I'm about 8 episodes into Season 3. Looks like there's about 4-5 left and I'll be caught up and ready for Season 4 next month. But for now I don't want to read back through this thread, so forgive me if my question is answered in the thread or later in the season.
I love the show of course, and one of my favorite things about is that everything kinda makes sense. Almost all of the decisions made be the characters seem, if not wise, at least rational given their circumstances. Almost every time there's an escape from what seems like an impossible situation or the advancement of a plan, it's done by a clever action that has subsequent consequences, rather than some cheap deus ex machina type bailout (like, oh, say, The Killing).
That said ... why is there any need for Gus, or anyone in the meth business, to have ever been involved with a Mexican cartel? Meth isn't like weed or cocaine or heroin. You don't need a favorable climate or a government that looks the other way at vast acreage where illicit plants are grown and harvested. All you need are some chemicals and a basement. Seems to me that adding a border-crossing element, and the added law enforcement attention that would draw, would be the worst possible thing you could do.
Thoughts? If this is explained in the last few episodes of Season 3- that's cool. Just tell me to have a little ####ing patience, and I'll abide. But it's been really bugging me as I've watched this season.
Maybe the cartel financed him? I thought they said they were going to a Gus-centric episode in Season Four.
Guess so. Obviously it's not a huge mistake or question. It's just that they're so good when everything "making sense" and the writers never seem to fall victim to television cliche or taking the easy way out despite the fact that it has to be
so tempting given the nature of the show.
I've got three more episodes left of Season 3- just finished Fly, which I thought was almost as outstanding as the hype. More generally, I'm now firmly in the camp that thinks this is the best drama on television.
I'm not a person who puts much credence in awards shows, but I remember hearing that the dad from Malcolm in the Middle/Tim Watley was winning Best Actor all the time instead of Jon Hamm and thinking that seemed insane. Now it seems insane to think that anyone else would ever win the award, and I think maybe they should just go ahead and name it the Cranston.