I would say we'll look back and remember Garrard in the same way we remember Aaron Brooks -- one of the most egregious examples of where fantasy stats completely belied the real world skill and value ascribed to the player.
I've generally thought that Garrard was a better NFL quarterback than fantasy quarterback. I thought the opposite about Brooks.
David has been the starter for at least most of the games for the past 5 seasons. The Jags have had one winning season in that time frame. Last season the Jaguars ranked 27th in passing in the NFL. They also ranked 2nd to last in attempts. The Jags are a run first team but under Garrard the passing attacks has become anemic to the point that they rarely even attempt passes down the field. David is a nice guy and not a bad NFL QB but it was time for a change.As an NFL QB David can look great for a time and then make amazingly silly mistakes. The term "self sack" was coined locally to describe when David escapes the pocket to avoid pressure and then runs out of bounds 5 yards behind the line of scrimmage instead of just throwing the ball away. David still throws to the man and not the spot. His progression on almost every play goes from the first read to the check down. Three of the last 5 seasons the Jaguars where in good position to make the playoff late only to collapse in December. Mike Thomas, MJD and Marcedes Lewis have all done well with David because their routes are usually run within his comfort zone which is with 15 yards of the line, anything beyond that and things get very risky. I think it was 2009 when the first time David even attempted a pass more than 20 yards down field was week 10 or 11.
I'm not convinced that McCown is going to be any better but at this point, with the rookie in waiting it seemed a good time to make the change. Myself and I think most Jaguar fan wish David well, but patience was indeed running thin with him. He certainly wasn't the only issue with the Jaguars over the last three seasons. But he wasn't the solution either.
Ok, so just curious, if the idea is to hand the reins to the rookie anyway, why not just keep Garrard?
Money? That's one difference between him and McCown.
These are McCown's lifetime stats:
Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% AV
2004 23 CLE 12 5 4 0-4-0 48 98 49.0 608 4 4.1 7 7.1 58 6.2 3.8 12.7 121.6 52.6 12 122 4.4 2.3 10.9 2
2007 26 TAM 12 5 3 1-2-0 94 139 67.6 1009 5 3.6 3 2.2 60 7.3 7.0 10.7 201.8 91.7 15 104 5.9 5.6 9.7 4
2008 27 TAM 12 2 0 0 1 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
2009 28 JAX 12 3 0 1 3 33.3 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.7 0.7 2.0 0.7 42.4 2 7 -1.0 -1.0 40.0 0
2010 29 JAX 12 1 0 11 19 57.9 120 0 0.0 0 0.0 25 6.3 6.3 10.9 120.0 76.6 0 0 6.3 6.3 0.0 0
Career 16 7
1-6-0 154 260 59.2 1739 9 3.5 10 3.8 60 6.7 5.7 11.3 108.7 74.8 29 233 5.2 4.3 10.0 6
2 yrs JAX 4 0 12 22 54.5 122 0 0.0 0 0.0 25 5.5 5.5 10.2 30.5 70.6 2 7 4.8 4.8 8.3 0
2 yrs TAM 7 3 1-2-0 94 140 67.1 1009 5 3.6 3 2.1 60 7.2 7.0 10.7 144.1 91.0 15 104 5.8 5.6 9.7 4
1 yr CLE 5 4 0-4-0 48 98 49.0 608 4 4.1 7 7.1 58 6.2 3.8 12.7 121.6 52.6 12 122 4.4 2.3 10.9 2
1-6 lifetime as a starter, 0-4 the last time he had a real shot.
Garrard is 39-37 lifetime as a starter.
That's one other difference.
Instead of installing McCown, why not just install the rookie and have Garrad there as backup and for guidance?