What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dad rock tier list (1 Viewer)

Must be nice to have a Dad that liked any of that music. My Dad was born in the mid 40s and hated anything not played by a big band. All the stuff I liked (which he should have appreciated) were bands like Rolling Stones, Allman Brothers, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Cream,etc.

 
Scoresman said:
High Tier

Eagles

REO Speedwagon

Foghat

Mid Tier

The Doobie Brothers

Fleetwood Mac

Bob Seger

Crap Tier

Steely Dan

Bad Company

Frank Zappa
This is a horrible list. The high tier is possibly the worst set of groups ever put together by chimps. And what the #### is Frank Zappa doing with Bad Company and Steely Dan??? This reads like a Dan Lambskin draft list.

You should be banned from any participation, commenting, or viewing of music threads.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
Overplayed is the least of it. Gutless, ballless, boring, mild-stoner, wimpy music.

 
Scoresman said:
High Tier

Eagles

REO Speedwagon

Foghat

Mid Tier

The Doobie Brothers

Fleetwood Mac

Bob Seger

Crap Tier

Steely Dan

Bad Company

Frank Zappa
This is a horrible list. The high tier is possibly the worst set of groups ever put together by chimps. And what the #### is Frank Zappa doing with Bad Company and Steely Dan??? This reads like a Dan Lambskin draft list.

You should be banned from any participation, commenting, or viewing of music threads.
how do you know the high tier are supposed to be the "best" bands? and I've already said this is like polishing a turd.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
Overplayed is the least of it. Gutless, ballless, boring, mild-stoner, wimpy music.
I get that, but I still like them. Maybe that is just a guilty pleasure of mine. I certainly prefer them by a wide measure to the Journey, REO, Foreigner, Motley Crüe, Poison, etc.
 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.
Their peak, such as it was, was relatively short. They weren't a commercially huge band until "Hotel California" and the greatest hits albums came out in 1976. They were still an opening act for the Stones the previous year. Once "Hotel California" came out their songs started getting played everywhere. They spent the next few years doing cocaine, arguing and recording "The Long Run". And thankfully that was it for them as a creative force. They respawned in the 90s to make up for all the money they snorted but I can't remember a single song from this period. They've had tremendous popularity for 40 years due to the unwillingness of late boomers to listen to new music and the unrelenting poor taste of proto-bros.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.
Their peak, such as it was, was relatively short. They weren't a commercially huge band until "Hotel California" and the greatest hits albums came out in 1976. They were still an opening act for the Stones the previous year. Once "Hotel California" came out their songs started getting played everywhere. They spent the next few years doing cocaine, arguing and recording "The Long Run". And thankfully that was it for them as a creative force. They respawned in the 90s to make up for all the money they snorted but I can't remember a single song from this period. They've had tremendous popularity for 40 years due to the unwillingness of late boomers to listen to new music and the unrelenting poor taste of proto-bros.
I have very diverse taste and rarely lean towards the overly popular end of the music spectrum, but I do love me some Eagles. Oh well, nobody is perfect.
 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.
Their peak, such as it was, was relatively short. They weren't a commercially huge band until "Hotel California" and the greatest hits albums came out in 1976. They were still an opening act for the Stones the previous year. Once "Hotel California" came out their songs started getting played everywhere. They spent the next few years doing cocaine, arguing and recording "The Long Run". And thankfully that was it for them as a creative force. They respawned in the 90s to make up for all the money they snorted but I can't remember a single song from this period. They've had tremendous popularity for 40 years due to the unwillingness of late boomers to listen to new music and the unrelenting poor taste of proto-bros.
I have very diverse taste and rarely lean towards the overly popular end of the music spectrum, but I do love me some Eagles. Oh well, nobody is perfect.
They have some good songs that are guilty pleasures but I loathe them out of principle.

 
Top Tier - Beatles

Mid Tier - Stones

Crap Tier - Beach Boys
Beach Boys are crap? Wow, so wrong.
Best song was Kokomo, 20 yrs after their hey-day...or is it hay-day?
I'm surprised you prefer European bands that promoted drugs, sex, violence, etc. over an ultra conservative American band that promoted traditional values.
Actually, I like several BB songs...more than the Stones, but the Stones were bigger internationally.

 
Top Tier - Beatles

Mid Tier - Stones

Crap Tier - Beach Boys
Beach Boys are crap? Wow, so wrong.
Best song was Kokomo, 20 yrs after their hey-day...or is it hay-day?
I'm surprised you prefer European bands that promoted drugs, sex, violence, etc. over an ultra conservative American band that promoted traditional values.
Actually, I like several BB songs...more than the Stones, but the Stones were bigger internationally.
I didn't think you were ranking them on their world wide appeal. You calling the BB crap, seemed to make it a personal ranking.
 
Top Tier - Beatles

Mid Tier - Stones

Crap Tier - Beach Boys
Beach Boys are crap? Wow, so wrong.
Best song was Kokomo, 20 yrs after their hey-day...or is it hay-day?
I'm surprised you prefer European bands that promoted drugs, sex, violence, etc. over an ultra conservative American band that promoted traditional values.
Actually, I like several BB songs...more than the Stones, but the Stones were bigger internationally.
I didn't think you were ranking them on their world wide appeal. You calling the BB crap, seemed to make it a personal ranking.
Sorry for the confusion. Senior moment?

 
Scoresman said:
High Tier

Eagles

REO Speedwagon

Foghat

Mid Tier

The Doobie Brothers

Fleetwood Mac

Bob Seger

Crap Tier

Steely Dan

Bad Company

Frank Zappa
This is a horrible list. The high tier is possibly the worst set of groups ever put together by chimps. And what the #### is Frank Zappa doing with Bad Company and Steely Dan??? This reads like a Dan Lambskin draft list.

You should be banned from any participation, commenting, or viewing of music threads.
how do you know the high tier are supposed to be the "best" bands? and I've already said this is like polishing a turd.
Frank Zappa is not a turd - shut your whore mouth!!

 
Scoresman said:
High Tier

Eagles

REO Speedwagon

Foghat

Mid Tier

The Doobie Brothers

Fleetwood Mac

Bob Seger

Crap Tier

Steely Dan

Bad Company

Frank Zappa
This is a horrible list. The high tier is possibly the worst set of groups ever put together by chimps. And what the #### is Frank Zappa doing with Bad Company and Steely Dan??? This reads like a Dan Lambskin draft list.

You should be banned from any participation, commenting, or viewing of music threads.
how do you know the high tier are supposed to be the "best" bands? and I've already said this is like polishing a turd.
Frank Zappa is not a turd - shut your whore mouth!!
Sure thing dad

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.
Their peak, such as it was, was relatively short. They weren't a commercially huge band until "Hotel California" and the greatest hits albums came out in 1976. They were still an opening act for the Stones the previous year. Once "Hotel California" came out their songs started getting played everywhere. They spent the next few years doing cocaine, arguing and recording "The Long Run". And thankfully that was it for them as a creative force. They respawned in the 90s to make up for all the money they snorted but I can't remember a single song from this period. They've had tremendous popularity for 40 years due to the unwillingness of late boomers to listen to new music and the unrelenting poor taste of proto-bros.
What's wrong with liking what you like? Who says you have to listen to new stuff if you don't like it?

 
Of almost every topic that gets started here the music ones baffle me as much as any. There are way too many music snobs. You'd be smart to not post about any band that has been remotely popular and you know...had a few hits.

Anyone mention Crosby Stills and Nash...Kansas?

 
Lets cut to the real issue. The fact that "Dad rock" is a thing.....is amazingly stupid. Couple that with the fact that it defines a specific time frame, even more so.

 
Of almost every topic that gets started here the music ones baffle me as much as any. There are way too many music snobs. You'd be smart to not post about any band that has been remotely popular and you know...had a few hits.

Anyone mention Crosby Stills and Nash...Kansas?
Nah - If you back up your opinion with sound reasoning, you'll do fine. Throwing out baseless opinions riles up the troops.

FWIW, I like the Eagles as well as most of the bands on the OP's list.

 
Of almost every topic that gets started here the music ones baffle me as much as any. There are way too many music snobs. You'd be smart to not post about any band that has been remotely popular and you know...had a few hits.

Anyone mention Crosby Stills and Nash...Kansas?
Nah - If you back up your opinion with sound reasoning, you'll do fine. Throwing out baseless opinions riles up the troops.

FWIW, I like the Eagles as well as most of the bands on the OP's list.
I guess this is my point to an extent. It's music, and it's my opinion that I like it. I am not sure how that can be argued.

I like a ton of stuff that would get my run off this board but at the same time I like a lot of stuff that even the music snobs would approve of. I worked in a music store for years so I have a pretty broad spectrum of music that I like.

Anyway back on topic...never been a fan of Bad Company except for 1 song that I can think of right now. REO is as cheesy as they get but they represent the time they came from extremely well so I like them. Styx...Foreigner?

 
Of almost every topic that gets started here the music ones baffle me as much as any. There are way too many music snobs. You'd be smart to not post about any band that has been remotely popular and you know...had a few hits.

Anyone mention Crosby Stills and Nash...Kansas?
Nah - If you back up your opinion with sound reasoning, you'll do fine. Throwing out baseless opinions riles up the troops.

FWIW, I like the Eagles as well as most of the bands on the OP's list.
I guess this is my point to an extent. It's music, and it's my opinion that I like it. I am not sure how that can be argued.

I like a ton of stuff that would get my run off this board but at the same time I like a lot of stuff that even the music snobs would approve of. I worked in a music store for years so I have a pretty broad spectrum of music that I like.

Anyway back on topic...never been a fan of Bad Company except for 1 song that I can think of right now. REO is as cheesy as they get but they represent the time they came from extremely well so I like them. Styx...Foreigner?
Putting Steely Dan and Frank Zappa in "crap tier" wasn't a good start for the OP. May not be one's taste, but talk about throwing gasoline on a fire.

 
Framed this way, these would be granddad bands. Or homeless great-uncle. Dad rock would be Wilco and the National. Mostly mid-tempo smart stuff.

 
I don't get the Eagles hate at all. They were overplayed, but still a very good band. To compare them to REO is a joke. I know the Eagles are despised here, but the band played well, wrote solid songs and Henley was a great lead singer.
If you lived it, and couldn't get away from it, you would hate them too.
Maybe this is it. By the time I was born, the Eagles were long gone. I never had to deal with them during their peak.
same here, but the guy across the hall my freshman year in college overplayed their greatest hits album.

While I overplayed Stevie Miller's greatest hits.

I get that, but I still like them. Maybe that is just a guilty pleasure of mine. I certainly prefer them by a wide measure to the Journey, REO, Foreigner, Motley Crüe, Poison, etc.
Journey doesn't belong in that list.

 
Everyone approaches music differently. One thing I like to do is separate the musicianship from the material -- they can be reckoned separately and can offer value in music that I wouldn't choose to listen to recreationally.

For instance, my dad was also born in the 1940s. He was probably born 7 or 8 years too early to really get into the British Invasion, or the Doors, Hendrix, or anything like that. His favored style was old country-western and acts that carried on that tradition. Never was my cup of tea. At all. But over time, I grew to learn that Chet Atkins and Roy Clark were basically the Hendrix and EVH of country music, and started listening just for their guitar parts. And I could appreciate their musicianship during the piece, even if I'd never put a country record on the turntable myself.

I'd invite people who were born in the '80s and '90s to approach the British Invasion, classic rock, seminal metal, etc. in the same way. Even if you're not a fan of those sounds, it's worth it to explore the history of groundbreakers in those genres. It's also worth it, IMHO, to explore the top-end instrumentalists in those genres. You might "hate the Eagles", but Felder & Walsh's interplay on "Hotel California" is objectively skillfully rendered and is a moving piece of music divorced from the overall song itself.

Do you have to be into Journey's material to appreciate Steve Perry's vocal chops? Into Styx to appreciate Tommy Shaw and James Young's guitar work?

I know the OP carved out an exception for British bands, but I still feel like it's important to note that British Invasion bands like the Yardbirds and the Beatles were very much bulding on the sounds of American acts such as Little Richard and The Imperials. Once you check around and get a taste of the history of post-WWII popular music, you won't be so hasty to affirm that no American music transcends generations. The truth is that popular music, of any nationality, nuilds upon itself over time and carries forward even into the current cool stuff young bucks are listening to today.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scoresman said:
High Tier

Eagles

REO Speedwagon

Foghat

Mid Tier

The Doobie Brothers

Fleetwood Mac

Bob Seger

Crap Tier

Steely Dan

Bad Company

Frank Zappa
This is a horrible list. The high tier is possibly the worst set of groups ever put together by chimps. And what the #### is Frank Zappa doing with Bad Company and Steely Dan??? This reads like a Dan Lambskin draft list.

You should be banned from any participation, commenting, or viewing of music threads.
how do you know the high tier are supposed to be the "best" bands? and I've already said this is like polishing a turd.
Frank Zappa is not a turd - shut your whore mouth!!
Yeah, well his putting Zappa on that part of the list in the first place made about as much sense as you plucking Zappa off of it, while leaving Steely Dan and all their Jazz Rock awesomeness to rot with Bad Company.

Neither's to everyone's taste, but if you actually enjoy musical talent, there ought to be a tier with Zappa, Steely Dan, and the Beach Boys, and it sure as hell shouldn't be the crap one.

 
Neither's to everyone's taste, but if you actually enjoy musical talent, there ought to be a tier with Zappa, Steely Dan, and the Beach Boys, and it sure as hell shouldn't be the crap one.
Not to diss the Beach Boys as I've never been much of a fan, but you're correct in your assessment of the bolded. Today's play queue is heavy with Zappa. Some live '74, some live '70, Burnt Weenie Sandwich and Waka/Jawaka.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I nominate this for worst thread of the year
I honestly don't know what's going on in here. I'm a dad. :oldunsure:
Scoresman: As a dad who was the son of a swing era music lover- unable to reeally share anything of our respective music tastes in my formative years(mid-late '60s)- just be glad that when you become a dad you will be able to do so. No matter how "Dad Rock" your music will become to he/she, the roots that bind your respective rock genres/eras will at least be evident. If you both try.

Otherwise, GL with this silly "hate" nonsense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top