I wondered that....like I said I didn't get a chance to catch the game and wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.Thanks!ummm it was preseason and Devery and Colston didnt play.No value here
Blood and guts, baby, blood and guts.Oh wait, that was Patton.100% totally worthless. Always has been, always will be. It's Patten for god's sake.
I would keep Henderson - although the hammy should be monitored - before Jones. My rationale for this that Favre is being asked to no pass as much; James is still 3rd, at best, behind Driver and Jennings (yes, I know he's been MIA this preseason but still...); and he's still a largely unknown rookie WR. Henderson is in a contract year. He's a 3rd year WR. He's playing in a potentially prolific offense. As a #5 WR on a roster, he's tremendous value.How much value does Henderson even have?Is he worth keeping as my 5th WR.Or am I better off picking up a guy like James Jones (if Driver is out for a few games)?
Yeah...I don't see him or Jones getting much action on my team anyway. We only have to play 2 WRs and he is behind CJ, Javon, Glenn, and Vincent Jackson.I would keep Henderson - although the hammy should be monitored - before Jones. My rationale for this that Favre is being asked to no pass as much; James is still 3rd, at best, behind Driver and Jennings (yes, I know he's been MIA this preseason but still...); and he's still a largely unknown rookie WR. Henderson is in a contract year. He's a 3rd year WR. He's playing in a potentially prolific offense. As a #5 WR on a roster, he's tremendous value.How much value does Henderson even have?Is he worth keeping as my 5th WR.Or am I better off picking up a guy like James Jones (if Driver is out for a few games)?
Always thought he had more ability than what his numbers were on the field during the regular season.He's a guy I've drafted deep in leagues in the past but not this year. He'd have to make a believer out of me before I draft him again.It's good that you check what you did though.......obviously it means a lot more during the regular season.I was going through the play by plays last night to check on McAllister (I like to do this for games that I do not get a chance to see) and I noticed that Patten had 7 targets in the 1st half last night. His final numbers were 6 for 75 yards, 1 TD.Thoughts?![]()
that's what i like to hear. keep the horse blinders on, buddy!100% totally worthless. Always has been, always will be. It's Patten for god's sake.
Thank you for affirming my post above yours. I was sure someone would post "Do you have a link to that redshirt thing"...muchos gracias!Staying on the topic of NO WRs....(Rotoworld) The New Orleans Times-Picayune believes 2007 could be a "redshirt year" for first-round pick Robert Meachem.Impact: With the way Lance Moore, David Patten, and Terrance Copper are playing behind starters Devery Henderson and Marques Colston, Meachem isn't needed. The Tennessee product has looked lost throughout the preseason.
Lucky for him that he 'cashed in' like he said he was going to do back in January. B-U-S-T.Staying on the topic of NO WRs....(Rotoworld) The New Orleans Times-Picayune believes 2007 could be a "redshirt year" for first-round pick Robert Meachem.Impact: With the way Lance Moore, David Patten, and Terrance Copper are playing behind starters Devery Henderson and Marques Colston, Meachem isn't needed. The Tennessee product has looked lost throughout the preseason.
OVER!I think he set a pretty accurate O/U for his season stats last night.
I'm not so sure the WR3 on the Saints has as much value as you think. Adding Johnson at TE might have real impact. Brees didn't have any help at the position last year. Johnson might be the weapon the offense needed more rather than another speedy WR. Based on last year's play, I happen to think the #3 WR on the team is really all about match ups. I don't think the Saints run a conventional offense because the versatility a player like Reggie allows them to have. Payton has shown himself to be pretty creative as a play caller.2. And this is what we really need to focus on. Patten is the No.3 WR on this team. What I mean by that is Patten will likely play the slot and is not really battling Henderson or Copper for playing time right now. Much the way Engram is the No.3 WR in Seattle and Burleson and Hackett are duking it out for the No.2 slot. It isn't a matter of the depth charts but more about the position. In 3 WR sets and formations you will likely see Patten on the field or Reggie Bush possibly in that slot with Deuce in the backfield. Patten has value right now.
IMO, didn't seem like Johnson had as big as a role as the TEs had last year. Once again it's only preseason.I'm not so sure the WR3 on the Saints has as much value as you think. Adding Johnson at TE might have real impact. Brees didn't have any help at the position last year. Johnson might be the weapon the offense needed more rather than another speedy WR. Based on last year's play, I happen to think the #3 WR on the team is really all about match ups. I don't think the Saints run a conventional offense because the versatility a player like Reggie allows them to have. Payton has shown himself to be pretty creative as a play caller.2. And this is what we really need to focus on. Patten is the No.3 WR on this team. What I mean by that is Patten will likely play the slot and is not really battling Henderson or Copper for playing time right now. Much the way Engram is the No.3 WR in Seattle and Burleson and Hackett are duking it out for the No.2 slot. It isn't a matter of the depth charts but more about the position. In 3 WR sets and formations you will likely see Patten on the field or Reggie Bush possibly in that slot with Deuce in the backfield. Patten has value right now.