This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Which is why they invited Hillary. They need something to move the "entertainment" needle. Would be boring if they just had the other four up there addressing issues.
Harder to find one for the dems. Here is one: http://noticeatrend.blogspot.com/2015/10/democratic-debate-drinking-game-for.html
ill drink a fifth of vodka if they get a "did God ask you to run?" Question
If they had some of the "Freedom" Caucus as moderators it could be must see TV.
Hillary is one of the least entertaining candidates out there. What crazy stuff do you expect out of her?
There won't be anything crazy. I love watching her mental gymnastics and the lengths she'll go to NOT answer a question. She's one of the best IMO
Hillary is one of the least entertaining candidates out there. What crazy stuff do you expect out of her?
And yes, I realize that's a bit sick 
I would hope for some gotchas
Its silly to say the email issue isn't a real issue when the president just called it a mistake and polls show it is impacting her support.
It was reckless, dangerous and illegal...moreover, what was her motivation? I can't think of a legitimate reason for her to have done this.
Take it to the thread you've already polluted with this garbage. You hate her. I get it.
It'll come up and it'll go nowhere. But I'm sure republicans would love to see it be the centerpiece of the debate. They've tried so hard.
Good luck with that. It will be a big circle jerk with a bunch of candidates talking about who can expand government the most and who can nail the rich the most.
There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.
Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.
Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.
The world needs ditch diggers too.Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.
I used to be able to understand the rising-tide view, but the disparity between the insanely rich and the regular folk (speaking economically) whom they need to support their increasingly voracious greed has grown to proportions that are absolutely preposterous. These days, it's more like the tide rises and only the mega-yachts get lifted.Fennis said:Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Aerial Assault said:Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
The rich are buying up all the votes, I mean boats.Fennis said:Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Aerial Assault said:Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
Senator Clinton, under the current administration wealth inequality has increased substantially, due in large part to the Obama administration's policies of allowing a huge influx of low skilled illegal immigrant labor crushing salaries on the low income scale and on the high end a Fed ZIRP policy allowing the richest to get first crack at cheap money. How would your administration handle these current policies?NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
Hard with that many people on stage. Once the numbers whittle down a bit I suspect these will get lots better. Right now, though, you're right about the lack in the R debates. We'll see how the D debate goes.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
It's amazing how blinded by partisanship some of you can be. There will be actual policy discussions tonight. You obviously disagree with what they think, but the discussion will be profoundly more intellectual and substantive than the republican debates we have seen.
IF a question like that were to ever get through the screening process, I can't imagine the size of the puddle under her podiumSenator Clinton, under the current administration wealth inequality has increased substantially, due in large part to the Obama administration's policies of allowing a huge influx of low skilled illegal immigrant labor crushing salaries on the low income scale and on the high end a Fed ZIRP policy allowing the richest to get first crack at cheap money. How would your administration handle these current policies?NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
Is there any country in the world that doesn't have "insanely rich people" (by that country's standards)? There will ALWAYS be rich people. And there will always be people who have less that are calling others that have more "insanely rich".I used to be able to understand the rising-tide view, but the disparity between the insanely rich and the regular folk (speaking economically) whom they need to support their increasingly voracious greed has grown to proportions that are absolutely preposterous. These days, it's more like the tide rises and only the mega-yachts get lifted.Fennis said:Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Aerial Assault said:Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
I am looking forward to seeing what Hillary, Sanders, MOM, and Chafee say about income inequality, if anything. Biden, too, if he parachutes in. I don't give a damn what Webb has to say.
It's like a who's who of western countries.Is there any country in the world that doesn't have "insanely rich people" (by that country's standards)? There will ALWAYS be rich people. And there will always be people who have less that are calling others that have more "insanely rich".I used to be able to understand the rising-tide view, but the disparity between the insanely rich and the regular folk (speaking economically) whom they need to support their increasingly voracious greed has grown to proportions that are absolutely preposterous. These days, it's more like the tide rises and only the mega-yachts get lifted.Fennis said:Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Aerial Assault said:Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
I am looking forward to seeing what Hillary, Sanders, MOM, and Chafee say about income inequality, if anything. Biden, too, if he parachutes in. I don't give a damn what Webb has to say.
Yeah, no one's calling for communism here, but keep pounding that straw man. You may have heard that the income gap has widened significantly in the last 30 years in this country. There's no good reason for that to have happened and most people are starting to recognize that. Perhaps you're one of these characters who support GOP policies that don't benefit you an ounce, even though you probably think they do.Is there any country in the world that doesn't have "insanely rich people" (by that country's standards)? There will ALWAYS be rich people. And there will always be people who have less that are calling others that have more "insanely rich".I used to be able to understand the rising-tide view, but the disparity between the insanely rich and the regular folk (speaking economically) whom they need to support their increasingly voracious greed has grown to proportions that are absolutely preposterous. These days, it's more like the tide rises and only the mega-yachts get lifted.Fennis said:Some people (including me) subscribe to a rising tide lifts all boats. That's not to say wealth inequality doesnt matter, I think its an important issue, but the super wealthy gaining doesn't mean the rest of us society can't/doesn't gain too.Aerial Assault said:Seriously. I will never understand how the 1% managed to snow far less wealthy people into buying the bill of goods they're selling. Not referring to jon specifically here as I like him as a person/poster, but it seems to me that some sort of frenzied whipping up of an "us against them" fight against "others" sure helps those will never, ever benefit from Republican economic policies to sign up. Witness that cretin Sarah Palin.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
I am looking forward to seeing what Hillary, Sanders, MOM, and Chafee say about income inequality, if anything. Biden, too, if he parachutes in. I don't give a damn what Webb has to say.
Why doesn't it concern you that everyone (besides a few like trump) wants to grant amnesty to illegals and have massive immigration here while there are millions of people unemployed? Who do you think it helps to have cheap labor brought into the country? The middle class? Nope, it only helps the super rich that employ them for cheap and it shrinks the middle class.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
Yeah, guys. Nobody went into the republican debate thread and criticized any of the candidates. Cut it out.rude classless thugs said:Aerial Assault said:
You sound like a big supporter of labor unions. Good on you.Why doesn't it concern you that everyone (besides a few like trump) wants to grant amnesty to illegals and have massive immigration here while there are millions of people unemployed? Who do you think it helps to have cheap labor brought into the country? The middle class? Nope, it only helps the super rich that employ them for cheap and it shrinks the middle class.NCCommish said:There is class warfare in this country and the rich are winning. There has been a massive transfer of wealth to the rich. Unless you are rich if it continues this way your children will be poorer for it. Why doesn't that concern you? Why so you insist on championing the cause of the elite? Who BTW are doing just fine without your help.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
I doubt there will be a rich policy discussion, the format of letting a candidate answer a question for 60 seconds is not really built for that.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
It's amazing how blinded by partisanship some of you can be. There will be actual policy discussions tonight. You obviously disagree with what they think, but the discussion will be profoundly more intellectual and substantive than the republican debates we have seen.
Oh puleeez. Hillary Clinton will be on stage giving her canned responses to a bunch of positions she just moved to so she can get the "I am one of you people" vote. It may be more substantive than the GOP debate, but that is a really low bar and it won't be cleared by much. Sanders may articulate some genuine positions in an intelligent matter, but I am not going to agree with much of what he says. The other three will stake out radical positions trying get attention to their candidacy.jon_mx said:pantagrapher said:
It's amazing how blinded by partisanship some of you can be. There will be actual policy discussions tonight. You obviously disagree with what they think, but the discussion will be profoundly more intellectual and substantive than the republican debates we have seen.
That wasn't in a debate. It was at an interview at some cafe.NetnautX said:
And it worked. Lost Iowa, down in NH polls, turn on the crocodile tears and back in the race.
to be followed by 
.
