What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

CB Richard Sherman (1 Viewer)

ConnSKINS26 said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
What stupid name do you guys all have for the Cardinals? Seems rude to leave them out, even if they are latecomers to the division.
Couldn't be as bad as Redskin.
Probably could be.I see that you're an equal opportunity offender, I respect that.
Yeah, I'm sure you do.
Exactly, we're on the same page.
On the wrong book.

 
ConnSKINS26 said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
What stupid name do you guys all have for the Cardinals? Seems rude to leave them out, even if they are latecomers to the division.
Couldn't be as bad as Redskin.
Probably could be.I see that you're an equal opportunity offender, I respect that.
Yeah, I'm sure you do.
Exactly, we're on the same page.
On the wrong book.
Are you one of those guys who has to have the last word even if nothing's being said? I thought that was sho nuff's shtick.

 
ConnSKINS26 said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
What stupid name do you guys all have for the Cardinals? Seems rude to leave them out, even if they are latecomers to the division.
Couldn't be as bad as Redskin.
Probably could be.I see that you're an equal opportunity offender, I respect that.
Yeah, I'm sure you do.
Exactly, we're on the same page.
On the wrong book.
Are you one of those guys who has to have the last word even if nothing's being said? I thought that was sho nuff's shtick.
Do you want it? You don't to have to ask me. Just post yes. I'm ok with that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ConnSKINS26 said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
What stupid name do you guys all have for the Cardinals? Seems rude to leave them out, even if they are latecomers to the division.
Couldn't be as bad as Redskin.
Probably could be.I see that you're an equal opportunity offender, I respect that.
Yeah, I'm sure you do.
Exactly, we're on the same page.
On the wrong book.
Are you one of those guys who has to have the last word even if nothing's being said? I thought that was sho nuff's shtick.
Do you want it? You don't to have to ask me. Just post yes. I'm ok with that.
No.

 
proninja said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
When sho nuff is the voice of reason, well. . .
Yeah, the whole "above it all" thing is kinda big with you.

 
proninja said:
proninja said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
When sho nuff is the voice of reason, well. . .
Yeah, the whole "above it all" thing is kinda big with you.
I'd rather not make up silly names and argue about other grown men in spandex playing a game. Sorry if that seems like I have some sort of superiority complex. It's not what I'm going for, and you're the only guy who calls it out. :shrug:

Good win for the 9ers tonight. I'd like to have another couple games on them. That's still a good squad.
As a Seahawks fan, I have to say that he 9ers aren't as awful as people are saying they are. Injuries definitely take a toll, but when the 49ers get hot they can do some damage. Still hate them, of course.
 
proninja said:
proninja said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
When sho nuff is the voice of reason, well. . .
Yeah, the whole "above it all" thing is kinda big with you.
I'd rather not make up silly names and argue about other grown men in spandex playing a game. Sorry if that seems like I have some sort of superiority complex. It's not what I'm going for, and you're the only guy who calls it out. :shrug:

Good win for the 9ers tonight. I'd like to have another couple games on them. That's still a good squad.
You really lay on that passive/aggressive shtick heavy, don't you?

Next post you'll make is your usual 'fan slotting'. Sheesh.

 
proninja said:
proninja said:
proninja said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
When sho nuff is the voice of reason, well. . .
Yeah, the whole "above it all" thing is kinda big with you.
I'd rather not make up silly names and argue about other grown men in spandex playing a game. Sorry if that seems like I have some sort of superiority complex. It's not what I'm going for, and you're the only guy who calls it out. :shrug:

Good win for the 9ers tonight. I'd like to have another couple games on them. That's still a good squad.
You really lay on that passive/aggressive shtick heavy, don't you?

Next post you'll make is your usual 'fan slotting'. Sheesh.
I don't know what to tell you. If Seahawks fans are obnoxious (which some are,) you call them out. I try to be reasonable, and you think I'm being passive aggressive. I'm not. If I cared to be aggressive, I'd just be aggressive. I have nothing to lose by offending you, I've clearly done so in the past, and you're clearly upset about it. You're the only 49er fan that has beef with me that I'm aware of, and I really have no desire to have beef with you. How about you lay down the sword with me? There are Seahawks fans who enjoy the kind of banter you're attempting to draw me into. Get into it with Sweeney and ITS. They like it.
Even MORE passive/aggressive shtick. Jeebus.

 
proninja said:
proninja said:
proninja said:
sho nuff said:
drummer said:
All this still doesn't explain why a grown man uses the phrase U Mad Bro, especially in a topic header.
Same reason we see things like whiners, lambs, and squawks in regards to 3 of the teams of this division among supposedly grown men discussing things?
When sho nuff is the voice of reason, well. . .
Yeah, the whole "above it all" thing is kinda big with you.
I'd rather not make up silly names and argue about other grown men in spandex playing a game. Sorry if that seems like I have some sort of superiority complex. It's not what I'm going for, and you're the only guy who calls it out. :shrug:

Good win for the 9ers tonight. I'd like to have another couple games on them. That's still a good squad.
As a Seahawks fan, I have to say that he 9ers aren't as awful as people are saying they are. Injuries definitely take a toll, but when the 49ers get hot they can do some damage. Still hate them, of course.
The game @SF is the one I'm least looking forward to on the schedule. That's a good team with one bad loss last week. No shame in losing to the Seahawks at home. They lost by a wider margin last year at Seattle and almost won the whole thing.
They were arguably the best team in the NFL at the time too, if Crabtree didn't go down they would have almost definitely won it. I'm also super pumped for @SF, and the result of that game will give us a better idea of who the better team is. If its a San Fran blowout, we know the benefits of home field, but if its close/Seattle win, it speaks more about the talent of the Hawks than any game at the Clink can say.

 
sho nuff said:
mad sweeney said:
Depends - is **** Sherman still on 'roids?
Not sure where you get your information, but he was never on roids. Might want to check your source.
Sherman was suspended for steroids and won on appeal due to a technicality. It worked for Ryan Braun for a while too.

link

Sherman attested that the cup with his urine specimen leaked, which forced the person collecting the sample to use a second cup underneath the first one. Thus, Sherman argued, the presence of the second cup (the seal on which was broken) violated the chain of custody requirements for a fair test.
As we all know most empty cups have steroids in them. Add in the fact that a bunch of Seahawks players have been popped and its pretty obvious to most people.
I've never heard of a 0 game suspension. Care to explain that to me?
Dude, we get it. He never actually got suspended. Either did Barry Bonds. It changes nothing. People aren't stupid. Even though guys like Sherman and Ryan Braun wish they were.
I invite you to read Mad Sweeney's post. He knows what's up.
You mean that the Seahawks fans are still convinced he just did Adderall?

Hah!!! Thats a good one.
Well, we can always trust you to chime in and show your dimness. Where in there does it say anything about being convinced of anything?
When you claimed it was more likely adderall than steroids.

Glad you could go just for insults though rather than understanding what you wrote yourself.
Where did I say I was convinced? Please illuminate me.

 
Depends - is **** Sherman still on 'roids?
Not sure where you get your information, but he was never on roids. Might want to check your source.
Sherman was suspended for steroids and won on appeal due to a technicality. It worked for Ryan Braun for a while too.

link

Sherman attested that the cup with his urine specimen leaked, which forced the person collecting the sample to use a second cup underneath the first one. Thus, Sherman argued, the presence of the second cup (the seal on which was broken) violated the chain of custody requirements for a fair test.
As we all know most empty cups have steroids in them. Add in the fact that a bunch of Seahawks players have been popped and its pretty obvious to most people.
I've never heard of a 0 game suspension. Care to explain that to me?
Dude, we get it. He never actually got suspended. Either did Barry Bonds. It changes nothing. People aren't stupid. Even though guys like Sherman and Ryan Braun wish they were.
I invite you to read Mad Sweeney's post. He knows what's up.
Sweeney agreeing with you may not have the effect on your argument that you think it does...
Yeah, it slides in right above the effectiveness of an insult from Hustler. Cue CH screaming and wailing about being stalked...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Of course you're not talking about the Kingdome, or the once possibility of they leaving Seattle.

I think fans filling a Stadium through bitter cold with a team that hasn't won for a long period of time trumps a Stadium built with acoustics that makes the venue really suited for only one purpose. Fans make the stadium. Soldier and Lambeau Field's are a lot more historic in fan nature than building one with an acoustic advantage in the millennium. Seriously, if you have to create architecture to get louder than others, then maybe try to get just as loud in a stadium that doesn't have that advantage.

Also, I don't know which fans travel more, but those who do could trump fans who stay at home as well.

I'm not knocking Seahawk fans here, just your myopic post.

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Man, I see what you're getting at, but it really only works when you're at the Clink. Anywhere else--like here, for example--and class and humility serve the team and its fans, including yourself, much better.

As a fan of teams that always do poorly, I never understood why people didn't like Pete Carroll and his enthusiasm over small victories and big plays, expressing a camaraderie with the common fan. But we all know the other side, the sting of those heartbreaking plays. And to immediately cut to the coach dancing about it is an unnecessary punch to the gut. Pull your punches, be grateful, be gracious. No team ever earns the right for their fans to be jerks. Doing that a squanders every bit of respect the team already seized for you on the field.

I'm not saying Hawks fans need to act like they've been there before (that would be a lie). Just don't act like you haven't been the other guy.

Go Cougs

 
You mean that the Seahawks fans are still convinced he just did Adderall?

Hah!!! Thats a good one.
You mean that GB fans are still mad about losing to us?

Hah!!!
The perfect response.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but I will say this. I love Sherman and his attitude. The dude is lights out, top 3 CB.

Having said that, Seattle fans (ItS in particular) should probably win something before walking around here beating their chest all the time. </bengalsfan>

 
Last edited by a moderator:
proninja said:
I don't know what to tell you. If Seahawks fans are obnoxious (which some are,) you call them out. I try to be reasonable, and you think I'm being passive aggressive. I'm not. If I cared to be aggressive, I'd just be aggressive. I have nothing to lose by offending you, I've clearly done so in the past, and you're clearly upset about it. You're the only 49er fan that has beef with me that I'm aware of, and I really have no desire to have beef with you. How about you lay down the sword with me? There are Seahawks fans who enjoy the kind of banter you're attempting to draw me into. Get into it with Sweeney and ITS. They like it.
Even MORE passive/aggressive shtick. Jeebus.
Typical seahawks fan. Being grouped with those guys is annoying and insults me. The ironic part of it all is they use to hate guys like Richard Sherman and Pete Carroll. When Pete was hired VERY few supported him. With Sherman they like to try to ignore what he does because it eats them up inside.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff said:
When you claimed it was more likely adderall than steroids.

Glad you could go just for insults though rather than understanding what you wrote yourself.
Where did I say I was convinced? Please illuminate me.
I just answered that question. Why ask it again?

Or do I need to find the exact word "convinced" to make you happy?

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Not all the fans are unbearable.

But it has little to do with jealousy.

Wait...you are right...Id trade in Lambeau, the history, back to back kick ### QBs, Super Bowl titles...all so that our stadium could be a little lourder.

You caught me.

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Not all the fans are unbearable.

But it has little to do with jealousy.

Wait...you are right...Id trade in Lambeau, the history, back to back kick ### QBs, Super Bowl titles...all so that our stadium could be a little lourder.

You caught me.
I respect fans of teams like the Jags more than fans that simply jumped on the wagon when the team was good and then points to all the past championships. Seriously, what would a guy from Hermitage, TN know about Lambeau?

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Not all the fans are unbearable.

But it has little to do with jealousy.

Wait...you are right...Id trade in Lambeau, the history, back to back kick ### QBs, Super Bowl titles...all so that our stadium could be a little lourder.

You caught me.
I respect fans of teams like the Jags more than fans that simply jumped on the wagon when the team was good and then points to all the past championships. Seriously, what would a guy from Hermitage, TN know about Lambeau?
Quite a bit...what would you like to know?

I know Ive been to Lambeau probably more times that you have been to Seahawks games.

I know I grew up 20 minutes from the place.

I know my family has been going to games since the place opened.

I know I have sat in seats my Grandparents have had for decades.

I know my mother was at the Ice Bowl with my Grandfather.

I know anytime I want tickets to a game I can easily get them from my family.

I know that you are utterly clueless about what I know about Lambeau Field...and that if you think I simply jumped on any wagon and did not grow up there during the 70s and 80s when they sucked and still have always been a Packer fan...then you are even more clueless than everyone here already thinks you are.

 
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Not all the fans are unbearable.

But it has little to do with jealousy.

Wait...you are right...Id trade in Lambeau, the history, back to back kick ### QBs, Super Bowl titles...all so that our stadium could be a little lourder.

You caught me.
I respect fans of teams like the Jags more than fans that simply jumped on the wagon when the team was good and then points to all the past championships. Seriously, what would a guy from Hermitage, TN know about Lambeau?
Quite a bit...what would you like to know?

I know Ive been to Lambeau probably more times that you have been to Seahawks games.

I know I grew up 20 minutes from the place.

I know my family has been going to games since the place opened.

I know I have sat in seats my Grandparents have had for decades.

I know my mother was at the Ice Bowl with my Grandfather.

I know anytime I want tickets to a game I can easily get them from my family.

I know that you are utterly clueless about what I know about Lambeau Field...and that if you think I simply jumped on any wagon and did not grow up there during the 70s and 80s when they sucked and still have always been a Packer fan...then you are even more clueless than everyone here already thinks you are.
:own3d:

And apparently ITS has never heard of relocation.

 
sho nuff said:
When you claimed it was more likely adderall than steroids.

Glad you could go just for insults though rather than understanding what you wrote yourself.
Where did I say I was convinced? Please illuminate me.
I just answered that question. Why ask it again?

Or do I need to find the exact word "convinced" to make you happy?
You didn't answer anything. You wrote another falsehood about what I said. You fit in well with drummer, Junior, wingy and a few others. You need to show that I said I was convinced of what you claim. You can find whatever wording fits. I specifically wrote it the way I did because there was no exoneration involved. But like a dog in heat you jump in with the other guys who make false interpretations of what's been said so you can counter it.

 
Was he on Cecil Shorts last week? He put up 24+ on me and I had laughed at the guy playing him vs. Seattle.
garbage time is money time.

i've seen guys do nothing for 40 minutes then end up with 20 points just when the game was out of hand.

shorts will be the king of garbage time

 
Lol I love how you stereotype all Hawk fans into one group... It's like its WW2 and we are all Japanese or something...

 
drummer said:
cacksman said:
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Of course you're not talking about the Kingdome, or the once possibility of they leaving Seattle.

I think fans filling a Stadium through bitter cold with a team that hasn't won for a long period of time trumps a Stadium built with acoustics that makes the venue really suited for only one purpose. Fans make the stadium. Soldier and Lambeau Field's are a lot more historic in fan nature than building one with an acoustic advantage in the millennium. Seriously, if you have to create architecture to get louder than others, then maybe try to get just as loud in a stadium that doesn't have that advantage.
This is a completely ridiculous post. All the Seattle fans have to get loud in is CLink. What you are asking is something no fan base can do, you simply cannot fill enough seats in a visiting stadium to make any sort of difference in noise.

Also, this is such an ignorant attempt to discredit Seattle fans and the effect they have on gameday. Sure the stadium is designed to funnel noise back onto the field, but it's still an outdoor stadium. Yes, the loudest outdoor stadium in the league but there is only one reason CLink gets louder than the domes(which no noise can escape) and it is the Seahawks fans. If you put this Seattle crowd in the old Kingdome, they would have hit 140 db at the SF game.

I think it's funny that a lot of stadiums need to have videos educating their fans of when to be quiet and when to make noise.

 
sho nuff said:
cacksman said:
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Not all the fans are unbearable.

But it has little to do with jealousy.

Wait...you are right...Id trade in Lambeau, the history, back to back kick ### QBs, Super Bowl titles...all so that our stadium could be a little lourder.

You caught me.
I wasn't saying you are jealous of the team and it's history. I'm saying the hate stems from jealousy that your home crowd can't influence a game like Seattle's.

 
drummer said:
cacksman said:
All this talk about Seattle's fans being unbearable is clearly jealousy. Sorry your fan base has never set a world record.

Seattle fans feel a connection to the team unlike any of yours do because they actually contribute and form the greatest homefield advantage the sport has ever seen. Fact.
Of course you're not talking about the Kingdome, or the once possibility of they leaving Seattle.

I think fans filling a Stadium through bitter cold with a team that hasn't won for a long period of time trumps a Stadium built with acoustics that makes the venue really suited for only one purpose. Fans make the stadium. Soldier and Lambeau Field's are a lot more historic in fan nature than building one with an acoustic advantage in the millennium. Seriously, if you have to create architecture to get louder than others, then maybe try to get just as loud in a stadium that doesn't have that advantage.
This is a completely ridiculous post. All the Seattle fans have to get loud in is CLink. What you are asking is something no fan base can do, you simply cannot fill enough seats in a visiting stadium to make any sort of difference in noise.

Also, this is such an ignorant attempt to discredit Seattle fans and the effect they have on gameday. Sure the stadium is designed to funnel noise back onto the field, but it's still an outdoor stadium. Yes, the loudest outdoor stadium in the league but there is only one reason CLink gets louder than the domes(which no noise can escape) and it is the Seahawks fans. If you put this Seattle crowd in the old Kingdome, they would have hit 140 db at the SF game.

I think it's funny that a lot of stadiums need to have videos educating their fans of when to be quiet and when to make noise.
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.

 
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.
That's funny because the Rams are actually the first team I heard of that played those videos for fans, educating on when to be loud and quiet. And comparing St Louis to Seattle when it comes to fan atmosphere is like comparing a Honda Accord to a Maserati.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.
That's funny because the Rams are actually the first team I heard of that played those videos for fans, educating on when to be loud and quiet. And comparing St Louis to Seattle when it comes to fan atmosphere is like comparing a Honda Accord to a Maserati.
The thing is STL fan has a Lombardi.

 
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.
That's funny because the Rams are actually the first team I heard of that played those videos for fans, educating on when to be loud and quiet. And comparing St Louis to Seattle when it comes to fan atmosphere is like comparing a Honda Accord to a Maserati.
The thing is STL fan has a Lombardi.
So they have a great car from the early 2000's?

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.

 
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.
That's funny because the Rams are actually the first team I heard of that played those videos for fans, educating on when to be loud and quiet. And comparing St Louis to Seattle when it comes to fan atmosphere is like comparing a Honda Accord to a Maserati.
The thing is STL fan has a Lombardi.
So they have a great car from the early 2000's?
You still ride a bicycle.

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
Probably because Seahawk fans have been invading 49er sites, Twitter, and Facebook. You brought this on yourselves.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ed Jones dome gets loud too. Just because you're loud doesn't make you great fans.
That's funny because the Rams are actually the first team I heard of that played those videos for fans, educating on when to be loud and quiet. And comparing St Louis to Seattle when it comes to fan atmosphere is like comparing a Honda Accord to a Maserati.
The thing is STL fan has a Lombardi.
So they have a great car from the early 2000's?
Get more funny

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
Probably because Seahawk fans have been invading 49er sites, Twitter, and Facebook. You brought this on yourselves.
:lmao: Ok guy.

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
:lmao:

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
Probably because Seahawk fans have been invading 49er sites, Twitter, and Facebook. You brought this on yourselves.
:lmao: Ok guy.
They have. I can't read a SF Gate comment section (a San Francisco news site) without Seahawk fans peppering it with nonsense. That along with almost every article about the 49ers out there with a comment section.

I think Gawker has the solution for Hawk fan creating internet noise:

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/disruptions-gawker-wants-to-encourage-more-voices-online-but-with-less-yelling/?_r=0

This article came from this one:

http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/09/youtube-tries-to-rescue-its-terrible-commenters-from-themselves/

To which this is an example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0DYodYTiL4

Of this:

kramer burns 2 days ago

Wilson>Kaepernick....go Hawks
Look like ItS is ubiquitous.

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
:lmao:
Still waiting for a response from you. Care to explain your cowardly ways?

 
BTW, give me one sole Raiderfan dressed in Silver and Black GWAR garb at Mile High watching his team get beat on Sunday night by Peyton, while suffering through an historic decade of losses over 50,000 "WE SO LOUD AT HOME!" fans any day of the week.
Coming from the fan base which chants "Seahawks Suck" last night while Kap and Gore were giving interviews after their game VERSUS ST. LOUIS. Seattle is now that team to SF.
:lmao:
Still waiting for a response from you. Care to explain your cowardly ways?
Im Matt Hasselbeck?

 
Depends - is **** Sherman still on 'roids?
Not sure where you get your information, but he was never on roids. Might want to check your source.
Sherman was suspended for steroids and won on appeal due to a technicality. It worked for Ryan Braun for a while too.

link

Sherman attested that the cup with his urine specimen leaked, which forced the person collecting the sample to use a second cup underneath the first one. Thus, Sherman argued, the presence of the second cup (the seal on which was broken) violated the chain of custody requirements for a fair test.
As we all know most empty cups have steroids in them. Add in the fact that a bunch of Seahawks players have been popped and its pretty obvious to most people.
I've never heard of a 0 game suspension. Care to explain that to me?
Dude, we get it. He never actually got suspended. Either did Barry Bonds. It changes nothing. People aren't stupid. Even though guys like Sherman and Ryan Braun wish they were.
I invite you to read Mad Sweeney's post. He knows what's up.
Sweeney agreeing with you may not have the effect on your argument that you think it does...
I know exactly what Sweeney's post means in regards to mine, hence why I referred to it. Maybe you don't understand....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was going to start Hartline instead of Andre Johinson until I saw this thread.... now I am starting Johnson with confidence.... cuz ##### this guy.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top