What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Covid and School This Fall (3 Viewers)

Texas is a complete mess.  Football is so important to the small towns.  That looks very unlikely to go at all.  

I'm predicting no in person school until 2021 at this rate.  There simply is no workable plan.  
I drove to Texas two years ago to watch local small town Texas football games.  High school, middle school.  I was not one of those people that ever "got it" about how Texas football at that level is a religion of sorts but I'll tell you, once I went,I saw.  I understood.  It's like the entire fabric that holds these communities together and makes them what they are. 

 
Of course.  I don't blame anyone for being concerned for their health right now and that's their decision to make.  However, their decision not to teach in the school, which is what they are compensated for, is going to affect a lot of children and families in a negative way.  There should be a significant decrease in their salaries if they refuse to return or only want to teach virtually, and those dollars should be used to support the families who rely on the school year for their own financial well being.  

Members of my staff did not return to work.  They obviously aren't being compensated and rightfully so.  I've offered a telehealth option for staff who wants to stay home at a reduced salary as their production will not be equivalent to someone who is in clinic. 

Teachers should be treated the exact same way.  They fight constantly for their benefits and wages.  To be treated as an "essential" profession.  They can't have it both ways.  Get to work just like the rest of us have to.
It's actually illegal for teachers to strike in several states so they don't have that unilateral discretion some may think. 

In those states, the teachers are actually at the mercy of whatever is decided.  In Georgia, they have to go back and mask wearing is optional, social distancing is NOT promised, classes that were already crowded are NOT promised to be reduced unless parents hold their kids out and it happens naturally, and, of course, there are no funds earmarked for PPE, cleaning, etc.  

This is not as cute and dried as stated.  In locations where unions do have power as you mention (and they do in some places), you have to consider that not all of them get paid if they don't work and that is maybe (I don't claim to know for sure everywhere but I know the discussions locally), a very small portion of the conversation.  The conversations are entengled on many community issues.  On top of the obvious economy and education and socialization to our children issues, they are talking about things like

-risking infection to kids and their families vs. not having kids able to attend school and have a decent meal that day.

-if school is out, there is definitely no pay for the non-union workers (bus drivers, classroom assistants, custodians, etc, etc)

-the ability to teach if class is not in person because many, many areas don't have community broadband that allows decent distance teaching and learning.  

-the challenges to parents with children with special needs.  Beyond the obvious of the additional challenges of teaching these children, things like physical therapy, speech therapy, respite for parents, etc is in tatters right now. 

I'll be honest, I'm in this discussion every day and I waffle on it because nobody havps a silver bullet proposal and everybody has an ox that is getting gored on it in one way or another.  It's not simple and it's certainly not a simple issue of a bunch of teachers thinking they are on easy Street and knocking down a paycheck if class is not in session.  

 
Can you unpack that?
Suggestions that schools/teachers take a pay cut if they have to teach remotely indicates to me that the person making the suggestion isn't really interested in quality of education - they're more concerned with having a place to dump their kids while they work.

 
We had a zoom meeting with our wonderful elementary school principal this afternoon.

Still very few answers about specifics, but he voiced his support of 100% remote for two main reasons: best way of guaranteeing kids and staff safety, he doesn't see the curriculum/educational efficiency  of the kids going in school 5-7 days a month (which is what it's looking like) as part of the hybrid system. He also pointed out that many of the low income kids weren't able to get as much done remotely due to a variety of issues that don't seem fixable.

Times ticking away- were supposed to pick our choice by August 7 and there aren't answers to most of the questions we all have that would help us make this awful choice.

 
Our Southwestern PA school district is going back in person with the option of remote learning. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We had a zoom meeting with our wonderful elementary school principal this afternoon.

Still very few answers about specifics, but he voiced his support of 100% remote for two main reasons: best way of guaranteeing kids and staff safety, he doesn't see the curriculum/educational efficiency  of the kids going in school 5-7 days a month (which is what it's looking like) as part of the hybrid system. He also pointed out that many of the low income kids weren't able to get as much done remotely due to a variety of issues that don't seem fixable.

Times ticking away- were supposed to pick our choice by August 7 and there aren't answers to most of the questions we all have that would help us make this awful choice.
I was able to see the issues of distance learning first-hand this spring in regards to the limitations of learning, especially with kids with special needs, with limited internet availability, decent meals for some kids, social risks, psychological impacts,etc. The list is loooong.  

There's almost no way to find a good choice but the more it goes on, the closer it gets without a good-laid out plan, I favor holding kids out from live education.  Israel opened their schools and saw some serious spikes.  It's not the same but if you're looking for comparisons, that's about as close as we have.  

It seems like less exposure is the least likely choice for potential exposure to the virus.  When you think of the unknown transmission likelihood in school, and you think about how about 30% of educators are 50+ in many areas and they have parents and etc,etc to concern with, it just seems like one of those situations where if there are three possible outcomes here, at least two are potentially bad and one is less bad than the other two....

 
Our Southwestern PA school district is going back in person with the option of remote learning. 
Any idea of how many are opting for remote?  Many areas are reaching out to parents and are able tomgive an idea of how their communities are thinking. ,

 
Any idea of how many are opting for remote?  Many areas are reaching out to parents and are able tomgive an idea of how their communities are thinking. ,
Our school sent out a questionnaire asking for input on how to proceed. 83% wanted to send the kids back at least on a hybrid (mix of online and in person) basis. Our school couldn’t find workable solutions to the hybrid schedule. 

 
Suggestions that schools/teachers take a pay cut if they have to teach remotely indicates to me that the person making the suggestion isn't really interested in quality of education - they're more concerned with having a place to dump their kids while they work.
Remote learning was mostly worthless. So is virtue signaling. 

 
Suggestions that schools/teachers take a pay cut if they have to teach remotely indicates to me that the person making the suggestion isn't really interested in quality of education - they're more concerned with having a place to dump their kids while they work.
Are you saying the teachers who are refusing to come in to actually teach ARE interested in quality of education?  They're interested in self preservation just like most of the rest of the population right now, and that's fine.  But, if they aren't going to do the job they're specifically paid to do why should they be compensated for it?

 
My job these next couple weeks is to get my daughter a chromebook.
I did this with the shutdown in March.  If you have an old laptop laying around, you'd be surprised at how easy it is to convert one to a chromebook.  Had one that barely ran Win7 anymore and runs android just fine (though not technically the same software that comes on a chromebook).  That was for one kid...then I got an Acer chromebook for like $350 on Best Buy I think.

 
Things are "interesting" here in Florida.  Given the national perception, I don't really understand a lot of the decision making, but that's for the Florida Politics thread.  Despite our outbreak, it's been mandated that all schools open for in person teaching 5 days a week which is a mind numbing mandate given our current situation.  There are now lawsuits around that and teachers are actually quitting if forced to go to the school.  Districts are also seemingly ignoring the mandate (or getting around it) by offering options in addition to face to face.  Our county just came out with three options...face to face, and two "online" methods...one that's at your own pace and one that is like a regular class day only via computer.  To add an extra layer, the charter schools (which my kids go to) have the ability to do what they want if their county doesn't provide something acceptable.  They have to submit a plan just like the different counties etc.  

Our county is pushing to delay the start of school to Aug 31 and the in person experience will be everyone temp checked every day, desks 3-6 feet apart, and rooms disinfected between classes (no idea how that works...I suspect lysol the desks/chairs?).  We are asked to commit to our choice for the semester and then in the spring we can change our option if circumstances change.

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2020/07/21/volusia-county-school-board-to-vote-on-reopening-plan/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Things are "interesting" here in Florida.  Given the national perception, I don't really understand a lot of the decision making, but that's for the Florida Politics thread.  Despite our outbreak, it's been mandated that all schools open for in person teaching 5 days a week which is a mind numbing mandate given our current situation.  There are now lawsuits around that and teachers are actually quitting if forced to go to the school.  Districts are also seemingly ignoring the mandate (or getting around it) by offering options in addition to face to face.  Our county just came out with three options...face to face, and two "online" methods...one that's at your own pace and one that is like a regular class day only via computer.  To add an extra layer, the charter schools (which my kids go to) have the ability to do what they want if their county doesn't provide something acceptable.  They have to submit a plan just like the different counties etc.  

Our county is pushing to delay the start of school to Aug 31 and the in person experience will be everyone temp checked every day, desks 3-6 feet apart, and rooms disinfected between classes (no idea how that works...I suspect lysol the desks/chairs?).  We are asked to commit to our choice for the semester and then in the spring we can change our option if circumstances change.

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2020/07/21/volusia-county-school-board-to-vote-on-reopening-plan/
Under the directive:

- School boards must prepare to reopen physical buildings in August for all students, full time.

- School districts cannot shift to a hybrid model, where students spend half their time in school and half at home. Every student must have the option of being in school five days per week.

- The only option for schools to not be physically open in August is if local Department of Health officials say schools cannot open.

- The DOE will not be waiving the minimum number of instructional hours for students and schools must provide all services they normally do.

In the fall, schools can offer a remote learning option in addition to in-person learning, but those plans must be approved by the state and must be far more robust than they were last spring.

Makes sense to me, but the teachers are, of course, raising HELL.

 
I did this with the shutdown in March.  If you have an old laptop laying around, you'd be surprised at how easy it is to convert one to a chromebook.  Had one that barely ran Win7 anymore and runs android just fine (though not technically the same software that comes on a chromebook).  That was for one kid...then I got an Acer chromebook for like $350 on Best Buy I think.
Yes just bought my son a Lenovo chromebook. It was over $400. The iPad wasn't cutting it for remote learning. 

 
Just some random thoughts:

1.  We continue to make a mess of this pandemic, in almost every conceivable way.

2.  It is pretty clear, to me, that we have wasted much of the time from last spring until now - in terms of understanding the spread of the virus, and the impact on children, directly and as potential carriers.

3.  I think most people expected this to have died out/down over the summer, and thus, nobody took planning seriously for the fall semester.

4.  Pushing these decisions onto parents is not a good solution.  Parents, for the most part, are among the least informed of the facts/data necessary to make a good decision.

5.  I think if you are going to force schools to open - then you need to back that up with science-based rational, in terms of the risk of local and community spread of the virus in school settings.

6.  Last spring, remote learning was a mixed-bag that depended on the resources of the teachers, students and families.  We should have been using the past few months figuring out how to address those issues - but I fear, that we will still have the same issues this fall.

7.  Infrastructure Week!  We really should be looking at a plan to roll out high-speed internet/wi-fi to every corner of the country - not as a luxury service, but as necessary as roads and bridges.  Students without internet access at home are at a major disadvantage in all times, but particularly now.

 
Our school district is going all remote to start the year with a chance to change to hybrid in a few months if things get better.  The board had a meeting on Monday and the debate went until 2am before they finally voted 4-3 for all remote versus a hybrid.  They stated that the remote planning will be far better than in the spring when it was a cluster and that it would include all subjects.  In the spring it was "hey you should do some math and some reading on this website each day, and then try to do some art or music each day" with a weekly zoom checkin, and they sent out printed packets that were way too easy (like 10+ pages of different ways to add up to 10 for my 1st grader) for people with no internet.

It seems like some other surrounding school districts are starting with hybrid and shuffling kids to different schools that have extra classroom space, or opening back up some schools that had recently closed due to combining schools together.

 
The Gator said:
7.  Infrastructure Week!  We really should be looking at a plan to roll out high-speed internet/wi-fi to every corner of the country - not as a luxury service, but as necessary as roads and bridges.  Students without internet access at home are at a major disadvantage in all times, but particularly now.
I am not sure exactly when we threw in the towel as a country but it's disappointing. If we had the same leaders and voters as we do now, we never would have built the Interstate freeway system, the Hoover Dam, brought electricity to the Tennessee Valley or cleaned up the country's drinking water.

 
We are going to hire someone to help with school stuff during the day cause we both work

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My district just announced that we will be 100% distance learning for the first quarter.   We didn’t have much of a choice due to what’s coming out of Sacramento.  Regardless, it was the absolute right decision.

As of now the plan is to go to a very modified system come the second quarter.  The modifications are complex but our district admins are breaking their backs trying to set everything up.

 
Remote learning was mostly worthless. So is virtue signaling. 
Sorry you had a bad experience with it. We didn't. I guess our anecdotal evidence cancels out. Maybe work with your school/school district to try and improve the experience?

If intimating that teachers shouldn't be forced (via threat of job loss or pay cut) into environments where they'd be exposed to this virus when remote learning is an option that has been made to work in lots of schools is virtue signalling, I guess I'm guilty.

 
Sorry you had a bad experience with it. We didn't. I guess our anecdotal evidence cancels out. Maybe work with your school/school district to try and improve the experience?

If intimating that teachers shouldn't be forced (via threat of job loss or pay cut) into environments where they'd be exposed to this virus when remote learning is an option that has been made to work in lots of schools is virtue signalling, I guess I'm guilty.
I am sure you can find some schools and I am sure you can even morph that qty into "lots". But on a relative scale finding remote learning success stories for schools is not common at all. And it pales in comparison with all of the stories of failure. 

 
@CletiusMaximus looks like your school's pretty well thought out plan got shut down by the city huh? 
Yes.  It was a bit of a bombshell announced on Friday.  I understand the decision, but the way the City handled it was very poor.  It seems the admin in the public school system knew this was coming as of June 25, but the more formal announcement (if you can call it that) wasn't widely known until last Friday.  Lots of local private schools put a ton of time and energy into formulating their plans during those few weeks.  However, both my kids' schools had three track plans - fully remote, hybrid and everyone back - so its not all for nothing.  They will all start fully remote, and hopefully we'll be in a position to move to hybrid sometime later this year or early next
So, not to bombard this thread with the cluster#### going on in my little community, but the City has now essentially said "oops, we didn't mean it."  I get it, its a very tough job and a very difficult, fluid situation, so I give them a pass on the communications on this.  Still, it has created a great amount of confusion and frustration and, for some, anger.

Milwaukee Health Department Will Allow Schools With Strong Safety Plans To Reopen

“At that point in time, June 25, we’re thinking of summer school, we’re not thinking of fall yet,” Kowalik said in a media briefing on Tuesday afternoon.


My house is right around the corner from the Mayor's house - we've had a lot of activity out here all summer, but the crowd protesting on Sunday was a bit different than the other groups we've seen.  For example, one of the groups protesting was organized by the ski team moms at my son's (all boys) school.  

 
I see the powers that be strategy to divide people and get them to fight with each other rather than with those actually in control is working rather effectively again. Unsolicited advice, anyone blaming educators for this and whatever happens over the coming months - don't engage with them. Whatever time or energy you're willing to devote to this issue put all of it towards those whose decisions have put us in this mess in the first place.

 
I am sure you can find some schools and I am sure you can even morph that qty into "lots". But on a relative scale finding remote learning success stories for schools is not common at all. And it pales in comparison with all of the stories of failure. 
I don't know what you mean by "on a relative scale." There are entire educational institutions that operate almost completely remotely, pre-dating covid. There are distance learning programs within "traditional" institutions that operate almost completely remotely, pre-dating covid. They've been successful. Certainly they're not kindergarden programs, but there are many of them across the country. The models exist, some schools were able to successfully adapt those models this past spring. Others have now had several months to prepare a distance learning approach for this coming school year.

Finding remote learning success stories isn't uncommon.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Covid in children in Orange County

The above article was posted in a local facebook group, generating discussion about return to school, etc.

Many of the responses make me just shake my head in disbelief. The sad thing is the majority of responses where along these lines:

- How many of these kids have underlying conditions?

- I don't trust ABC news.

- How convenient that this article comes out close to schools reopening, this is clearly just media bias/political.

- The tests are all fake

- The doctor in the article says he thinks schools should be open, let's go open schools  (he actually said he favored opening schools when safe to do so, and that we are not there yet)

- One quite literally said - they're testing people without symptoms, of course the numbers are going up. We should stop testing.

- Then within the thread a heated back and forth about the requirements for TB testing for some occupations came up - not really sure how it devolved into that, but basically became a pissing match of anecdotal tales like my mother's neighbor's sister does this job and didn't need a TB test to work, so you are wrong, then teachers saying it is required for their job, etc. Really odd.

All told, it actually made me really appreciate the mostly cordial, semi-educated back and forth in most of the threads here.

As a rule I don't really post anything or reply to anything on facebook (though I did pull a fact check on someone yesterday for a meme they posted, which they said thy appreciated and actually retracted their post - probably my first time posting something other than a happy birthday in the better part of a year), mainly because I don't see anything good usually coming from it.

 
Not sure if this was included in the school stuff I posted last week (don't think it was), but got this from our athletic department today, which is apparently from the guidelines the school admins have set forth as of right now... subject to daily change of course:

WITHOUT SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: If a student tests positive without symptoms, they must stay home in isolation for 14 days. They may not return to school until the mandatory 14-day isolation period elapses. If a student is positive with no symptoms, they may return 14 days after the day of testing with a required doctor's release.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITHOUT A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they are fever-free (below 100.4) for three days, and respiratory symptoms have improved.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they have completed 14 days home in isolation since the first onset of the symptoms. We require a doctor's release verifying a return to school after the aforementioned criteria are met.

IF A PARENT OR SOMEONE ELSE IN THE HOUSEHOLD OF A STUDENT TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19 OR IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING TESTED: Student(s) should quarantine for 14 days. The student may return after 14 days unless they become symptomatic with COVID-19 symptoms. Please see the above requirements in the COVID POSITIVE TEST criteria.

IF A FACULTY MEMBER TESTS POSITIVE: The faculty member will adhere to the same guidelines for COVID-19 testing/ results, as stated above. Students in their class would only need to be quarantined if they have been in close contact (inside six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with the teacher. Teachers will be instructed to wear their face covering/shield while communicating in close proximity (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with students.

GUIDELINES FOR MANDATORY QUARANTINE: If your student has a classmate that tests positive for COVID-19, they MAY need to be quarantined if they were in close contact as defined by the CDC (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes). In this scenario, not every student may require quarantine; however, any student that had close contact would be expected to stay home for fourteen days. Parents have the option to keep students home for the 14-day quarantine.

 
Not sure if this was included in the school stuff I posted last week (don't think it was), but got this from our athletic department today, which is apparently from the guidelines the school admins have set forth as of right now... subject to daily change of course:

WITHOUT SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: If a student tests positive without symptoms, they must stay home in isolation for 14 days. They may not return to school until the mandatory 14-day isolation period elapses. If a student is positive with no symptoms, they may return 14 days after the day of testing with a required doctor's release.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITHOUT A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they are fever-free (below 100.4) for three days, and respiratory symptoms have improved.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they have completed 14 days home in isolation since the first onset of the symptoms. We require a doctor's release verifying a return to school after the aforementioned criteria are met.

IF A PARENT OR SOMEONE ELSE IN THE HOUSEHOLD OF A STUDENT TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19 OR IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING TESTED: Student(s) should quarantine for 14 days. The student may return after 14 days unless they become symptomatic with COVID-19 symptoms. Please see the above requirements in the COVID POSITIVE TEST criteria.

IF A FACULTY MEMBER TESTS POSITIVE: The faculty member will adhere to the same guidelines for COVID-19 testing/ results, as stated above. Students in their class would only need to be quarantined if they have been in close contact (inside six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with the teacher. Teachers will be instructed to wear their face covering/shield while communicating in close proximity (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with students.

GUIDELINES FOR MANDATORY QUARANTINE: If your student has a classmate that tests positive for COVID-19, they MAY need to be quarantined if they were in close contact as defined by the CDC (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes). In this scenario, not every student may require quarantine; however, any student that had close contact would be expected to stay home for fourteen days. Parents have the option to keep students home for the 14-day quarantine.
This seems very reasonable to me. I’m sure it would be revisited if they find it to be insufficient. 

 
Not sure if this was included in the school stuff I posted last week (don't think it was), but got this from our athletic department today, which is apparently from the guidelines the school admins have set forth as of right now... subject to daily change of course:

WITHOUT SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: If a student tests positive without symptoms, they must stay home in isolation for 14 days. They may not return to school until the mandatory 14-day isolation period elapses. If a student is positive with no symptoms, they may return 14 days after the day of testing with a required doctor's release.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITHOUT A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they are fever-free (below 100.4) for three days, and respiratory symptoms have improved.

COVID-LIKE SYMPTOMS WITH A POSITIVE TEST: Students may not return to school until they have completed 14 days home in isolation since the first onset of the symptoms. We require a doctor's release verifying a return to school after the aforementioned criteria are met.

IF A PARENT OR SOMEONE ELSE IN THE HOUSEHOLD OF A STUDENT TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID-19 OR IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING TESTED: Student(s) should quarantine for 14 days. The student may return after 14 days unless they become symptomatic with COVID-19 symptoms. Please see the above requirements in the COVID POSITIVE TEST criteria.

IF A FACULTY MEMBER TESTS POSITIVE: The faculty member will adhere to the same guidelines for COVID-19 testing/ results, as stated above. Students in their class would only need to be quarantined if they have been in close contact (inside six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with the teacher. Teachers will be instructed to wear their face covering/shield while communicating in close proximity (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes) with students.

GUIDELINES FOR MANDATORY QUARANTINE: If your student has a classmate that tests positive for COVID-19, they MAY need to be quarantined if they were in close contact as defined by the CDC (less than six feet for more than fifteen minutes). In this scenario, not every student may require quarantine; however, any student that had close contact would be expected to stay home for fourteen days. Parents have the option to keep students home for the 14-day quarantine.
My mother tested positive in tests separated by more than 3 weeks.  One size may not fit all...

 
Honestly, I would much rather be back in the classroom full-time.  That isn't an option.  My district is starting online.  We can teach from home or school, but if we are at school, we have to stay isolated in our classrooms and make sure we do not congregate or go to the office or especially eat with colleagues.

Somewhere down the line, at the whim discretion of the governor, we will move to hybrid (Group A: Mon., Tues.; Group B: Thurs, Fri.; All online when not in school). This plan stresses me out.  I'm very comfortable with digital tools, Google Classroom, the entire G-Suite, project-based learning. I've been doing it for the last three years.  But juggling an online class while engaging in-class students simultaneously seems like a logistic headache.  

My district has purchased two face masks per staff member, gloves, face shields, and cleaning supplies.  No one is allowed at school on Wednesdays, to allow for aggressive cleaning.  They are prohibiting us from using microwaves and personal refrigerators...I still don't quite understand that.  I feel anxious and off-balance, and did I mention stressed?  Teachers can request all online teaching, but they are not guaranteed a position.  

I miss the good ol' days.  😟

 
Honestly, I would much rather be back in the classroom full-time.  That isn't an option.  My district is starting online.  We can teach from home or school, but if we are at school, we have to stay isolated in our classrooms and make sure we do not congregate or go to the office or especially eat with colleagues.

Somewhere down the line, at the whim discretion of the governor, we will move to hybrid (Group A: Mon., Tues.; Group B: Thurs, Fri.; All online when not in school). This plan stresses me out.  I'm very comfortable with digital tools, Google Classroom, the entire G-Suite, project-based learning. I've been doing it for the last three years.  But juggling an online class while engaging in-class students simultaneously seems like a logistic headache.  

My district has purchased two face masks per staff member, gloves, face shields, and cleaning supplies.  No one is allowed at school on Wednesdays, to allow for aggressive cleaning.  They are prohibiting us from using microwaves and personal refrigerators...I still don't quite understand that.  I feel anxious and off-balance, and did I mention stressed?  Teachers can request all online teaching, but they are not guaranteed a position.  

I miss the good ol' days.  😟
I suspect because of multiple users touching the microwave controls and door handles of both.

 
They are my own personal appliances in my own classroom that no one else is supposed to enter.  🤷‍♀️
Quite obviously, you spit in your food and then turn on the microwave, the inner-working of which blows your spit-virus around your room.

But seriously, I'm guessing the logic is something like that.

 
Honestly, I would much rather be back in the classroom full-time.  That isn't an option.  My district is starting online.  We can teach from home or school, but if we are at school, we have to stay isolated in our classrooms and make sure we do not congregate or go to the office or especially eat with colleagues.

Somewhere down the line, at the whim discretion of the governor, we will move to hybrid (Group A: Mon., Tues.; Group B: Thurs, Fri.; All online when not in school). This plan stresses me out.  I'm very comfortable with digital tools, Google Classroom, the entire G-Suite, project-based learning. I've been doing it for the last three years.  But juggling an online class while engaging in-class students simultaneously seems like a logistic headache.  

My district has purchased two face masks per staff member, gloves, face shields, and cleaning supplies.  No one is allowed at school on Wednesdays, to allow for aggressive cleaning.  They are prohibiting us from using microwaves and personal refrigerators...I still don't quite understand that.  I feel anxious and off-balance, and did I mention stressed?  Teachers can request all online teaching, but they are not guaranteed a position.  

I miss the good ol' days.  😟
We got pretty much the same directives in my district for when/if we open up 2nd quarter.

 
Our small private elementary school is pursuing a second waiver with our local health department.    Outlined a plan for 10-student cohorts,  masks and staggered drop off times that was already approved by the county a week ago.  

They seem optimistic for in-person instruction.  We aren't holding our breath though.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just saw this from our state's interscholastic athletic association:

Practice for lower risk fall sports; Cross Country, Girls Golf, G. Swim & G. Tennis, can begin Aug 17.

Practice for Football, Boys Soccer & Volleyball can begin Sept 7.

If districts opt not to participate, a spring opportunity will be provided. Details TBD.


So if you play a sport that's been deemed higher risk, the fix is to start practices a few weeks later.

 
Just saw this from our state's interscholastic athletic association:

So if you play a sport that's been deemed higher risk, the fix is to start practices a few weeks later.
IF our football season proceeds as currently scheduled, we will have played 2 regular season games by the time you start practice.

 
Just saw this from our state's interscholastic athletic association:

So if you play a sport that's been deemed higher risk, the fix is to start practices a few weeks later.
I'm sure they're just buying time to see where the virus is by then. If worse, they'll likely cancel/postpone the high risk sports.

 
Several schools including my wife's is starting the year with teachers in classrooms streaming video to kids at home.  

Odd, but ok I guess. 

 
Several schools including my wife's is starting the year with teachers in classrooms streaming video to kids at home.  

Odd, but ok I guess. 
It gives teachers a little more access to materials and resources than the home environment may allow.  

 
Several schools including my wife's is starting the year with teachers in classrooms streaming video to kids at home.  

Odd, but ok I guess. 
In our school's presentation a couple weeks ago, the teachers noted how they didn't like teaching by sitting alone in a classroom in front of their laptop cameras.  They got some new camera systems this summer called "Swivl" which is basically a camera that sits on a stand and can move around to view the entire classroom.  The teacher holds a fob which the camera follows as the teacher moves around, and it also has the microphone.  They can also use the fob to remotely move the camera around to show a white board, or something else they are demonstrating. It can also be used to show students participating in the classroom, if/when they go to a "hybrid" situation with some kids at home and a small group of masked/distanced students in the room.  I thought is was pretty slick, and helps make the lectures a little less boring and static.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sometimes you need a big brush. Especially when the substrate is crap or hasn't been prepped properly. 
(blows out) Not trying to single you out at all, brother,  but you seem to be pretty vocal about all of this...and I understand...but this post is really for everyone. 

This whole thing does not have to be adversarial.  It should be not “us vs them”.  I know it is a cliche but WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER.  This is true when it comes to education period but now more than ever.

THIS SUCKS.  Everything about this pandemic sucks.  Everything.  But let us stick to education.  It sucks for every kid, every family, every person involved in education...from the superintendents down to the yard duty aides.  I can’t speak for every educator in America but NOBODY wants this.  

First of all...what we all saw back in the spring wasn’t really a good example of “distance learning”.  It was an emergency response to a crisis that nobody was prepared for.  We haven’t had a pandemic in the US for over 100 years.  The idea that schools could be shut down for months at a time just wasn’t a concept we had to consider.  We were caught off guard.  Feel free to point fingers but it is what it is.  

to be continued

 
In our school's presentation a couple weeks ago, the teachers noted how they didn't like teaching by sitting alone in a classroom in front of their laptop cameras.  They got some new camera systems this summer called "Swivl" which is basically a camera that sits on a stand and can move around to view the entire classroom.  The teacher holds a fob which the camera follows as the teacher moves around, and it also has the microphone.  They can also use the fob to remotely move the camera around to show a white board, or something else they are demonstrating. It can also be used to show students participating in the classroom, if/when they go to a "hybrid" situation with some kids at home and a small group of masked/distanced students in the room.  I thought is was pretty slick, and helps make the lectures a little less boring and static.
I just looked up this Swivl system and read a little on it.  It does look like it would be very useful especially for a situation where some students are in the room and some remote.  I naturally move around the room a ton during class.  One of my biggest fears is that I am going to be slave to a static camera and will have to continuously manipulate it throughout the class period.  That will certainly distract from whatever we are trying to do and put significant limitations on lesson structure to accommodate both the in class and at home crowd simultaneously.  The price tag on the basic starter set is $1262.  Did your school set up every teacher with this system?  That would be a pretty significant expenditure.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just looked up this Swivl system and read a little on it.  It does look like it would be very useful especially for a situation where some students are in the room and some remote.  I naturally move around the room a ton during class.  One of my biggest fears is that I am going to be slave to a static camera and will have to continuously manipulate it throughout the class period.  That will certainly distract from whatever we are trying to do and put significant limitations on lesson structure to accommodate both the in class and at home crowd simultaneously.  The price tag on the basic starter set is $1262.  Did your school set up every teacher with this system?  That would be a pretty significant expenditure.
I’m not sure how many they bought. Maybe not one for every classroom, but they did push this tech as one of the features of the fall plan. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top