What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chili. Beans or not. Time to Settle this once and for all. (1 Viewer)

Your opinion on beans in chili?

  • OMG IF THERE ARE BEANS IT'S NOT EVEN CHILI!!

    Votes: 33 11.6%
  • I definitely prefer no beans in chili

    Votes: 44 15.4%
  • Whatevs.

    Votes: 58 20.4%
  • I like beans in chili a lot.

    Votes: 71 24.9%
  • Why would you not have beans in chili? Isn't that like some kind of meat soup?

    Votes: 79 27.7%

  • Total voters
    285
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?

 
I like beans because I like beans. I'm not substituting them for meat. If I made chili without beans it would have the same amount of meat as chili with beans. I like beans.

 
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Official International Chili Society sanctioning body is pretty clear on the rules of what constitutes Chili:

The Rules and Regulations for cooks at the World’s Championship, State, Regional and District Cookoffs are as follows:

1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.

2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked

with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.
They are the preeminent authority on the dish, sanctioning over 200 events worldwide with over 1 Milion attendees annually.

There is a "homestyle" chili category that allows for "whatever you want" (aka beans), but it is not considered one of the 3 main categories (salsa being the 3rd), and no "World Champion" is crowned. Homestyle chili category is basically there to placate the people can't afford to make real chili, and have to resort to cheap fillers like beans. :shrug:
:lmao: at World Championship of Chili. Do they award title belts? :lmao:

 
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,
cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,


so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.

 
I have never eaten chili but if someone handed me a bowl I would assume there would be beans in it.
How is this even possible?
It is just that food that's never appealed to me. Everyone has a popular food they don't like for some reason. I see friends putting chili on hot dogs and it makes me want to puke. Why would you put something that looks like dog doo on your hot dog? People love it though, i get it. Enjoy your bowl of slop.
Many people have a popular food they don't like. I would not say that very many people have a popular food that they've never even TRIED.

Live a little, dude. It may be the best thing you've ever tasted.
Pretty much this.
Maybe I tried it many moons ago. I really don't remember. What I do remember is that I don't care for chili. Any foods you don't care for?
Sure. But not delicious ones.
I'll be the judge of that. let's hear them.
Based on what you have said in this thread, you are in no position to be a judge of anything in the culinary realm. But I'll overlook that out of my sense of sporting fun.

Here you go:

Sweet pickles

Pickled fish

Lima beans

A wide variety of Indian and Chinese dessert items
What? What??!! Oh my lord, what is wrong with you? Sweet pickles are THE BEST! And who doesn't like Indian and Chinese dessert items?? :doublefacepalm:
This is not convincing.

 
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,

so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.
I'm going to try it with spam to see how much better it is than the bean versions I'm used to

 
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,

so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.
I'm going to try it with spam to see how much better it is than the bean versions I'm used to
woah

worlds colliding

http://www.food.com/recipe/spam-spring-chili-98499

spam chili WITH BEANS

 
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,

so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.
I'm going to try it with spam to see how much better it is than the bean versions I'm used to
better? who cares about that. All that matters is complying with Chili regulations set by the international governing body. You don't want to upset the folks from Ghana or Maldives.

 
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?
Gonna have to vehemently disagree with you on the porn question.

 
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?
Gonna have to vehemently disagree with you on the porn question.
Not really my thing, but I don't see the problem with focusing your porn intake on whatever action you like best. I'm not gonna start watching midget golden showers just because I get bored watching petite blondes in cheerleader skirts take it from behind (hypothetically, of course). And beans are the midget golden showers of chili. If that's your thing, great, more power to you. I'm glad you've found something you enjoy. But it just seems like a waste to me.

 
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?
Gonna have to vehemently disagree with you on the porn question.
Not really my thing, but I don't see the problem with focusing your porn intake on whatever action you like best. I'm not gonna start watching midget golden showers just because I get bored watching petite blondes in cheerleader skirts take it from behind (hypothetically, of course). And beans are the midget golden showers of chili. If that's your thing, great, more power to you. I'm glad you've found something you enjoy. But it just seems like a waste to me.
That is a Socrates quote, isn't it?

 
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?
Gonna have to vehemently disagree with you on the porn question.
Not really my thing, but I don't see the problem with focusing your porn intake on whatever action you like best. I'm not gonna start watching midget golden showers just because I get bored watching petite blondes in cheerleader skirts take it from behind (hypothetically, of course). And beans are the midget golden showers of chili. If that's your thing, great, more power to you. I'm glad you've found something you enjoy. But it just seems like a waste to me.
That is a Socrates quote, isn't it?
It is also possible that I am the prisoner chained to the cave, the walls of the cave are my conventional porn, and midget golden showers are my sunlight.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
B-Deep said:
jfranco77 said:
You can have your weird meat and bean soup concoction. I'll be eating the real chili with no ### #### beans.
to be clear

cow balls are meat, give the choice would you rather have beans or testes in your chili?
I'm guessing testes would be the choice for most of the anti bean people.

 
B-Deep said:
jfranco77 said:
You can have your weird meat and bean soup concoction. I'll be eating the real chili with no ### #### beans.
to be clear

cow balls are meat, give the choice would you rather have beans or testes in your chili?
I'm guessing testes would be the choice for most of the anti bean people.
as much as i dislike beans, i think given the choice of a mouthful of pintos or a mouthful of bovine family jewels, I am going beans every time

 
B-Deep said:
jfranco77 said:
You can have your weird meat and bean soup concoction. I'll be eating the real chili with no ### #### beans.
to be clear

cow balls are meat, give the choice would you rather have beans or testes in your chili?
Cows don't have balls. :shrug:

 
This is pretty simple. Just depends on which style of chili you prefer.

The ground beef based concoction served in many parts of the country as "chili" really needs beans. If only for some texture.

Chili built around chunks of chuck really doesn't need beans. The meat has some texture, and good chile flavor with good quality beef doesn't need much else.

I prefer the latter, so I don't normally prefer chili with beans, but I appreciate both styles.

Beans, in general, are very good, btw, and to suggest otherwise is crazy talk.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
B-Deep said:
jfranco77 said:
You can have your weird meat and bean soup concoction. I'll be eating the real chili with no ### #### beans.
to be clear

cow balls are meat, give the choice would you rather have beans or testes in your chili?
Cows don't have balls. :shrug:
bull balls, whatever.

substitute the #### of your choosing. Pig, goat, bull, deer....

balls are balls
:lmao:

Beans in chili kind of look like little balls.

 
This is pretty simple. Just depends on which style of chili you prefer.

The ground beef based concoction served in many parts of the country as "chili" really needs beans. If only for some texture.

Chili built chunks of chuck really doesn't need beans. The meat has some texture, and good chile flavor with good quality beef doesn't need much else.

I prefer the latter, so I don't normally prefer chili with beans, but I appreciate both styles.

Beans, in general, are very good, btw, and to suggest otherwise is crazy talk.
Take your common sense answer elsewhere, friend. This thread is for outrage, hyperbole and terrible analogies only.

 
This is pretty simple. Just depends on which style of chili you prefer.

The ground beef based concoction served in many parts of the country as "chili" really needs beans. If only for some texture.

Chili built chunks of chuck really doesn't need beans. The meat has some texture, and good chile flavor with good quality beef doesn't need much else.

I prefer the latter, so I don't normally prefer chili with beans, but I appreciate both styles.

Beans, in general, are very good, btw, and to suggest otherwise is crazy talk.
Take your common sense answer elsewhere, friend. This thread is for outrage, hyperbole and terrible analogies only.
I can't believe you'd say this. Saddling this thread with that kind of negativity is like Hitler riding a donkey into a snowstorm in July.

 
This is pretty simple. Just depends on which style of chili you prefer.

The ground beef based concoction served in many parts of the country as "chili" really needs beans. If only for some texture.

Chili built chunks of chuck really doesn't need beans. The meat has some texture, and good chile flavor with good quality beef doesn't need much else.

I prefer the latter, so I don't normally prefer chili with beans, but I appreciate both styles.

Beans, in general, are very good, btw, and to suggest otherwise is crazy talk.
Take your common sense answer elsewhere, friend. This thread is for outrage, hyperbole and terrible analogies only.
I can't believe you'd say this. Saddling this thread with that kind of negativity is like Hitler riding a donkey into a snowstorm in July.
while eating bean and testicle chili!

 
This is pretty simple. Just depends on which style of chili you prefer.

The ground beef based concoction served in many parts of the country as "chili" really needs beans. If only for some texture.

Chili built chunks of chuck really doesn't need beans. The meat has some texture, and good chile flavor with good quality beef doesn't need much else.

I prefer the latter, so I don't normally prefer chili with beans, but I appreciate both styles.

Beans, in general, are very good, btw, and to suggest otherwise is crazy talk.
Take your common sense answer elsewhere, friend. This thread is for outrage, hyperbole and terrible analogies only.
This guy gets it.

 
TobiasFunke said:
fatguyinalittlecoat said:
TobiasFunke said:
17seconds said:
The people who dislike beans simply because they are filler or not equal to the meat...

Do you ever put toppings on anything?

Do you ever eat a side dish?

Instead of making a sandwich, do you just eat deli meat out of the bag?

Is your pron limited to 2hr money shot compilations?
I feel like you're asking these questions sarcastically, which worries me because my answers are meh, meh, sure, and why not?
Gonna have to vehemently disagree with you on the porn question.
Not really my thing, but I don't see the problem with focusing your porn intake on whatever action you like best. I'm not gonna start watching midget golden showers just because I get bored watching petite blondes in cheerleader skirts take it from behind (hypothetically, of course). And beans are the midget golden showers of chili. If that's your thing, great, more power to you. I'm glad you've found something you enjoy. But it just seems like a waste to me.
Whoa whoa whoa...it's "little people".

Savage.

 
JerseyToughGuys said:
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,

so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.
Are beans not considered an "other ingredient"?

 
Tom Servo said:
[icon] said:
Official International Chili Society sanctioning body is pretty clear on the rules of what constitutes Chili:

The Rules and Regulations for cooks at the World’s Championship, State, Regional and District Cookoffs are as follows:

1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.

2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked

with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.
They are the preeminent authority on the dish, sanctioning over 200 events worldwide with over 1 Milion attendees annually.

There is a "homestyle" chili category that allows for "whatever you want" (aka beans), but it is not considered one of the 3 main categories (salsa being the 3rd), and no "World Champion" is crowned. Homestyle chili category is basically there to placate the people can't afford to make real chili, and have to resort to cheap fillers like beans. :shrug:
:lmao: at World Championship of Chili. Do they award title belts? :lmao:
Maybe not title belts but don't laugh--icon knows stuff. That said I don't enter the competitions and I like chili, w/ or w/o beans. :cool:

 
JerseyToughGuys said:
Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients,

so if I make a chili out of hotdogs, it would be more chili-like than chili with beans.

neat.
I make a mean red snapper, fennel and ginger chili

 
Tom Servo said:
[icon] said:
Official International Chili Society sanctioning body is pretty clear on the rules of what constitutes Chili:

The Rules and Regulations for cooks at the World’s Championship, State, Regional and District Cookoffs are as follows:

1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.

2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked

with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.
They are the preeminent authority on the dish, sanctioning over 200 events worldwide with over 1 Milion attendees annually.

There is a "homestyle" chili category that allows for "whatever you want" (aka beans), but it is not considered one of the 3 main categories (salsa being the 3rd), and no "World Champion" is crowned. Homestyle chili category is basically there to placate the people can't afford to make real chili, and have to resort to cheap fillers like beans. :shrug:
:lmao: at World Championship of Chili. Do they award title belts? :lmao:
Maybe not title belts but don't laugh--icon knows stuff. That said I don't enter the competitions and I like chili, w/ or w/o beans. :cool:
:lol: thanks GB.

For the record, I'm just shticking it up in here... When I make chili it more often than not has beans.

 
Tom Servo said:
[icon] said:
Official International Chili Society sanctioning body is pretty clear on the rules of what constitutes Chili:

The Rules and Regulations for cooks at the World’s Championship, State, Regional and District Cookoffs are as follows:

1. Traditional Red Chili is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats,

cooked with red chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.

2. Chili Verde is defined by the International Chili Society as any kind of meat or combination of meats, cooked

with green chili peppers, various spices and other ingredients, with the exception of BEANS and PASTA which are strictly forbidden. No garnish is allowed.
They are the preeminent authority on the dish, sanctioning over 200 events worldwide with over 1 Milion attendees annually.

There is a "homestyle" chili category that allows for "whatever you want" (aka beans), but it is not considered one of the 3 main categories (salsa being the 3rd), and no "World Champion" is crowned. Homestyle chili category is basically there to placate the people can't afford to make real chili, and have to resort to cheap fillers like beans. :shrug:
:lmao: at World Championship of Chili. Do they award title belts? :lmao:
Maybe not title belts but don't laugh--icon knows stuff. That said I don't enter the competitions and I like chili, w/ or w/o beans. :cool:
:lol: thanks GB.

For the record, I'm just shticking it up in here... When I make chili it more often than not has beans.
I too have made chili with beans in it.

It tasted good.

But I felt terribly guilty while eating it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top