeem Nicks comes back, that's when you have to worry about the pecking order between Hixon and Barden, because that's when only one of them is likely to be on the field.)
This seems most likely.
 
I would consider Hixon and Barden to both be starters. The Giants use three-WR sets extensively. I think you'll see Hixon and Barden on the outside with Cruz in the slot.When there are only two WRs on the field, I think Hixon and Barden will rotate opposite Cruz.(When Hakeem Nicks comes back, that's when you have to worry about the pecking order between Hixon and Barden, because that's when only one of them is likely to be on the field.)
what he said.Plus Hixon can play both spots and give Cruz a breather. Don't forget these guys go deep moreso than most teams send their WRs deep. They need breathers at times. Don't expect Hixon to make a sweet long punt return then go in and run a deep route. The Gmen give their WRs breathers pretty regularly and I think they do it well.Barden "gets in the way" when run blocking, he's not such a good blocker....can't call him ineffective so much but I'd definitely prefer Hixon blocking.There''s no question Barden is a better red zone target with his gigantic frame and "ups" but the defense will know that too.I'm not a Hixon fan, but if ya got him on your FF team apparently you are. I don't see why you can't start either of these guys this week.
 
I'm a Barden owner but if I owned both I would play Barden.

What we saw last week wasn't a mirage from Barden. He is in tune with Eli and that should continue.

Agree with the previous poster, if you own Hixon, play him, and also , if you own Barden, play him too, Eli is not going to stop throwing the ball any time soon.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For Nicks owners, is the play to simply pick up Hixon and ride it out til Nicks returns or try to ride Hixon in general and trade Nicks while his stock is still high?

 
Any news out of NYC? I gotta guess Barden is so deep in the doghouse, he may not be FF rosterable anymore.

 
For Nicks owners, is the play to simply pick up Hixon and ride it out til Nicks returns or try to ride Hixon in general and trade Nicks while his stock is still high?
Knicks is a stud, so unless you can get his true value, I'd keep him and add Hixon. Eli does a great job of spreading the ball around and taking advantage of mismatches so it's hard to tell who will be the guy who goes off besides Cruz when Knicks is out. Hixon to me is the guy because he's done it prior to this year too.
 
thanks for starting this thread. I was really impressed with Hixon last night, but I didn't see the thursday nighter when Barden blew up. I'm sure I would have been impressed with him, too. Has the knock on Hixon always been his health? It seems like he has played parts of the last 4 seasons and always gets hurt.

 
Any news out of NYC? I gotta guess Barden is so deep in the doghouse, he may not be FF rosterable anymore.
No, not at all.This is the final drive.

[*]6-A.Henery kicks 67 yards from PHI 35 to NYG -2. 22-D.Wilson to NYG 35 for 37 yards (6-A.Henery).

[*]1-10-NYG 35 (1:43) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 80-V.Cruz.

[*]2-10-NYG 35 (1:39) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning FUMBLES (Aborted) at NYG 30, and recovers at NYG 30. 10-E.Manning pass incomplete to 13-R.Barden.

[*]3-10-NYG 35 (1:34) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short right to 80-V.Cruz to NYG 44 for 9 yards (22-B.Boykin).

[*]4-1-NYG 44 (1:03) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-23-D.Rodgers-Cromartie, Defensive Pass Interference, 21 yards, enforced at NYG 44 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 35 (1:03) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short left to 80-V.Cruz (22-B.Boykin).

[*]2-10-PHI 35 (:58) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden (24-N.Asomugha).

[*]3-10-PHI 35 (:53) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-24-N.Asomugha, Defensive Pass Interference, 8 yards, enforced at PHI 35 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 27 (:49) (Shotgun) 44-A.Bradshaw left tackle to PHI 26 for 1 yard (97-C.Jenkins).

[*]2-9-PHI 26 (:25) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on NYG-13-R.Barden, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at PHI 26 - No Play.

[*]2-19-PHI 36 (:21) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 87-D.Hixon.

I'd rather refs "let em play" but to each his own. Two defensive PI and then Barden's.

I thought the Giants were fishing for one, can't recall which. I'm not a fan of that tactic even though they got it.

He's so inexperienced and those awesome CBs toyed with him on that drive. He's learning on the fly and those CBs were a tough matchup for him.

 
thanks for starting this thread. I was really impressed with Hixon last night, but I didn't see the thursday nighter when Barden blew up. I'm sure I would have been impressed with him, too. Has the knock on Hixon always been his health? It seems like he has played parts of the last 4 seasons and always gets hurt.
He has been the stereotypical flash in the pan.He's made some sweet returns, some nice grabs, some sweet runs after the catch. If I'm not mistaken, the Broncos and Gmen used him on reverses which he did well on occasionally.He's never put it together. The nice game builds hope and more targets and then sheer frustration. He's definitely more mature now and I am reasonably hopeful he'll continue to do well. That was the deal with him in the past though.
 
thanks for starting this thread. I was really impressed with Hixon last night, but I didn't see the thursday nighter when Barden blew up. I'm sure I would have been impressed with him, too. Has the knock on Hixon always been his health? It seems like he has played parts of the last 4 seasons and always gets hurt.
He has been the stereotypical flash in the pan.He's made some sweet returns, some nice grabs, some sweet runs after the catch. If I'm not mistaken, the Broncos and Gmen used him on reverses which he did well on occasionally.He's never put it together. The nice game builds hope and more targets and then sheer frustration. He's definitely more mature now and I am reasonably hopeful he'll continue to do well. That was the deal with him in the past though.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=657548&st=0&p=14825828&hl=barden&fromsearch=1entry14825828Should prolly merge this with the barden thread, but there's a YouTube link to barden highlights there...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for starting this thread. I was really impressed with Hixon last night, but I didn't see the thursday nighter when Barden blew up. I'm sure I would have been impressed with him, too. Has the knock on Hixon always been his health? It seems like he has played parts of the last 4 seasons and always gets hurt.
He has been the stereotypical flash in the pan.He's made some sweet returns, some nice grabs, some sweet runs after the catch. If I'm not mistaken, the Broncos and Gmen used him on reverses which he did well on occasionally.He's never put it together. The nice game builds hope and more targets and then sheer frustration. He's definitely more mature now and I am reasonably hopeful he'll continue to do well. That was the deal with him in the past though.
Hixon. Not even close.Should prolly merge this with the barden thread, but there's a YouTube link to barden highlights there...
 
Any news out of NYC? I gotta guess Barden is so deep in the doghouse, he may not be FF rosterable anymore.
No, not at all.This is the final drive.

[*]6-A.Henery kicks 67 yards from PHI 35 to NYG -2. 22-D.Wilson to NYG 35 for 37 yards (6-A.Henery).

[*]1-10-NYG 35 (1:43) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 80-V.Cruz.

[*]2-10-NYG 35 (1:39) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning FUMBLES (Aborted) at NYG 30, and recovers at NYG 30. 10-E.Manning pass incomplete to 13-R.Barden.

[*]3-10-NYG 35 (1:34) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short right to 80-V.Cruz to NYG 44 for 9 yards (22-B.Boykin).

[*]4-1-NYG 44 (1:03) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-23-D.Rodgers-Cromartie, Defensive Pass Interference, 21 yards, enforced at NYG 44 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 35 (1:03) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short left to 80-V.Cruz (22-B.Boykin).

[*]2-10-PHI 35 (:58) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden (24-N.Asomugha).

[*]3-10-PHI 35 (:53) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-24-N.Asomugha, Defensive Pass Interference, 8 yards, enforced at PHI 35 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 27 (:49) (Shotgun) 44-A.Bradshaw left tackle to PHI 26 for 1 yard (97-C.Jenkins).

[*]2-9-PHI 26 (:25) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on NYG-13-R.Barden, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at PHI 26 - No Play.

[*]2-19-PHI 36 (:21) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 87-D.Hixon.

I'd rather refs "let em play" but to each his own. Two defensive PI and then Barden's.

I thought the Giants were fishing for one, can't recall which. I'm not a fan of that tactic even though they got it.

He's so inexperienced and those awesome CBs toyed with him on that drive. He's learning on the fly and those CBs were a tough matchup for him.
To clarify, I thought his PI penalty cost the Gmen the game by moving them out of FG range. I know Coughlin hates mental mistakes. That's why I was wondering if he would bury Barden.
 
Any news out of NYC? I gotta guess Barden is so deep in the doghouse, he may not be FF rosterable anymore.
No, not at all.This is the final drive.

[*]6-A.Henery kicks 67 yards from PHI 35 to NYG -2. 22-D.Wilson to NYG 35 for 37 yards (6-A.Henery).

[*]1-10-NYG 35 (1:43) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 80-V.Cruz.

[*]2-10-NYG 35 (1:39) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning FUMBLES (Aborted) at NYG 30, and recovers at NYG 30. 10-E.Manning pass incomplete to 13-R.Barden.

[*]3-10-NYG 35 (1:34) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass short right to 80-V.Cruz to NYG 44 for 9 yards (22-B.Boykin).

[*]4-1-NYG 44 (1:03) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-23-D.Rodgers-Cromartie, Defensive Pass Interference, 21 yards, enforced at NYG 44 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 35 (1:03) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short left to 80-V.Cruz (22-B.Boykin).

[*]2-10-PHI 35 (:58) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden (24-N.Asomugha).

[*]3-10-PHI 35 (:53) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete short right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on PHI-24-N.Asomugha, Defensive Pass Interference, 8 yards, enforced at PHI 35 - No Play.

[*]1-10-PHI 27 (:49) (Shotgun) 44-A.Bradshaw left tackle to PHI 26 for 1 yard (97-C.Jenkins).

[*]2-9-PHI 26 (:25) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 13-R.Barden. PENALTY on NYG-13-R.Barden, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at PHI 26 - No Play.

[*]2-19-PHI 36 (:21) (Shotgun) 10-E.Manning pass incomplete deep right to 87-D.Hixon.

I'd rather refs "let em play" but to each his own. Two defensive PI and then Barden's.

I thought the Giants were fishing for one, can't recall which. I'm not a fan of that tactic even though they got it.

He's so inexperienced and those awesome CBs toyed with him on that drive. He's learning on the fly and those CBs were a tough matchup for him.
To clarify, I thought his PI penalty cost the Gmen the game by moving them out of FG range. I know Coughlin hates mental mistakes. That's why I was wondering if he would bury Barden.
Barden prevented a pick IMO.
 
Why are people ignoring the facts:

-Hixon proved himself to be a better WR during the OTA's and preseason and earned a spot on the depth chart behind Cruz and Nicks and ahead of Barden

-Barden got his opportunity when both Nicks and Hixon were unavailable for the game against Carolina

-When Hixon got healthy, NY immediately inserted him into the starting lineup over Barden

-The NYG coaches see these guys every day and apparently in their opinion Hixon is the better play

Unless there is reason to think NYG has changed their stance, the pecking order is set for another week. Don't let who is on your roster make you think illogically.

Who is likely to get more PT and Targets this week? Hixon

Could Barden outrpoduce Hixon this week by scoring a touchdown on less targets? Sure.

Do you want to make that gamble when the odds are against you? Your call - I would look for a better option.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barden has a concussion,

Roto

Giants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.

Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.

 
Barden has a concussion, RotoGiants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.
Well...I guess that solves this issue.
 
'steveski said:
'lexdizzle said:
Barden has a concussion, RotoGiants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.
Well...I guess that solves this issue.
It was done at post 26.
 
'lexdizzle said:
Barden has a concussion, RotoGiants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.
that hardly sounds serious....well, idk it's so hard to understand concussions nowadays. Doesn't seem it was that bad, yet a concussion is bad. It's tough for us to follow for FF
 
Why are people ignoring the facts:

-Hixon proved himself to be a better WR during the OTA's and preseason and earned a spot on the depth chart behind Cruz and Nicks and ahead of Barden

-Barden got his opportunity when both Nicks and Hixon were unavailable for the game against Carolina

-When Hixon got healthy, NY immediately inserted him into the starting lineup over Barden

-The NYG coaches see these guys every day and apparently in their opinion Hixon is the better play

Unless there is reason to think NYG has changed their stance, the pecking order is set for another week. Don't let who is on your roster make you think illogically.

Who is likely to get more PT and Targets this week? Hixon

Could Barden outrpoduce Hixon this week by scoring a touchdown on less targets? Sure.

Do you want to make that gamble when the odds are against you? Your call - I would look for a better option.
Yeah he's a 6 foot 6 inch WR with good ups and soft hands. His red zone ability will be a constant tease for FF. The Giants use him in the redzone so the gamble is a tricky one and it is quite possible he is in and Hixon is out inside the 20. Hixon is far more experienced and (like I said above) if he's going to be reliable the Giants will surely appreciate that. He hasn't been earlier in his career but seems to be now. The Giants O can easily use 3 WRs and have done so often. This isn't so much Barden versus Hixon until Nicks comes back. There's enough for the two of them now.

 
Why are people ignoring the facts:

-Hixon proved himself to be a better WR during the OTA's and preseason and earned a spot on the depth chart behind Cruz and Nicks and ahead of Barden

-Barden got his opportunity when both Nicks and Hixon were unavailable for the game against Carolina

-When Hixon got healthy, NY immediately inserted him into the starting lineup over Barden

-The NYG coaches see these guys every day and apparently in their opinion Hixon is the better play

Unless there is reason to think NYG has changed their stance, the pecking order is set for another week. Don't let who is on your roster make you think illogically.

Who is likely to get more PT and Targets this week? Hixon

Could Barden outrpoduce Hixon this week by scoring a touchdown on less targets? Sure.

Do you want to make that gamble when the odds are against you? Your call - I would look for a better option.
Yeah he's a 6 foot 6 inch WR with good ups and soft hands. His red zone ability will be a constant tease for FF. The Giants use him in the redzone so the gamble is a tricky one and it is quite possible he is in and Hixon is out inside the 20. Hixon is far more experienced and (like I said above) if he's going to be reliable the Giants will surely appreciate that. He hasn't been earlier in his career but seems to be now. The Giants O can easily use 3 WRs and have done so often. This isn't so much Barden versus Hixon until Nicks comes back. There's enough for the two of them now.
There wasn't enough for two last week. You may be right long term - but your argument is illogical based on the facts to this point.Seems like every time somebody posts in a thread, they should have a mandatory disclosure statement - "Yes, I own Ramses Barden."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why are people ignoring the facts:

-Hixon proved himself to be a better WR during the OTA's and preseason and earned a spot on the depth chart behind Cruz and Nicks and ahead of Barden

-Barden got his opportunity when both Nicks and Hixon were unavailable for the game against Carolina

-When Hixon got healthy, NY immediately inserted him into the starting lineup over Barden

-The NYG coaches see these guys every day and apparently in their opinion Hixon is the better play

Unless there is reason to think NYG has changed their stance, the pecking order is set for another week. Don't let who is on your roster make you think illogically.

Who is likely to get more PT and Targets this week? Hixon

Could Barden outrpoduce Hixon this week by scoring a touchdown on less targets? Sure.

Do you want to make that gamble when the odds are against you? Your call - I would look for a better option.
Yeah he's a 6 foot 6 inch WR with good ups and soft hands. His red zone ability will be a constant tease for FF. The Giants use him in the redzone so the gamble is a tricky one and it is quite possible he is in and Hixon is out inside the 20. Hixon is far more experienced and (like I said above) if he's going to be reliable the Giants will surely appreciate that. He hasn't been earlier in his career but seems to be now. The Giants O can easily use 3 WRs and have done so often. This isn't so much Barden versus Hixon until Nicks comes back. There's enough for the two of them now.
There wasn't enough for two last week. You may be right long term - but your argument is illogical based on the facts to this point.Seems like every time somebody posts in a thread, they should have a mandatory disclosure statement - "Yes, I own Ramses Barden."
what do you have for targets for the two?
 
'lexdizzle said:
Barden has a concussion, RotoGiants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.
that hardly sounds serious....well, idk it's so hard to understand concussions nowadays. Doesn't seem it was that bad, yet a concussion is bad. It's tough for us to follow for FF
Does not really matter. Hixon played 91% of the snaps last week and got 11 targets with Barden healthy AND coming off a big statistical break out game. There really should no longer be a question as to which one of them is the preferred Nicks handcuff or which is the one to own.
 
just an FYI, Hixon was question then probable with a concussion the week before.

 
'lexdizzle said:
Barden has a concussion, RotoGiants WR Ramses Barden has been diagnosed with a concussion.Barden never left Sunday night's loss to the Eagles, so it's unclear exactly when the concussion occurred. Regardless, his status for Sunday's game against the Browns is unclear. If Barden and Hakeem Nicks (knee, foot) can't go, Domenik Hixon will start and be an every-down wideout against a Joe Haden-less secondary.
that hardly sounds serious....well, idk it's so hard to understand concussions nowadays. Doesn't seem it was that bad, yet a concussion is bad. It's tough for us to follow for FF
Does not really matter. Hixon played 91% of the snaps last week and got 11 targets with Barden healthy AND coming off a big statistical break out game. There really should no longer be a question as to which one of them is the preferred Nicks handcuff or which is the one to own.
OK then I'll stop discussing it
 
11 targets to 4
it's 7 for Barden, 13 for Hixon, chunk whatever site can't count there. That should be enough for both IMO.
Used ESPN. I am guessing the 3 more for Barden are the PI calls. 7 targets and they were playing from behind (so they increased the 3 WR sets). Not stating 7 is bad - but nothing to get excited about - that's likely 3-4 receptions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top