It appears they're doing everything okay, but years of incompetence from the Yorks have given me loads of skepticism.Why? What are or aren't they doing?I'm a Niner fan who's putting more blame on SF's management than most.
They're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.Why? What are or aren't they doing?I'm a Niner fan who's putting more blame on SF's management than most.
if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
I'm not really understanding the point. Are you faulting them for not signing a guy who demands to be paid outside his slot, or faulting them for selecting the one guy who would demand that? I totally disagree with the first option. While I marginally agree with the 2nd option it is hard to fault a team for taking a talent that slid in the draft.As a person who could not care less about Crabtree or the 49ers, I welcome the outcome whereCrabtree goes back into the 2010 draft and getstaken after Benn, Bryant and LaFell. He should go even lower than most think after pulling this stunt over top 10 moneuy. God knows what he would do getting drafted at 25, or worse yet in the 2nd round.But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
That's a 'rick' statement if I have ever heard one. No, you have no idea what that means. Only one other on this board can understand the comedy of that one.But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?I'm not really understanding the point. Are you faulting them for not signing a guy who demands to be paid outside his slot, or faulting them for selecting the one guy who would demand that? I totally disagree with the first option. While I marginally agree with the 2nd option it is hard to fault a team for taking a talent that slid in the draft.As a person who could not care less about Crabtree or the 49ers, I welcome the outcome whereCrabtree goes back into the 2010 draft and getstaken after Benn, Bryant and LaFell. He should go even lower than most think after pulling this stunt over top 10 moneuy. God knows what he would do getting drafted at 25, or worse yet in the 2nd round.But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
But then this thread would be about Crabtree and another team.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?I'm not really understanding the point. Are you faulting them for not signing a guy who demands to be paid outside his slot, or faulting them for selecting the one guy who would demand that? I totally disagree with the first option. While I marginally agree with the 2nd option it is hard to fault a team for taking a talent that slid in the draft.As a person who could not care less about Crabtree or the 49ers, I welcome the outcome whereCrabtree goes back into the 2010 draft and getstaken after Benn, Bryant and LaFell. He should go even lower than most think after pulling this stunt over top 10 moneuy. God knows what he would do getting drafted at 25, or worse yet in the 2nd round.But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
I don't disagree with that. But its just a failure of the process. As a Vike fan I'm painfully reminded of the year the Vikes drafted Bryant McKinney and he did not sign until the 8th week, if I recall right. Maybe there is some due diligence expected as to the signability of players, but Crabtree is far from the first draftee who has slid in the draft and I don't think an NFL team operating in the slotting system would be reasonably expected to smell out that a guy is unsignable before actual negotiations begin. If SF had not drafted him at 10, certainly some other team would have pounced on him shortly after that and would be equally exposed to ridicule. I don't think anyone would expect that Crabtree would go completely undrafted due to signability questions. It stinks for SF, but they took the chance drafting talent and are, as I understand, only insisting Crabtree fit into the slotting system. Hard to fault them for that. At some point Crabtree will cave like they all do, and the league and its 'negotiable slotting system' will be better off because they toed the line.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?I'm not really understanding the point. Are you faulting them for not signing a guy who demands to be paid outside his slot, or faulting them for selecting the one guy who would demand that? I totally disagree with the first option. While I marginally agree with the 2nd option it is hard to fault a team for taking a talent that slid in the draft.As a person who could not care less about Crabtree or the 49ers, I welcome the outcome whereCrabtree goes back into the 2010 draft and getstaken after Benn, Bryant and LaFell. He should go even lower than most think after pulling this stunt over top 10 moneuy. God knows what he would do getting drafted at 25, or worse yet in the 2nd round.But none of the other first rounders did.if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
it would be about another team who made a mistake by drafting CrabtreeThere's no question the 49ers made a mistake here. At a minimum, they took a risk and lost, at least for now.But then this thread would be about Crabtree and another team.![]()
I was referring to Crabtree's cousin and "adviser", David Wells. His influence could be debated.As for Eugene Parker, it's quite possible he could be using the Crabtree situation (slipping down in the draft) as an opportunity to shake up the traditional "salary follows draft pick" paradigm. If he successfully got #7 money for Crabtree, it would be just like proving a case in court - agents could point to that next year as substantiation for THEIR client to do the same thing.As mentioned earlier, Eugene Parker is a well respected agent.This is it right here.Stoopid does as stoopid is advised.- he is heavily influenced by an advisor who may not necessarily have his best interest in mind
Allison Dubois, did you dream this?it would be about another team who made a mistake by drafting CrabtreeThere's no question the 49ers made a mistake here. At a minimum, they took a risk and lost, at least for now.But then this thread would be about Crabtree and another team.![]()
Demanding lots of money is a negotiating ploy. The way negotiation works is, you ask for more than you'll accept, you offer less than you'll be willing to pay, and you work out something in the middle. I'm sure there are plenty of teams which would have signed Crabtree by now; the Yorks are cheapskates and terrible managers.But then this thread would be about Crabtree and another team.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?![]()
The deadline for trading rights to unsigned draft picks has passed.Maybe mentioned earlier but I don't understand why they are not trading away their rights to Crabtree. Surely other teams are calling about this since other teams could sign him, no?
The trade deadline for unsigned draft picks was in August.Maybe mentioned earlier but I don't understand why they are not trading away their rights to Crabtree. Surely other teams are calling about this since other teams could sign him, no?
Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
Agreed. The pick amde sense where they took him, and everyone applauded it.And really agree that the 49ers can't break the slotting system to sign him. That can of worms can never be opened.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
Exactly. I don't understand why the player's union isn't involved here as well. Sure they want to see Crabtree get all he can, but at the same time, he needs to be paid in line with the rest of the draft or else future drafts will be filled with Crabtrees. I hope he sits out personally.Agreed. The pick amde sense where they took him, and everyone applauded it.And really agree that the 49ers can't break the slotting system to sign him. That can of worms can never be opened.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
Obviously, this thing is Crabtree's fault, but I can't agree with this excuse. I actually think someone could and at least a few teams did. Him being a colossal dumb ### is the reason he was available at 10. Mangini, among others, has essentially stated that he would've been interested in Crabtree the player if not for Crabtree the person.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
BS. There have been plenty of guys who have had character issues and ended up slipping, while the number who have threatened to sit out a year is miniscule. Crabtree isn't holding out because he got drafted at 10; he wants more money because DHB got drafted at 7. If Oakland goes in any other position direction, this isn't an issue.Obviously, this thing is Crabtree's fault, but I can't agree with this excuse. I actually think someone could and at least a few teams did. Him being a colossal dumb ### is the reason he was available at 10. Mangini, among others, has essentially stated that he would've been interested in Crabtree the player if not for Crabtree the person.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
That's correct. Neither WR is worth a crap. The only difference right now is that DHB is getting to showcase his lack of skills.BS. There have been plenty of guys who have had character issues and ended up slipping, while the number who have threatened to sit out a year is miniscule. Crabtree isn't holding out because he got drafted at 10; he wants more money because DHB got drafted at 7. If Oakland goes in any other position direction, this isn't an issue.Obviously, this thing is Crabtree's fault, but I can't agree with this excuse. I actually think someone could and at least a few teams did. Him being a colossal dumb ### is the reason he was available at 10. Mangini, among others, has essentially stated that he would've been interested in Crabtree the player if not for Crabtree the person.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
I read today that John Riggins sat out a year.has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
Bo Jackson did, albeit under different circumstances. He went 1st overall in 86, but the Bucs didn't offer him enough money and didn't want him to play baseball. The Raiders drafted him in the 7th round in 87, worked out pretty good for them.has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
bo jackson comes to mindas there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
WR wise i know mike williams was forced to sit out a year because the NCAA ruled him to be ineligible ... so he sat a year, and re-entered the draft.... we know what happend with him...has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
Crabtree is a total moron for holding out.......but to say he is not worth a crap as a WR shows how little you know about football.....FavreCo said:That's correct. Neither WR is worth a crap. The only difference right now is that DHB is getting to showcase his lack of skills.RUSF18 said:BS. There have been plenty of guys who have had character issues and ended up slipping, while the number who have threatened to sit out a year is miniscule. Crabtree isn't holding out because he got drafted at 10; he wants more money because DHB got drafted at 7. If Oakland goes in any other position direction, this isn't an issue.cheese said:Obviously, this thing is Crabtree's fault, but I can't agree with this excuse. I actually think someone could and at least a few teams did. Him being a colossal dumb ### is the reason he was available at 10. Mangini, among others, has essentially stated that he would've been interested in Crabtree the player if not for Crabtree the person.Well, I am a 49ers, and I am unhappy that my team may wind up without a first round pick this year; however just because they made a mistake drafting Michael Crabtree doesn't mean they need to compound it by meeting his ridiculous demands. And, yes, hindsight being 20-20 they'd have been better off drafting virtually anyone else, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen what a colossal dumb ### this kid turned out to be.If I was a fan of the 49ers, I'd be very unhappy that my team didn't have a first round pick this year. They'd have been much better off drafting someone like Orakpo, no?
I think that was an old comment (or put out of context) if I am not mistaken. Can anyone confirm that was recent?Crabtree just now on ESPNews, "asking" Lou Holtz a question: "What should a player do when dealing with an agent?".![]()
Maybe, overrule his decision?
Not to change the subject, but Bo's holdout in 86 had nothing to do with money. The Bucs ruined his last year of NCAA baseball eligibility. Bo told them that he would never play for them because of it and not to draft him.As to Crabtree... everything that could be said has already been. This kid is losing a ton of money.Bo Jackson did, albeit under different circumstances. He went 1st overall in 86, but the Bucs didn't offer him enough money and didn't want him to play baseball. The Raiders drafted him in the 7th round in 87, worked out pretty good for them.has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
Kelly Stouffer sat out the '87 season for the St. Louis Cardinals after they drafted him 6th overall. He never played with them and they traded his rights to Seattle the next year.has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
From Maiocco:Is this a sign that Crabtree does not agree with agent Eugene Parker's handling of the contract situation with the 49ers?I think that was an old comment (or put out of context) if I am not mistaken. Can anyone confirm that was recent?Crabtree just now on ESPNews, "asking" Lou Holtz a question: "What should a player do when dealing with an agent?".
![]()
Maybe, overrule his decision?
See me in 3 years when Crabtree has busted out of the NFL. You won't be anywhere to be found either.Crabtree is a total moron for holding out.......but to say he is not worth a crap as a WR shows how little you know about football.....
From today's Chicago Tribune on this very subject:Kelly Stouffer knows what that's like. Twenty-two years ago, he was the sixth pick by the then- St. Louis Cardinals, who made the Colorado State standout the second quarterback selected -- sandwiched between No. 1 Vinny Testaverde and No. 13 Chris Miller.Kelly Stouffer sat out the '87 season for the St. Louis Cardinals after they drafted him 6th overall. He never played with them and they traded his rights to Seattle the next year.has there ever been a player sit out all year? if so how did it affect their draft stock the following year?
Disagree. If all other first rounders demaned to get money 5-7 slots above them...they all would have signed, because thats where they would have been sloted!if all the other first rounders had demanded money that players drafted 5-7 slots above them got, NONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE SIGNEDThey're not signing their first round pick, something every other team in the NFL has done this year.
A few slots? Try a few ROUNDS. Todd McShay was saying he wouldn't be surprised if Crabtree went in the 3rd round next year. For those of us who get up and go to work every morning... those of us who would KILL to have the talent this kid has, I hope he rots in his recliner and never steps foot on an NFL field.And obviously if he opts to go back into the draft in 2010 he'll be a total wild-card, a holdout with a proven bad attitude who hasn't played competitive football for a full year. Maybe he moves up a slot or two and gets that Darrius Heyward-Bey money he thinks he deserves, but it's every bit as likely he falls a few slots. Maybe more than a few.
because at this point it reflects him as a person and as a teammate. it no longer is about bargaining and haggling - its about who he is to the core and people are finding out they don't like who Crabtree is and THAT seperates it from simple dealings and trying to get a bit morehe's a rookie - he's proved nothing and has done nothing yetWhy is is that athletes who bargain aggressively are viewed as miscreants? I don't disagree that he's making a boneheaded move, but why all the vitriol?