What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Do you personally agree with taking down confederate monuments? (1 Viewer)

As much as I like to clown around about the North making the South their #####....I don't see the point in removing the statues now just because (to generalize) the Northerners then didn't seem concerned with total subjugation of Southerners who fought.  IIRC, there wasn't war crime tribunals, there weren't Southerners hung for treason. To me, it doesn't seem like the Federal Government wanted to eradicate the memory of the South ala the Allies did with the Nazi Party or Emperor worship post WWII. 

Where I do think there is a problem today is in the co-opting (generally speaking) of Southern Civil War ideals by hate groups today. I think if you're a proud "Son of the South" you need to be at the tip of the spear in shouting these people down for trying to glom onto and corrupt what (I'm assuming) you hold sacred. 
Of course they didn't - most of them at the time were racist #######s, too. Hence the revisionist history with a century of romanticizing the Antebellum South and d!ckheads like Stonewall Jackson & Beauregard

 
2 hours ago, Quez said:

I think it's opening up a can of worms.  All those old guys have baggage.  Unless we are going to erase everyone's name who owned a slave.  Adios, Jefferson.  Goodbye Washington, and even Lincoln.
Wait. You think Lincoln owned slaves?
Quez is not exactly a big student of history, is he?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps there is a compromise.  Simply place another statue nearby, in the apparent gaze of the current Confederate one.  Have this statue noticeably grander in scale.  Have it be Harriet Tubman.  You can substitute MLK if that is your predilection. 

 
If only I'd thought to make a post that there's no reason to take down something for commemorating something that no one thinks it is commemorating.
I was supporting your argument, actually  

What is wrong with your brain?
Nothing.  Of note is these were people defending the way of life of their neighbors and friends. They were supporting something that had been normal for about 4000+ years.  They weren't rolling across the north murdering Jews, killing non Romans.  I don't support what they were standing for, but the comparisons to Hitler are laughable. 

I don't know why they were allowed to be put up in the first place, but they were meant to honor the people who led them in a time of great strife, not the principles they stood for. 

 
Slaves were beaten, raped repeatedly, and hung in front of their friends and family. Mothers would kill their infant babies so they wouldn't have to endure that life. Families were ripped apart when slave owners felt like selling one of them off. The comparisons to Hitler in terms of how the people he persecuted were treated don't seem at all out of line. Your responses make me think you don't actually know very much about what it was like to be a slave. 

"Defending the way of life" is a startlingly ignorant way to whitewash the human rights catastrophe that slavery was. You should stop posting about this. 
And none of that has anything to do with what i said.  Please continue with your hysteria while putting words in my mouth. 

 
The President should create a task force to go around looking for things that might be offensive and erase them.  Sure, it will be a massive undertaking, and cost plenty of tax dollars, but we want to make sure nobody has their feelings hurt.

 
I live in an area where people use Confederate flags for curtains. It's their property and, as much as it sickens me, their right.

I draw the line at having monuments to traitors on grounds that I pay taxes to support. I'll budge on museums, but not on active government sites. 
I drive past 4 confederate flags every day on the way home. People can scream "heritage not hate" until they're blue in the face, but I personally know each homeowner flying one I drive past, and coincidentally they're all racists.  Not "the welfare state is paternalistic toward blacks" Republican racists, full on "that [nword] ever looks at my wife again I'll put a bullet in him" racists.

There are arguments for keeping the statue of Lee.  Even some for Jefferson Davis and, I suppose, P.G.T. Beauregard.  The Battle of Liberty Place monument was the dumbest hill I can imagine the anti-removal demonstrators electing to die on. 

 
The President should create a task force to go around looking for things that might be offensive and erase them.  Sure, it will be a massive undertaking, and cost plenty of tax dollars, but we want to make sure nobody has their feelings hurt.
No one is talking about having "their feelings hurt". This was a systematic genocide that's been romanticized. Pick another hill to die on

 
Why can't we let the monuments stand as a memory of how we have progressed as a society, rather than as some kind of celebration of a past we'd like to forget.

I'm for keeping the ones we have and not erecting any new ones.  Can we start by getting rid of the Ark and Creationist Museum?  I know they're not really monuments but they're both stupid and embarrassing. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would have thought that's something you'd at least respect ;)

And yes, I'm being a ####. I get that. Guys like you don't generally appreciate people who #####foot around things, so I'm being direct. And I'm not worried about offending you because you're a big boy. 
Yep.  Slavery sucked.  Always did.  4000+ yrs of it.  These dip####s didn't invent it, but we did get rid of it. 

 
I tell you what.  They can keep the statues but right next to each one we put a 50 foot tall one of these with a plaque that says 

"TALK ####, GET HIT"

--The good Americans
I'm okay with keeping them and then just changing the plaque to explain how each person's failures led to the defeat of the Confederacy. 

"If General Beauregard had simply pressed his advantage through the night, General Grant would have been slaughtered at Shiloh.  Thank you General Beauregard, for deciding to get some sleep and let reinforcements arrive and begin their own assault that shattered your forces the next day."

- a grateful nation

 
We shouldn't whitewash it or run from it at all. We should recognize that we aren't as different from Cambodia/Germany when it comes to the painful things in our history as we'd like to think. We should *always* remember that. 

What we shouldn't do is celebrate it. 
But we are whitewashing it.........whitewashing a past, that we as a country, have tried to make right.

Not recognizing our past is forgetting what we've moved forward from.  

 
"Let's take down that statue of Lee.  We shouldn't celebrate him."  NOT whitewashing.

"Slavery wasn't that bad. I mean they had jobs and food and houses.  Some of the slave women even got free sex!"  = whitewashing.

anything, as deceptive words or actions, used tocover up or gloss over faults, errors, orwrongdoings, or absolve a wrongdoer from blame.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top