Bucs were #32 in overall defense and # 32 in rush defense last year. I wouldn't be making too much of a week 2 preseason stat line against the worst defense in football.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
Bucs were #32 in overall defense and # 32 in rush defense last year. I wouldn't be making too much of a week 2 preseason stat line against the worst defense in football.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
But we should be making something out of 5 carries in week 1 of pre-season?I think that was Banger's point.Bucs were #32 in overall defense and # 32 in rush defense last year. I wouldn't be making too much of a week 2 preseason stat line against the worst defense in football.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
I don't know why that's a stretch. Who else do they have? A bottom 5 qb, a knucklehead wr with some upside coming off a couple surgeries facing suspension and possibly an average TE. If this team is going to be successful the offense will run through him like it did 2 years ago.entire offense? He was very good last night, but come on . . .'Banger said:He's got talent and he's going to be their entire offense. He probably won't be 2010 cj but I don't think he'll be 2011 cj. I think he'll end up where he's being drafted... Top 4 or 5.'Shutout said:I wouldn't be so quick to judge, either way.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
. He ran for 2000 yards 2 years ago. He's not some schlub. Yes he had a good qtr vs a bad defense but he's very talented and last year was a wasted year. He didn't focus, wasn't in shape, missed camp and it hurt him. From all the reports he's looked good in camp, worked hard all offseason and is in great shape. If he were coming off an injury I might be more apprehensive but I think he's gonna be fine this year.Bucs were #32 in overall defense and # 32 in rush defense last year. I wouldn't be making too much of a week 2 preseason stat line against the worst defense in football.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
He'll be close and he'll certainly get over 300 touches. Who's going to pass? Who are the receivers? Locker is projected as the 23rd qb with 19 Teds and 3200 yards. You are the first person I've heard call their offense a passing offense. Cj is by far the most talented player on the offense and it makes sense to use him and run it through him.Palmer wasnt there in 2010. They are a passing team. They will spread it out. No way does Johnson get 300 carries.
Dominick Davis or whatever the hell his name is/was had 300 carries in 15 games in 2004 with Palmer as the OC. Munchack of course is a former offensive lineman who wants to run the ball and it's not like Hasselbeck or Locker is Rogers, Brees, or Brady back there. 300 carries for Johnson is not a lock but to say "no way" he'll do it is way off base. In fact, I'd say if he's healthy all year it's pretty damn likely.Palmer wasnt there in 2010. They are a passing team. They will spread it out. No way does Johnson get 300 carries.
Take Johnson out of that list and they don't have much. That was my point. They have no backs behind cj and their wrs are average at best as a group and their TE is average and qb is below average. Yes their line may be good and cj is good which is why I think they'll be more of a run team than a pass team.The titans skill players are easily in the top half of the league. Washington, britt, cook, Johnson, Williams, and wright are plenty good. They have one of the five best lines in football. If whoever the qb is can avoid turning the ball over then there is no excuse for the team not to score a tom of points.
I don't agree with anything you said. CJ2K is the only elite player they have on offense.The titans skill players are easily in the top half of the league. Washington, britt, cook, Johnson, Williams, and wright are plenty good. They have one of the five best lines in football. If whoever the qb is can avoid turning the ball over then there is no excuse for the team not to score a tom of points.
I missed the part where I called anyone (including Johnson) elite. I said they have talent all around on offense except at quarterback. You don't agree with my assessment of their Iine?I don't agree with anything you said. CJ2K is the only elite player they have on offense.The titans skill players are easily in the top half of the league. Washington, britt, cook, Johnson, Williams, and wright are plenty good. They have one of the five best lines in football. If whoever the qb is can avoid turning the ball over then there is no excuse for the team not to score a tom of points.
Excellent post.I'm not sure how you classify ther receivers as average at best. Washington and britt (add in "if healthy" caveat) would get plenty of run on most teams and cook is no slouch. Add in a First round receiver in wright and they are talented and deep.
Yeah, you pretty much missed the point of BAnger's post...Bucs were #32 in overall defense and # 32 in rush defense last year. I wouldn't be making too much of a week 2 preseason stat line against the worst defense in football.'Banger said:Yeah. He's good again.
As a receiving corp I'd probably rather have, Philly, Pitt, NO, GB, NE, TB, NYG, Dallas, HOU, KC, Detroit, Denver and prob Chicago, SF, Minn. there are teams worse but even on those teams some have elite options that TEnn doesn't like AJ Green, Steve Smith and Steve Johnson. They are right in the middle to me and that makes them average.I'm not sure how you classify ther receivers as average at best. Washington and britt (add in "if healthy" caveat) would get plenty of run on most teams and cook is no slouch. Add in a First round receiver in wright and they are talented and deep.
Agree that they should be able to score. btw always am interested in your knowledgable take when it comes to the Titans. Keep it up!!I would disagree on some of those (like San Fran) but that would be needlessly slitting hairs. It seems like we agree that they are somewhere around the middle. A mid range group of receivers, a very good rb, and a top tier o line should be enough of a formula to move the ball and score a bit.
With a guy like Chris Johnson....you give him 20 + touches......he is capable of breaking one of those for 70 yards and a TD.That is who he is. It is a matter of touches. The more he get's the more dangerous he is.While he did not look good last night.....people might be reading into this way too much. Yeah...last season he was not the same player.But I have seen great backs have putrid pre-seasons after putrid pre-season then do what they do when the games count.He will be fine.Chris Johnson was held to 27 yards on 13 carries against the Cardinals in the third preseason game.
Yep....cracks me up. He all of sudden forgot how to play football.ITS PRE SEASON. HE HAS NOTHING TO PROVE.Staying healthy is the goal for him in pre-season...nothing else. He held out last year, lost focus, was not in top shape. This year I have little doubt we see a much better Chris Johnson. And if he has another lackluster year...then I will begin to doubt. But I don't panic based on games that have no meaning for clear cut starters like CJ. Would I be nervous taking him in the first round of a redraft this year? Yeah I can't deny I would due to last season and those memories still fresh. But he is a clear cut #1 workhorse and I see a lot of touches for him which will give him plenty of chances to explode for big plays and TD's.It is all about the neck up for Chris Johnson. Because he is in top condition and in the prime of his career. If his heart and mind are into it he is elite. We all know that.Yah and last week he was BACK!!!... after scoring 2 touchdowns in the 1st half. These boards are hilarious sometimes.
so if he just had one more touch, he would of broken it.With a guy like Chris Johnson....you give him 20 + touches......he is capable of breaking one of those for 70 yards and a TD.That is who he is. It is a matter of touches. The more he get's the more dangerous he is.While he did not look good last night.....people might be reading into this way too much. Yeah...last season he was not the same player.But I have seen great backs have putrid pre-seasons after putrid pre-season then do what they do when the games count.He will be fine.Chris Johnson was held to 27 yards on 13 carries against the Cardinals in the third preseason game.
Smart ###.so if he just had one more touch, he would of broken it.With a guy like Chris Johnson....you give him 20 + touches......he is capable of breaking one of those for 70 yards and a TD.That is who he is. It is a matter of touches. The more he get's the more dangerous he is.While he did not look good last night.....people might be reading into this way too much. Yeah...last season he was not the same player.But I have seen great backs have putrid pre-seasons after putrid pre-season then do what they do when the games count.He will be fine.Chris Johnson was held to 27 yards on 13 carries against the Cardinals in the third preseason game.
I did. That and Locker's ineffectiveness on check downs/screens concern me much more than how CJ looked or his pre-season stat line. And for those looking at the stat line, here's what I posted in one of the other CJ threads on the first page of the SP:200925 carries 77 yards 3.1 ypc 0 TDs- Finished RB1, NFL record for yards from scrimmage201019 carries 39 yards 2.1 ypc 2 TDs- Finished RB5201228 carries 81 yards 2.9 upc 2 TDs- ??????anyone notice that Ringer was in on 3rd down alot too?
there are not 12 guys better than him if healthy. He's a #1 by default, I do see people's concerns about this bad game last nightCJ is just too inconsistent to be drafted as a RB1.Take a top end WR before you get CJ's inconsistency. He will drive fantasy owners crazy again all year. He has lost that extra gear that used to make him great. He is still fast but not what he once was. He is now just a good NFL rb. His ppg will make him only draftable as a RB2 to me, but many are going to draft him as a RB1. He won't be on my teams this year because of that.
I think once you post a 2000 yard season in this league, and a couple other quality season, thus showing hall of fame level talent, that a drop off like this when you are at an age where you should still be in prime form will be considered a bust every year.Last year it was almost "explainable" but if this year is a frustration.. well forget it.The thing is... the guy will probably have 2-3 games this year where he goes nuts and gets an 80 yard run or something and has like 180 yards and 2-3 TD's... and in THOSE 2-3 games (one of which will inevitably be week 17) you'll remember the guy has game... and those 2-3 games will make his end of year stats look: "not as bad as you might think" but the guys who owned him and had to play him who suffered through the other 13-14 games of mediocrityCan you be considered a bust 2 years in a row?
All this guy ever was was a big play or 2 a game. If that doens't happen he is below mediocre.Can you be considered a bust 2 years in a row?
everyone in the world had him ranked in the top 8 RB's... it's ok.. we all fell for it.it's tough... what can a mere mortal do when all the experts have it wrong...The minute he has one of "those games" I will trade him for anything, worst first round pick ever. What was I thinking?
how large do your balls need to be to cut him outright at this point.you know, to make a statement in your league and to rid the cancer from your rosterThis guy is pure feast or famine and right now he is an ethiopian with flies buzzing around his head.