Brady back to practice (1 Viewer)

[BelichicksRevenge]

Brady was back to practice Monday running drills. Ankle was heavily wrapped. Good sign for Pats fans though. I would imagine the wrapping will gradually lessen during the week.

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patr...8_patspractice/

 

[Dman30]

Osi and Strahan will ram a helmet into it during the first quarer.

 

[ceo3west]

Superbowl thread down?

 

[((Morpheus))]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

 

[David Yudkin]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

 

[vasco75]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

Thank you...

 

[{Syrus}]

This is sickening. If you're not in absolute love with the Patriots and constantly praise them you get banned from the board?

 

[Ghost Rider]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It's about time.

This is sickening. If you're not in absolute love with the Patriots and constantly praise them you get banned from the board?

The guy was a troll. He did nothing but troll about the Patriots. He added nothing to discussions here.

 

[Das Boot]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

 

[Mr. Brownstone]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

 

[Alias]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You mean if he defended his team against anti-Patriots trolls?

 

[David Yudkin]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

 

[Mr. Brownstone]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

I agree, he needed to go. I question why he was allowed to go this long without being banned.

 

[IM666]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

Well, animals are not like people, Mrs. Simpson. Some of them act badly because they've had a hard life, or have been mistreated...but, like people, some of them are just jerks

 

[timintey]

Brady was back to practice Monday running drills. Ankle was heavily wrapped. Good sign for Pats fans though. I would imagine the wrapping will gradually lessen during the week.

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patr...8_patspractice/

Looking at photo # 4, that's not just a little tape job. With a brace in there to boot (no pun intended).

 

[stbugs]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

Yes, he would have and should have. Dman was a waste. Some people enjoy lively discussions but some people are just trolls, plain and simple. He was even doing the same thing in the FFA on TV shows and movies. Personally, I think it is pretty sad that someone has so little going on that they take enjoyment at trying to piss people off so much.

 

[Tanner9919]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

maybe you should be banned for lousy predictions and rankings, then..? its a joke, I'm kidding...don't suspend me b/c your feelings are hurt.LOL

 

[Borat]

Someone lock this thread and just let it die, please.

 

[{Syrus}]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

maybe you should be banned for lousy predictions and rankings, then..? its a joke, I'm kidding...don't suspend me b/c your feelings are hurt.LOL

 

[David Yudkin]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

maybe you should be banned for lousy predictions and rankings, then..? its a joke, I'm kidding...don't suspend me b/c your feelings are hurt.LOL

There is a huge difference in routing for players to get career ending injuries and insulting other posters and generally calling people names vs. making inaccurate predictions. I do't suspect that people would call posting rankings that end up as being inaccurate as being obnoxious and inflammatory.

 

[IM666]

serious question: why isn't dman banned?

I just sent him on an all expenses paid board vacation.

It was much needed. But would you have done it had it been the other way around?

You can debate and discuss things from any perspective, but you don't need to embark on name calling and wishing people to get hurt in numerous threads to express your position.Posters get disciplined for being obnoxious on either side of a discussion . . . the side that the poster takes is irrelevant.

maybe you should be banned for lousy predictions and rankings, then..? its a joke, I'm kidding...don't suspend me b/c your feelings are hurt.LOL

Thank you for clearly indicating your suggestion was a joke with the intent to give Mr. Yudkin a hard time.To follow your playful logic, if one was to receive a ban due to poor rankings, I fear to imagine what repercussions Clayton gray would receive for providing intentionally misleading ranking with his humorous “Bogus Top 200” list.

 

[AnonymousBob]

If lousy rankings were cause for banishment, LHUCKS would've been killed off long ago.