What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DNC Leaks...official thread (1 Viewer)

Quez said:
Check out @KimDotcom's Tweet: https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/786428040859361280?s=09
Click to expand...
DotCom was the first one who said Assange had serious data on Hillary February of last year.

Yesterday it started floating around that WL had Hillary's actual emails from her server. That is really pretty much the only thing that I could see having an impact, though the content would have to be extremely substantive and the voters would have to take it seriously. One problem with WL's approach is I wonder if people would trust the source and also if the effect hasn't been watered down by all the releases they have been doing. 

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
One problem with WL's approach is I wonder if people would trust the source and also if the effect hasn't been watered down by all the releases they have been doing. 
Click to expand...
He had also mentioned something previously about her birthday, which is October 26th.  They raided his house on his birthday, so he was eluding to something happening on hers.  

As far as the "watering down", it brings up the curation of the releases.  This is very interesting to me.  Assange must have some knowledge of the contents, but there is no way they are going through then all.  The barrage of 5 different Podesta leaks in 2 days was crazy.  There is a ton of stuff to digest, and it is somewhat overwhelming to the news outlets trying to analyze them.

Also, it appears the latest releases were triggered by the Trump tape release.  I think the Trump tape leaked first, but am not 100% sure.  There are rumors of more Trump tapes, and if the Apprentice footage leaks there could be a ton more.  We have full blown leak war going on between Assange and the Hillary media empire.  It sounds like it's about to go nuclear. : popcorn:

 
I love that Assange is turning the spigot on and off based on who knows what subjective criteria which goes completely against his ethos that all information wants to be free.  He is the new boss, same as the old.  Fraud.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
DotCom was the first one who said Assange had serious data on Hillary February of last year.

Yesterday it started floating around that WL had Hillary's actual emails from her server. That is really pretty much the only thing that I could see having an impact, though the content would have to be extremely substantive and the voters would have to take it seriously. One problem with WL's approach is I wonder if people would trust the source and also if the effect hasn't been watered down by all the releases they have been doing. 
Click to expand...
Emails from her server won't be enough to derail her campaign - that ship has sailed.  If they had been released during the primary, then maybe you get some legs that "OMG! Hillary can't be trusted since her server was hacked!"

Now, they need evidence of actual wrong-doing - serious wrong-doing.  Even then it still comes down to "Not Trump"

 
dutch said:
I love that Assange is turning the spigot on and off based on who knows what subjective criteria which goes completely against his ethos that all information wants to be free.  He is the new boss, same as the old.  Fraud.
Click to expand...


Don't like the message, shoot the messenger :thumbup:

That fixes everything

 
At this point in the game, I'm hesitate to trust Assange, Wiki Links or any of these places that are putting these e-mails out.  There's too much of a political bias and stink to them to take seriously.  

 
Sinn Fein said:
Don't like the message, shoot the messenger :thumbup:

That fixes everything
Click to expand...
I have no problem with the message as it is mostly backroom pablum with little to no reason to see the light of day other than as 'gotcha' fodder.  And frankly it barely rises to that level in the main.

 
All these places keep saying "we've got the email, video, witness that will end Hillary's campaign" but, then they don't.....

make no mistake, I would like their to actually be something, just tired of this whole thing

 
jerry jones said:
All these places keep saying "we've got the email, video, witness that will end Hillary's campaign" but, then they don't.....

make no mistake, I would like their to actually be something, just tired of this whole thing
Click to expand...


All feels a bit desperate right now...don't think anyone has anything serious

 
If there is a wjc video with a 13 yo girl I'm not clicking the link.  We went through this with the GoT girl from the fappening.

 
Quez said:
https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/575e37/new_wikileaks_podesta_emails_part_five_673_more/?utm_source=mweb_redirect&compact=true

If anyone didn't know already, the leaks indicate Hillary is going to definitely be onboard with TPP, Or whatever it will be rebranded as.
Click to expand...


One thing I've noticed an which I find surprising is the level of consultation between Brent Budowsky and John Podesta. Budowsky comes off in his published opinions as an independent (albeit progressive) pundit, but actually he appears to be very much tied to the campaign.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jerry jones said:
All these places keep saying "we've got the email, video, witness that will end Hillary's campaign" but, then they don't.....

make no mistake, I would like their to actually be something, just tired of this whole thing
Click to expand...
In just about any other year, something bad would end, or at least seriously derail, her campaign, but she is going against the worst candidate ever, so no matter what bad stuff comes out about her, she will still crawl over the finish line.  And make no mistake about it, she is crawling over the finish line.  These are sad times for America. 

 
I've said this but I'll keep riffing on the point - problem is the hacked emails are just reflecting on old scandals, not unveiling new ones. The releases just confirm what people thought about Hillary already, even her supporters.

 
Ghost Rider said:
In just about any other year, something bad would end, or at least seriously derail, her campaign, but she is going against the worst candidate ever, so no matter what bad stuff comes out about her, she will still crawl over the finish line.  And make no mistake about it, she is crawling over the finish line.  These are sad times for America. 
Click to expand...
Well, with the assistance of "the press". They bury most of the bad stuff

 
Here is the current RSVP list to the Thursday Night (4/9) dinner at Podesta’s. As a reminder, this is with the 25 reporters more closely following HRC (aka the future bus). Yes ABC – Liz Kreutz Yes AP – Julie Pace Yes AP - Ken Thomas Yes AP - Lisa Lerer AURN - April Ryan Yes Bloomberg - Jennifer Epstein Yes Buzzfeed - Ruby Cramer Yes CBS – Steve Chagaris Yes CNBC - John Harwood Yes CNN - Dan Merica Yes Huffington Post - Amanda Terkel NO (Panama) LAT - Mike Memoli Yes LAT - Evan Handler Yes McClatchy - Anita Kumar Yes MSNBC - Alex Seitz-Wald Yes National Journal - Emily Schultheis Yes NBC – Mark Murray Yes NPR – Tamara Keith NYT - Amy Chozik Yes NYT - Maggie Haberman Yes Politico - Annie Karni Politico - Gabe Debenedetti Yes Reuters - Amanda Becker The Hill - Amie Parnes Yes Washington Post - Anne Gearan Yes WSJ - Laura Meckler Yes WSJ - Peter Nicholas Yes WSJ - Colleen McCain Nelson *From:* Jesse Ferguson [mailto:jesse@jesseferguson.com] *Sent:* Monday, April 6, 2015 5:10 PM *To:* Amanda Renteria; 'Huma Abedin'; 'Marlon Marshall'; 'Robby Mook'; Nick Merrill; Jennifer Palmieri; brianefallon@gmail.com; Kristina Schake; 'Mandy Grunwald'; 'Margolis, Jim'; 'Joel Benenson'; 'John Podesta' *Cc:* 'Marissa Astor' *Subject:* Press Dinners - Full Info We wanted to make sure everyone on this email had the latest information on the two upcoming dinners with reporters. Both are off-the-record. 1) Thursday night, April 9th at 7:00p.m. Dinner at the Home of John Podesta. His address is 3743 Brandywine St NW in Washington, DC. This will be with about 20 reporters who will closely cover the campaign (aka the bus

 
This is the core group of "journalist" colluding with the DNC.  Completely corrupt media!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
bagger said:
What super interesting thing has come out of them?

Media is about ratings, not some nefarious agenda.
Click to expand...
Even the tabloids covered the Wikileaks emails better.  The networks focus on more low grade news.

 
Rohn Jambo said:
Even the tabloids covered the Wikileaks emails better.  The networks focus on more low grade news.
Click to expand...
Again what super interesting thing has come of them? What information in there would warrant coverage daily (or whatever threshold you would like to see)?

 
Ministry of Pain said:
Pretty telling but still jaw dropping how the media just glosses over much of this, incredible.
Click to expand...
I want to see leaked emails from Donald Trump and the Republicans for the past 10 years  Once those have been released I can then make a decision on what's more credible. Until that happens all I see is a foreign government with an agenda trying to help one side getting elected. That doesn't bother you that the Russians want Trump to be president?

 
bagger said:
Again what super interesting thing has come of them? What information in there would warrant coverage daily (or whatever threshold you would like to see)?
Click to expand...
How about Donna Brazile providing Hillary with debate questions in advance?  And now she is the head of the DNC?  That should be 2 heads of the DNC fired in a matter of months.

Take your pick of any of the pay to play Clinton Foundation leaks.  That should be huge news.

 
Mile High said:
I want to see leaked emails from Donald Trump and the Republicans for the past 10 years  Once those have been released I can then make a decision on what's more credible. Until that happens all I see is a foreign government with an agenda trying to help one side getting elected. That doesn't bother you that the Russians want Trump to be president?
Click to expand...
It is impossible for anyone to be 100% certain of where the hacks originated.  It may have been someone inside the DNC that leaked everything.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ShamrockPride said:
They've released just 10,000 of a planned 50,000. So MANY more to come.
Click to expand...
And I would think that they are building up to the really good stuff. If the payoffs from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation, if the collaboration with the media, etc. is just the tip of the iceberg what is yet to come?

 
KingPrawn said:
And I would think that they are building up to the really good stuff. If the payoffs from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation, if the collaboration with the media, etc. is just the tip of the iceberg what is yet to come?
Click to expand...
I saw this on Twitter this a.m.  it's from beforeitsnews.com so take it fwiw.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/10/all-33k-of-hillarys-deleted-emails-to-be-released-by-november-1-3424969.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=beforeitsnews

Eta I would also expect some more recordings.  They released a bunch of voicemails earlier, but there was nothing substantial in them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top