What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dallas at New orleans (1 Viewer)

Just found this thread, miss anything?
Not really. People just trying to pinpoint what is actually wrong with the Cowboys. The answer is everything.
I wonder if Jerry Jones will ever decide to hire a GM and let them run the team like the other 31 teams do. It's unreal that he's so stubborn that he thinks it's still the 90's and that he can build a team.
Why would he though? I believe it's one of the wealthiest teams so he's doing well no matter how the team does. Hiring a GM means less money for him.
Seriously. If I owned the #1 most profitable and valuable NFL franchise in the world, and I had almost limitless $ like him, you're darn right I'd have a big say in all the decisions. I'm sure it's a lot more fun that way and only 1 of 32 teams can win the SB each year anyway.

I'm sure there are better fantasy managers out there, why don't you hire them to run your fantasy teams?
because I get results and he doesn't

dallas is loltastic

 
Stills certainly makes the most of his targets
Can he ever be more than that though? Of is he the next Meech/Devry?
He might be a tad slower, but he has better WR skills than those 2. And than Mike Wallace.
Maybe, but that also seems a bit revisionist. Can he develop a midrange and short game?
He's quick, and I think he's a good route runner, so yes. He may not be physical enough to be a #1, but he doesn't need to with Graham/Sproles/Colston. He's already exceeded what Meachem/Henderson did in their first year.

 
Stills certainly makes the most of his targets
Can he ever be more than that though? Of is he the next Meech/Devry?
He might be a tad slower, but he has better WR skills than those 2. And than Mike Wallace.
Maybe, but that also seems a bit revisionist. Can he develop a midrange and short game?
He's quick, and I think he's a good route runner, so yes. He may not be physical enough to be a #1, but he doesn't need to with Graham/Sproles/Colston. He's already exceeded what Meachem/Henderson did in their first year.
Some players develop quicker/slower, some make huge strides, some peak early. Sure, Stills has had a good rookie year. Meech had a nice 2nd year with 700 yards and 9 TDs. Do you think Stills can do that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top