I'm not sure if Watt lets him out alive.I'm on board with the rest of you haters this week. Playing Houston's defense with extreme confidence in a W17 title game.
Hoping for a shutout. Get 'em next year, kid!![]()
Get him an O Line and you will see a change. Plus with the young WRs developing, he will be good.
I've been saying that for 13 pages. Where is my GDGet him an O Line and you will see a change. Plus with the young WRs developing, he will be good.![]()
Bortles was better at getting sacked and throwing picks than Gabbert was in year 1. He was also worse at throwing TDs while throwing more total passes. QB rate ended up being 65.4 to 69.5. Bortles gets the nod in comp% ending with 58.9%. This is just as bad a pick as Gabbert was. It's not the coach. He stinks, but there will be nothing but excuses made for him.There is no comparison to gabbert. None. Bortles has stepped up in the pocket more in 7 starts than Gabbert has his entire career. Gabbert's rookie year, he was averaging 147 yards passing per game. While Bortles' QB rating is a pedestrian 72, Gabbert's rookie rating was 65. Bortles is actually completing passes at a 63% clip. Gabbert's rookie passing pct was 50.8.I think he, and a few posters here, earned it. He's one of the worse young QBs to come into the league lately... along with Gabbert and Geno ect.. He's going to kill the value of his young WRs(I'm a Shorts and Robinson fan, just not with Bortles). At best he's a boarder line starter. I don't see it in his play or his numbers to suggest otherwise.Ouch. I don't think he deserves to be compared to Gabbert. Bortles is a football player...Gabbert was a sissy. Bortles will motivate his team and be a leader. I'm willing to give him a little more of a leash than Gabbert. I knew when they drafted Gabbert that they would regret that pick. I'm more optimistic on Bortles. Give him an off season to work on the playbook and timing with his young WRs and I'd expect a solid leap next year. They will have another high pick to add (hopefully a stud O-lineman...look what Boselli did for the Jags!) to their cabinet.He's as bad as Gabbert and Geno. He should have had like 3-4 INTs this game if they weren't dropped. He has no feel for the position. Another flameout...
This year is just a learning curve for Bortles. I'll judge more harshly in 2015 if he doesn't show improvement.
Bortles is killing the value of the young WR? What was ARobinson/Hurns/MLee value after Game 2? And how about this crazy idea - Maybe the fact that the offense is predominately rookies and 2nd year players might take just a little while to gel. Really the only offensive starters with multiple years of starting experience are Beadles and the oft-injured Shorts. People laughed when the Jags said they wanted to let him sit all year. "Play the kid so he can learn." Well, he's getting some hard lessons.
Absolutely, I'm concerned about his decision-making. Ironically, after several risky throws that should have been picked, he says his end zone INT was meant to be thrown away but he didn't get enough on it.
You want to model an offense around Carolina?I'd like to see him run an offense similar to Cam's in Carolina. Bortles had 419 yards rushing in 13 starts, in an offense which didn't heavily utilize designed QB runs. Newton had 529 yards rushing in 14 starts in an offense which did.
For fantasy, yes.You want to model an offense around Carolina?I'd like to see him run an offense similar to Cam's in Carolina. Bortles had 419 yards rushing in 13 starts, in an offense which didn't heavily utilize designed QB runs. Newton had 529 yards rushing in 14 starts in an offense which did.![]()
He not as good a passer or runner as Cam. Not even closeFor fantasy, yes.You want to model an offense around Carolina?I'd like to see him run an offense similar to Cam's in Carolina. Bortles had 419 yards rushing in 13 starts, in an offense which didn't heavily utilize designed QB runs. Newton had 529 yards rushing in 14 starts in an offense which did.![]()
One or two weak links get eliminated and a line can improve in a hurry.That is true.
Bortles has some potential though. He needs an Oline. Bad.
Cam peaked as a rookie. I don't think Bortles has come close to his peak yet.He not as good a passer or runner as Cam. Not even closeFor fantasy, yes.You want to model an offense around Carolina?I'd like to see him run an offense similar to Cam's in Carolina. Bortles had 419 yards rushing in 13 starts, in an offense which didn't heavily utilize designed QB runs. Newton had 529 yards rushing in 14 starts in an offense which did.![]()
From someone with a background in statistics, this is not how it works at all when it comes to predicting outcomes or correlation.NAME POS YR AGE EXP G CMP ATT PYD Y/A PTD INT RSH RSHYD YD/RSH RSHTD FANT PT1 Robert Griffin qb 2012 22 1 15 259 394 3211 8.15 20 5 118 833 7.06 7 360.92 Russell Wilson qb 2012 24 1 16 252 393 3118 7.93 26 10 94 489 5.20 4 322.83 Cam Newton qb 2011 22 1 16 310 517 4051 7.84 21 17 126 706 5.60 14 426.94 Fran Tarkenton qb 1961 21 1 14 157 280 1997 7.13 18 17 56 308 5.50 5 215.75 Michael Vick qb 2001 21 1 8 50 113 785 6.95 2 3 29 300 10.34 1 80.36 Geno Smith qb 2013 23 1 16 247 443 3046 6.88 12 21 72 366 5.08 6 253.27 Vince Young qb 2006 23 1 15 184 357 2199 6.16 12 13 83 552 6.65 7 242.28 Blake Bortles qb 2014 23 1 14 280 475 2907 6.12 11 17 56 419 7.48 0 214.39 Troy Aikman qb 1989 23 1 11 155 293 1749 5.97 9 18 38 302 7.95 0 135.710 Rick Mirer qb 1993 23 1 16 274 486 2833 5.83 12 17 68 343 5.04 3 225.011 Bobby Douglass qb 1969 22 1 11 68 148 773 5.22 5 8 51 408 8.00 2 103.512 Donovan McNabb qb 1999 23 1 12 106 216 948 4.39 8 7 47 313 6.66 0 103.7Rookie RB's who've rushed for 300+ yards, sorted by YPA.
Bortles had the 2nd highest YPR of QB's who threw more than 150 passes - would not have guessed Aikman (7.95 YPR) was 1st.
Narrowing it down to 150+ passes and 6+ YPR shows Griffin, Young, Bortles, Aikman and McNabb.
All this tells me is that Bortles' career could go anywhere from Young to Aikman/McNabb.
Welcome to my world.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
Cam is far from a gold standard. I don't think Bortles will become an average NFL passer, which Cam has been for the most part of his career. He'll be forgotten by thenWelcome to my world.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
And when did Cam Newton become the gold standard for passing? Suggesting that Bortles couldn't approach Newton's production as a passer is just silly.
Well just keep comparing him to QBs from the 1960's. The game hasn't changed at all.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
Cam is far from a gold standard. I don't think Bortles will become an average NFL passer, which Cam has been for the most part of his career. He'll be forgotten by thenWelcome to my world.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
And when did Cam Newton become the gold standard for passing? Suggesting that Bortles couldn't approach Newton's production as a passer is just silly.![]()
This is my Blain Bortles faceCam is far from a gold standard. I don't think Bortles will become an average NFL passer, which Cam has been for the most part of his career. He'll be forgotten by thenWelcome to my world. And when did Cam Newton become the gold standard for passing? Suggesting that Bortles couldn't approach Newton's production as a passer is just silly.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics![]()
<----- You don't need to use that guy in every post. It doesn't hide the fact that your arguments are terrible.
I'm older than I thought if Aikman and McNabb played in the 60's.Well just keep comparing him to QBs from the 1960's. The game hasn't changed at all.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
You put up a chart with two players from the 60s. Wtf are you talking about?I'm older than I thought if Aikman and McNabb played in the 60's.Well just keep comparing him to QBs from the 1960's. The game hasn't changed at all.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
No, you don't. You'll be know for endorsing Gabbert reincarnated. Nuff saidSorry, I don't have a "statistical background." I just know football.
--------------->![]()
Go make a few graphs or something. Men are talking football.No, you don't. You'll be know for endorsing Gabbert reincarnated. Nuff saidSorry, I don't have a "statistical background." I just know football.
--------------->![]()
Go make a few graphs or something. Men are talking football.No, you don't. You'll be know for endorsing Gabbert reincarnated. Nuff saidSorry, I don't have a "statistical background." I just know football.
--------------->![]()
Happy?ShaHBucks said:You put up a chart with two players from the 60s. Wtf are you talking about?cstu said:I'm older than I thought if Aikman and McNabb played in the 60's.Well just keep comparing him to QBs from the 1960's. The game hasn't changed at all.but not in reading.From someone with a background in statistics
NFL Films guru Greg Cosell believes Blake Bortles "got into some bad habits" as a rookie, and the Jaguars "probably need to start over with him with the basics."
This was the fear when Bortles was coming out of UCF. He was extremely raw, drawing comparisons from as low as Jake Locker to as high as Andrew Luck. He looked like a Locker clone as a rookie, showing plus athleticism with long bouts of inconsistent accuracy. New Jaguars OC Greg Olson has a strong background in developing quarterbacks, and he gets yet another project in Bortles. The 23-year-old should benefit from a full offseason.
Source: Paul Kuharsky on Twitter