ghostguy123
Footballguy
Car rolled multiple times
NFL Network's Tom Pelissero reports Browns EDGE Myles Garrett was released from the hospital Monday night.
Garrett will reportedly undergo more tests but any injuries he suffered are all non-life threatening. Garrett flipped his vehicle several times on his way home from practice Monday, reportedly losing control on a wet road while swerving to avoid an animal. The Browns' All-Pro EDGE rusher and his passenger both escaped with no major injuries. The team has not yet disclosed Garrett's status ahead of the team's Week 4 game against the Falcons.
SOURCE: Tom Pelissero on Twitter
Sep 27, 2022, 9:49 AM ET
Browns HC Kevin Stefanski said the team will reassess Myles Garrett's (shoulder) Week 5 status on Wednesday.
Stefanski refuted a report from ESPN's Adam Schefter that Garrett could miss "two to four weeks," and added that Garrett is feeling better. Garrett was held out for Sunday's game against the Falcons, but it sounds like there's a slim chance he could suit up in Week 5. For now, we'll wait until Wednesday to see where the team's at on Garrett's status.
SOURCE: Profootballtalk on NBCSports.com
Oct 3, 2022, 3:22 PM ET
Next Gen Stats
Myles Garrett generated all 9 of his pressures after Jaguars backup LT Blake Hance replaced starter Ezra Cleveland during the 2nd quarter.
Garrett produced 7 of his 9 QBP in the 4th quarter, tied for the most in the final quarter of a game this season.
#JAXvsCLE | #DawgPound
Next Gen Stats
Myles Garrett generated 7 pressures on 42 pass rushes in Week 15 (16.7% pressure rate), with 6 pressures coming in less than 2.5 seconds.
Garrett leads all defenders with a 2.33-second average time to pressure entering the Week 15 afternoon slate.
#CHIvCLE | #DawgPound
Next Gen Stats
Myles Garrett recorded all six of his pressures against Mekhi Becton in under 2.5 seconds in Week 17.
Garrett (54) is 1 of 2 pass rushers (Micah Parsons, 60) to generate over 40 quick pressures this season.
#NYJvCLE | #DawgPound
Myles Garrett has averaged just 0.66 seconds to cross the line of scrimmage when rushing the passer this season, the quickest get-off in the NFL (min. 250 pass rushes).
As a result, he has recorded the 2nd-quickest time to pressure (2.32 seconds).
#NYJvCLE | #DawgPound
1 sack in last 7 games.
Tell me you didn't watch the Steelers, without telling me you didn't watch the steelers. Watt is more impactful and had a better season.1 sack in last 7 games.
Tell me you didn't watch the browns, without telling me you didn't watch the browns.
I would also say that Crosby should be in the conversation too. His problem is his team was not very good so the impact he made wasn't very fruitful. But he played almost every down and was a huge impact playerTell me you didn't watch the Steelers, without telling me you didn't watch the steelers. Watt is more impactful and had a better season.1 sack in last 7 games.
Tell me you didn't watch the browns, without telling me you didn't watch the browns.
Here you go:Crosby outperformed both Watt and Garrett this year by a decent margin. He should have been DPOY.
Nate Tice
Myles Garrett has 6 QB pressures on 14 pass rush snaps so far against the Giants.
A crisp 42.9% pressure rate, with 3 of those pressures defined as "quick QB pressures", per @NextGenStats.
Next Gen Stats
Myles Garrett has generated 4 pressures, 3 sacks and a forced fumble through the first half, with 3 pressures and 2 sacks coming against left tackle Dan Moore Jr.
: #PITvsCLE
: @TNFPrimeVision w/@NextGenStats
Watch Nowamazon.com/TNFPrimeVision…
The 33rd Team
Myles Garrett is the first player in NFL History to have 14+ sacks in 4 straight seasons![]()
Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
That's what GM's say to keep the best possible relationship with a player whom they may or may not try to trade. It doesn't tie their hands.
That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
This really is the answer, but you know that Andrew Berry will think he can Washington Commanders the 2025 Browns.That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
I think in today's NFL, no team, no matter what they look like, is 3+ years away. I think if the Browns aren't in the playoffs in 2026, they (probably rightfully) fire the whole front office.That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
Garrett turns 30 (in December) this season. Realistically, how many more dominant years are we expecting from him? And how many years is it going to take the Cleveland Browns to build a contender? If the answer is 1 year, then keep him. If the answer is 3-4-5 years, get max value for him.
I think in today's NFL, no team, no matter what they look like, is 3+ years away. I think if the Browns aren't in the playoffs in 2026, they (probably rightfully) fire the whole front office.That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
Garrett turns 30 (in December) this season. Realistically, how many more dominant years are we expecting from him? And how many years is it going to take the Cleveland Browns to build a contender? If the answer is 1 year, then keep him. If the answer is 3-4-5 years, get max value for him.
I mean, the Browns made the playoffs in 2023, despite Watson's contract, with Joe Flacco starting. I kinda wonder if they hadn't, if they would have cleaned house (Berry/Stefanski) already.I think in today's NFL, no team, no matter what they look like, is 3+ years away. I think if the Browns aren't in the playoffs in 2026, they (probably rightfully) fire the whole front office.That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
Garrett turns 30 (in December) this season. Realistically, how many more dominant years are we expecting from him? And how many years is it going to take the Cleveland Browns to build a contender? If the answer is 1 year, then keep him. If the answer is 3-4-5 years, get max value for him.
Cleveland isn't in the same situation as other teams since they have DeShaun Watson contract to deal with. Option A for them is to cut him and have a huge dead money hit. Option B is to keep him and have a huge cap number ($72M+). He's not a realistic cut candidate until after the 2026 season. But at that point, Garrett is a 31 year old UFA.
Well, yeah.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
Exactly.I think in today's NFL, no team, no matter what they look like, is 3+ years away. I think if the Browns aren't in the playoffs in 2026, they (probably rightfully) fire the whole front office.That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
Garrett turns 30 (in December) this season. Realistically, how many more dominant years are we expecting from him? And how many years is it going to take the Cleveland Browns to build a contender? If the answer is 1 year, then keep him. If the answer is 3-4-5 years, get max value for him.
Cleveland isn't in the same situation as other teams since they have DeShaun Watson contract to deal with. Option A for them is to cut him and have a huge dead money hit. Option B is to keep him and have a huge cap number ($72M+). He's not a realistic cut candidate until after the 2026 season. But at that point, Garrett is a 31 year old UFA.
you are probably right. but this is also the Browns......That's tough in my opinion. Garrett is a franchise cornerstone, possibly the best player they've had since they came back in 1999 (its a tossup between him and Joe Thomas) and its hard to really think of what the fair market value is for the best defensive player (probably just best non-QB) in the NFL, who is still in his prime.Any other answer would have been the wrong answer, even if he had a deal in place at the time of the question.
Yeah, but they should be looking to trade him.
What's fair value? A 1st and a 2nd feels like just giving him away. 2 1sts feels unlikely to be offered but also feels like nowhere near enough. If I were a GM of a contender with cap space, I'd start a trade negotiation with 2 1sts. Let them know you are serious. Looking in your direction, Commanders, Vikings, and Lions.
I will say, a good defense adds Myles Garrett, and it changes things for that defense, probably akin to what Barkley/Henry did for their offenses, but probably even more so. A league average defense adds Garrett and they become top-5. If its a Ravens/Eagles situation where everything around him is already great, that's gonna keep OCs and QBs up at night.
Garrett turns 30 (in December) this season. Realistically, how many more dominant years are we expecting from him? And how many years is it going to take the Cleveland Browns to build a contender? If the answer is 1 year, then keep him. If the answer is 3-4-5 years, get max value for him.
On one had, yes. On the other hand, this was very uncharacteristic of Berry, who often uses a lot of words to say nothing. Vets speak highly of him because of his relationship building approach to management. To say this with plans on moving him would run counter to that.That's what GM's say to keep the best possible relationship with a player whom they may or may not try to trade. It doesn't tie their hands.
Interesting. They SHOULD have zero trouble getting 2 late 1sts for him. This being the Browns, they'll likely give him away, or refuse to trade him and risk him sitting.x.com
x.com
Trade officially requested.