Boston Herald Says Randy Moss to GB Almost Done (1 Viewer)

[matt jones]

Oh man, the packers are thinking superbowl!

With Rodgers gone, that gets the pressure of Favre to retire. You got a real weapon on offense (No offense to Driver and Jennings). Now they just need to shore up that O-Line, Draft a Corner and bam!

 

[Billy1x]

Oh man, the packers are thinking superbowl!With Rodgers gone, that gets the pressure of Favre to retire. You got a real weapon on offense (No offense to Driver and Jennings). Now they just need to shore up that O-Line, Draft a Corner and bam!

Safety not a corner at least in the 1st 2 rounds. A good backup could be drafted in round 3 or 4. Teams really took advantage for the Packers safety position last year. They definitely need to shore up the offensive line. Theres overall line performance really drops off when anyone goes down. Spitz and College could make great strides if they build up their upper body strength in the off season. There greatest problem was being over powered.Courtney Anderson is a big addition if the Packers get him with Moss. He's a solid receiver and it would eliminate a need for them to draft a TE. He could be a big fantasy sleeper depending on how much he see's the field.

 

[Billy1x]

I dont' see how anyone could make a definitive judgement on Rodgers at this point.

you're crazyit's clear he's the worst QB drafted in the last 15 years. HE CAN'T EVEN GET ON THE FIELD!i have serious doubts that he can play Arena League even.

It takes a minimum of 3 years to learn a West Coast Offense. Only in year 4 would we know how good he is or could have been. In Oakland, he could shine behind a All Pro offensive line right now (but they don't have one).

 

[Billy1x]

Just cutting Moss would be fine by me, but I doubt Al Davis agrees with that. I can see Davis being okay with a QB and a couple of picks back, but I would think the value of the pick(s) would be based on Moss' performance.The 2008 7th round pick sounds like some sort of throw-in on a fantasy trade.

I think he represents a major salary cap issue for them. For the Packers to take him a new contract would have to be in place which may be the biggest thing holding up the deal.

 

[Billy1x]

Just cutting Moss would be fine by me, but I doubt Al Davis agrees with that. I can see Davis being okay with a QB and a couple of picks back, but I would think the value of the pick(s) would be based on Moss' performance.The 2008 7th round pick sounds like some sort of throw-in on a fantasy trade.

Don't forget Courtney Anderson is also ruled in the trade and up to a 2nd rounder in 2008 or 2009 based on Rogers performance.That 7th rounder in New Orleans turned out pretty good last year!!

 

[Billy1x]

I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)

Depends on how you rank Rodgers, Quinn and Russell.If the Raiders think they're pretty equal than they'd indeed be killing three birds with one stone.

No. Its Rogers & Johnson vs Quinn or Russell. No brainer if you ask me. One former potential #1 overall QB with 2 years NFL training & conditioning and this years #1 overall ranked WR.

 

[matt jones]

They should draft that one safety, can't think of his name, think he's polish or something, guy looked beastly.

 

[ThePittbully]

The Raiders are getting hosed. There's something missing from these reports IMO.

Yeah, probably the fact that they are B.S. If a trade does go down, it won't be as currently speculated.

Yea that seems like a real screwy deal, for one if you're the pack why trade the guy you have been grooming the last two years when your current QB couldnt be any more on the brink of retirement. And then they are getting an old, disgruntled WR who often lacks work ethic.

 

[Couch Potato]

The Raiders are getting hosed. There's something missing from these reports IMO.

Yeah, probably the fact that they are B.S. If a trade does go down, it won't be as currently speculated.

Yes, because teams have never made poor trades before....So you have specific knowledge that they are BS? Or just speculating like everyone else?

Well now, sure looks like the particulars of the Boston Herald report were B.S. doesn't it. Forgive me for not being one of the sheep earlier today.Thompson: Moss Trade Talk is 'Wild Speculation'

 

[sho nuff]

The Raiders are getting hosed. There's something missing from these reports IMO.

Yeah, probably the fact that they are B.S. If a trade does go down, it won't be as currently speculated.

Yes, because teams have never made poor trades before....So you have specific knowledge that they are BS? Or just speculating like everyone else?

Well now, sure looks like the particulars of the Boston Herald report were B.S. doesn't it. Forgive me for not being one of the sheep earlier today.Thompson: Moss Trade Talk is 'Wild Speculation'

Do you believe everything you hear out of a GM?How many times have you heard....he is our guy, we are committed to XXX...only for that guy to be released a week later or traded?

 

[Couch Potato]

The Raiders are getting hosed. There's something missing from these reports IMO.

Yeah, probably the fact that they are B.S. If a trade does go down, it won't be as currently speculated.

Yes, because teams have never made poor trades before....So you have specific knowledge that they are BS? Or just speculating like everyone else?

Well now, sure looks like the particulars of the Boston Herald report were B.S. doesn't it. Forgive me for not being one of the sheep earlier today.Thompson: Moss Trade Talk is 'Wild Speculation'

Do you believe everything you hear out of a GM?How many times have you heard....he is our guy, we are committed to XXX...only for that guy to be released a week later or traded?

Yeah, I believe him. Sorry if that bothers you.My turn for a question -- why are you so desperate to believe this trade as currently described is true, and that Harlan, Thompson, and the Raiders are all lying?

 

[sho nuff]

The Raiders are getting hosed. There's something missing from these reports IMO.

Yeah, probably the fact that they are B.S. If a trade does go down, it won't be as currently speculated.

Yes, because teams have never made poor trades before....So you have specific knowledge that they are BS? Or just speculating like everyone else?

Well now, sure looks like the particulars of the Boston Herald report were B.S. doesn't it. Forgive me for not being one of the sheep earlier today.Thompson: Moss Trade Talk is 'Wild Speculation'

Do you believe everything you hear out of a GM?How many times have you heard....he is our guy, we are committed to XXX...only for that guy to be released a week later or traded?

Yeah, I believe him. Sorry if that bothers you.My turn for a question -- why are you so desperate to believe this trade as currently described is true, and that Harlan, Thompson, and the Raiders are all lying?

Desperate to believe it? Not at all, Id love to believe it...However, I simply disagreed with your automatic denial of the deal in the first place.

 

[wannabee]

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/sports/ind...784&ntpid=1

Packers: Deal for Moss isn't done

JASON WILDE

jwilde@madison.com

The Green Bay Packers may very well end up trading for Oakland Raiders wide receiver Randy Moss, but the deal didn't go down Thursday. Nor will it happen Friday, according to several NFL sources contacted in the wake of a report that a deal was imminent.

Citing "a source in Wisconsin," the Boston Herald reported on its Web site Thursday morning that the Packers and Raiders were "on the verge of announcing a trade that would send the troubled receiver to Green Bay in exchange for backup quarterback Aaron Rodgers."

Packers general manager Ted Thompson was traveling to a college workout on Thursday, but he issued a terse statement through a team spokesman: "We dismiss this report as wild speculation."

According to the Herald report, the Raiders were also to receive seventh-round pick in 2008, while the Packers would receive Raiders tight end Courtney Anderson as part of the deal. The Packers would also get a conditional pick from the Raiders in the 2009 draft that would be based on Rodgers' production in Oakland the next two seasons.

The report also stated Moss has agreed to restructure his contract, and that a news conference announcing the deal could be held as early as today. Later in the day, the report was updated to say that a source close to Rodgers adamantly denied the rumor.

The Moss-for-Rodgers trade has also been rumored on the Web site profootballtalk.com for several weeks.

Rodgers said when reached on his cell phone that he had been advised not to comment. But Rodgers did say no one from the Packers called him Thursday to reassure him he was not going to be traded, and that the only calls he received were from "interested friends."

Asked at the team's annual Fan Fest last weekend whether Rodgers was the Packers' quarterback of the future, Thompson replied, "Yes. Absolutely."

Asked about the report, Moss' agent, Tim DiPiero, said, "There is a lot of speculation out there. I can't say one way or another (if it's going to happen)."

According to another source, the Packers were surprised by the report.

"We have absolutely no idea where this came from," the source said. "There's nothing to it."

However, that source confirmed the Packers have been discussing a trade for Moss for some time. Nonetheless, there's no reason to believe a deal is close.

The seed of the Moss-to-Green Bay talk was planted by agent Bus Cook, who represents Packers quarterback Brett Favre and shares Moss as a client with DiPiero. Cook has been quoted several times saying Favre would love to have Moss on his team.

Moss, who turned 30 on Feb. 13, was the most feared big-play receiver in football. In his first six NFL seasons, all with Minnesota, Moss was didn't miss a game and averaged 88 catches for 1396 yards and 12.8 touchdowns per year.

But in his last three seasons, his last with the Vikings in 2004 and his two with the Raiders, Moss has averaged just 50 catches, 775 yards and eight TDs. In 2006, Moss caught just 42 passes for 553 yards and three touchdowns in 13 games.

 

[massraider]

Your theory is based on two very thin premise:

1. That Favre is going to be there for 3 more years. This seems like an important part of the thoery, and I'm supposed to believe that Favre has gone from waffling for two years straight, to convincing the Pack that he's here until 2009 and beyond? Nah.

do you mean "the media has created the idea that Favre has been waffling for 2 years... and since they pounded it down the collective sports fans throat for 2 years i now believe it to be true.".

Fine. take that out of the equation.Do you believe that Favre is going to be in GB so long, and that the Pack believes it, that a QBOTF is no longer a viable need? GB is so sure they can count on him for the forseeable future, that they can let a promising young QB go?

Because that's what is need to be believed in order for the theory to hold up.

Or is it more likely that green bay is willing to part with him because they think he's no stud? That seems more likely to me.

I have no idea what kind of QB Rodgers is going to be. But if GB is willing to let him go, it kind of makes me wonder what they think about him.

 

[larry_boy_44]

Your theory is based on two very thin premise:

1. That Favre is going to be there for 3 more years. This seems like an important part of the thoery, and I'm supposed to believe that Favre has gone from waffling for two years straight, to convincing the Pack that he's here until 2009 and beyond? Nah.

do you mean "the media has created the idea that Favre has been waffling for 2 years... and since they pounded it down the collective sports fans throat for 2 years i now believe it to be true.".

Fine. take that out of the equation.Do you believe that Favre is going to be in GB so long, and that the Pack believes it, that a QBOTF is no longer a viable need? GB is so sure they can count on him for the forseeable future, that they can let a promising young QB go?

Because that's what is need to be believed in order for the theory to hold up.

Or is it more likely that green bay is willing to part with him because they think he's no stud? That seems more likely to me.

I have no idea what kind of QB Rodgers is going to be. But if GB is willing to let him go, it kind of makes me wonder what they think about him.

A QBOTF is a need, but a QBOTF entering his third year and still the backup with no end to his backup spot in sight isn't really a QBOTF, he's a backup...Detmer, Brunell, Brooks, & Hasselbeck were all "QBOTF" up here, too, and they were all traded because they were NEVER going to get playing time here... same thing with Rogers...

 

[deep vacuum]

What do you think this deal - if it goes through - would do to Drivers value?

I would think it can only help his production.No more straight double teams as teams will have to pay attention to Moss out there as well.

didnt driver have a record number of passes thrown his way last year or am I wrong there? Those would obviously go down quite a bit.Who gets drafted first moss or driver?

Moss, and as a Driver owner you couldn't pay me enough to trade him. His #'s will be very solid at about 10+ FF pts every week. Like starting an extra Rb.

 

[el centro]

What does this do to the Packers draft plans?A lot of mocks I see have them taking Lynch, but with a guy like Moss, you aren't acquiring him to play with some scrub after Favre retires, which should be next year. Does this turn Green Bay's attention to a QB to replace Favre and let Morency and a FA (Dillon/Brown/Dayne...) compete?

I don't think it changes things at all. Thompson is a BPA guy, so if Lynch is the highest rated player, that's who they'll draft. This would also bump up Ingle Martin's dynasty value quite a bit!

I agree with you... TT is a BPA guy - that said, I gotta believe that if by the grace of God slid all the way down to the Packers & he had to chose between Lynch & Quinn/Russell - I gotta believe the QB are higher on everyone's Draft Board.

 

[Donnybrook]

A Herald source on Thursday said the Packers would send Rodgers and a seventh-round pick to the Raiders, while Oakland would send Green Bay Moss and tight end Courtney Anderson. There could also be a conditional pick in the mix, related to how Rodgers performs in Oakland.

LinkI am guessing the Herald source is a delusional Packer fan.

 

[Saints-Man]

I think this is an AWESOME deal for the Raiders. Rogers should be a fine fit for Kiffin's system if he's bringing over some of the elements from USC (which remains to be seen). Plus, he already knows the whole travel-money-groupies system of being an NFL player, so the ramp up time may well be shorter. Just as importantly, it allows the Raiders to take the best player in the draft with the #1 pick (CJ), essentially killing three birds with one stone (1. Trade Moss 2. Get a QB 3. Get the BPA with the #1 pick)

 

[pigskin pimp]

Am I the only guy here seeing this as a win-win trade?

The Raiders dump an aging ex-Super freak WR and in place are able to draft the next Super freak WR at #1 overall and get their franchise QB*.

*Rodgers was reguarded as the #1 pick** in the draft by many experts that he free falled in.

**Franchise QBs that are drafted are boom or bust. I don't think I have to name them for you.

The Packers get a Super freak WR that has been injured and/or disinterested. There is no question Moss was the WR to have until his last injury-filled year in Minny. GB should be in it to win it now. And they can. The NFC is not that strong (i.e. no Colts, Pats, SD). Favre has only so many miles in him. The team has made some nice draft picks in the last 2 years with Barnett and Hawk to shore up a woeful D. Woodson has only so much. This is a team that is in flux. Many outstanding vets (Favre, Woodson, Driver) and many guys with a future (Jennings, Barnett, Hawk).

You do nothing. Don't expect nothing.

You get a Moss and can get him to buy into the system and the rewards, watch out Bears. What does GB give up? A franchise QB who may or may not be 'the guy'.

Seriously, this proposed trade is a win-win.

The Raiders are not going to the playoffs next year. Moss will be a year older if they keep him. Why not get the best WR prospect since Keyshawn (without the 'tude') and get a franchise QB***.

***Again franchise QB is boom or bust. No one really knows if Russell, Quinn, or Rodgers is the next best thing. And if you do know, how many of you were lauding the Pats draft pick of a Mich QB in the 6th.

The Pack are able to get a former game breaking WR, and will be banking on a return to glory in a new environment. Now on any other team I might be wary. But Lord Favre has a cannon and can still rifle it. If hits you in the numbers...

Now Lord Favre also has the ability to gamble. This is where Moss comes into play. We've all seen Favre's 500 balls, reeling off his back foot. 200 pts, 400, 500. Prayers and rainbows to the gods. Some become miracles, the others just another Brett being Brett.

Well, Randy Moss is the best 500 up for grabs WR I have ever seen. From the days off Randall's rainbows to Daunte's over or under throws, I've here never, ever seen a WR able to adjust so well and get that deep ball.

Rodgers for Moss? No brainer for either team.

I'd like to add that I'm a Viking's fan and I feel sick I'm endorsing this trade as I'd hate to see Moss in Green and Gold. And as an added insult, if the Raiders make this trade and take CJ, there goes the only player I wanted MN to try to trade up and get.

 

[bostonfred]

I'll be honest, the fishiest part of this rumor is the draft pick. Seriously, did someone say "No way, not unless you throw in a seventh round pick" in the negotiations?

 

[ELM]

Am I the only guy here seeing this as a win-win trade?The Raiders dump an aging ex-Super freak WR and in place are able to draft the next Super freak WR at #1 overall and get their franchise QB*.*Rodgers was reguarded as the #1 pick** in the draft by many experts that he free falled in.**Franchise QBs that are drafted are boom or bust. I don't think I have to name them for you.The Packers get a Super freak WR that has been injured and/or disinterested. There is no question Moss was the WR to have until his last injury-filled year in Minny. GB should be in it to win it now. And they can. The NFC is not that strong (i.e. no Colts, Pats, SD). Favre has only so many miles in him. The team has made some nice draft picks in the last 2 years with Barnett and Hawk to shore up a woeful D. Woodson has only so much. This is a team that is in flux. Many outstanding vets (Favre, Woodson, Driver) and many guys with a future (Jennings, Barnett, Hawk). You do nothing. Don't expect nothing.You get a Moss and can get him to buy into the system and the rewards, watch out Bears. What does GB give up? A franchise QB who may or may not be 'the guy'. Seriously, this proposed trade is a win-win.The Raiders are not going to the playoffs next year. Moss will be a year older if they keep him. Why not get the best WR prospect since Keyshawn (without the 'tude') and get a franchise QB***.***Again franchise QB is boom or bust. No one really knows if Russell, Quinn, or Rodgers is the next best thing. And if you do know, how many of you were lauding the Pats draft pick of a Mich QB in the 6th.The Pack are able to get a former game breaking WR, and will be banking on a return to glory in a new environment. Now on any other team I might be wary. But Lord Favre has a cannon and can still rifle it. If hits you in the numbers...Now Lord Favre also has the ability to gamble. This is where Moss comes into play. We've all seen Favre's 500 balls, reeling off his back foot. 200 pts, 400, 500. Prayers and rainbows to the gods. Some become miracles, the others just another Brett being Brett.Well, Randy Moss is the best 500 up for grabs WR I have ever seen. From the days off Randall's rainbows to Daunte's over or under throws, I've here never, ever seen a WR able to adjust so well and get that deep ball.Rodgers for Moss? No brainer for either team.I'd like to add that I'm a Viking's fan and I feel sick I'm endorsing this trade as I'd hate to see Moss in Green and Gold. And as an added insult, if the Raiders make this trade and take CJ, there goes the only player I wanted MN to try to trade up and get.

I agree. No brainer. Get it done and get the hype building in this town. Heck maybe favre would play one more year after this one. I have never known packer football without favre and my son is only 3. I would love for him to be able to have some favre memories.

 

[fatness]

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/sports/ind...784&ntpid=1

Packers: Deal for Moss isn't done

JASON WILDE

jwilde@madison.com

...............The seed of the Moss-to-Green Bay talk was planted by agent Bus Cook, who represents Packers quarterback Brett Favre and shares Moss as a client with DiPiero. Cook has been quoted several times saying Favre would love to have Moss on his team.............

Thank you for posting that. Half the NFL stories in the news now were floated by agents.

 

[hutchins929]

I agree. No brainer. Get it done and get the hype building in this town. Heck maybe favre would play one more year after this one. I have never known packer football without favre and my son is only 3. I would love for him to be able to have some favre memories.

You mean the memories where Farve, over the last two seasons, has averaged a QB Rating of 71.8 and has 9 more INT's than touchdowns?As a Green Bay Hater I agree let Farve stay!!!

 

[sho nuff]

I agree. No brainer. Get it done and get the hype building in this town. Heck maybe favre would play one more year after this one. I have never known packer football without favre and my son is only 3. I would love for him to be able to have some favre memories.

You mean the memories where Farve, over the last two seasons, has averaged a QB Rating of 71.8 and has 9 more INT's than touchdowns?As a Green Bay Hater I agree let Farve stay!!!

Nah...we prefer to forget those.Rating aside...I think Moss could help in the TD thing...not just for him, but opening up things for the other WRs.

INTs...those are nothing new...early in his career they had the Brett Favre foam brick...used to throw at the TV when he did something stupid...Im actually surprised they did not start making those again.

http://www.packertime.com/products/ptms56.html

it was like that...only had a #4 on it I think...

 

[mozzy84]

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/sports/ind...784&ntpid=1

Packers: Deal for Moss isn't done

JASON WILDE

jwilde@madison.com

...............The seed of the Moss-to-Green Bay talk was planted by agent Bus Cook, who represents Packers quarterback Brett Favre and shares Moss as a client with DiPiero. Cook has been quoted several times saying Favre would love to have Moss on his team.............

Thank you for posting that. Half the NFL stories in the news now were floated by agents.

they were talking about this on the radio yesterday, he's also the agent of calvin johnson, put 2 and 2 together.

 

[sho nuff]

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/sports/ind...784&ntpid=1

Packers: Deal for Moss isn't done

JASON WILDE

jwilde@madison.com

...............The seed of the Moss-to-Green Bay talk was planted by agent Bus Cook, who represents Packers quarterback Brett Favre and shares Moss as a client with DiPiero. Cook has been quoted several times saying Favre would love to have Moss on his team.............

Thank you for posting that. Half the NFL stories in the news now were floated by agents.

they were talking about this on the radio yesterday, he's also the agent of calvin johnson, put 2 and 2 together.

Perhaps...but there have been no denials that there are talks between the Packers and Raiders concerning Moss for the most part.This latest one was not because of Bus Cook.

 

[Phurfur]

Oh man, the packers are thinking superbowl!With Rodgers gone, that gets the pressure of Favre to retire. You got a real weapon on offense (No offense to Driver and Jennings). Now they just need to shore up that O-Line, Draft a Corner and bam!

This is a joke, right!

 

[Todem]

When there is this much smoke there is a fire.

Moss is getting dealt.

 

[Challenge Everything]

When there is this much smoke there is a fire.Moss is getting dealt.

 

[eefflrat]

any update in this, I heard Clayton says this deal is not going down, any other news?

 

[uwgb96]

I just don't see it happening.

Thompson isn't going to give up more than a 4th and I don't think is interested in giving up Rogers unless the price is too good to pass up.

 

[Sabertooth]

any update in this, I heard Clayton says this deal is not going down, any other news?

This trade has been "almost done" for about 3 weeks now. It's not going to happen.

 

[T Man]

Updated: March 18, 2007, 12:37 PM ETPackers GM insists QB Rodgers not on trading blockESPN.com news servicesDespite the rumors of a trade that would include Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and Raiders wide receiver Randy Moss, Green Bay officials are dismissing the talk, according to a published report. Aaron Rodgers QuarterbackGreen Bay PackersProfile 2006 SEASON STATISTICS Att Comp Yds TD Int Rat 15 6 28 0 0 48.2 "It's never been discussed inside the building or outside the building," Green Bay General Manager Ted Thompson told the Green Bay Press-Gazette when asked about the chances of a deal that would include Rodgers. Rodgers was the Packers' first round pick (No. 24 overall) in the 2005 NFL draft and is expected to be Green Bay's quarterback of the future. "I think [Aaron's] a very talented guy," Thompson said. "He's everything we thought of in terms of intelligence, and his physical ability, his ability to throw the ball. I like the way he handles himself around the team." Last season, Rodgers completed six of 15 passes for 46 yards before breaking his left foot during a 35-0 loss to the New England Patriots on Nov. 19. Rodgers was placed on IR after the injury. The former Cal QB is expected to back up veteran Brett Favre this season.

 

[hutchins929]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

 

[cstu]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

 

[hutchins929]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

 

[Capella]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

Because simply, Favre would never go to Oakland and GB would never trade him anyways.Ridiculous to even think about it.

 

[Dreamer]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

Because simply, Favre would never go to Oakland and GB would never trade him anyways.Ridiculous to even think about it.

 

[hutchins929]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

Because simply, Favre would never go to Oakland and GB would never trade him anyways.Ridiculous to even think about it.

I made it quite clear... "I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland". I agree that it wont happen but, I think it makes more sense.

 

[cstu]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

Because simply, Favre would never go to Oakland and GB would never trade him anyways.Ridiculous to even think about it.

I made it quite clear... "I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland". I agree that it wont happen but, I think it makes more sense.

How does it make more sense if Favre would never in a million years play for OAK?

 

[Grigs Allmoon]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

 

[mr. furley]

 

[sts911911]

If they are so big on Aaron Rodgers they should TRY trade Favre to Oakland along with their 1st round pick to Oakland for the #1 and get Calvin Johnson. That would make more sense for GB. Other than keeping the QB that ,at most, will play two more seasons loosing the their QB of the future and getting a washed up locker room cancer. I am a Lions fan and hope that they do what the roomers are suggesting but if they do it would be a big mistake! Now I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland but it makes more sense then the other.

Why don't you, instead of " ", you use your words to criticize my comment or do you not have the ability to use your words?

Because simply, Favre would never go to Oakland and GB would never trade him anyways.Ridiculous to even think about it.

I made it quite clear... "I am not saying that it is possible to make that deal with Oakland". I agree that it wont happen but, I think it makes more sense.

How does it make more sense if Favre would never in a million years play for OAK?

He's saying it would make more sense for the packers organization, he's not discussing what makes sense with Favre. If the Packers organization is serious about rebuilding it would make more sense for them to stick with their young QB and get Calvin Johnson rather than going after Moss and giving up Rodgers and draft picks. I see his point, but yeah like he and others said... it'll never happen.

 

[hutchins929]

He's saying it would make more sense for the packers organization, he's not discussing what makes sense with Favre. If the Packers organization is serious about rebuilding it would make more sense for them to stick with their young QB and get Calvin Johnson rather than going after Moss and giving up Rodgers and draft picks. I see his point, but yeah like he and others said... it'll never happen.

At least someone was smart enough to pick up my point!!!I never said it would happen, Just that it made more sense for the Packers.