What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Denarius Moore - CIncinnatti Bengals (4 Viewers)

Just going to keep watching all the haters blow their load after "being right." I'll hold onto Moore in my dynasty and see where things go.

:popcorn:

 
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
Sorry, just read this nonsense.Read my stuff. I said, repeatedly, in this thread that I thought he was a keeper/dynasty play, not redraft. Repeatedly. Really sorry if anyone read my posts, picked up a rookie off the waiver wire in week 2, and started him immediately. :shrug: I didn't tell anyone to do that, and when they come stomping in here, wondering why the rookie Raider WR isn't putting up consistent numbers ( :mellow: ), I don't feel the need to respond. I love the kid, and think he is going to be the best WR they have. Better than DHB, that I think has had to fight and struggle and work just to be competent. Moore always should have been a long term play. If you were giving him 2 weeks to earn a spot, you shouldn't have picked him up in the first place.
 
'Hoss Style said:
'cvnpoka said:
dont see how anyone can prefer moore over dhb. ofc, id just keep manningham.
I also don't understand the DHB love you keep professing. If anything, there's more in the past to discredit DHB than any other WR on the Raider's roster.The last 3 games for me do not erase his previous 2+ years of bad play. I don't know about last year but I remember his rookie season he was dropping an incredible 17% of the passes thrown his way which was by far the most for any WR with 40+ targets. In 2010 he played in 15 games and only had 26 catches. The first two games this year he had 4 catches for 44 yards and the next game had one catch for 5 yards.

I know he's played better the last 3 games - but to wonder how anyone might still like Moore over DHB in the long run is a bit of a stretch, I'd say. I wish DHB the best but I wouldn't say I'm "sold" on him yet.
i think it was quite clear that poster was referring to redraft leagues where, ya, it seems crazy to prefer moore. its funny that you are maligning dhb's other yrs when moore has performed only slightly better this yr. he is on pace for 35 catches and 554 yards.
Hey, you quoted me first, buddy. ;) I clearly said I'm in a keeper league and I was responding to the guy above me who mentioned he's in a keeper as well. Anyway, I'm not maligning DHB's past - I'm just stating facts. His previous 2+ years have been horrid and 3 games doesn't make me a believer. He has a history of "bad hands" which is usually an uphill battle to correct. Nothing against DHB - I just need to see a bit more before I'll have faith that he's gonna hold on to a starting WR position for the long term.As for comparing rookie stats - DHB started from day one, I believe. Moore didn't. I'm heading out the door so I don't have the time to fix your stats but I'm pretty sure Moore's on pace for a decent rookie year if you factor in games started. And it could get better with Carson at the helm. That's all I'm saying. It might not change a thing, either. But Moore's got the talent and if he can get the passes thrown his way it'll get very interesting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
hoss, i think i have been pretty clear that i dont gaf about dynasty or long term. in the next few weeks esp, and even for the rest of the season, i think dhb is the better option than moore. i am relying on the play from this season to arrive at that conclusion.

and this little exchange was derived from me responding to glumpy, advising him to keep manningham or dhb in lieu of moore. i reread his posts and again did not discern that he was in a keeper/dynasty league.

 
hoss, i think i have been pretty clear that i dont gaf about dynasty or long term. in the next few weeks esp, and even for the rest of the season, i think dhb is the better option than moore. i am relying on the play from this season to arrive at that conclusion.

and this little exchange was derived from me responding to glumpy, advising him to keep manningham or dhb in lieu of moore. i reread his posts and again did not discern that he was in a keeper/dynasty league.
No worries. We can discuss both redraft and keeper in the same thread. It's all good. I still am not sold on DHB this year, either. Yet. :D
 
Oh, ok...so the 23 pages have been about a "dynasty stash"... nothing more. I imagine the tune will change again if D Moore has another good game this year.

 
What does MASSRAIDER think? I thought Moore would stay the number one?Another reason you can't get too excited about a rookie that blows up when the other receivers are hurt.No doubt he has talent but they are a running team and looks like DHB is finally playing like their number one. The Randy Moss comparisons are not accurate...or the commitment to the big play just isn't there.
Sorry, just read this nonsense.Read my stuff. I said, repeatedly, in this thread that I thought he was a keeper/dynasty play, not redraft. Repeatedly. Really sorry if anyone read my posts, picked up a rookie off the waiver wire in week 2, and started him immediately. :shrug: I didn't tell anyone to do that, and when they come stomping in here, wondering why the rookie Raider WR isn't putting up consistent numbers ( :mellow: ), I don't feel the need to respond. I love the kid, and think he is going to be the best WR they have. Better than DHB, that I think has had to fight and struggle and work just to be competent. Moore always should have been a long term play. If you were giving him 2 weeks to earn a spot, you shouldn't have picked him up in the first place.
raider is right, he did say to temper expectations . . .-----------------it was countless other people revving up the hype train . . .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
week 2, hagan subbing for dhb ran 31 routes. moore ran 29.week 3: dhb 33, moore 30.week 4: dhb 40, moore 36.week 5: dhb 32, moore 33.week 5: dhb 26, moore 24.
Not a D.Moore bump. Was just hoping someone could tell me what site you can use to get this type of info. Even a site that shows how many snaps each player played would be great, but the route running site would even be a step up from that.Thanks in advance.
 
oohf!

I guess will have to wait to see if he has any value when Palmer gets up and running but as of now there must be several WW options with that same uncertain upside.

 
Seriously, this thread needs to die. 23 pages on such a worthless receiver is ridiculous. Moore is an okay dynasty stash and that's it. He is complete waiver wire fodder in all redraft leagues.

 
You guys who are poo pooing Moore need to watch the tape. Moore has 2 and sometimes up to 5 defenders stalking him...leaving the field open for everyone else. He is so explosive, no one wants him to touch the ball. Not even the OAK QB's. They are afraid of what may happen.

 
You guys who are poo pooing Moore need to watch the tape. Moore has 2 and sometimes up to 5 defenders stalking him...leaving the field open for everyone else. He is so explosive, no one wants him to touch the ball. Not even the OAK QB's. They are afraid of what may happen.
I hear Al Davis' ghost is even blocking for Moore
 
Seriously, this thread needs to die. 23 pages on such a worthless receiver is ridiculous. Moore is an okay dynasty stash and that's it. He is complete waiver wire fodder in all redraft leagues.
Tell ya what. Why don't you start your own 23 page annoying thread that none of us are required to respond to?YWIA
 
'Dought Man said:
You guys who are poo pooing Moore need to watch the tape. Moore has 2 and sometimes up to 5 defenders stalking him...leaving the field open for everyone else. He is so explosive, no one wants him to touch the ball. Not even the OAK QB's. They are afraid of what may happen.
Don't knowHe looked awful Sunday against the Chiefs
 
Raiderfan...have you changed your early season view of DHB's role in the offense? Or do you still think Moore is the man?
Very reluctantly I have come around to DHB. He's definitely here to stay as a main component of the offense. I really didn't think that he had that in him. Still not putting DHB up there with other team's number one wideouts, regardless of the stats. As a Raider fan, I am very happy to see DHB's breakout in season 3. I'd never have predicted it, but even it sinks my fantasy teams, I'm cheering it on.I think Moore is going through some growing pains right now. The transition from the college season may be a factor. He's already played in 4 preseason plus 7 regular season games, which is the equivalent of end of year college schedule. I think the bye week is just what he needs to get the batteries recharged. I think Palmer needs to work hard to get ramped up and not thrown into a game down by 3 scores and only 10% of the playbook. I like Moore to rebound later this year, but maybe not as gaudy stats as the 3 earlier games. DHB is too big a factor and he's not going away. Moore is probably available for free on the waiver wire, and it might be a good idea to pick him up before week 9 on the down low. Right now, no one is really paying much attention to him, and with good reason. He's done squat for some time. I still believe in his superior ball catching skills and playmaking ability. As long as he's healthy, he just needs to incorporated in the game plan and he could be producing some nice fantasy numbers.
 
Remember back when the standard learning curve for a WR was 3 years?

We have been spoiled recently with rookies breaking out their first year. This probably has a Roddy White feel to it. I know White was dropped in our dynasty league too early and I scooped him up.

 
Remember back when the standard learning curve for a WR was 3 years?We have been spoiled recently with rookies breaking out their first year. This probably has a Roddy White feel to it. I know White was dropped in our dynasty league too early and I scooped him up.
Yep and I'll tell you what I am hoping for out of Moore. A parrallel to Mike Wallace. So far he is not doing bad considering the serious handicap he has at QB so far. Same size, Wallace a little faster.
 
I'll tell you what I am hoping for out of Moore. A parrallel to Mike Wallace. So far he is not doing bad considering the serious handicap he has at QB so far. Same size, Wallace a little faster.
There are a couple of HUGE reasons why Moore is unlikely to parallel Wallace.1-QB; Roethlisberger is a much better QB than Campbell was, and then Palmer is, unless somehow, Palmer is able to return to his form of 2007.

2-WR competition; Wallace benefited from coming to Pittsburgh right before Holmes was traded away and Ward nearing the end of his career. There was a WR1 role to be filled, and Wallace slipped right into it; there was little competition. Moore has A LOT of competition at WR: DHB, Ford, Murphy, Schilens, etc.

That's not to say that Moore won't be a good (or even great) WR, but to expect it to happen in year 2 might be un-realistic.

 
I'll tell you what I am hoping for out of Moore. A parrallel to Mike Wallace. So far he is not doing bad considering the serious handicap he has at QB so far. Same size, Wallace a little faster.
There are a couple of HUGE reasons why Moore is unlikely to parallel Wallace.1-QB; Roethlisberger is a much better QB than Campbell was, and then Palmer is, unless somehow, Palmer is able to return to his form of 2007.

2-WR competition; Wallace benefited from coming to Pittsburgh right before Holmes was traded away and Ward nearing the end of his career. There was a WR1 role to be filled, and Wallace slipped right into it; there was little competition. Moore has A LOT of competition at WR: DHB, Ford, Murphy, Schilens, etc.

That's not to say that Moore won't be a good (or even great) WR, but to expect it to happen in year 2 might be un-realistic.
None of those wideouts is a #1. If Moore is good, he'll pass those guys. It isn't like he's got to overcome Andre Johnson or Greg Jennings. We're talking about a whole slew of "never-quite" type of dudes there. Talent will rise. Whether he's got the most talent is still up for debate.
 
I'll tell you what I am hoping for out of Moore. A parrallel to Mike Wallace. So far he is not doing bad considering the serious handicap he has at QB so far. Same size, Wallace a little faster.
There are a couple of HUGE reasons why Moore is unlikely to parallel Wallace.1-QB; Roethlisberger is a much better QB than Campbell was, and then Palmer is, unless somehow, Palmer is able to return to his form of 2007.

2-WR competition; Wallace benefited from coming to Pittsburgh right before Holmes was traded away and Ward nearing the end of his career. There was a WR1 role to be filled, and Wallace slipped right into it; there was little competition. Moore has A LOT of competition at WR: DHB, Ford, Murphy, Schilens, etc.

That's not to say that Moore won't be a good (or even great) WR, but to expect it to happen in year 2 might be un-realistic.
None of those wideouts is a #1. If Moore is good, he'll pass those guys. It isn't like he's got to overcome Andre Johnson or Greg Jennings. We're talking about a whole slew of "never-quite" type of dudes there. Talent will rise. Whether he's got the most talent is still up for debate.
I was responding to another poster who hoped Moore would parallel Wallace's path to stardom. Wallace became a stud in his 2nd year largely because of opportunity. Holmes was gone, so he went from WR3 on the team to WR2, and then thoroughly out-played Holmes to claim the WR1 spot. If Holmes hadn't been traded, Wallace wouldn't have been a starter in his 2nd year, and he wouldn't have exploded like he did.Moore won't have that same opportunity, so it's not reasonable to expect the same (parallel) type of production. Even though none of the other guys are established WR1s, they are more established then the competition Wallace had for a starter's spot (which was none).

 
I counted 10 targets for him today - were either of the INTs on targets to Moore his fault? May be a decent week to pick him back up, under the assumption that Palmer's accuracy may improve...

 
I counted 10 targets for him today - were either of the INTs on targets to Moore his fault? May be a decent week to pick him back up, under the assumption that Palmer's accuracy may improve...
What happened to DHB today? Stat line shows nada from him? Was he hurt, or was this a sign of things to come with Palmer at the helm, i.e. opportunity knocking for Moore?
 
I counted 10 targets for him today - were either of the INTs on targets to Moore his fault? May be a decent week to pick him back up, under the assumption that Palmer's accuracy may improve...
What happened to DHB today? Stat line shows nada from him? Was he hurt, or was this a sign of things to come with Palmer at the helm, i.e. opportunity knocking for Moore?
Moore and Ford were the #1 and #2 today. Hope that's the trend moving forward. They have the most talent, and best hands and speed out of all their wideouts
 
I think Moore will be a great buy low candidate this week. Shouldn't cost much if the owner doesn't keep up with target details.

 
Disclaimer: (I'm not a fan of benching DHB. Hopefully they find a role for him going forward.)

Bumping this thread to point out how this week FBG's are unanimously supporting Moore going forward. He's in the "acquire" category and has shot up the top 200 going forward list. Go check it if you are a subscriber. :popcorn:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top