Not terribly unusual, IMO. Newton's upside this year is high, if he wins the starting gig and starts all 16 games. His downside risk is also considerable, being a rookie with no starting guarantee. Colt is the safer pick for more points this year but his ceiling is fairly low. I went with Colt for the expectation that he'll start 4-6 games more than Newton this year, so his year end totals will be higher. I expect that Newton's pts/gm will be higher than Colt's, but not enough to make up the difference in games.So Colt McCoy is running away with this ...yet he's being drafted seven spots after Newton. (178 vs. 171)
Not terribly unusual, IMO. Newton's upside this year is high, if he wins the starting gig and starts all 16 games. His downside risk is also considerable, being a rookie with no starting guarantee. Colt is the safer pick for more points this year but his ceiling is fairly low. I went with Colt for the expectation that he'll start 4-6 games more than Newton this year, so his year end totals will be higher. I expect that Newton's pts/gm will be higher than Colt's, but not enough to make up the difference in games.So Colt McCoy is running away with this ...yet he's being drafted seven spots after Newton. (178 vs. 171)
I'd expect that these poll results would shift significantly to Newton if he lights it up in preseason and is named the game 1 starter.
Then maybe you should ask a different question...Colt is more likely to score more points and will take more snaps, but in a standard 12 teamer neither is going to be my starter.I might draft Newton first because...1. At the end of the year he may be producing better than Colt. I'm more likely to need a back up QB later in the year.2. The Cats have a schedule more favorable to rack up passing numbers.3. Some might think Newton's rushing numbers will be high.4. Newton will have more trade value if he puts up a stretch of numbers like Tebow did last year.So Colt McCoy is running away with this ...yet he's being drafted seven spots after Newton. (178 vs. 171)
I'm not surprised at your lack of reading comprehension.Please point out a "Newton backer" (yes, Newton is capitalized in schools outside of Arizona) that actually backed Newton.I should have known the newton backers were going to come back with the ppg or late season performer nonsenseRegardless, I am pleasantly surprised that the shark pool seems to get this one
He makes so many outlandish statements that he can't keep track of them. I do have to give him credit for recognizing all his bad calls in the past and taking a new approach in 2011. He pretty much takes both sides of a discussion in different threads so he'll be right 50% of the time.Lhucks,
McCoy doing well in camp and being tutored by Farve has been played up on ESPN and other sources. Anyone who's been paying attention the last week or so, McCoy is trending to some degree on people's QB list. So to compare him to a Cam Newton, a rookie in a tough spot, it doesn't surprise me at all that people are favoring McCoy over Newton.
BTW, when I took McCoy later in PDSL, I think you gave me grief for it.
Colt McCoy is no slouch when it comes to running.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htpJjUAdkbohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAyiN-8Nr00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bokbhwcFIQI went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
He is pretty good at running. Basically 1/4th as good as Cam Newton'Biggs04 said:Colt McCoy is no slouch when it comes to running.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htpJjUAdkbohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAyiN-8Nr00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bokbhwcFIQ'adrenaline said:I went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
I could see McCoy putting up 3 or 4 td's and 300-400 yards similar to Rodgers. What do you think Newton's running stats will look like assuming 16 games?He is pretty good at running. Basically 1/4th as good as Cam Newton'Biggs04 said:Colt McCoy is no slouch when it comes to running.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htpJjUAdkbohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAyiN-8Nr00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bokbhwcFIQ'adrenaline said:I went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
That wasn't me ace.'Iwannabeacowboybaby! said:BTW, when I took McCoy later in PDSL, I think you gave me grief for it.
It was a joke as Cam's 1 year rushing from last season is almost as good as McCoys 4 year totals. 16 game totals I think Cam is looking at 500-550 yards, 4-5 TDs. TDs is tough with their running game but Chud was the O-coordinator in CLE during DAs big year and he had 3 rushing TDs so he is willing to use a big bodied QB to push those last few yards.I could see McCoy putting up 3 or 4 td's and 300-400 yards similar to Rodgers. What do you think Newton's running stats will look like assuming 16 games?He is pretty good at running. Basically 1/4th as good as Cam Newton'Biggs04 said:Colt McCoy is no slouch when it comes to running.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htpJjUAdkbohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAyiN-8Nr00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bokbhwcFIQ'adrenaline said:I went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
:archive:In 4pt passing TD leagues Cam should have a substantial edge on a per game basis, otherwise they are very close with Cam a slight lead.
:archive:I take Newton because he has more potential. If its a 16 or 20 team league I go with McCoy though.
:archive:'BassNBrew said:I might draft Newton first because...1. At the end of the year he may be producing better than Colt. I'm more likely to need a back up QB later in the year.2. The Cats have a schedule more favorable to rack up passing numbers.3. Some might think Newton's rushing numbers will be high.4. Newton will have more trade value if he puts up a stretch of numbers like Tebow did last year.
:archive:'adrenaline said:I went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
I'd give a very slight edge to Car receivers but its close. You have to give the edge at WR1 to Smith(Car) but Clevelands at WR2 and WR3 give the edge to Little and Robinski/Cribbs. TE Olson(Cr) and Watson(Clev) are a wash and RBs Hillis(Clev) and Williams(Car) are also even IMO. I voted McCoy but then I play in a couple of 6 point passing td leagues.I think CAR has much better weapons around Newton and as was said previously an easier schedule. Not to mention the weather for later season games will be better in CAR. I like Newton vs. McCoy.
so how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?or Cam's higher ADP?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
I don't try to use expert ranking for anything other than determining if I can ask for more in a trade for one of my players. I haven't seen any experts that I trust more than my own eyes and my own gut. Not saying I am better than them, but also not saying they are better than me. I have no interest in "explaining" their rankings for players, but if they say that Newton was better for redraft than McCoy by a couple rounds, then I know that I can likely trade Newton away to the McCoy owner and ask for a little kicker in return.so how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
or Cam's higher ADP?
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.
I think that's most of us around here.I don't try to use expert rankingso how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
or Cam's higher ADP?
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.
Thanks for assuring Cam a HOF career.I've already explained "why" on the higher ADP. Remember the reason you didn't like Moreno last year? That's the logic being employed by many people.so how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?or Cam's higher ADP?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.
i just wait for you to post predictions, and then do the oppositeI think that's most of us around here.I don't try to use expert rankingso how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
or Cam's higher ADP?
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.
Just don't see it happening. Finishes with @Cin, Bal, @Pit, @Ari, @Bal, Pit. I see lmited scroing opportunities down the stretch. The schedule is more favorable earlier in the year, but I don't see a lot of shootout games to rack up stats.Newton on the other hand will have NO, Atl, Tam lighting up the score board on two occasions each. GB, Ind, Det, Hou will are also capable of posting big numbers. I can easily see 8 games where the Cats are down by 14+ at halftime and Newton is given the green light to toss it around most of the second half of these games.There are some references to Newton's upside as being one of the deciding factors between he and McCoy, and that seems legit to me... but what do you guys think McCoy's upside is this season? Seems likely that most see his upside as being somewhat limited, maybe due to a lack of weapons on the CLE O or Colt's less-than-ideal size and arm strength. But if things lined up perfectly for Colt to have a big 2011 season, what type of numbers would we be looking at?
so how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?or Cam's higher ADP?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.
:unarchive:Cam - 6/19 for 75, 0 td, 0 int and 4 for 49, 1 TD rush = 3.7 + 4.9 + 6 = 14.6 pt Colt - 9/18 for 89, 0 TD, 1 INT and 1 for 4 rush = 4.5 - 2 + .4 = 2.9 pt:archive:I went Newton, I think his running ability can seperate him..
That's about how many he'll pass for.Cam could run for 8 TDs by accident.
In most scoring systems 8 rush + 8 pass TDs works out to be equivalent to a 20 passing TD season.You think McCoy is good for 20 TD passes?Cam won't pass for much more than 2000 yards either but factor in rushing yards being 2-5 times more valuable than passing yards in virtually every scoring format and he looks to have some value.They should finish pretty close to each other in total points.That's about how many he'll pass for.Cam could run for 8 TDs by accident.
He has a decent shot at 30.You think McCoy is good for 20 TD passes?
DudeHe has a decent shot at 30.You think McCoy is good for 20 TD passes?
Yikes, the LHUCKS curse hits McCoy early.I should have known the newton backers were going to come back with the ppg or late season performer nonsenseRegardless, I am pleasantly surprised that the shark pool seems to get this one
:archive:I should have known the newton backers were going to come back with the ppg or late season performer nonsenseRegardless, I am pleasantly surprised that the shark pool seems to get this one
oofThat's gonna leave a markso how do you expain the "experts" ranking Cam ahead of McCoy?or Cam's higher ADP?I'm one of the bigger Newton backers on this board, and took him in multiple rookie drafts this year, but for this year, redraft, Colt by a few rounds.
It appears the vast majority of ffers are getting this catastrophically wrong...embarrassing really.