Technically he " cheated" then based on your last sentence. I voted yes based on that. Of course he put in the hard work and rehab but knees that shredded just don't heal that quickly on hard work and prayers alone just like Ray Lewis. The thing is I don't really care nor should any NFL fan. If all the NFL players who took some sort of illegal PED ( not saying steroids) It would be a very watered down version of what we have today.The messed up part is, steroids are regularly prescribed in the medical profession for regular people for coming back from injuries. And yet an NFL player would get in trouble for taking the exact same treatment that anyone else would get?I vote no, but I am sure he did all kinds of exotic treatments which may or may not be completely legal, just like ray Lewis supposedly did.
why would i have any reason to doubt him? i dont get this post.![]()
As far as a "watered down" game, I could go for a game with smaller (less bulked up) players but more athleticism. Bigger, faster, stronger players mean more big hits but more injury too.The money will never let that happen, though.Technically he " cheated" then based on your last sentence. I voted yes based on that. Of course he put in the hard work and rehab but knees that shredded just don't heal that quickly on hard work and prayers alone just like Ray Lewis. The thing is I don't really care nor should any NFL fan. If all the NFL players who took some sort of illegal PED ( not saying steroids) It would be a very watered down version of what we have today.The messed up part is, steroids are regularly prescribed in the medical profession for regular people for coming back from injuries. And yet an NFL player would get in trouble for taking the exact same treatment that anyone else would get?I vote no, but I am sure he did all kinds of exotic treatments which may or may not be completely legal, just like ray Lewis supposedly did.
I agree with your post as well. I voted "no", but even if he did I don't see a problem using PEDs coming back from injury. As a poster above stated, PEDs and steroids are given to regular people all of the time to get over all sorts of maladies. I remember my son being given steroids because he had a serious case of croup and the steroids we're supposed to reduce the swelling in his throat (at least that's what the DR told me).Technically he " cheated" then based on your last sentence. I voted yes based on that. Of course he put in the hard work and rehab but knees that shredded just don't heal that quickly on hard work and prayers alone just like Ray Lewis. The thing is I don't really care nor should any NFL fan. If all the NFL players who took some sort of illegal PED ( not saying steroids) It would be a very watered down version of what we have today.The messed up part is, steroids are regularly prescribed in the medical profession for regular people for coming back from injuries. And yet an NFL player would get in trouble for taking the exact same treatment that anyone else would get?I vote no, but I am sure he did all kinds of exotic treatments which may or may not be completely legal, just like ray Lewis supposedly did.
There's a big difference between corticosteroids and anabolic steroids.I agree with your post as well. I voted "no", but even if he did I don't see a problem using PEDs coming back from injury. As a poster above stated, PEDs and steroids are given to regular people all of the time to get over all sorts of maladies. I remember my son being given steroids because he had a serious case of croup and the steroids we're supposed to reduce the swelling in his throat (at least that's what the DR told me).Technically he " cheated" then based on your last sentence. I voted yes based on that. Of course he put in the hard work and rehab but knees that shredded just don't heal that quickly on hard work and prayers alone just like Ray Lewis. The thing is I don't really care nor should any NFL fan. If all the NFL players who took some sort of illegal PED ( not saying steroids) It would be a very watered down version of what we have today.The messed up part is, steroids are regularly prescribed in the medical profession for regular people for coming back from injuries. And yet an NFL player would get in trouble for taking the exact same treatment that anyone else would get?I vote no, but I am sure he did all kinds of exotic treatments which may or may not be completely legal, just like ray Lewis supposedly did.
Doh! Shows you how much I know about steroids. Thanks for the clarification.There's a big difference between corticosteroids and anabolic steroids.I agree with your post as well. I voted "no", but even if he did I don't see a problem using PEDs coming back from injury. As a poster above stated, PEDs and steroids are given to regular people all of the time to get over all sorts of maladies. I remember my son being given steroids because he had a serious case of croup and the steroids we're supposed to reduce the swelling in his throat (at least that's what the DR told me).Technically he " cheated" then based on your last sentence. I voted yes based on that. Of course he put in the hard work and rehab but knees that shredded just don't heal that quickly on hard work and prayers alone just like Ray Lewis. The thing is I don't really care nor should any NFL fan. If all the NFL players who took some sort of illegal PED ( not saying steroids) It would be a very watered down version of what we have today.The messed up part is, steroids are regularly prescribed in the medical profession for regular people for coming back from injuries. And yet an NFL player would get in trouble for taking the exact same treatment that anyone else would get?I vote no, but I am sure he did all kinds of exotic treatments which may or may not be completely legal, just like ray Lewis supposedly did.
Could it be because he has been on PED's for awhile now?Peterson's return might have been unprecedented before this season, but then we had Jamaal Charles come back at the same time and set a career high in carries while putting up 1400 yards at over 5 ypc on a terrible team. If Peterson cheated, then so did Charles. It's possible, but I've been given no reason to believe it's likely. On the other hand, I have been given reason to believe Peterson is fundamentally different from everyone else- when his doctor scoped his knee, it was so free of signs of wear the doctor compared it to a newborn baby's. Peterson was starting his recovery from a different point, so no surprise his recovery took a different shape.
If we start hearing credible rumors Peterson took PEDs, it's something I will believe easily; in the absence of those rumors, I believe he did it the hard way.
There is plenty of reason to believe he has - I think what you wanted to say is until there is definitive proof that he cheated you'll believe that he hasn't. That is fair.Until there's reason to believe he has, I'll believe he hasn't.
Until there's reason to believe he has, I'll believe he hasn't.
I think the vast majority of nfl players are taking something that is either currently banned or will be once it is "discovered".
Seriously...half of you think a guy can run for 2000+ yards in today's NFL without steroids? I'm absolutely shocked at that. I expected this poll to be like 99%/1%! You guys realize that there are tons of stuff similar to deer antler spray that the NFL hasn't figured out how to catch people using, right? You really think that with millions of dollars on the line these athletes aren't using these things just because they're good and moral people who want to obey the rules?Of course he "cheated". I am surprised that the vote is even remotely close.
Not to excuse Charles but at least he was hurt early in the season. Petersen was hurt at the end of the regular season and in surgery on or about New Years. That's about 3 1/2 months extra recovery for Charles.Peterson's return might have been unprecedented before this season, but then we had Jamaal Charles come back at the same time and set a career high in carries while putting up 1400 yards at over 5 ypc on a terrible team. If Peterson cheated, then so did Charles. It's possible, but I've been given no reason to believe it's likely. On the other hand, I have been given reason to believe Peterson is fundamentally different from everyone else- when his doctor scoped his knee, it was so free of signs of wear the doctor compared it to a newborn baby's. Peterson was starting his recovery from a different point, so no surprise his recovery took a different shape. If we start hearing credible rumors Peterson took PEDs, it's something I will believe easily; in the absence of those rumors, I believe he did it the hard way.
I want to believe Adrian is clean and I wanted to believe that Lance was clean. Lance, however, made it very difficult to believe when he was consulting and training with a well known Italian drug doctor.I hate that it has come to this in sports that you have to be suspicious of great achievements but it just seems so commonplace at this point who knows who is cheating and who isn't. I would tend to say no that he didn't take ped's but I believed lance Armstrong was clean......
Seriously...half of you think a guy can run for 2000+ yards in today's NFL without steroids? I'm absolutely shocked at that. I expected this poll to be like 99%/1%! You guys realize that there are tons of stuff similar to deer antler spray that the NFL hasn't figured out how to catch people using, right? You really think that with millions of dollars on the line these athletes aren't using these things just because they're good and moral people who want to obey the rules?Of course he "cheated". I am surprised that the vote is even remotely close.
Bicycling is a different sport. I don't think you could compete IF you weren't blood doping. Google "cyclists dying from EPO" and you'll find 10+ guys literally dying in their sleep. It was sort of an epidemic. In one Tour, the top 23 finishers (including Armstrong) were all tied to blood doping/PEDs. What's sad is the governing body acts like Lance is an isolated case when the fact is that there may be no one "clean" in professional cycling.ETA: Since Tommy Simpson's death in 1967, 86% of Tour de France winners have been tarnished or implicated by doping. I suspect some number of the other 14% just never got caught.I want to believe Adrian is clean and I wanted to believe that Lance was clean. Lance, however, made it very difficult to believe when he was consulting and training with a well known Italian drug doctor.I hate that it has come to this in sports that you have to be suspicious of great achievements but it just seems so commonplace at this point who knows who is cheating and who isn't. I would tend to say no that he didn't take ped's but I believed lance Armstrong was clean......
60% of the time, it works every time!deer antler and panther cologne
That what I am saying, anyone with knowledge of cycling wouldn't be surprised that Armstrong was not clean. At least in football a player should get the benefit of the doubt.Bicycling is a different sport. I don't think you could compete IF you weren't blood doping. Google "cyclists dying from EPO" and you'll find 10+ guys literally dying in their sleep. It was sort of an epidemic. In one Tour, the top 23 finishers (including Armstrong) were all tied to blood doping/PEDs. What's sad is the governing body acts like Lance is an isolated case when the fact is that there may be no one "clean" in professional cycling.ETA: Since Tommy Simpson's death in 1967, 86% of Tour de France winners have been tarnished or implicated by doping. I suspect some number of the other 14% just never got caught.I want to believe Adrian is clean and I wanted to believe that Lance was clean. Lance, however, made it very difficult to believe when he was consulting and training with a well known Italian drug doctor.I hate that it has come to this in sports that you have to be suspicious of great achievements but it just seems so commonplace at this point who knows who is cheating and who isn't. I would tend to say no that he didn't take ped's but I believed lance Armstrong was clean......
It took Peterson several months to get up to speed.'DropKick said:Not to excuse Charles but at least he was hurt early in the season. Petersen was hurt at the end of the regular season and in surgery on or about New Years. That's about 3 1/2 months extra recovery for Charles.'SSOG said:Peterson's return might have been unprecedented before this season, but then we had Jamaal Charles come back at the same time and set a career high in carries while putting up 1400 yards at over 5 ypc on a terrible team. If Peterson cheated, then so did Charles. It's possible, but I've been given no reason to believe it's likely. On the other hand, I have been given reason to believe Peterson is fundamentally different from everyone else- when his doctor scoped his knee, it was so free of signs of wear the doctor compared it to a newborn baby's. Peterson was starting his recovery from a different point, so no surprise his recovery took a different shape.
If we start hearing credible rumors Peterson took PEDs, it's something I will believe easily; in the absence of those rumors, I believe he did it the hard way.
I actually think this is a little naive. If everyone were doing it, you don't think some disgruntled former player would have cashed in on a tell-all by now? I'm sure it's more prevalent than we know, but once it reached a certain critical mass, we'd all know about it- like we do with cycling and bodybuilding and baseball.'Assani Fisher said:Even asking the question seems incredibly naive to me. Of course he used steroids- every single NFL(except maybe kickers/punters) player does.
Opinions from a former bodybuilder and a very educated health/fitness expert: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CY0ELMhAsy0
"If they're not on the best drugs known to man, they don't go pro. If you're on the best drugs from five years ago and not the best drugs from 2013 then you don't go pro in your sport. Period."
People don't seem to understand how much more money is being spent on steroids and beating steroid tests compared to the money being spent on catching the "cheaters." Everyone uses them, maybe 1% get caught, and then all the naive fans out there criticize that player as if he was the only one doing it. The world of sports is insanely competitive, and theres an absurd amount of money on the line. I doubt there are even any big time DI college players who aren't using- its simply too much to overcome(you not using them while everyone else is). If you want to be a pro athlete, you need to use steroids.