mquinnjr
Footballguy
It's on fire. The question is when do you push it off the cliff.Let me know when to fire up the band wagon?
It's on fire. The question is when do you push it off the cliff.Let me know when to fire up the band wagon?
Wow. So all of a sudden after 114 pages this thread is getting serious???not cool even in this threadJust my 2 cents1 down 2 to go
Which is fine, since the Cowboys will never have another third down once he's starting.CMike isn't a third down back.
Or overtime.They are saving him for the 4th quarter.
Line is getting dominated tonight so CMike would probably only have 9ypc if he were playing instead of Randle tonight imo.What happened to this (so called) dominant Dallas Oline??
Hold on, anyone have jumper cables? The battery died.It's on fire. The question is when do you push it off the cliff.Let me know when to fire up the band wagon?
Don't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
139 users are reading this topic.
98 users are reading the game thread.
Rules.
Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.
By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.
Back off the field after one play.That was a good first carry. I'll take 7 yards every time.
Like the board wouldn't have crashed if that happened.Back off the field after one play.That was a good first carry. I'll take 7 yards every time.
It's Cmike wearing mcfaddens jerseyWhy is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Because this is the same team that kept giving Felix Jones chancesWhy is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Looks bad. Probably long term if not season. ACL or PCL probably, but nothing announced.By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.
Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
He was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
The initial sideline test was the Sage sign for PCL stabilityLooks bad. Probably long term if not season. ACL or PCL probably, but nothing announced.By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.
Winner winnerThe initial sideline test was the Sage sign for PCL stabilityLooks bad. Probably long term if not season. ACL or PCL probably, but nothing announced.By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
Better a has been than a never wasHe was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Since its been mentioned, another opinion on Dunbar.@ProFootballDoc: Hoping @Dunbar_CDB5 @dallascowboys does not have what video looked like.
Worry is ACL/MCL to left knee. #FingersCrossed
Ya he tore his PCL 2 years ago... not sure if its the same knee or not.Winner winnerThe initial sideline test was the Sage sign for PCL stabilityLooks bad. Probably long term if not season. ACL or PCL probably, but nothing announced.By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
Garrett doesn't seem to have any issues at all with it.DMC & Randle have 18 carries for 49 yards.
Tough to argue with that type of production.
5 of his 8 NFL seasons have been below 4 YPC, usually by a comfortable margin. He is quite bad and almost always has been.Better a has been than a never wasHe was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Quite bad is hardly seeing the field in 3 years.5 of his 8 NFL seasons have been below 4 YPC, usually by a comfortable margin. He is quite bad and almost always has been.Better a has been than a never wasHe was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Did you mean 5 of his 8 seasons had less than 4 games played?5 of his 8 NFL seasons have been below 4 YPC, usually by a comfortable margin. He is quite bad and almost always has been.Better a has been than a never wasHe was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
He comes out-of-the-box Contra code activated.I'm beginning to wonder why they even activated him if this was their "plan" for him.
Maybe he has an aura like the character in a moba computer game. C-Mike's presence on the battlefield causes +15 strength, +15 speed, and +15 agility to all allied warriors within a 100 yard radius.
When I test, I test the PCL first, So it's possible and likely they tested all the ligaments. The injury itself looked more ACL related in my medical opinion by using my eyes onlyYa he tore his PCL 2 years ago... not sure if its the same knee or not.Winner winnerThe initial sideline test was the Sage sign for PCL stabilityLooks bad. Probably long term if not season. ACL or PCL probably, but nothing announced.By the way, I was doing some studying with my high schooler. What happened to Dunbar? Multi-week/season ender or just out of the game? He'd been a pretty nice PPR back for me in all 3 of my leagues.Wow, that is lucky hahaDon't worry, guess what I did. I changed it to Dunbar and didn't hit submit. Randle still starting for me. I put my kids to bed, went back to the paused game and watched the 45 yarder by Dunbar and was all excited only to see that Dunbar didn't seem to be in my lineup. LOL, Randle still needs 1.3 points.I apologize bugs.Deamon said:yeah, easy call. Should get 9.9 out of dunbar.ATB said:In PPR, I'd go Dunbar for sure.stbugs said:Crap, was hoping he'd stay inactive so I could plug in Randle and not worry about it. I need 9.9 in PPR for the win with Randle, Dunbar and Michael available to play. I have Randle in, but wondering about Dunbar with the mess.
That said, that OL just doesn't look the same as last year at all. The Saints aren't a good run D and they have guys blowing up the plays. I know Randle isn't a great RB, but he is getting hit behind the LOS a bunch. I think they need to mix up their play calling run-wise. They just seem really predictable this year almost like they assume their OL will win the battle and just need to run basic plays.
Sad, because he got 17 tickets for this game for his whole family to come watch (including his grandma who has never seen him play live). Gotta suck for them to see that.
They activated him for depth. The notion that he was going to get 5-20 touches was completely absurd. It's amazing how blind people can become to "their" players.I'm beginning to wonder why they even activated him if this was their "plan" for him.
Maybe he has an aura like the character in a moba computer game. C-Mike's presence on the battlefield causes +15 strength, +15 speed, and +15 agility to all allied warriors within a 100 yard radius.
Oh no you didn't.Better a has been than a never wasHe was good 8 years ago.Why is McFadden getting any snaps over Michael.
Depth? You don't need to dress 4 RBs. Especially if you're not even gonna use the fourth guy. If they activated whitehead they wouldn't be so thin at receiver.They activated him for depth. The notion that he was going to get 5-20 touches was completely absurd. It's amazing how blind people can become to "their" players.I'm beginning to wonder why they even activated him if this was their "plan" for him.
Maybe he has an aura like the character in a moba computer game. C-Mike's presence on the battlefield causes +15 strength, +15 speed, and +15 agility to all allied warriors within a 100 yard radius.
Are you suggesting that it's normal for teams to dress a 4th RB for "depth" when said RB doesn't play special teams?They activated him for depth. The notion that he was going to get 5-20 touches was completely absurd.It's amazing how blind people can become to "their" players.I'm beginning to wonder why they even activated him if this was their "plan" for him.
Maybe he has an aura like the character in a moba computer game. C-Mike's presence on the battlefield causes +15 strength, +15 speed, and +15 agility to all allied warriors within a 100 yard radius.