Who funds the U.S. soccer team?Disrespecting the taxpayers? Seriously?
Who funds the U.S. soccer team?Disrespecting the taxpayers? Seriously?
That's what is says. SeriouslyDisrespecting the taxpayers? Seriously?
I’m genuinely confused. What taxpayer money goes to the US Women’s Soccer Team?That's what is says. Seriously
Maybe you can explain. Sorry, didn’t realize it originated with you.Bingo. Massive hypocrisy. All expenses paid trip to play a game then turn around and disrespect many of the taxpayers that enable her to do so.
A real protest would have been to decline the invitation to play for the U.S. at all. Not take the candy and then b**ch about where it came from.
Can you point me to the taxpayer money in their financial statements?Who funds the U.S. soccer team?
So not taxpayer funded. Guess that argument is out the window.
Of course, keeping in mind that the US Olympic Committee (which is less than 1% of US Soccer’s total funding anyway) does not take federal funding.
I’m sure those people were all in behind Kaepernick when he was protesting.Remember that this thread was started because Kappy knelt during the anthem to protest police violence. A peaceful protest.
Reddit ‘Quarantines’ Pro-Trump Subreddit Over Anti-Police Threats
/r/the_donald is absolutely the most depressing place on the internet.Remember that this thread was started because Kappy knelt during the anthem to protest police violence. A peaceful protest.
Reddit ‘Quarantines’ Pro-Trump Subreddit Over Anti-Police Threats
Throwing their Nike and Keurigs at him.I’m sure those people were all in behind Kaepernick when he was protesting.
I'm past middle age, old now. I am translucent, not white. I like lesbians, my reasons will remain my own.He y is this the thread where a bunch of middle class, middle aged white dudes tell lesbians how they should feel about their place in American society?
Do you have half a dozen kids too?I'm past middle age, old now. I am translucent, not white. I like lesbians, my reasons will remain my own.
There’s only one?He y is this the thread where a bunch of middle class, middle aged white dudes tell lesbians how they should feel about their place in American society?
“Lesbianic reasons”?Rapinoe is one of the lesbianic reasons I don't support, financially or politically, Title IX or professional women's sports. There. Been said.
Lesbianism often times concerns itself sociopolitically and immediately. Generally, I find it to my detriment. Therefore, I generally don't support the political aspirations of either radical feminism or lockstep sociopolitical lesbianism.“Lesbianic reasons”?
Why is lesbianism to your detriment?Lesbianism often times concerns itself sociopolitically and immediately. Generally, I find it to my detriment. Therefore, I generally don't support the political aspirations of either radical feminism or lockstep sociopolitical lesbianism.
Not lesbianism. Its political wing, as expressed through the typical identity politics of the day.Why is lesbianism to your detriment?
Why is the political wing of lesbianism (whatever that means) to your detriment?Not lesbianism. Its political wing, as expressed through the typical identity politics of the day.
Lesbianism often times concerns itself sociopolitically and immediately. Generally, I find it to my detriment. Therefore, I generally don't support the political aspirations of either radical feminism or lockstep sociopolitical lesbianism.
I see. Lesbianism but not lesbianism. Sounds very complex.Not lesbianism. Its political wing, as expressed through the typical identity politics of the day.
I seem to remember something about "liberty and justice for all" as an American value. Sometimes we've fallen short of that standard. A lot of conservatives don't seem to think that peope who point that out are good Americans.I would interpret her comments as supportive of her country, except when it falls short of its obligations under its foundational principals. She is not supportive of falling short.
Their influence on the fashion industry?Why is the political wing of lesbianism (whatever that means) to your detriment?
I associate lesbianism with its inevitable political manifestation, which is generally identity-driven and places men's concerns as a distant second to their own advocacy.I see. Lesbianism but not lesbianism. Sounds very complex.
It’s possible you just don’t like something that you associate with lesbians and you’ve decided to oppose lesbians because of that thing that you associate with lesbians.
Because I have to be honest, I’m pretty confused why Rapinoe (and I’m assuming you mean just Megan) is a reason to not support Title IX and professional women’s sports. .
"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" finds itself manifest inappropriately in all sorts of normative behavior and especially and most tangibly, family law. I need lesbians like I need a hole in my head. They have no use for me. I have no use for them.Why is the political wing of lesbianism (whatever that means) to your detriment?
It can be done is a respectful manner. But when someone is being intentionally disrespectful and I have no idea why people try to spin that as respectful.I seem to remember something about "liberty and justice for all" as an American value. Sometimes we've fallen short of that standard. A lot of conservatives don't seem to think that peope who point that out are good Americans.
Not yet. I intend to be like Tony Randall or James Doohan, fathering kids into my dotage.Do you have half a dozen kids too?
I bit less "doughy". Oh, and not a ginger. Close to a ginger, freckled as a young kid, but they faded, and not a red head.DW is Jim Gaffigan?
She doesn't put her hand over her heart and won't sing during the National Anthem -AND- she's a lesbian. No true American could admire a person like that.I’ve been reading this woman’s bio:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_Rapinoe
She’s pretty remarkable. Besides being one of the very best ever at her sport, she was an honor student all through high school and college. Her philanthropy work is off the charts. Pretty proud that she’s from California (Foothill High School, though her college was Portland University.) Sounds like someone to truly admire.
It is easy to think you 'win' arguements when you completely mischaracterize or ignore the real point.She doesn't put her hand over her heart and won't sing during the National Anthem -AND- she's a lesbian. No true American could admire a person like that.
Yesterday, it amazed him anyone spent more than 10 seconds on this topic. Yet here he is posting and posting and posting about it. Strange turn of events.It is easy to think you 'win' arguements when you completely mischaracterize or ignore the real point.
That quote is from Gloria Steinem, a lifelong proud heterosexual (in fact she’s married to Christian Bale’s dad.) it wasn’t a rejection of men but of the idea of need."A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" finds itself manifest inappropriately in all sorts of normative behavior and especially and most tangibly, family law. I need lesbians like I need a hole in my head. They have no use for me. I have no use for them.
In general.
It didn't take me more than 10 seconds to make up my mind that this was a silly thing to be bothered with. I just pop in here and occasionally respond to people that get butt-hurt over goofy things like this. Thanks for noticing.Yesterday, it amazed him anyone spent more than 10 seconds on this topic. Yet here he is posting and posting and posting about it. Strange turn of events.
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/755362-colin-kaepernick-thread-and-related-anthem-kneeling-issuesnews/?do=findComment&comment=21980913
Never knew this.in fact she’s married to Christian Bale’s dad
I am not trying to win any arguments. There is nothing I can say that is going to make you change your mind.It is easy to think you 'win' arguements when you completely mischaracterize or ignore the real point.
I know who said it and who she was married to. I was talking about who adopted it and what it meant. It's not the exact quote or who exactly said it -- it's the sentiment.That quote is from Gloria Steinem, a lifelong proud heterosexual (in fact she’s married to Christian Bale’s dad.) it wasn’t a rejection of men but of the idea of need.
In any case I still don’t understand what you’re getting at. What is inappropriate? What about family law bothers you? And what has Rapinoe in particular ever said or done that makes you think she is anti-man?
My daughter prefers pockets on her pants.Their influence on the fashion industry?
Well I think you misunderstand the sentiment.I know who said it and who she was married to. I was talking about who adopted it and what it meant. It's not the exact quote or who exactly said it -- it's the sentiment.
Again...first kneeling wasn't respectful...now not only must someone stand, they must put their hand on their heart and sing.It can be done is a respectful manner. But when someone is being intentionally disrespectful and I have no idea why people try to spin that as respectful.
That's a wild mischaracterization of my opinions of your average lesbian's politics.I see that rockaction does not approve much of women who are strong and independent.
The points he talked about have been made in this thread. Some are upset with her not putting her hand on her heart and singing...at least one was upset about her being a lesbian (at least politically and as to why he wouldn't support Title IX).It is easy to think you 'win' arguements when you completely mischaracterize or ignore the real point.
Maybe but you’re not trying very hard to characterize them yourself. You still haven’t been specific about what you don’t like.That's a wild mischaracterization of my opinions of your average lesbian's politics.
I would say it's a very common trait that lesbians who are in the headlines have, right? The ones who get criticized the most. What is it that bothers you so much about them?That's a wild mischaracterization of my opinions of your average lesbian's politics.