Denarius Moore - CIncinnatti Bengals (1 Viewer)

[Sabertooth]

so in this thread we have learned that denarius moore>andre johnson for this yr and next?

pretty much...lol.

 

[RedBird33]

More Moore hype.

I'm seriously contemplating trading Andre Johnson in a Keeper League and rolling with Wallace and Moore this year and beyond. These type of endorsements are not helping me sway from pulling the trigger.

If you are so incline please chime in on my Assistant Coach thread.

pretty sweet deal for you if you can swing it. i kinda doubt he gives that much for andre tho.

I am under the impression that he already owns Wallace and the trade would just be Moore for Johnson; otherwise I am with you 100%. At this moment I'm not sure I make the swap of Johnson for Moore, with all the questions surrounding Johnson; unless you are out of it. I think, especially in a keeper league, that you have to hold onto Moore with what we've seen so far between Palmer and him; Palmer has a 4-year contract with OAK, correct?

I was under the impression that he had all 3 and and was just lookin to deal andre. I would also think about having moore as a keeper over aj, too many injuries

I am going to agree with your impression. That is a nice core of WRs to have, especially now; he must of had a few restless weeks waiting for AJ to return and Moore putting up zeros.

lexdizzle read it right, I had AJ, Wallace, Moore and Boldin.I traded AJ last night for a 1st, 3rd in 2013 and a 3rd, 4th in 2012 along with a swap of a bunch of lower picks in 2012 so I moved up in draft position in all cases.

The last 6-7 weeks have sucked not having AJ but Wallace, Moore and Boldin did me fine (start two). I hold the last playoff spot at the moment with a pretty good schedule to close.

BTW, for those that care, I had Wallace and AJ coming into this year as keepers, drafted Moore thanks to this message board late and traded for Boldin (B. Jacobs) to provide depth when AJ was on/off/on/off.

so in this thread we have learned that denarius moore>andre johnson for this yr and next?

pretty much...lol.

I'm not sure if this is what others think but it's not what I believe. For this year it remains to be seen I would say given everything written here about Moore's matchups, targets since Palmer took the reins, etc. I wanted to play Moore more this year and if I had AJ I'm not sure I would be able to not start Moore. Trading AJ was the easy way out if that's even possible.Moving forward into next year and beyond I would rather have AJ over Moore if I had a gun to my head. But given AJ's age, 9yrs in the league, his physical style, coming off injury, run first team in the Texans, suspect QB situation AND what I think is a pretty good compensation package for AJ I pulled the trigger.

This is a TD heavy league, almost nothing for yards, so the consistency you get from AJ doesn't really apply. We also get 2x points for 50+ yrd TDs which enhances Moore in this league to a certain extent.

The Chat-room in the league is split on the trade. I think right now the other owner won the deal since he got the best player. This is a gamble on Moore no doubt. But it sets me up nice for next years draft and gives me 1,1,2,2,3,3 picks already going into 2013...I had the other 2nd from a previous deal.

 

[Dought Man]

134/2 to come this weekend. Such a nice matchup and Carson only has eyes for him.

What a nice turn of fortune for DMoore.

 

[Eastwood]

I am amazed he was still available in any league format. I scooped him prior to week 1 in all my leagues. You guys are very fortunate to pick him up this late, or trade for him for just a 2nd rounder. That just seems crazy.

 

[ldizzle]

so in this thread we have learned that denarius moore>andre johnson for this yr and next?

pretty much...lol.

I dont think that. I feel that you can still get great value for aj and have a solid wr in moore for years to come. With said value u can upgrade in other spots...

 

[Hank Mardukas]

This isn't exactly news, but AJ is 30 years old. I'm not in a Dynasty league but if I was I would seriously start to think about getting value out of Johnson before he starts to decline.

 

[Sabertooth]

so in this thread we have learned that denarius moore>andre johnson for this yr and next?

pretty much...lol.

I dont think that. I feel that you can still get great value for aj and have a solid wr in moore for years to come. With said value u can upgrade in other spots...

I meant it kind of tongue in cheek. Considering what you had to pay to get Andre, and what you had to pay to get Moore, I'd say more is a nice little nugget of value. In the situation you describe it's basically finding the value of X when Moore+X=Andre.

 

[cvnpoka]

cant believe i got sucked into the hype again.

 

[flapgreen]

Picked him up to put on my bench but no way was I starting him after what happened earlier in the season.

 

[Mistabishi]

Looks like Moore fooled us again. Sheesh.

 

[ldizzle]

C'mon raiders are domiinating u expect them to keep airing it out?

 

[cvnpoka]

C'mon raiders are domiinating u expect them to keep airing it out?

no i stupidly hoped for moore to perform up to the standards predicted itt and in the subscriber content.

 

[elbowrm]

This game is far from over.

 

[Raiderfan32904]

This game is far from over.

this game is OVVVAAHH! (Vince Carter)Expect a big second half for M. Bush.

 

[elbowrm]

Oh, and

 

[mr roboto]

cant believe i got sucked into the hype again.

It's not 'hype'. He has produced. He's a big-upside guy. I don't know why people keep calling it hype. He has clearly showed huge potential and production at points this year.

 

[Slapdash]

 

[cvnpoka]

cant believe i got sucked into the hype again.

It's not 'hype'. He has produced. He's a big-upside guy. I don't know why people keep calling it hype. He has clearly showed huge potential and production at points this year.

lots of players have shown similar. yet they arent labeled wr1, must start, or on par with andre johnson. if i had yall in my league i coulda got vjax for this fools gold.

 

[mr roboto]

cant believe i got sucked into the hype again.

It's not 'hype'. He has produced. He's a big-upside guy. I don't know why people keep calling it hype. He has clearly showed huge potential and production at points this year.

lots of players have shown similar. yet they arent labeled wr1, must start, or on par with andre johnson. if i had yall in my league i coulda got vjax for this fools gold.

I don't know who 'yall' is but I have him as a WR3 in redraft, and probably in the 15-25 range in dynasty. And I'm one of his believers. You want the same group think, plug the studs, copy-and-paste from predraft list rankings? I don't. I want the call based on recent performance that goes against the grain. You hit on some and miss on others.

I'm sorry for your loss.

 

[cvnpoka]

meh, this comes off like im blamin yall. im not. im just saying you guys are way wrong.

 

[Bruno2]

Looks like the Raiders just lost another WR.. I hope DHB is ok, its a head/neck injury.

 

[ldizzle]

Looks like the Raiders just lost another WR.. I hope DHB is ok, its a head/neck injury.

I hope dhb is fine. If its significant can Moore be bumped anymoore?

 

[Das Boot]

meh, this comes off like im blamin yall. im not. im just saying you guys are way wrong.

It's a mistake to put too much emphasis on any one week, last week and this week being perfect examples.Oakland has a good team and an excellent running game and now a competent to good passing QB.Oakland's schedule against weak passing Defs is excellent for the remainder of the year as well.There's a lot here to like with Moore's potential for the rest of the year in FF.

 

[Wyld Stallyns]

No doubt in my mind that Denarius puts up a lot of points on a lot benches next week.

 

[Eastwood]

Nelson is on my bench, Moore in my lineup.

 

[shadyridr]

Nelson is on my bench, Moore in my lineup.

wtf would u bench jordy?

 

[mr roboto]

Nelson is on my bench, Moore in my lineup.

wtf would u bench jordy?

Just blame it on each and everyone in this thread.

 

[cubbie5150]

I know it's stupid to think this way, but I'm at least glad I also started Denarius last week @ SD....at least I got those pts. I'd feel especially bad if I had him on my bench last week, & gotten the stinker from him this week as well. I was kinda expecting this (since I'm superstitious to a fault) given all the band wagon hype

 

[shadyridr]

Nelson is on my bench, Moore in my lineup.

wtf would u bench jordy?

Just blame it on each and everyone in this thread.

heck i started him over a struggling roddy but i would never sit a bonafide stud for an unknown quantity

 

[misc]

Nice, Moore on my lineup while Tampa Mike and Sidney Rice is sitting on the bench

 

[J Giles Band]

Don't know which is worse, Moore's maddening inconsistency or the ridiculous fawning he has received in this thread.

Bump Finley

 

[bushdocda]

Don't know which is worse, Moore's maddening inconsistency or the ridiculous fawning he has received in this thread.Bump Finley

Fawning!

 

[AmosMoses]

I guess this means we can expect another 300 posts by duaneok.

 

[bill bates hits hard]

He is Djax, Vjax, just that kind of player.

 

[cubbie5150]

Glad peeps are mad. Now I can feel safe starting him next week as he doesn't perform when expectations are high

 

[Lavachebeadsman]

Anyone who didn't realize he was a boom or bust guy is kidding themselves. Additionally, it was obvious the Raiders would be leading a majority of the game versus the anemic Minnesota offense that only put points up late, ergo 30 carries for Bush.

 

[Skeletore Eh]

I know it's stupid to think this way, but I'm at least glad I also started Denarius last week @ SD....at least I got those pts. I'd feel especially bad if I had him on my bench last week, & gotten the stinker from him this week as well. I was kinda expecting this (since I'm superstitious to a fault) given all the band wagon hype

I fall into this category. Thankfully I won both games regardless. And I'll be rolling him out next week too

 

[shadyridr]

started over roddy

 

[Dought Man]

 

[Kenny Powers]

Enjoy the Moore hype while it lasts for another week

Thanks. Totally enjoyable.

Totally enjoying the ownage here.

What ownage? He did exactly what I expected, had his *2nd* good game of the year and has people gushing about him just like after his week 2 game.I will be totally ownaged if he isnt back to being a weekly bench WR within a few weeks.

 

[Gr00vus]

Pretty much guaranteeing a 0 point week here aren't ewe?

 

[ourmanflint]

Don't know which is worse, Moore's maddening inconsistency or the ridiculous fawning he has received in this thread.Bump Finley

A QB that was on his couch a month ago and a rookie receiver. While both are talented and both are capable of big days, is this a big surprise?I don't see why his inconsistency would be maddening. It should be expected.Yes I would have started him today in the right situation but I wouldn't have considered today's result maddening.

 

[cvnpoka]

Pretty much guaranteeing a 0 point week here aren't ewe?

in general i hate guyz who toot their own horn but nice thats nice in this case. regardless, this guy is in my lineup from here on out. i cant trust guys like vjax and fbg tells me nicks is wr18 going forward. dmoore it is.

 

[J Giles Band]

A QB that was on his couch a month ago and a rookie receiver. While both are talented and both are capable of big days, is this a big surprise?I don't see why his inconsistency would be maddening. It should be expected.Yes I would have started him today in the right situation but I wouldn't have considered today's result maddening.

The point was that Moore's production does not match the hype he has received here (particularly in this thread). The idea this guy had attained WR2 status after last week was simply wishful thinking.Moore has had two great weeks, two so-so weeks and has been unstartable otherwise. If you don't like the term 'maddening' fine... let's just leave it that his play is inconsistent and he is an unreliable start at best.Not a guy I'm willing to roll out week to week. Maybe on bye weeks. But judging by some of the posts here, this guy was the next coming of Jerry Rice. That's all... Feel free to continue with semantics.

 

[cvnpoka]

A QB that was on his couch a month ago and a rookie receiver. While both are talented and both are capable of big days, is this a big surprise?I don't see why his inconsistency would be maddening. It should be expected.Yes I would have started him today in the right situation but I wouldn't have considered today's result maddening.

The point was that Moore's production does not match the hype he has received here (particularly in this thread). The idea this guy had attained WR2 status after last week was simply wishful thinking.Moore has had two great weeks, two so-so weeks and has been unstartable otherwise. If you don't like the term 'maddening' fine... let's just leave it that his play is inconsistent and he is an unreliable start at best.Not a guy I'm willing to roll out week to week. Maybe on bye weeks. But judging by some of the posts here, this guy was the next coming of Jerry Rice. That's all... Feel free to continue with semantics.

nah bro, you just dont get it. we were talkin bout dynasty. thats where teh skillzors iz at.

 

[J Giles Band]

nah bro, you just dont get it. we were talkin bout dynasty. thats where teh skillzors iz at.

Overhyped is overhyped no matter the format. Haven't been in a redraft in years. Denarius certainly has talent, but let's not annoint him for the hall of fame just yet... bro.

 

[cvnpoka]

sarcasmdetector.jpeg

 

[firstseason1988]

nah bro, you just dont get it. we were talkin bout dynasty. thats where teh skillzors iz at.

Overhyped is overhyped no matter the format. Haven't been in a redraft in years. Denarius certainly has talent, but let's not annoint him for the hall of fame just yet... bro.

Off topic, but I play 1 redraft league, 1 keeper league, 1 dynasty league. Playing in each help me with the others and makes it fun for all of them. That's the way to go if you have the time, but besides my kids, this is basically my only hobby.

 

[pantagrapher]

Denarius Less

 

[Area51Inhabitant]

Overreact much?