bulger2holt
Footballguy
Where do you think he ranks from here out ? RB2 ? RB3 ? I think Woodhead being out inflated his numbers. His value is probably high right now due to his huge week, would you trade him or hold him ?
I think he could be as good as a high end number 2 rb. The Patriots are starting to realize that they have one of the worst defenses in the NFL. With that in mind I think the Patriots are going to run a lot more (see yesterdays game) in an effort to control the clock and keep their defense off the field...Ridley and Woodhead will be involved, but BJGE is still the rb to own in NE.I honestly dont know. He was superb yesterday against a tough Jets DEF. Hes never fumbled in his entire career (400+ carries). Logic would say that the coaching staff will ride him out, but then again I can completely see Belichick continuing to rotate the hot RB in.
I agree 100% but I would suggest that if the Patriots are truly going to run the ball more to keep their defense off the field BJGE could be a low end #1 rb. He finished in the top 12 last year and wasn't a fulltime player at the start of the season last year.'Thumper said:I think he could be as good as a high end number 2 rb. The Patriots are starting to realize that they have one of the worst defenses in the NFL. With that in mind I think the Patriots are going to run a lot more (see yesterdays game) in an effort to control the clock and keep their defense off the field...Ridley and Woodhead will be involved, but BJGE is still the rb to own in NE.'Native said:I honestly dont know. He was superb yesterday against a tough Jets DEF. Hes never fumbled in his entire career (400+ carries). Logic would say that the coaching staff will ride him out, but then again I can completely see Belichick continuing to rotate the hot RB in.
But last year he wasn't the starter for the first chunk of the season. This year he is RB11 so far and the Pats offense is scoring a lot more points than last season. He also looks a lot better than last year. So why would he "regress" to RB18? Just the fear of the rookies stealing touches? Not disagreeing with you necessarily, but you seem to perpetually lowball BJGE's production. That happened all last season and again during this preseason when you had him pegged for numbers that he looks like he's going to blow through in the next couple of games. The Pats offense is pretty explosive right now and BJGE looks like a focal point. Hard to see how he isn't somewhere around RB12. At least.BJGE finished last year as RB18 in ppg on the strength of his TDs. Given the other backs on the roster, that's probably about where he should be ranked moving forward (mid RB2 trending worse if other backs get a lot of work).
People are going to see what they want to see. Here were BJGE carries each game last year including the playoffs . . .5, 10, 16, 16, 10, 11, 17, 9, 18, 21, 12, 18, 21, 6, 19, 20, 9Here are his carries for this year . . .7, 17, 10, 16, 27FOR WHATEVER REASON, it does not appear that BJGE gets a full workload from week to week compared to some other RBs throughout the league. I count 12 games with 15 or more carries and 10 of under 15 carries. That's almost 50%/50%. That alone keeps him out of RB1 territory in my book, no matter what else people will want to bring up.But last year he wasn't the starter for the first chunk of the season. This year he is RB11 so far and the Pats offense is scoring a lot more points than last season. He also looks a lot better than last year. So why would he "regress" to RB18? Just the fear of the rookies stealing touches? Not disagreeing with you necessarily, but you seem to perpetually lowball BJGE's production. That happened all last season and again during this preseason when you had him pegged for numbers that he looks like he's going to blow through in the next couple of games. The Pats offense is pretty explosive right now and BJGE looks like a focal point. Hard to see how he isn't somewhere around RB12. At least.BJGE finished last year as RB18 in ppg on the strength of his TDs. Given the other backs on the roster, that's probably about where he should be ranked moving forward (mid RB2 trending worse if other backs get a lot of work).
That's helpful, thanks. The last two games it seems the Pats have really re-committed to the run and, accordingly, BJGE has been getting a lot more carries. I think we can all agree that if he's getting 16-27 carries per game, he's got a good shot at RB1 numbers. So, what's your take on whether they will keep trying to run the ball that much? Likely, given the need to control the clock and keep the defense off the field? Either way, I do think that the # of carries issue is somewhat mitigated due to the goal line role he gets to play in this offense. Even with a high degree of variance in carries, he has more rushing TDs than any other player in the NFL over the last season and a half. TD production has been very consistent with him.People are going to see what they want to see. Here were BJGE carries each game last year including the playoffs . . .5, 10, 16, 16, 10, 11, 17, 9, 18, 21, 12, 18, 21, 6, 19, 20, 9Here are his carries for this year . . .7, 17, 10, 16, 27FOR WHATEVER REASON, it does not appear that BJGE gets a full workload from week to week compared to some other RBs throughout the league. I count 12 games with 15 or more carries and 10 of under 15 carries. That's almost 50%/50%. That alone keeps him out of RB1 territory in my book, no matter what else people will want to bring up.But last year he wasn't the starter for the first chunk of the season. This year he is RB11 so far and the Pats offense is scoring a lot more points than last season. He also looks a lot better than last year. So why would he "regress" to RB18? Just the fear of the rookies stealing touches? Not disagreeing with you necessarily, but you seem to perpetually lowball BJGE's production. That happened all last season and again during this preseason when you had him pegged for numbers that he looks like he's going to blow through in the next couple of games. The Pats offense is pretty explosive right now and BJGE looks like a focal point. Hard to see how he isn't somewhere around RB12. At least.BJGE finished last year as RB18 in ppg on the strength of his TDs. Given the other backs on the roster, that's probably about where he should be ranked moving forward (mid RB2 trending worse if other backs get a lot of work).
People in general need to realize that "the big picture" involves more than looking at the most recent game that was played and what the results were. After Week 1, Tom Brady was going to throw for 8,000 yards. Last week Ridley was going to get 1,500 yards from scrimmage on the season. This week BJGE is going to get the ball 25 times a game. None of those are likely to happen.People were suggesting that Green Ellis was going to lose his job altogether after a mediocre showing against Buffalo. Now he will be a fantasy RB1? What changed?IMO, it's unlikely that green Ellis will get a Larry Johnson workload. Like I have been saying for all the NE backs, all of them will do something at some point, but it's unlikely that one of them will do everyting all the time. It's still some sort of committe approach and that is unlikely to change.Put another way, BJGE now has had 5 games of 20 or more carries in 43 career regular season and post season games. I don't see where he will become a bell cow running back. He's had 15 carries 14 times. Yes, he scores lots of TDs (which is why people should want to play him), but he generally is going to average 13-15 carries a game and not normally get into the 20s. He also rarely catches passes, so he's not really a dual threat.It stands to reason that Woodhead, Ridley, and Vereen will at some point all get to play. And at some point soon Faulk may be back (not that he will take a ton of carries from BJGE) and could also make another mouth to feed. People also need to remember that the Pats game plan changes from week to week and they some weeks will feature the run and other times ignore it. Long story short, BJGE is unlikely to get a heavy workload on a consistent basis and other backs on the team will normally get more carries and touches than this past week.That's helpful, thanks. The last two games it seems the Pats have really re-committed to the run and, accordingly, BJGE has been getting a lot more carries. I think we can all agree that if he's getting 16-27 carries per game, he's got a good shot at RB1 numbers. So, what's your take on whether they will keep trying to run the ball that much? Likely, given the need to control the clock and keep the defense off the field? Either way, I do think that the # of carries issue is somewhat mitigated due to the goal line role he gets to play in this offense. Even with a high degree of variance in carries, he has more rushing TDs than any other player in the NFL over the last season and a half. TD production has been very consistent with him.
In redraft or dynasty. I still can't find any dynasty owners willing to give up anything close to the value of the numbers he puts up. I'm not sold on him having long term value but for what I can get for him I will just keep him.In redraft I think he has a good shot at having ow end RB1 or high end RB2 numbers all year barring injury.It may be the perfect 'sell high' opportunity right now. This may be his high point.