When I’m considering multiple same position players, my projected ceiling / upside is a pretty strong tiebreaker. I used to believe it was OK to just be content with drafting a few consistent, steady Eddie floor guys while I was building out my lineup in the draft. But I now believe that’s not an optimal strategy.
Players who massively outperform their ADP are the key to being a league winner. Intentionally going after high variance players with a path to upside trumps taking guys who will perform to their ADP.
The phrase is overused, for sure - but taking chances on big upside players (e.g., not drafting players at their ceiling wrt ADP) is an essential core value, regardless of what you call it.
Of course, I also have misses in my projections/rankings every year. That’s understood, no one is perfect, we’re dealing with range of outcomes based on publicly available information (which is inherently incomplete.)
I would contend those caveats do not invalidate the philosophy.