What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Divisional Round Game Thread*** Baltimore at Pittsburgh (2 Viewers)

I'm not sure I'd waste a challenge on that if I were Tomlin.And nice tackle by Suisham.
Yep, bad challenge. Now if they challenge and lose, they out of challenge's. Was not worth 14 yards.
They punted around the 40 yard line of Pittsburgh. If they didn't have that 14 yards, they most likely wouldn't have kicked a field goal. That challenge was worth 3 points for Pittsburgh.
Nope, things would have been different. Saved the Steelers, nothing. Can't assume anything. Making a field goal on that field is never easy and so on.
Do you agree now? :goodposting:
 
no problem with any of the calls thus far. Ike not getting a penalty for the headbutt and Suggs not getting penalized for going low were both bad noncalls.

 
Jeff Triplette is one of the worst refs in the NFL - he blinded Orlando Brown and he seems to be blind himself.This game is turning into a debacle. Wonder if he will overturn himself. Looked like a TD
Agreed. Triplette absolutely sucks. He reminds me of a substitute junior high teacher.
 
For a couple teams that hate each other and are so willing to get into little altercations, it's stunning that they just stood around when a whistle hadn't been blown.

 
Can they call a penalty on a replay? Because that should have been a blow to the head, right?
Oh brother.It's Baltimore Steelers buddy....they are letting them playa little.Post Season.
I dislike the rule, but anyone named "Manning" gets that call. It should be called consistently.
I hear ya...the rule is bad. But it is the playoffs, two very physical teams...looks like they are going to let some things go unless it is very obvious.
 
The Steelers have trailed at the half in only three games all year. The Patriots loss, and both Ravens games. And they are threatening to trail again.

 
why isn't that the tuck rule..because he recocked?
It absolutely should have been the stupid tuck rule. He pumped, and never "tucked" the football after pulling the ball down. It should have been an incomplete pass according to the worst and most infamous rule in football, which they clearly can't even call right.
 
I'm not sure I'd waste a challenge on that if I were Tomlin.And nice tackle by Suisham.
Yep, bad challenge. Now if they challenge and lose, they out of challenge's. Was not worth 14 yards.
They punted around the 40 yard line of Pittsburgh. If they didn't have that 14 yards, they most likely wouldn't have kicked a field goal. That challenge was worth 3 points for Pittsburgh.
Nope, things would have been different. Saved the Steelers, nothing. Can't assume anything. Making a field goal on that field is never easy and so on.
Do you agree now?
Yea, the first 2 words that popped in my head on that challenge: MIKE MARTZ :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can they call a penalty on a replay? Because that should have been a blow to the head, right?
Oh brother.It's Baltimore Steelers buddy....they are letting them playa little.Post Season.
I dislike the rule, but anyone named "Manning" gets that call. It should be called consistently.
I hear ya...the rule is bad. But it is the playoffs, two very physical teams...looks like they are going to let some things go unless it is very obvious.
Have you been watching the game? They are letting the obvious go and calling phantom penalties. They are all over the map on this game and it takes away from what could be a good game.
 
And yes, a HORRENDOUS challenge by Tomlin. The Ravens weren't rushing to kick the XP, so he had time to check upstairs to see whether it was a fumble or not.

 
CBS coverage is terrible. Why not show this alleged pass interference rather than the tackle?
Also, why not mention that leading with the crown of the helmet is an illegal tackle and should be flagged?
Because it isn't illegal unless you are tackling a QB or a "defenseless receiver". Leading with your helmet against a runner is perfectly legal.
Leading with the crown of the helmet is not legal, ever.from Rule 12, Section 2, Article 8 of the NFL rulebook...

Unnecessary Roughness

There shall be no unnecessary roughness. This shall include, but will not be limited to: ...

...(f) If a player uses any part of his helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/"hairline" parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily. Although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet and facemask is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protecting those players who are in virtually defenseless postures, including but not limited to:

(1) Forcibly hitting the defenseless player's head, neck, or face with the helmet or facemask, regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenseless player by encircling or grasping him; or

(2) Lowering the head and violently or unnecessarily making forcible contact with the "hairline" or forehead part of the helmet against any part of the defenseless player's body
I am pretty sure leading with your helmet in order to make a tackle is legal so long as the officials deem you aren't doing anything I bolded. It is possible to make a tackle, lead with your helmet and not commit a penalty.
It depends upon the judgment of what is "violent or unnecessary." Of course the rule is written so that this should not be called when it is accidental. But it's only a point of emphasis to protect defenseless players; there is nothing that prevents refs from flagging these hits even under other circumstances, including when the offense delivers them.There is a separate section of the rule (which is very, very long) that deals with "launching" to deliver a hit, which was also done. In any case, I know a lot of people think the broader interpretation of "violent and unnecessary" is ####ifying the game, but you certainly cannot say that hits with the helmet are explicitly legal. They're not.

 
Hoping this game will settle down now.

1st Q thoughts:

Suggs is dominating.

Ravens have a great offensive game plan. Just stay away from throwing from the unbalanced line - don't give Pitt a chance beat Tony Moll to make a game-changing sack

Tomlin blew his use of the challenges

A turnover and/or Balt stop here and a quick score could change the game bigtime

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top