Brooks vs. Vick (1 Viewer)

[John Mamula]

Will be interesting to see how hype compares to reality. One of these QBs is a clear top 10 QB. The other is not.

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

 

[thayman]

Will be interesting to see how hype compares to reality. One of these QBs is a clear top 10 QB. The other is not.

Fantasy or NFL???I'll go Brooks Fantasy, but Vick NFL.

 

[John Mamula]

Will be interesting to see how hype compares to reality.  One of these QBs is a clear top 10 QB.  The other is not.

Fantasy or NFL???I'll go Brooks Fantasy, but Vick NFL.

Fantasy.

 

[John Mamula]

9-1?

Interesting.

 

[thayman]

Well unless your in a league that gives bonus points for rushing QB's, Vick is pretty mediocre FF QB.

 

[Blackjacks]

Randy Moss, Jerry Porter and a core of nice other wr's compared to Jenkins and White.....I'll take Brooks. Also considering that Oakland will probably be playing from behind most of the year.

 

[Big Score]

Are you asking

A) Which QB will take his team to a more successful season?

or

B) Which QB will have the better fantasy stats?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A) = Vick

B) = Brooks

 

[John Mamula]

Are you asking

A) Which QB will take his team to a more successful season?

or

B) Which QB will have the better fantasy stats?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A) = Vick

B) = Brooks

B of course.I don't care about records of any team.

 

[-OZ-]

Will be interesting to see how hype compares to reality. One of these QBs is a clear top 10 QB. The other is not.

Fantasy or NFL???I'll go Brooks Fantasy, but Vick NFL.

FWIW though, I'd draft Vick ahead of Brooks, scary as it sounds "less risk"

 

[John Mamula]

Will be interesting to see how hype compares to reality.  One of these QBs is a clear top 10 QB.  The other is not.

Fantasy or NFL???I'll go Brooks Fantasy, but Vick NFL.

FWIW though, I'd draft Vick ahead of Brooks, scary as it sounds "less risk"

What increased risk does Brooks has compared to Vick?

 

[Big Score]

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

Depends the fantasy QB rules. if there's a decent emphasis on QB rushing stats, Vick.If not, Brooks, especially considering he'll be throwing Moss & Porter while Vick throws to Jenkins & White.

 

[John Mamula]

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

Depends the fantasy QB rules. if there's a decent emphasis on QB rushing stats, Vick.If not, Brooks, especially considering he'll be throwing Moss & Porter while Vick throws to Jenkins & White.

Standard scoring. 6 points or 4 points per passing TD. Shouldn't matter.

 

[Big Score]

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

Depends the fantasy QB rules. if there's a decent emphasis on QB rushing stats, Vick.If not, Brooks, especially considering he'll be throwing Moss & Porter while Vick throws to Jenkins & White.

Standard scoring. 6 points or 4 points per passing TD. Shouldn't matter.

Still depends on your leagues QB rules.IE:

1 pt per 20 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

4 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

I'd take Vick here.

1 pt per 10 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

6 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

Under these rules, I'd take Brooks.

See what I mean?

 

[Big Score]

What increased risk does Brooks has compared to Vick?

Brooks has a far greater risk to throw his passes backwards, than Vick does.

 

[John Mamula]

What increased risk does Brooks has compared to Vick?

Brooks has a far greater risk to throw his passes backwards, than Vick does.

OK I will give you that.

 

[joffer]

right now i've got:

Vick

238/405/2775/ 18/11 passing

90/650/4 rushing

324.6 points

Brooks

315/530/3665 20/18 passing

50/225/3 rushing

325.8 points

too close to call

 

[AnonymousBob]

I think both will finish top ten. Personally, I've got Vick ranked higher as he's finished higher before. Brooks has ranked just on the outer edge of top ten every year (well, save for last). Vick has already finished as the #3, I don't think it's much of a reach for him to repeat.

 

[John Mamula]

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

Depends the fantasy QB rules. if there's a decent emphasis on QB rushing stats, Vick.If not, Brooks, especially considering he'll be throwing Moss & Porter while Vick throws to Jenkins & White.

Standard scoring. 6 points or 4 points per passing TD. Shouldn't matter.

Still depends on your leagues QB rules.IE:

1 pt per 20 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

4 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

I'd take Vick here.

1 pt per 10 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

6 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

Under these rules, I'd take Brooks.

See what I mean?

who does 1 per 10 passing?this is why i said standard rules. you know the typical rules that FBG ranks their players on. i understand there are some funky rules out there, but i am not concerned about those.

for simplicity sake, let's assume rule scenario one where you would take vick.

 

[Joe T]

Is Brooks even starting in Oakland?

 

[Joe T]

btw - this is more like Assistant Coach Forum stuff....

we don't need to tell you who to keep.

 

[Big Score]

I am discussing fantasy production since this is a fantasy football board.

Depends the fantasy QB rules. if there's a decent emphasis on QB rushing stats, Vick.If not, Brooks, especially considering he'll be throwing Moss & Porter while Vick throws to Jenkins & White.

Standard scoring. 6 points or 4 points per passing TD. Shouldn't matter.

Still depends on your leagues QB rules.IE:

1 pt per 20 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

4 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

I'd take Vick here.

1 pt per 10 yds passing - 1 pt per 10 yds rushing.

6 pts passing TD - 6 pts rushing TD.

Under these rules, I'd take Brooks.

See what I mean?

who does 1 per 10 passing?this is why i said standard rules. you know the typical rules that FBG ranks their players on. i understand there are some funky rules out there, but i am not concerned about those.

for simplicity sake, let's assume rule scenario one where you would take vick.

Right now I'd go Brooks. Hard to ignore the talent disparity at WR.