Yep, its tough to run up the score when you have your star players on the benchNot while BB is trying to set records.
The logic is as Brady owners you should be preparing contingency plans for when Brady sits and he will sit..... Bellichek has a history of sitting his starters when nothing is on the line - look at preseason and season games. Last year week 17 when the game didn't matter as the Pats playoff spot was lock in he sat everyone....Even if you knew he'd be sitting in Weeks 16 and 17, what would you do differently? Would you trade him? I'm trying to understand the logic of the question.
Brady wasn't brought back into a game to throw a 6th TD pass or to run up the score. Brady was brought back in the game because Matt Cassel was throwing INT's and NE was only up 21 points. 21 points in the NFL is a good lead, but not comfortable enough to have Matt Cassel throwing picks. 1-2 INT's could easily turn that game into only a 10 point lead. Anyway, NE is a pass first, pass second and pass third team. If they score TD's then so be it. I don't think it's purposely "running up the score". And if it is running up the score so what! This is the NFL not the pee wee league where we have to worry about 5 and 6 year olds feelings!A team that's bringing Brady back into games for a 6th TD pass and "running up the score" as some assert, isn't going to sit Brady IMHO. I think it's clear the Pats don't just want to have home field, they want to be viewed as historically dominant and that means pushing toward 15, 16 wins and setting points scored and point differential marks. Brady will also likely be pushing for the all-time passing marks; another reason Belichick will let him play out the string.
Brady has started and played significantly in meaningless week 17 games before under BB.Depends. If the Pats lose a game, like maybe this weekend, then Brady owners had better be worried. If and when the unbeaten record goes away, so does Brady playing in meaningless games. I they stay undefeated, then BB's ego keeps him playing.
Depends. If the Pats lose a game, like maybe this weekend, then Brady owners had better be worried. If and when the unbeaten record goes away, so does Brady playing in meaningless games. I they stay undefeated, then BB's ego keeps him playing.
If there undefeated I think he starts.They lose between now and then -- he'll sit. But I would think it would be week 17 and only week 17. They will get a bye, and BB won't let Brady go three weeks without playing a real game.
Phew, I was getting worried when you were the second person to mention them losing (and the first guy said this weekend, which made no sense since then the Colts are in the home field driver's set) and Brady sitting because of it. The best thing for FF owners of NE Players is for the Colts to beat them. I have no Colts, so I would be more than happy with a 35-34 loss to the Colts.I believe that everyone is assuming that they are in the playoffs, have locked down home field advantage, etc.Obviously if they are behind the Colts or only 1 game up on anyone he'll start regardless. Yes, I realize the Colts are undefeated (until SundayAs for Brady taking a cheap shot, let me know when someone gets close enough to him please