This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I hadn't heard about this and do appreciate the OP posting. It does lower his dynasty value slightly in my view, but not too much yet. Mostly this is now something that bears monitoring.
Going to trial?? From the linked article, the lawsuit was just filed yesterday. It will be a long time before this case would go to trial, if it even makes it to that stage.
Going to trial?? From the linked article, the lawsuit was just filed yesterday. It will be a long time before this case would go to trial, if it even makes it to that stage.
Does anyone have a link that actually explains how DT is being charged? No offense, but the link above talks about Perrish Cox and it sounds like most of the filings are against him (save for perhaps the aiding and abetting portion).
Going to trial?? From the linked article, the lawsuit was just filed yesterday. It will be a long time before this case would go to trial, if it even makes it to that stage.
Does anyone have a link that actually explains how DT is being charged? No offense, but the link above talks about Perrish Cox and it sounds like most of the filings are against him (save for perhaps the aiding and abetting portion).
Essentially Cox and Thomas are being sued for the night in question. Kinda like the O.J. thing, the case can't be proved in criminal court but in civil you don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Plus since the baby is Cox's, we can assume there is child support etc.
Going to trial?? From the linked article, the lawsuit was just filed yesterday. It will be a long time before this case would go to trial, if it even makes it to that stage.
Does anyone have a link that actually explains how DT is being charged? No offense, but the link above talks about Perrish Cox and it sounds like most of the filings are against him (save for perhaps the aiding and abetting portion).
Essentially Cox and Thomas are being sued for the night in question. Kinda like the O.J. thing, the case can't be proved in criminal court but in civil you don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Plus since the baby is Cox's, we can assume there is child support etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.