What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DNC Leaks...official thread (1 Viewer)

jonessed said:
I have always assumed foreign governments are directly/indirectly trying to influence our elections.  We definitely try to influence elections in other countries.
Click to expand...
I was doing some major eye rolling at the guys in this thread who got their panties in a wad that the Russians were trying to influence our election, when we have outright put puppets into power in other countries (Shah of Iran, for example).

 
How about last weeks revelation that the Obama Administration sent several hundred thousands of tax payers dollars to an Israeli group to oust their PM in the last election.  That was to a country that has historically been an ally. 

The only thing that worries me more is what is not being revealed.....Is that so the hackers can blackmail those when they get into office?

 
Statorama said:
I was doing some major eye rolling at the guys in this thread who got their panties in a wad that the Russians were trying to influence our election, when we have outright put puppets into power in other countries (Shah of Iran, for example).
Click to expand...
I keep wondering where these people were when the Chinese (who just banned Internet news) were funneling all kinds of money into Clinton Gore '96.  Where are they when money into the Clinton Foundation grants them favors with State Dept.  The Russians should be happy with their uranium...

 
Ksquared said:
How about last weeks revelation that the Obama Administration sent several hundred thousands of tax payers dollars to an Israeli group to oust their PM in the last election.  That was to a country that has historically been an ally. 

The only thing that worries me more is what is not being revealed.....Is that so the hackers can blackmail those when they get into office?
Click to expand...
Hackers gotta eat. 

 
Ksquared said:
How about last weeks revelation that the Obama Administration sent several hundred thousands of tax payers dollars to an Israeli group to oust their PM in the last election.  That was to a country that has historically been an ally. 

The only thing that worries me more is what is not being revealed.....Is that so the hackers can blackmail those when they get into office?
Click to expand...
There have to be politicians walking around right now that are going crazy wondering if any of their dirt is going to be revealed.  Probably a similar feeling to how all the married dudes who signed up for Ashley Madison accounts felt like when they got hacked.  Sleepless nights, going through the motions, hoping nobody types their email address in.

 
Were these leaked, or were they hacked? Leaked would imply someone from within shared anonymously. Hacked implies stolen.

If you think it doesn't matter, just change the thread title to "DNC Gossip".

 
THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS RIGGED FOLKS! When you turn on your TV and see people protesting, those are paid interns.  When you hear poll numbers, those are bs numbers strategically released to counter other poll numbers.  When you see comments supporting a candidate under a blog post, those are paid bloggers.  When you hear the same talking points over & over, those were given to the media.  EVERYTHING!  It's like f'n bizzaro world.

 
Quez said:
THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS RIGGED FOLKS! When you turn on your TV and see people protesting, those are paid interns.  When you hear poll numbers, those are bs numbers strategically released to counter other poll numbers.  When you see comments supporting a candidate under a blog post, those are paid bloggers.  When you hear the same talking points over & over, those were given to the media.  EVERYTHING!  It's like f'n bizzaro world.
Click to expand...
It might even explain some of the posters here :gasp:

 
Going to be funny when the hacker is identified as a 15 year old kid named Jason & used the password hope/change.  I stole that line, but too good.

So DNC is hacked & no one hacked some crap server in Hillary's closet?   Okay.

 
Although this could be from a Russian hack, I find it interesting that the FBI showed proof of the source of the Sony hack, but are showing nothing here.  

More wag the dog stuff from the media-controlled government.

- Some of these documents have been altered.

- Russia is trying to influence the elections.

All put in place so when the next leak has more damaging information, we can all ignore.  

 
David Dodds said:
Although this could be from a Russian hack, I find it interesting that the FBI showed proof of the source of the Sony hack, but are showing nothing here.  

More wag the dog stuff from the media-controlled government.

- Some of these documents have been altered.

- Russia is trying to influence the elections.

All put in place so when the next leak has more damaging information, we can all ignore.  
Click to expand...
You mean the FBI might not do the right thing due to outside influence?  Hopefully they don't do that when it comes to someone compromising classified information on a personal server.

 
Quez said:
Are you one of Hillary's paid shills?  You must be, because you keep posting stuff blaming Russia.

"Absolutely no evidence..."

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/wikileaks-julian-assange-no-proof-hacked-dnc-emails-came-russia-n616541?client=ms-android-verizon
Click to expand...
You have zero clue if you think Saints is a Hillary guy.  He has been consistently posting links against her for months too...and posting about Russian ties to Trump for months before this as well.

And believing Assange in this is as good as you believing that Donald wasn't making fun of a handicapped guy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff said:
You have zero clue if you think Saints is a Hillary guy.  He has been consistently posting links against her for months too...and posting about Russian ties to Trump for months before this as well.

And believing Assange in this is as good as you believing that Donald wasn't making fun of a handicapped guy.
Click to expand...
I was joking about him being a paid shills. I apparently don't have as great if a notebook as you do.  Russians responsible for the hack is poor circumstantial evidence.  But hey, let's start WW3 to deflect Hillary's corruption.

 
Quez said:
I was joking about him being a paid shills. I apparently don't have as great if a notebook as you do.  Russians responsible for the hack is poor circumstantial evidence.  But hey, let's start WW3 to deflect Hillary's corruption.
Click to expand...
Is anyone advocating any of that here?

No?  ok.

 
sho nuff said:
Is anyone advocating any of that here?

No?  ok.
Click to expand...
What exactly is the goal of publishing news stories that are based on bs evidence?  Make an excuse as to why we got hacked?  Paint Trump in a bad light, and try and fabricate ties with Putin?  Deflect the heat from all of the juicy nuggets found in the leak?  Make us dislike Russia?  I'm not a pawn.  I'm not feeding into this one.  Call me skeptical of what the news says, but in light of recent discoveries about media / political cooperation, who isn't?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quez said:
What exactly is the goal of publishing news stories that are based on bs evidence?  Make an excuse as to why we got hacked?  Paint Trump in a bad light, and try and fabricate ties with Putin?  Deflect the heat from all of the juicy nuggets found in the leak?  Make us dislike Russia?  I'm not a pawn.  I'm not feeding into this one.  Call me skeptical of what the news says, but in light of recent discoveries about media / political cooperation, who isn't?
Click to expand...
You keep calling it bs evidence.  I don't think bs means what you think it means.

 
Quez said:
Are you one of Hillary's paid shills?  You must be, because you keep posting stuff blaming Russia.

"Absolutely no evidence..."

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/wikileaks-julian-assange-no-proof-hacked-dnc-emails-came-russia-n616541?client=ms-android-verizon
Click to expand...
Wow Quez, that's rough bro.

That's not a political site. I've posted to technical sites here and technical experts. I'd say maybe review the evidence before accepting Assange's statements at face value.

However if you're going to look at Assange then look at Assange:

While three cybersecurity experts told NBC that the DNC emails were hacked by Russian intelligence, Assange stressed that Wikileaks has not disclosed the source of the leak.

"Well there is no proof of that whatsoever. We have not disclosed our source, and of course, this is a diversion that's being pushed by the Hillary Clinton campaign," he said in an interview.
Click to expand...
- It's not mutually exclusive for it to be both a diversion from the Hillary campaign and also actually be from Russia.

- Now you tell me, is it not true that WL has always said it's sources are anonymous? And now Assange says he knows the sourcing? Which is it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BustedKnuckles said:
because YOU and people like you,think so?
Click to expand...
Because people that are experts in the field think so?

I really don't understand why you guys are getting so uptight about the reporting on what if obviously a very legitimate and important story. It doesn't make the story of the content of the emails go away.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DEFLECT  DEFLECT!!!! Dems are hoping that the Russia story is what takes over and people pay attention to that not the crookedness of their party and nominee.

 
BustedKnuckles said:
really?
Click to expand...

 


About ThreatConnect Research Team


The ThreatConnect Research Team: is an elite group of globally-acknowledged cybersecurity experts, dedicated to tracking down existing and emerging cyber threats. We scrutinize trends, technology and socio-political motivators to develop comprehensive knowledge of the cyber landscape. Then, we share what we’ve learned so that you can protect your organization, and your team can take precise action against threats.
Click to expand...
Do these guys check out?

Yes? No?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BustedKnuckles said:
Honestly i dont know WHAT or WHO to believe anymore ...gone are the days of trusting what you hear and read ...sad
Click to expand...
Ok how about this. Folks screaming 'Diversion!' 'Squirrel Hunt!' 'Hillary Shill!" maybe take a moment to find a technology or intelligence expert who is saying it's not the Russians. No rush or anything but they're not out there from what I see. I'm geeked out by the technical aspects, I enjoy it, it's a deep dive for me.

But I'm also interested in the emails. Maybe dig some up, has the well run dry? Yes the DNC has had what they are getting coming to them and how, so let's see some dirt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Quez said:
Are you one of Hillary's paid shills?  You must be, because you keep posting stuff blaming Russia.

"Absolutely no evidence..."

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/amp/wikileaks-julian-assange-no-proof-hacked-dnc-emails-came-russia-n616541?client=ms-android-verizon
Click to expand...
Wow Quez, that's rough bro.

That's not a political site. I've posted to technical sites here and technical experts. I'd say maybe review the evidence before accepting Assange's statements at face value.

However if you're going to look at Assange then look at Assange:

While three cybersecurity experts told NBC that the DNC emails were hacked by Russian intelligence, Assange stressed that Wikileaks has not disclosed the source of the leak.

"Well there is no proof of that whatsoever. We have not disclosed our source, and of course, this is a diversion that's being pushed by the Hillary Clinton campaign," he said in an interview.
Click to expand...
- It's not mutually exclusive for it to be both a diversion from the Hillary campaign and also actually be from Russia.

- Now you tell me, is it not true that WL has always said it's sources are anonymous? And now Assange says he knows the sourcing? Which is it?

Edited 21 minutes ago by SaintsInDome2006
Click to expand...
Quez, SaintsinDome is one of the fairest poster around. He is very thoughtful and his posts are well thought out. I don't agree with him a lot but I respect the hell out of him. He deserves better than being called a Hillary Shrill.

 
Card Trader said:
DEFLECT  DEFLECT!!!! Dems are hoping that the Russia story is what takes over and people pay attention to that not the crookedness of their party and nominee.
Click to expand...
And what's disappointing is watching ABC news tonight there was not one mention of the content of the emails-NOT ONE MENTION of what was in 22,000 emails, but yet they covered the whole Russian angle and had experts on there claiming they had proof it was Russia and then went into details about Trump and Russia. 

What kind of country do we live in? We make fun of the North Korea Media and the unbelievable stories they tell of their leader but we are the leader of the free world and this is what we have?? 

 
Any idea why Twitter is sending me emails about the DNC, the schedule and topics of the speeches each day? They've never emailed me about anything before. 

 
It's very irresponsible for a major Presidential candidate contender to blame Russia without any evidence...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top