Big Picture - Herman (1 Viewer)

[TeamDingo]

Love this feature. Would like to see PR/KR added if possible.

A couple things that jumped out about the Vikings.

Starting RT at this point is Ryan Cook not Marcus Johnson. Not the biggest McKinnie fan ( B seems right) but not sure why anyone would rank MJohnson higher when he can't stay on the field because of all his mistakes.

VShiancoe should be #1 TE, especially Fantasy wise. He will be (at least they hope ) be the receiving option.

 

[RIM]

just checked this compilation by Herman myself.

Now this is what i subscribe for. Hours of work put together in one simple, easy to read format giving me tons of information with one click.

I love it. Thank you Mike!

 

[Mike Herman]

Love this feature. Would like to see PR/KR added if possible. A couple things that jumped out about the Vikings.Starting RT at this point is Ryan Cook not Marcus Johnson. Not the biggest McKinnie fan ( B seems right) but not sure why anyone would rank MJohnson higher when he can't stay on the field because of all his mistakes.VShiancoe should be #1 TE, especially Fantasy wise. He will be (at least they hope ) be the receiving option.

Mr. Dingo,Thanks for the comments. I'll update Cook and Shiancoe accordingly in the next release.Note that the offensive line grades are not for the individual players, it just looks that way as I tried to cram them into the grid. The grades are for the entire line as a unit in various categories (see Key at the bottom of the chart).

 

[TeamDingo]

Love this feature. Would like to see PR/KR added if possible. A couple things that jumped out about the Vikings.Starting RT at this point is Ryan Cook not Marcus Johnson. Not the biggest McKinnie fan ( B seems right) but not sure why anyone would rank MJohnson higher when he can't stay on the field because of all his mistakes.VShiancoe should be #1 TE, especially Fantasy wise. He will be (at least they hope ) be the receiving option.

Mr. Dingo,Thanks for the comments. I'll update Cook and Shiancoe accordingly in the next release.Note that the offensive line grades are not for the individual players, it just looks that way as I tried to cram them into the grid. The grades are for the entire line as a unit in various categories (see Key at the bottom of the chart).

Like I said I love this feature. Great work.

 

[WampusCat43]

VERY minor point, but Ronnie Ghent got cut by the Bengals the other day. Bobby Blizzard is currently 2nd team TE, although they expect to sign someone else's castoff.

for sure.

 

[kensat30]

At first I thought you went out on a limb rating Arizona's offensive line. But then I noticed that you have only 6 below average marks for offensive linemen in the entire league. Not everyone can be average...

 

[Mike Herman]

VERY minor point, but Ronnie Ghent got cut by the Bengals the other day. Bobby Blizzard is currently 2nd team TE, although they expect to sign someone else's castoff. for sure.

I've deleted Ghent, and will add Blizzard (and Tim Day as well).Also correcting Seahawks backup TE from Mili to Will Heller. Next version will include more pink guys, per Mark Wimer's injury update article.

 

[Mike Herman]

At first I thought you went out on a limb rating Arizona's offensive line. But then I noticed that you have only 6 below average marks for offensive linemen in the entire league. Not everyone can be average...

Good point. I'll review this with our OL guy.

 

[Gr00vus]

At first I thought you went out on a limb rating Arizona's offensive line. But then I noticed that you have only 6 below average marks for offensive linemen in the entire league. Not everyone can be average...

Actually everyone can be average. However everyone can't be above (or below) average. -end nitpick

 

[ruelvis]

#1 - AWESOME! a ton of info at your fingertips ROCKS!

#2 - I'm a bit confused about the far far right of the 'picture' - specifically the letters next to the defenses/team names. i am referring to the area that show the tems schedule and seems to grade the defenses of those teams.

Is an A grade good for the offensive players vs that team or bad?

I thought is was obvious but looking a bit closer

oakland (not too shabby a defense) Cle & TB get and F,

baltimore (a top defense i thought), Ten (a weaker one) get a C,

Cin (a weaker defense and not in the category of phi or ne), Phi, NE (a stronger defense i thought) & StL (a weaker defense i thought) get an A

any insights?

Thanks

 

[phthalatemagic]

 

[Mike Herman]

#1 - AWESOME! a ton of info at your fingertips ROCKS!#2 - I'm a bit confused about the far far right of the 'picture' - specifically the letters next to the defenses/team names. i am referring to the area that show the tems schedule and seems to grade the defenses of those teams.Is an A grade good for the offensive players vs that team or bad?I thought is was obvious but looking a bit closer oakland (not too shabby a defense) Cle & TB get and F, baltimore (a top defense i thought), Ten (a weaker one) get a C, Cin (a weaker defense and not in the category of phi or ne), Phi, NE (a stronger defense i thought) & StL (a weaker defense i thought) get an Aany insights?Thanks

Those are my projected grade for that team's offense this year... so that you can look for a defense that will be playing against a poor offense.

 

[ruelvis]

#1 - AWESOME! a ton of info at your fingertips ROCKS!#2 - I'm a bit confused about the far far right of the 'picture' - specifically the letters next to the defenses/team names. i am referring to the area that show the tems schedule and seems to grade the defenses of those teams.Is an A grade good for the offensive players vs that team or bad?I thought is was obvious but looking a bit closer oakland (not too shabby a defense) Cle & TB get and F, baltimore (a top defense i thought), Ten (a weaker one) get a C, Cin (a weaker defense and not in the category of phi or ne), Phi, NE (a stronger defense i thought) & StL (a weaker defense i thought) get an Aany insights?Thanks

Those are my projected grade for that team's offense this year... so that you can look for a defense that will be playing against a poor offense.

Ooooooooooooooh! I should use that right part of the grid for evaluating the teams DEFENSE not offense! Now it makes complete sense...to the point i'm embarrased that i had to ask. Thanks!