Here's an outcome that I am not sure about. I caught up with the post-HS career of one of the kids my son played with and against in basketball for 10 years. He ended up playing a post-graduate year at a prep school and then 4 years at a D-II college as a bench player. He averaged 8 minutes of playing time in 80 games averaging a little over 1 ppg. I'm guessing he may have gotten some sort of scholarship for his freshman year, but his playing time actually dipped over the years and generally only played in garbage time. Not sure how the scholarship stuff works, maybe others can chime in as to what the chances were that this kid got a free ride
Back in the day, I loved watching my kid play, but that's 5 years devoted to basketball that I'm not sure I would have been thrilled with in terms of role and playing time. How would you feel if your kid ended up in a similar situation (let's set the parameters at a partial scholarship at a D-II school with limited playing time and never starting)? I get it, we all love are kids and would support them no matter what, but would you feel some sense of disappointment with your kid not getting much playing time?
Wouldn't be disappointed in my child at all. I'm not at practices or know the full story. Maybe that money really enabled them to attend. The only time I get "upset" if it's completely obvious a kid should not be on the floor/field when you know they shouldn't be . But that is with the coach. .
If they love being on the team and that's all that matters
Agree. If they are having a great college experience and made some life long brotherhood or sisterhood friends playing sports together regardless of playing time…..it’s all good.
For 99.5% of college athletes who do not turn pro, their chosen sport is character building, life lessons. Any future employer (or if they create their own business) that sees former collegiate athlete….moves you to the front of the line. They know you had to be:
1. Disciplined
2. Dependable
3. Able to recover quickly from set backs
4. Able to over come adversity
5. Able to to be a great team player
6. Able to set goals and acheive.
So much good comes from being a college athlete regardless of the gratification of playing time.
Again if your student athlete loves their team, teammates and coaches and is ok with whatever role they earned…..it’s all a win/win in life.
With the player I mentioned, it wasn't as holistic or happy go lucky. The player and my son played the same position for years on an AAU team. The coach played the other player a ton against mediocre teams in pool games, and my son played max minutes against top teams in knockout play. The parents of the other player berated the coach relentlessly as he wasn't getting enough exposure. For a big regional tournament, the coach succumbed to the pressure and switched their roles. They ended up getting destroyed (with my son on the bench). Ultimately, we ended up getting asked to leave the team. (We didn't care that much, as there are only 1,000 AAU teams to pick from). This set up battles among HS teams and other AAU teams between the two kids that were teammates for years. That family convinced coaches moving forward to have their kid play as many minutes and take as many shots as possible to pad his stats (both HS and AAU). I remember an article where his HS team ran up the score against a 1-win team so he could score 50 points in a 70-point blowout.
The father was a D-I starter at a Big 10 college and was hell bent on his kid taking the same path. His son was talented as a 3-point shooter, but he wasn't a great ball handler and despite being tall wasn't a great defender. When the son didn't get enough exposure or offers after his senior year in HS, the dad had him play a post-grad year to up his stock and visibility. That didn't get them what they wanted either. The son ended up signing a letter of intent at a D-II school. As already mentioned, that didn't how they expected. I am sure they looked at having him transfer, but there weren't better places that were interested.
I haven't spoken to the parents in a while, but my sense is they convinced their kid he would be a star. I do know the son liked being the primary player on his teams, but he sulked and really wasn't interested in being a role player. I can't speak to whether he loved his college teammates and liked the camaraderie, but my guess is he probably didn't. Last I ran into someone who knew the dad, he mentioned the father said the coach wasn't using his kid right, but he would dominate once they made him a starter (which never happened). I do know that the son would have picked other places to go to college if he was "just a student."
To summarize, it appears that the parents and the kid thought he would be a bigger deal than he was. Whether that got them some scholarship money, who knows. But IMO, the son spent the past 5 years focusing on a basketball dream that may have meant more to the parents than the player . . . and I am not sure the son loved only seeing spotty minutes at the end of blowouts.