What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brian Griese (1 Viewer)

I need peoples help to do the research on this but I will gaurantee you that Griese puts up career best numbers against the Lions this week. There are countless examples of this happening. Matt Leinart had his coming out party last year against Detroit. Joey Harrington had his best game ever against Detroit on Thanksgiving last year. Mcnabb last week was at least a top five career performance. Farve, Rodney Pete. This could actually be its own thread. Players best performances and what team was it against??? Answer: Detroit Lions more often than not. Sad but true. Griese is a must start at fantasy this week unless you have Brady, Palmer, or Manning.

 
This thread is hilarious. Griese sucks. He sucked in Denver, he had one decent year in Tampa but wasn't that great, and he sucked in Miami. He's had one season where he had a positive TD to INT ratio. Both Miami and Tampa, who didn't have much at QB to brag about, didn't think he was worth keeping around. He couldn't even beat out Jay Fiedler for the job in Miami.

The backup QB is always the most popular player on a football team, until he actually plays.
He's had three seasons with positive TD to INT ratio, and has an overall positive ratio for his career of 104 TDs to 80 INTsSTATS

His stats are good. Not great, but good.

He was run out of Denver because he wasn't Elway, in physical or leadership ability. Few are. Turnovers admittedly didn't help him; the same thing that got Jake run out of Denver.

Miami has been a train wreck for QBs since Marino left, and for coaches since Johnson left.

Played well in Tampa, but was unwilling to come back at the salary they were offering.

Went to Chicago, where nearly all "experts" and "pundits" thought he had a legit shot at starting, either due to Rex's inexperience, injury history, or poor play. Griese CLEARLY outplayed Rex in the 2006 offseason. Lovie got a hard on for Rex and Rex played spectacularly well early in the 2006 season, protecting him from being benched.

Griese played well again this preseason.

I expect him to be a serviceable to good starter in fantasy terms. As someone counting on Brees, and with the QB crop looking very thin in my league, a combo of Pennington and Griese is all I have to fall back on.
outstanding post, thanks
Agreed, nice post. Is there a touch of wishful thinking involved, though?
 
In Grossman's 1 season as a starter, he completed 54.6% of his passes for 3193 yards, with 23 TDs and 20 INTs. That's roughly 14.8 fantasy points per game.

Griese's average fantasy total for his career: 15.2 fantasy points per game.

In other words, Griese in an average year is better than Grossman at his best.

 
Griese will be asked to just keep the chains moving and dont turn it over. Dont expect many big plays. I would definitely think this favors Muhammed and not Berrian
If this is true, why didn't Lovie try asking Rex Grossman to do this?
 
Griese will be asked to just keep the chains moving and dont turn it over. Dont expect many big plays. I would definitely think this favors Muhammed and not Berrian
If this is true, why didn't Lovie try asking Rex Grossman to do this?
are you insinuating that lovie asked grossman to trip over his own feet, panic at the sight of an offensive lineman, and repeatedly throw up wobbly 25 yard ducks under duress? grossman has thrown his share of short dump-offs and quick-outs, but most seem to get deflected or are just not on target for some reason. your guess is as good as mine as to why this is.griese is being brought in to bring some stability to the position. i agree that he's being brought in to 'keep the chains moving', not turn over the ball, and let the defense (or what's left of it) win games. he's not a fantasy qb by any stretch of the imagination, but his presence and ability to operate under pressure (like any average qb should), should immediately bump up the value of cedric benson. also, as noted above, griese has outperformed grossman in his limited looks here in chicago, but has never been utilized. i'll go out on a limb and say that brian griese could have led the 2006 bears team to the superbowl last year... and perhaps won it. all he had to do was 'not lose' the game. i guess in the same vein, warren moon could have come out of retirement and led last year's bears team to the superbowl. go figure. i hope they go with griese and stick with him.
 
It's like people don't believe that a coach would pick the wrong guy. There have been numerous examples of this over the years. The one which springs to mind is when Jimmy Johnson took over the Miami Dolphins. Johnson KNEW he had an aging QB in Dan Marino, who was hobbling from the achilles injury. However, instead of making positive moves, or pursuing solid free agent QB's, he was locked into Marino because of Marino's legacy. I firmly believe, had Johnson not been handcuffed with an aging Marino, he would have done much better as a Dolphin.

Seems to me there is more going on here than just what we see. Grossman has been horrible, and that should not come as a news flash. When they ran that MNF stat about actually earning a "0" rating as a starting QB, and having three more games with a rating under "40" -- just awful. Perhaps Lovie swore to him he would remain the starting QB and refused to go back on his word. Perhaps Grossman has compromising tapes of Lovie committing some heinous act. Or maybe Lovie Smith let his pride rule the roost. Whatever the case, joe-public doesn't have all the information at hand. Because if the situation was this clear, this straightforward, Grossman would have hit the bench a while ago and we'd have seen Griese in some capacity besides just pre-season. By the way, if Griese was THIS bad, why didn't the Bears pursue one of the many free agent QB's in the off-season?

Bottom line: On that team, with better than average weapons, Griese may do some short term damage. His career completion percentage is 63% and he's no stranger to the NFL scheme. And if the city, and better yet, the team get behind him, we could see this Bear team actually make a legit run. Time will tell, but I agree with most, the Grossman experiment is over (for now). Let's see what Griese can do. As for me? Bulger is dinged up, his RB is torn, and his line is suspect. I may actually take a long shot start with Griese at the helm.

 
It's like people don't believe that a coach would pick the wrong guy. There have been numerous examples of this over the years. The one which springs to mind is when Jimmy Johnson took over the Miami Dolphins. Johnson KNEW he had an aging QB in Dan Marino, who was hobbling from the achilles injury.
That "aging" Dan Marino was 34 years old and had just thrown 24 TDs (in only 14 games) and had been named to the Pro Bowl. Marino's average season under Johnson was better than any Dolphins QB since Marino retired.
 
Ron Turner likes to get pass happy; Griese is somewhat accurate and likes to spread the ball around = good fit.

The 2000 Ravens won with Dilfer; Da Bears can win with Griese.

 
Some folks are really getting carried away with Griese here....

If he is as good as some of you are hyping him up to be, wouldn't it make sense that he'd be Elways's succesor instead of being a journetman who landed in Chicago?

Is he better than Grossman? For NFL purposes, yes. Fantasy? won't be much difference.

In standard leagues, he'll be giving his owners about 10 to 12 points per week... on a good day. His arm is weak so it will be short passes. Not long bombs to Berrian. Come on folks, stop cranking the hype machine and asdvertise Griese as a better solution than the likes of Cutler.

 
Ron Turner likes to get pass happy; Griese is somewhat accurate and likes to spread the ball around = good fit. The 2000 Ravens won with Dilfer; Da Bears can win with Griese.
I don't think you should be comparing us with those Ravens. Our defense w/o Harris, Briggs, Vasher isn't the best in the division, let alone the NFL.
 
Is he better than Lienart, Cutler and Garrard from here on out?
:wall:
Dude lay down the pipe. If Griese was all that he would of been the starter. Griese will fold just like he alway does. Griese is not even the QB that Grossman is. I have seen him ruin the Denver Bronocs he will do the same to the Bears.But on this Board the grass is always greener. Just to bad you will be dissapointed.
:goodposting: If Griese was as advertised, maybe he wouldn't have been cut from Denver, Miami, and TB.
Career QB rating of 84.5, 104-80 TD-to-INT ratio, 204.5 yards per game average, 63.0% completion percentageWhat exactly is so bad about him? Heres a few QBs simlilar to him for a comparison:Drew Brees: 80.0 QB rating, 107-71 TD/INT, 223.6 yards per game.Steve McNair: 83.2 QB rating, 173-116 TD/INT, 194.9 yards per gamePhil Simms: 78.5 QB rating, 199-157 TD/INT, 204.0 yards per gameTroy Aikman: 81.6 QB rating, 165-141 TD/INT, 199.6 yards per gameMatt Hasselbeck: 85.5 QB rating, 119-74 TD/INT, 156.7 yards per game(note: Matt's ypg is unfairly brought down due to a lot of spot duty though)
 
It's like people don't believe that a coach would pick the wrong guy. There have been numerous examples of this over the years. The one which springs to mind is when Jimmy Johnson took over the Miami Dolphins. Johnson KNEW he had an aging QB in Dan Marino, who was hobbling from the achilles injury.
That "aging" Dan Marino was 34 years old and had just thrown 24 TDs (in only 14 games) and had been named to the Pro Bowl. Marino's average season under Johnson was better than any Dolphins QB since Marino retired.
Jimmy Johnson took over the Dolphins in 1996 and relinquished his reign in 1999. During that time Marino (evidently) did not prosper, save one year. Come with facts, not conjecture.1996: 17 TD/9 INT, 2795 YDS1997: 16 TD/11 INT, 3780 YDS1998: 23 TD/15 INT, 3497 YDS1999: 12 TD/ 17 INT, 2448 YDSHowever, this is off-topic. As mentioned previously, there is something else going on here and Griese is worth a flyer if you have room. Unless you're giving up someone with dramatic upside, why not? No one is saying he's the next Kurt Warner, just potential UNANTICIPATED upside.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some folks are really getting carried away with Griese here....If he is as good as some of you are hyping him up to be, wouldn't it make sense that he'd be Elways's succesor instead of being a journetman who landed in Chicago? Is he better than Grossman? For NFL purposes, yes. Fantasy? won't be much difference.In standard leagues, he'll be giving his owners about 10 to 12 points per week... on a good day. His arm is weak so it will be short passes. Not long bombs to Berrian. Come on folks, stop cranking the hype machine and asdvertise Griese as a better solution than the likes of Cutler.
Not necessarily. Some QBs don't fully mature for a while (Rich Gannon, eg) and sometimes it is just a matter of finding the right system (Kitna).I do agree that expectations are over the top for Griese. My concern about him is injury as he is always gets hurt.
 
I've got Vince (Bye) with Grossman as my backup.As sad as it makes me I just picked up Griese.
My exact situation ... was only planning on starting Grossman this week cuz of the matchup, so rolling the dice with Griese. Hoping for 200/1/1 with upside of 250/2/2 if things turn into a shootout of some sort.The WW was preeety thin at QB, so I'm happy to at least have my bye-week filler QB to be playing against the Lions ...
 
This thread is hilarious. Griese sucks. He sucked in Denver, he had one decent year in Tampa but wasn't that great, and he sucked in Miami. He's had one season where he had a positive TD to INT ratio. Both Miami and Tampa, who didn't have much at QB to brag about, didn't think he was worth keeping around. He couldn't even beat out Jay Fiedler for the job in Miami.

The backup QB is always the most popular player on a football team, until he actually plays.
He's had three seasons with positive TD to INT ratio, and has an overall positive ratio for his career of 104 TDs to 80 INTsSTATS

His stats are good. Not great, but good.

He was run out of Denver because he wasn't Elway, in physical or leadership ability. Few are. Turnovers admittedly didn't help him; the same thing that got Jake run out of Denver.

Miami has been a train wreck for QBs since Marino left, and for coaches since Johnson left.

Played well in Tampa, but was unwilling to come back at the salary they were offering.

Went to Chicago, where nearly all "experts" and "pundits" thought he had a legit shot at starting, either due to Rex's inexperience, injury history, or poor play. Griese CLEARLY outplayed Rex in the 2006 preseason. Lovie got a hard on for Rex and Rex played spectacularly well early in the 2006 season, protecting him from being benched.

Griese played well again this preseason.

I expect him to be a serviceable to good starter in fantasy terms. As someone counting on Brees, and with the QB crop looking very thin in my league, a combo of Pennington and Griese is all I have to fall back on.
u should post this in the five or six griese thread on the first page. some of this bashing and can't throw the deep ball nonsense is getting to be annoying, i think people must have read the same article somewhere on another sports service and decided that's what he'll be branded as. rod smith >> ed mccafferey while griese was in denver, last i checked rod smith was the deep ball guy and big ed was the slant and go hit somebody in the middle guy. griese is no world beater by any means, but i don't see how anyone can argue that this isn't an upgrade for that team. i guess we'll find out on Sunday.
 
Just updating the list:

Jim Harbaugh

Peter Tom Willis

Will Furrer

Erik Kramer

Steve Walsh

Dave Kreig

Rick Mirer

Steve Stenstrom

Moses Moreno

Shane Matthews

Cade McNown

Jim Miller

Chris Chandler

Henry Burris

Kordell Stewart

Jonathan Quinn

Craig Krenzel

Chad Hutchinson

Kyle Orton

Rex Grossman

and the latest (since Favre's first start in '92),

Brian Griese

 
Just updating the list:Jim HarbaughPeter Tom WillisWill FurrerErik KramerSteve WalshDave KreigRick MirerSteve StenstromMoses MorenoShane MatthewsCade McNownJim MillerChris ChandlerHenry BurrisKordell StewartJonathan QuinnCraig KrenzelChad HutchinsonKyle OrtonRex Grossmanand the latest (since Favre's first start in '92),Brian Griese
Are these all starters, or just QBs on the active roster?
 
I think the coaches knew what they had in Griese and he's no better than Rex. I think it is the right move now because the team is playing like they don't believe in him anymore.

Sometimes change can be a good thing and maybe a fresh attitude and face in the huddle will help. As far as overall ability, I just don't think it's any better which is why the coaches waited as long as they could before they had to pull the plug on this.

 
200 yds and a TD for BG.... hes not going to be asked to do anything.Guys... if Griese was good; he would of been playing since day one.
You are talking about the same team that traded Jones and kept Benson.
Another horrible thing.I like the way John Madden said it at the beginning of the season.When you trade away a player like Thomas Jones that can't be a good thing.Pretty much
 
200 yds and a TD for BG.... hes not going to be asked to do anything.Guys... if Griese was good; he would of been playing since day one.
Warner, Gannon, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Garcia (to name a few)....they were all good, but didn't play from day one. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just updating the list:Jim HarbaughPeter Tom WillisWill FurrerErik KramerSteve WalshDave KreigRick MirerSteve StenstromMoses MorenoShane MatthewsCade McNownJim MillerChris ChandlerHenry BurrisKordell StewartJonathan QuinnCraig KrenzelChad HutchinsonKyle OrtonRex Grossmanand the latest (since Favre's first start in '92),Brian Griese
Are these all starters, or just QBs on the active roster?
QB's who have started for the Bears since Favre's first start in 1992
 
It's probably not realistic to expect Griese to take off with the Bears QB job and put up Warner-esque type numbers the rest of the year. That being said, those of us with marginal QBBC starters (especially if you ended up with Losman :goodposting: ) have to consider rolling the dice on him.

 
Please keep in mind that the Bears offensive coordinator, Ron Turner (brother of Norv), had success with a similar QB to Brian Griese (see Erik Kramers stats in the mid 90s) his first time around with the Bears. Griese is a much better fit for what Turner likes to do than the erratic Grossman and once he shakes the rust off I think he could be fairly decent (say 16 TDs and 10-12 Ints... if he can be anywhere near his career QB rating of 84.5 the Bears would be ecstatic

BTW whoever said that the Moose should see better number hit the nail on the head. He and the TEs should get the biggest bump at the expense of Berrian.

 
Please keep in mind that the Bears offensive coordinator, Ron Turner (brother of Norv), had success with a similar QB to Brian Griese (see Erik Kramers stats in the mid 90s) his first time around with the Bears. Griese is a much better fit for what Turner likes to do than the erratic Grossman and once he shakes the rust off I think he could be fairly decent (say 16 TDs and 10-12 Ints... if he can be anywhere near his career QB rating of 84.5 the Bears would be ecstatic

BTW whoever said that the Moose should see better number hit the nail on the head. He and the TEs should get the biggest bump at the expense of Berrian.
Why? :(
 
I find it interesting that Lovie picks the Detriot game to make the switch. Obviously the Lions are a cherry match up for any QB so perhaps Lovie choosing this game is an indication that he wants to give Greise every chance to suceed longterm. Afterall, even Grossman could have had a big day against the Lions. Lovie easily could have let Rex start one more and maybe build some confidence. But he instead makes the switch giving Greise the sweet match up for his first game. It sounds like Lovie is done with Rex.

 
Please keep in mind that the Bears offensive coordinator, Ron Turner (brother of Norv), had success with a similar QB to Brian Griese (see Erik Kramers stats in the mid 90s) his first time around with the Bears. Griese is a much better fit for what Turner likes to do than the erratic Grossman and once he shakes the rust off I think he could be fairly decent (say 16 TDs and 10-12 Ints... if he can be anywhere near his career QB rating of 84.5 the Bears would be ecstatic

BTW whoever said that the Moose should see better number hit the nail on the head. He and the TEs should get the biggest bump at the expense of Berrian.
Why? :goodposting:
Because he's a west coast system QB that would rather dump the ball down than wait for a pattern deep to open up... this does not bode well for a "go deep" WR like Berrian
 
Please keep in mind that the Bears offensive coordinator, Ron Turner (brother of Norv), had success with a similar QB to Brian Griese (see Erik Kramers stats in the mid 90s) his first time around with the Bears. Griese is a much better fit for what Turner likes to do than the erratic Grossman and once he shakes the rust off I think he could be fairly decent (say 16 TDs and 10-12 Ints... if he can be anywhere near his career QB rating of 84.5 the Bears would be ecstatic

BTW whoever said that the Moose should see better number hit the nail on the head. He and the TEs should get the biggest bump at the expense of Berrian.
Why? :shrug:
Because he's a west coast system QB that would rather dump the ball down than wait for a pattern deep to open up... this does not bode well for a "go deep" WR like Berrian
Do the bears run a west coast offense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please keep in mind that the Bears offensive coordinator, Ron Turner (brother of Norv), had success with a similar QB to Brian Griese (see Erik Kramers stats in the mid 90s) his first time around with the Bears. Griese is a much better fit for what Turner likes to do than the erratic Grossman and once he shakes the rust off I think he could be fairly decent (say 16 TDs and 10-12 Ints... if he can be anywhere near his career QB rating of 84.5 the Bears would be ecstatic

BTW whoever said that the Moose should see better number hit the nail on the head. He and the TEs should get the biggest bump at the expense of Berrian.
Why? :confused:
I am too. Berrian is superior underneath and over the top. What's made Berrian a more complete WR is his progression underneath.

Moose's issue is seperation.....it doesn't matter who is the QB.

Grossman isn't/wasn't the only problem on the Bears right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is he better than Lienart, Cutler and Garrard from here on out?
:confused:
Dude lay down the pipe. If Griese was all that he would of been the starter. Griese will fold just like he alway does. Griese is not even the QB that Grossman is. I have seen him ruin the Denver Bronocs he will do the same to the Bears.But on this Board the grass is always greener. Just to bad you will be dissapointed.
He will be better then Lienart. The rest is a toss up. For this week he is a great start.....Im a better QB than Grossman.[/b}
Well if you were I would be seeing you on Sundays and not posting on am football message board. Last I checked Grossman started in the Super Bowl how many other QB's have?
Let's be clear. The Bears got to the Super Bowl in spite of Grossman.The fact that he rode the defenses coatails to the Super Bowl doesn't make him an NFL QB.

 
The shuffle at quarterback significantly impacts Benson, who will likely see more carries with Griese in the lineup. The third-year running back is getting nearly 20 carries per game (3.2 average), has scored once and fumbled twice. However, look for Benson to get a few more handoffs in Week Four. Griese could be a good pickup this week if you’re in need of a quarterback. As mentioned, the Lions' secondary is weak and the Bears' offense may be jolted by Griese’s presence. If Griese’s half the quarterback as Eagles QB Donovan McNabb was last week, he’ll throw a pair of TD passes.

:rolleyes:

 
if anything i bump benson and gould with this news, more than i get excited over the high-flying potential of griese. i'm assuming this change was made to have more sustained drives, rather than an air show.

 
As someone who started the season with Brees as QB1 and Grossman as QB2, I obtained Griese and Pennington via my league's waiver wire tonight, at a cost of dropping Randle-El and Adrian Peterson (CHI).

Now, the real quandry: do I start Griese against Detroit, or Pennington against the Bills?

 
As someone who started the season with Brees as QB1 and Grossman as QB2, I obtained Griese and Pennington via my league's waiver wire tonight, at a cost of dropping Randle-El and Adrian Peterson (CHI).Now, the real quandry: do I start Griese against Detroit, or Pennington against the Bills?
Same situation here.I have my choice of Griese or Pennington on waivers.I'm 90% sure I'm going with Griese. I was 50/50 and the slight chance that Pennington gets taken out due to his ankle tipped my decision towards ol' Greasey
 
Is he better than Lienart, Cutler and Garrard from here on out?
:lmao:
Dude lay down the pipe. If Griese was all that he would of been the starter. Griese will fold just like he alway does. Griese is not even the QB that Grossman is. I have seen him ruin the Denver Bronocs he will do the same to the Bears.But on this Board the grass is always greener. Just to bad you will be dissapointed.
:banned: If Griese was as advertised, maybe he wouldn't have been cut from Denver, Miami, and TB.
I think people are overrating Griese. Chicago has a backup Qb fetish. (see the Sugar Shane Matthews and Jim Miller debacle)
 
Is he better than Lienart, Cutler and Garrard from here on out?
:banned:
Dude lay down the pipe. If Griese was all that he would of been the starter. Griese will fold just like he alway does. Griese is not even the QB that Grossman is. I have seen him ruin the Denver Bronocs he will do the same to the Bears.But on this Board the grass is always greener. Just to bad you will be dissapointed.
He will be better then Lienart. The rest is a toss up. For this week he is a great start.....Im a better QB than Grossman.[/b}
Well if you were I would be seeing you on Sundays and not posting on am football message board. Last I checked Grossman started in the Super Bowl how many other QB's have?
Let's be clear. The Bears got to the Super Bowl in spite of Grossman.The fact that he rode the defenses coatails to the Super Bowl doesn't make him an NFL QB.
Those in glass houses....feel free to finish this statement.
 
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Griese throws no more than 1 TD against Detroit. I just think he will be fools gold this week for people looking for a waiver wire gem. I think he may have some solid games later this year if he continues to start, but not this weekend. Believe it or not, but Detroit actually plays decent defense at home and Griese is prone to turnovers if you can bring the pressure. Griese is not going to put up McNabb numbers against the Lions. He may not even put up Grossman numbers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Griese throws no more than 1 TD against Detroit. I just think he will be fools gold this week for people looking for a waiver wire gem. I think he may have some solid games later this year if he continues to start, but not this weekend. Believe it or not, but Detroit actually plays decent defense at home and Griese is prone to turnovers if you can bring the pressure. Griese is not going to put up McNabb numbers against the Lions. He may not even put up Grossman numbers.
My QB situation is so desperate that I'd be content with that. ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top