Danario Alexander (3 Viewers)

[Franknbeans]

Comon guys, one good week. And then this? I understand his potential but immediately plugging him in over respectable and consistent WRs is a little much. I think this is a stash and see for a week or so to see if he can recreat the same numbers. I added him from the waivers so it's not like I'm not a believer, but all this is a little much.

The dude might not stay healthy long enough to stash and see. He gets the start as my #3 WR.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

There's no room to fit this guy into my lineup, but he's moved all the way up to my #1 alternate. Go Danario, go!

Make room.

Miles AustinLarry FitzgeraldT.O.Percy Harvin (return yardage league)Roddy WhiteDanario AlexanderI start 5. I think even Otis would leave him on the bench were he running my team. I picked this kid up before last week. I dropped Manningham for him, who was himself scooped up quickly. I wish I had started Danario last week over Cribbs, but that's in the past.

Austin/Fitz/White would be my starters..I'm not typically a stats projector.. but more of a stats studier... .. I'm guessing 5 for 70-80 ... maybe a TD for DX this week...

 

[BRONG]

Starting Crayton over DX. (PPR league)

I think there's an official "mistakes I'm about to make" thread over in the shallow end of the assistant coaches forum. You should crosspost.

Otisguys.com...eh, what's one more shady shady-sounding URL for the browser history?

While I await subscription details , I'll go crosspost about this in "mistakes I'm about to make."

But I won't be posting there about starting Danario this w/end.

Try not to get too excited.

 

[Horses Mouth]

Otisguys.com...eh, what's one more shady shady-sounding URL for the browser history?

just checked godaddy. Otisguys.com is available.

 

[Couch Potato]

There's no room to fit this guy into my lineup, but he's moved all the way up to my #1 alternate. Go Danario, go!

Make room.

You don't make room for Danario Alexander. Other players just get out of the way.

 

[Tau837]

There's no room to fit this guy into my lineup, but he's moved all the way up to my #1 alternate. Go Danario, go!

Make room.

You don't make room for Danario Alexander. Other players just get out of the way.

 

[jbz]

There's no room to fit this guy into my lineup, but he's moved all the way up to my #1 alternate. Go Danario, go!

Make room.

You don't make room for Danario Alexander. Other players just get out of the way.

Outstanding.

 

[LawFitz]

Wow, pretty shocked by the amount of love in here. I like him but wow. Would it be safe to say that most of you in here would go with DX over Amendola? Even in a return yardage league?

I confidently had Amendola as my bye week WR and you guys have me thinking I want to cut him and grab DX to start in his place this week.

 

[el-gato-grande]

There's no room to fit this guy into my lineup, but he's moved all the way up to my #1 alternate. Go Danario, go!

Make room.

You don't make room for Danario Alexander. Other players just get out of the way.

I've just found a new sig..

 

[DocHolliday]

With Alexander's injury history, my prediction is that he will not even be playing in 2 or 3 games. Grab Gibson now.

 

[CrossEyed]

With Alexander's injury history, my prediction is that he will not even be playing in 2 or 3 games. Grab Gibson now.

"As a senior, he started all 13 games (including the 2009 Texas Bowl), and finished with 113 receptions for 1,781 yards and 14 touchdowns, averaging 15.8 yards per reception and 137 yards per game."

 

[az_prof]

I am cautiously optimistic. But the injury history does scare me. Won't start him though until I see two weeks of production in a row.

 

[Neofight]

I am cautiously optimistic. But the injury history does scare me. Won't start him though until I see two weeks of production in a row.

Cue HawkTalk™ from Otis

 

[gianmarco]

I'm just simply going to point out that many people steered clear of MSW last year before his breakout due to his injury history, multiple knee injuries, surgeries, etc.

Now, granted, he got hurt yet again later on in the season, but his value still spiked big time before that. He's also been healthy since and still has value (despite his QBs doing a great job in killing it right now).

I'm not saying anything, but I'm just sayin.........

 

[BobbyLayne]

With Alexander's injury history, my prediction is that he will not even be playing in 2 or 3 games. Grab Gibson now.

My prediction is if every WR except Brandon Gibson was involved in a rollover car accident, suffered a concussion, and was unable to suit up the remainder of the year, the 2nd year WR out of Washington State would still catch less than half his targets.Gibson has had plenty of opportunity in the 2nd half of 2009 and again in the first month of this season to step it up and take command. It doesn't appear he's going to stop dropping balls that should be caught anytime soon. He doesn't have to speed to stretch the field like Alexander does, and he doesn't run crisp routes like Amedola.

Given that, what makes you think something has changed that will make him a viable WR1?

As for Mardy Gilyard, the last 3 days the practice reports were (in order): he has problems with reads/running correct routes, he was limited yesterday, and he is sitting out today - questionable for Sunday.

All of which leads me to two conclusions: Amendola is a great play in return yardage leagues this week, because he'll return both punts and kickoffs, and Danario will probably be the guy Bradford looks for on deep intermediate and long patterns.

Should the Rams be able to run against Tampa Bay? Probably. But if you have been paying attention to St. Louis this year, then you know they will still be chucking it a lot. S-Jax has four games with 20+ carries (and another he toted it 19 times), yet Bradford's passing attempts on the year are 39 per game.

39 passing attempts per game. Close games, blowouts, games decided late, healthy WRs, no-name WRs, whatevs - that is the 2010 Rams persona, and it ain't gonna change.

 

[BRONG]

Bobby Layne. Jumping ahead, how do you think Bradford will do next week against Carolina (who's not bad at Pass D)?

In other news... Conspicuously, nobody is touching Alexander in this league I'm in which is full of Missouri guys. 16-team, PPR, too. Honestly, it's perplexing.

 

[ItsOnlytheRiver]

With Alexander's injury history, my prediction is that he will not even be playing in 2 or 3 games. Grab Gibson now.

My prediction is if every WR except Brandon Gibson was involved in a rollover car accident, suffered a concussion, and was unable to suit up the remainder of the year, the 2nd year WR out of Washington State would still catch less than half his targets.Gibson has had plenty of opportunity in the 2nd half of 2009 and again in the first month of this season to step it up and take command. It doesn't appear he's going to stop dropping balls that should be caught anytime soon. He doesn't have to speed to stretch the field like Alexander does, and he doesn't run crisp routes like Amedola.

Given that, what makes you think something has changed that will make him a viable WR1?

As for Mardy Gilyard, the last 3 days the practice reports were (in order): he has problems with reads/running correct routes, he was limited yesterday, and he is sitting out today - questionable for Sunday.

All of which leads me to two conclusions: Amendola is a great play in return yardage leagues this week, because he'll return both punts and kickoffs, and Danario will probably be the guy Bradford looks for on deep intermediate and long patterns.

Should the Rams be able to run against Tampa Bay? Probably. But if you have been paying attention to St. Louis this year, then you know they will still be chucking it a lot. S-Jax has four games with 20+ carries (and another he toted it 19 times), yet Bradford's passing attempts on the year are 39 per game.

39 passing attempts per game. Close games, blowouts, games decided late, healthy WRs, no-name WRs, whatevs - that is the 2010 Rams persona, and it ain't gonna change.

The only thing I will add to this is that the Rams just refuse to throw deep. As was the case last year and thus far this year. Maybe it will change with Alexander...

 

[az_prof]

With Alexander's injury history, my prediction is that he will not even be playing in 2 or 3 games. Grab Gibson now.

My prediction is if every WR except Brandon Gibson was involved in a rollover car accident, suffered a concussion, and was unable to suit up the remainder of the year, the 2nd year WR out of Washington State would still catch less than half his targets.Gibson has had plenty of opportunity in the 2nd half of 2009 and again in the first month of this season to step it up and take command. It doesn't appear he's going to stop dropping balls that should be caught anytime soon. He doesn't have to speed to stretch the field like Alexander does, and he doesn't run crisp routes like Amedola.

Given that, what makes you think something has changed that will make him a viable WR1?

As for Mardy Gilyard, the last 3 days the practice reports were (in order): he has problems with reads/running correct routes, he was limited yesterday, and he is sitting out today - questionable for Sunday.

All of which leads me to two conclusions: Amendola is a great play in return yardage leagues this week, because he'll return both punts and kickoffs, and Danario will probably be the guy Bradford looks for on deep intermediate and long patterns.

Should the Rams be able to run against Tampa Bay? Probably. But if you have been paying attention to St. Louis this year, then you know they will still be chucking it a lot. S-Jax has four games with 20+ carries (and another he toted it 19 times), yet Bradford's passing attempts on the year are 39 per game.

39 passing attempts per game. Close games, blowouts, games decided late, healthy WRs, no-name WRs, whatevs - that is the 2010 Rams persona, and it ain't gonna change.

This was really helpful to me.

 

[HoTnickZ]

I'm sure this might have already been mentioned in here, but this was a bit concerning, as per espn

"Alexander was on the field for 17 of St. Louis's 69 snaps last week. "

Really, just 17? On the other hand, goes to show that there's real talent here to get those stats with such limited snaps.

 

[BobbyLayne]

I'm sure this might have already been mentioned in here, but this was a bit concerning, as per espn"Alexander was on the field for 17 of St. Louis's 69 snaps last week. "Really, just 17? On the other hand, goes to show that there's real talent here to get those stats with such limited snaps.

I think if you read through the last 3-4 pages you will find this was addressed (I think). Basically, the guy has had the same knee operated on 3-4 times (?), and he is lacking basic core strength. He had soreness on Monday despite the limited snap count - but they also said that was expected.The guy has talent. The re-injury concerns are valid. Given the price you'll likely pay to obtain him, seems like it is worth a shot.

 

[cvnpoka]

I'm sure this might have already been mentioned in here, but this was a bit concerning, as per espn"Alexander was on the field for 17 of St. Louis's 69 snaps last week. "Really, just 17? On the other hand, goes to show that there's real talent here to get those stats with such limited snaps.

this is pretty typical. few wr on any team are in on every play. he likely isnt familiar with every route, and is limited in run blocking. perhaps he was only on the field on their 31 passing plays.

 

[damageinc]

Get Ready .

Looks like he will play a whole lot and Start.

Its his big chance. Last week was his chance to show he can play. This week its to show he can be a starter.

Alexander is definetly a WR3 / bye week filler start this week. No doubt now (Depending on your roster )

Rams WR Mardy Gilyard (hamstring) was downgraded to "no participation" in Friday's practice, and is listed as questionable for Week 7.

Danario Alexander would see a potentially big increase in snaps, and may even start, if Gilyard can't play against the Bucs. Currently, Gilyard doesn't look like a good bet to suit up. Players who do not practice on Friday usually don't play on Sunday. Alexander is a safer WR3 play with this news. Oct. 22 - 1:57 pm et

 

[Phantom Knight]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)

I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander.

Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

 

[Horses Mouth]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander. Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

 

[King of the Jungle]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander. Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

 

[finito]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander. Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

Ditto.

 

[flranger]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander. Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

Ditto.

Grant owner.....would rather have Alexander. Bradford might just be Manning over the next 10 years.

 

[Football Jones]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander. Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

Ditto.

Grant owner.....would rather have Alexander. Bradford might just be Manning over the next 10 years.

And a much more athletic Manning at that. A lot of people don't realize what a great athlete Sam Bradford is. Many people think you have to run super-fast & be able to jump over a car to be a good athlete, but it's simply not true.The kid can do anything. Basketball, baseball, golf, whatever. I heard a story on Sirius where the team went bowling & he was their best bowler. Bradford is what I call a natural-born "ball" athlete.

 

[tdhartis]

Let's hold back just yet on proclaiming Bradford to one day equal one of the best QBs to EVER play the game.

 

[plyka]

I'm a pretty big Danario fan, but Grant? Even in a dynasty format, that just is too high of a price. Most of us are picking up Danario for free off the waivers (or we were, not sure he is available anymore). Giving up a proven stud producer like Grant...i just don't know about that. A think people with bad teams use "rebuilding" as an excuse sometimes to justify moves they probably shouldn't be making.

As a non grant owner and a Danario owner, I hope you made the right choice and Danario proves to be an utter stud. I'm just not so sure it will pan out that way. Grant will be back next year to where he was last year or close to it. Where will Danario be? The jury is still out on that one.

 

[dharmapunk]

Otisguys.com...eh, what's one more shady shady-sounding URL for the browser history?

just checked godaddy. Otisguys.com is available.

Shark move is to scoop it up and squat until the new car smell of family life wears off and Mr. Moneybags Esquire needs a hobby.

 

[PaperBagHead]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)

I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander.

Given the SHAMBLES :X of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

I've wondered this myself. The only reason I'm hanging onto him in my dynasty league is the terrible state of GB's running attack. The gates are wide open for Grant to return next year. It wouldn't surprise me to see him bounce back with a 1300 yard, 10TD season and win Comeback Player of the Year. Now if they had landed Lynch, I would've dropped Grant in a heartbeat. As long as GB's running game sucks, Grant is worth a roster spot.

 

[pghrob]

I took a flyer on Danario at the start of the season and tried to stash him on my dynasty team. Had to cut him to make room for another when he was on the practice squad, then brought him back a couple weeks ago before being activated - when it became clear that Devin Thomas was going nowhere fast and was cut by the Redskins.

I think there is no discounting his skill set and the huge advantage his physical metrics give him. It is the rigors of the game and the physical toll it puts on his not yet conditioned body. My hope is that he is getting the highest level of training and orthopedic oversight of his knee so that he can deliver on the promise he shows.

As others have noted, he shows tremendous ability. Here is a good read from SI last fall when he was tearing it up at Mizzou. I don't know who Joe Posnanski is, but I love the comps he made on Alexander in the column. Granted, there was that 4th injury after that writing, but if Alexander can somehow overcome the long odds of not reinjuring, he could be a fun one to watch.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...nder/index.html

 

[nysportsfan]

I like this kid, but no way would I give up Grant at this point, IMO.

 

[damageinc]

I have a question. I watched him this weekend and he was so fast. How is a guy this fast when he has had so many knee surgeries. And how fast was he before all the operations. Dude walked into the huddle every play with a slight limp but when the play starts he flys. No way did I think he would be as fast as he was. 6-6 and that fast . hes uncoverable at times.

 

[ItsOnlytheRiver]

I took a flyer on Danario at the start of the season and tried to stash him on my dynasty team. Had to cut him to make room for another when he was on the practice squad, then brought him back a couple weeks ago before being activated - when it became clear that Devin Thomas was going nowhere fast and was cut by the Redskins.

I think there is no discounting his skill set and the huge advantage his physical metrics give him. It is the rigors of the game and the physical toll it puts on his not yet conditioned body. My hope is that he is getting the highest level of training and orthopedic oversight of his knee so that he can deliver on the promise he shows.

As others have noted, he shows tremendous ability. Here is a good read from SI last fall when he was tearing it up at Mizzou. I don't know who Joe Posnanski is, but I love the comps he made on Alexander in the column. Granted, there was that 4th injury after that writing, but if Alexander can somehow overcome the long odds of not reinjuring, he could be a fun one to watch.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...nder/index.html

You don't know who Joe Posnanski is? Really?

 

[Alberta Clipper]

I jumped on the Alexander bus early in a couple leagues as a lotto ticket.

The ticket cashed but remember he's only hit on step 1 - getting into the lineup and doing well.

He still has to prove he can do it on a consistent basis and stand up to the abuse that a starting WR takes on a weekly basis.

Every year we see a few fantasy FA hit what looks like a home run only to fizzle due to injuries within a few weeks.

I'm glad I own him a few times but I'd still temper your expectations with the unproven durability and high inj risk he comes with at this time.

 

[pghrob]

I took a flyer on Danario at the start of the season and tried to stash him on my dynasty team. Had to cut him to make room for another when he was on the practice squad, then brought him back a couple weeks ago before being activated - when it became clear that Devin Thomas was going nowhere fast and was cut by the Redskins.

I think there is no discounting his skill set and the huge advantage his physical metrics give him. It is the rigors of the game and the physical toll it puts on his not yet conditioned body. My hope is that he is getting the highest level of training and orthopedic oversight of his knee so that he can deliver on the promise he shows.

As others have noted, he shows tremendous ability. Here is a good read from SI last fall when he was tearing it up at Mizzou. I don't know who Joe Posnanski is, but I love the comps he made on Alexander in the column. Granted, there was that 4th injury after that writing, but if Alexander can somehow overcome the long odds of not reinjuring, he could be a fun one to watch.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...nder/index.html

You don't know who Joe Posnanski is? Really?

Nope. Not before I found his article while researching Danarion Alexander. This is what I found on Posnanski. http://www.joeposnanski.com/Bio.html

I can see he is acclaimed. But honestly never heard of him. His credentials

at least lead me to feel that much more enthused about his earlier raves on Alexander.

 

[CaptainHook]

The buccaneers are just terrible vs the run (their defense isnt really good in general) this will be a steven jackson 25-30 touch game.

You bring up some valid points, but I'll never understand this logic. Phases of the game feed off each other and Jackson having success on the ground helps Alexander through sustained drives, more time in the RZ and increased effectiveness of the play action. Jackson getting 25 carries in this game would be a GOOD thing for Alexander. Not an argument against.

30 running plays = ~30 seconds each = an entire quarter of gameclock. thats definitely not good for the WRs

 

[Phantom Knight]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)

I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander.

Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

I've wondered this myself. The only reason I'm hanging onto him in my dynasty league is the terrible state of GB's running attack. The gates are wide open for Grant to return next year. It wouldn't surprise me to see him bounce back with a 1300 yard, 10TD season and win Comeback Player of the Year. Now if they had landed Lynch, I would've dropped Grant in a heartbeat. As long as GB's running game sucks, Grant is worth a roster spot.

I kept Grant in for similar reasons. And grabbed Starks as well. I was prepared to hold onto both thru the rest of this season. But I think there is a lot of uncertainty in what will happen in GB next year. Perhaps Grant comes back 100%, perhaps he doesn't. Perhaps Starks proves to be a viable starter after being "out" of football for a couple of years. Perhaps, GB drafts an early round rb. A lot of ifs there for my taste. For me the only if with Danario is will he be able to stay healthy or not. At the end of the day, I decided to swing for the fences.

 

[Magnus_CA]

Who are people sitting for Alexander this week? I'm considering starting him given Crabtree and Dez' less than savory matchups in my non-ppr.

 

[Cookiemonster]

In over a hurt MSW with no QB, and Anthony Armstrong.

In another league he's currently sitting for Welker, Hines and Crabtree. Hard to sit him for Crabs but production has been up since Raye was canned.

 

[damageinc]

Im sitting Tampa Mike Williams. Starting Marshall-Seattle Mike Williams and Alexander. I was up in the air until I read that Gilyard was probally out. meaning that ALexander is going to play alot if not start.

Let me tell you its confusing having 2 WR with the same name. (Mike Williams) I have to always double check which one I put in and which one is on the bench.

 

[wudaben]

Im sitting Tampa Mike Williams. Starting Marshall-Seattle Mike Williams and Alexander. I was up in the air until I read that Gilyard was probally out. meaning that ALexander is going to play alot if not start. Let me tell you its confusing having 2 WR with the same name. (Mike Williams) I have to always double check which one I put in and which one is on the bench.

I've got all these guys but I'm starting Austin, Nicks and Tampa Mike. This is probably a good week to start Danario but I'd like to see one more game from he and BMW first.

 

[plyka]

Unfortunately i'm playing the best team in my main keeper league this week, and I am without Calvin Johnson and Jahvid Best. I'm basically in 2nd place (i say basically since i'm technically in 3rd, but the guy in 2nd has 100+ less points than me with 1 extra win), so this is going to be a big match up. And we start 3 WRs, 2 RBs and a flex.

I'm going: Fitz, Crabtree and yes Danario as my WRs. Forte, Torain and Deangelo as my RBs+flex. Sitting Amendola and Blount. I'm wondering whether i should play it safe and go with Amendola instead of Danario. Unfortunately, this guy has to take Calvin's spot, and there really is no chance that Amendola can do it, only Danario can possibly replace Calvin's production. That's not to say that i'm not worried about Danario. He may disappoint this week.

 

[damageinc]

Same here , I forgot to add that my usual lineup is MArhsal & Megatron and one of the williams. this week Denario is taking Megatrons place. Not expecting Megatron production , just want him to be Productive. A decent 5-65 and I wouldnt complain. And I am also playing the best team ( winner is in first place) and I also am without Best. Alot of similar issues I see.

 

[az_prof]

For anyone wondering current Alexander's value - here's one trade that I just accepted in a dynasty league. (.5 ppr)

I gave up James Starks/Ryan Grant for Alexander.

Given the SHAMBLES of my rbs BEFORE this trade, the cost is much higher for me than it might seem. I was projecting (ok, hoping) that I would get one starting rb out of the two rbs. But I am in total rebuild mode and would rather gamble on a #1 stud wr than a potential lower end #1 rb.

oof

I disagree and would rather have Alexander. I doubt Grant comes back to be a top level player (wherever he plays). Alexander has the highest upside of the three and actually will have the first opportunity to prove of the three.

I've wondered this myself. The only reason I'm hanging onto him in my dynasty league is the terrible state of GB's running attack. The gates are wide open for Grant to return next year. It wouldn't surprise me to see him bounce back with a 1300 yard, 10TD season and win Comeback Player of the Year. Now if they had landed Lynch, I would've dropped Grant in a heartbeat. As long as GB's running game sucks, Grant is worth a roster spot.

I think if you can unload Grant for a young player with a lot of upside, do it. It isn't like he is one of the most talented backs like ADP, CJ, or Rice, who is almost certainly going to get a chance to win their job if they get hurt. It is hard for me to believe that GB won't draft a back or bring in a good FA.

 

[az_prof]

Unfortunately i'm playing the best team in my main keeper league this week, and I am without Calvin Johnson and Jahvid Best. I'm basically in 2nd place (i say basically since i'm technically in 3rd, but the guy in 2nd has 100+ less points than me with 1 extra win), so this is going to be a big match up. And we start 3 WRs, 2 RBs and a flex.I'm going: Fitz, Crabtree and yes Danario as my WRs. Forte, Torain and Deangelo as my RBs+flex. Sitting Amendola and Blount. I'm wondering whether i should play it safe and go with Amendola instead of Danario. Unfortunately, this guy has to take Calvin's spot, and there really is no chance that Amendola can do it, only Danario can possibly replace Calvin's production. That's not to say that i'm not worried about Danario. He may disappoint this week.

I think you are doing the right thing if you feel like you need a big pay day. Amendola is probably more likely to give you 4 for 60 yards, but Denario has upside to produce more than that.

 

[az_prof]

Im sitting Tampa Mike Williams. Starting Marshall-Seattle Mike Williams and Alexander. I was up in the air until I read that Gilyard was probally out. meaning that ALexander is going to play alot if not start. Let me tell you its confusing having 2 WR with the same name. (Mike Williams) I have to always double check which one I put in and which one is on the bench.

I've got all these guys but I'm starting Austin, Nicks and Tampa Mike. This is probably a good week to start Danario but I'd like to see one more game from he and BMW first.

I feel the same about wanting to see another good week; I am starting Deion Branch over him

 

[B Will]

184 and 2 TD's!