I'll watch
I wouldn't think so. It happens well after the Avengers movie. So you may hear references to that but it shouldn't make it hard to follow the film.Does one have to have caught all of the marvel movies to enjoy this if the 1st CA is the only one watched?
The elevator scene was pretty good.Wow, there is a lot of badassery going on there.
The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
Not sure I agree with that. I thought Iron Man 2, Thor & the Edward Norton Hulk were all about on par (at times better & at times worse) with the first Captain America movie. Haven't seen IM 3 yet.The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
I don't count Norton's Hulk personally. I liked IM 2 and Thor better than the first Cap flick.Not sure I agree with that. I thought Iron Man 2, Thor & the Edward Norton Hulk were all about on par (at times better & at times worse) with the first Captain America movie. Haven't seen IM 3 yet.The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
Oh boy.They really made some mistakes with the shield in general. They stated that because it is made of vibranium (still waiting on that Black Panther movie BTW) it absorbs all kinetic energy. If that's the case why would it bounce and ricochet all over the place? The answer is that it wouldn't, it would hit something, absorb the kinetic energy and fall to the ground.
It isn't pure vibranium. It is an alloy of iron, vibranium and some unknown catalyst. The scientist who created it would later invent Admantium trying to re-create the properties of the shield. Now the shield has been referred to as containing Admantium steel as well. But they have changed the history of the shield so many times it is kind of hard to keep track of which one he is currently using.Oh boy.They really made some mistakes with the shield in general. They stated that because it is made of vibranium (still waiting on that Black Panther movie BTW) it absorbs all kinetic energy. If that's the case why would it bounce and ricochet all over the place? The answer is that it wouldn't, it would hit something, absorb the kinetic energy and fall to the ground.
I'm rather hoping this is the last time we'll see him for a while... like, until Avengers 2. It would make sense... as long as he's not in Thor 2 (which he probably isn't) and he's not in Guardians of the Galaxy (an appearance there would be unlikely), then Avengers 2 will be the next one. And hopefully the last.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
I am talking about the movie shield not comic book canon. In the film it was stated to absorb all vibrations well if that's the case then ricocheting would not be possible.It isn't pure vibranium. It is an alloy of iron, vibranium and some unknown catalyst. The scientist who created it would later invent Admantium trying to re-create the properties of the shield. Now the shield has been referred to as containing Admantium steel as well. But they have changed the history of the shield so many times it is kind of hard to keep track of which one he is currently using.Oh boy.They really made some mistakes with the shield in general. They stated that because it is made of vibranium (still waiting on that Black Panther movie BTW) it absorbs all kinetic energy. If that's the case why would it bounce and ricochet all over the place? The answer is that it wouldn't, it would hit something, absorb the kinetic energy and fall to the ground.
Almost definitely not. I'd place a reasonable wager on people being able to walk into this one and enjoy it without having seen the others. It has the advantage of taking place in real time from The Avengers - that flick came out in 2012, this one is 2014, and it takes place two years after the events of The Avengers... so it wouldn't be natural for the characters to be constantly referencing those events.Does one have to have caught all of the marvel movies to enjoy this if the 1st CA is the only one watched?
You got to go by canon.I am talking about the movie shield not comic book canon. In the film it was stated to absorb all vibrations well if that's the case then ricocheting would not be possible.It isn't pure vibranium. It is an alloy of iron, vibranium and some unknown catalyst. The scientist who created it would later invent Admantium trying to re-create the properties of the shield. Now the shield has been referred to as containing Admantium steel as well. But they have changed the history of the shield so many times it is kind of hard to keep track of which one he is currently using.Oh boy.They really made some mistakes with the shield in general. They stated that because it is made of vibranium (still waiting on that Black Panther movie BTW) it absorbs all kinetic energy. If that's the case why would it bounce and ricochet all over the place? The answer is that it wouldn't, it would hit something, absorb the kinetic energy and fall to the ground.
Just sayin'.
Huh. I'll be damned.With his hand.How does he catch the shield!?!?
Really? They are using the same actor as in the first movie.Probably nitpicking but the previous post is kind of spoilerish.
Nah, he's right. I was just assuming that 99% of the people who are not comic book nerdsReally? They are using the same actor as in the first movie.Probably nitpicking but the previous post is kind of spoilerish.![]()
Never followed the Marvel comics as a kid. I was more DC.NCCommish said:I don't count Norton's Hulk personally. I liked IM 2 and Thor better than the first Cap flick.Chaka said:Not sure I agree with that. I thought Iron Man 2, Thor & the Edward Norton Hulk were all about on par (at times better & at times worse) with the first Captain America movie. Haven't seen IM 3 yet.NCCommish said:The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.mad sweeney said:Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
Surprisingly, my 10 year old son was somewhat underwhelmed by the trailer. He said it looked "too modern and high tech". He prefers Captain America in his original setting like in the old comic books and the first movie. Kid has always been a bit of an "old soul" though.In. Looks good and my son is going to be ecstatic about this. Captain America is his favorite superhero by far.
I liked that the first one was a period piece, which made it unlike most other superhero films.Surprisingly, my 10 year old son was somewhat underwhelmed by the trailer. He said it looked "too modern and high tech". He prefers Captain America in his original setting like in the old comic books and the first movie. Kid has always been a bit of an "old soul" though.In. Looks good and my son is going to be ecstatic about this. Captain America is his favorite superhero by far.
Thought it was right there with Ironman at the top.The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
Nothing wrong with being a traditionalist.Surprisingly, my 10 year old son was somewhat underwhelmed by the trailer. He said it looked "too modern and high tech". He prefers Captain America in his original setting like in the old comic books and the first movie. Kid has always been a bit of an "old soul" though.In. Looks good and my son is going to be ecstatic about this. Captain America is his favorite superhero by far.
Yeah I couldn't go there with it. I would put it even with Norton's Hulk both had some good parts but were spotty IMO.Thought it was right there with Ironman at the top.The first one was the weakest of the Marvel entrants last time IMO. This does look a lot better.Looks pretty weak IMO. Not even sure that Redford being in it can counteract the exhaustively over saturated SLJ. I couldn't even finish the first one.
Ironman sequel sucked but this looks legit.