That's not a very good article. There's no good evidence supporting creationism. There are peer-reviewed papers in respected science journals suggesting potential benefits associated with probiotics (and prebiotics).
Yes, homeopathy is stupid and should be ridiculed at every opportunity. But Whole Foods doesn't exist to promote homeopathy the way that the Creation Museum exists to promote creationism. Whole Foods exists to sell food that isn't laced with tons of Round-Up, or pumped full of antibiotics, or coated with refined sugar. That's not a consequence of pseudoscience; it's a consequence of wanting to be healthy, ethically responsible, and environmentally conscious.
Yes, homeopathy is stupid and should be ridiculed at every opportunity. But Whole Foods doesn't exist to promote homeopathy the way that the Creation Museum exists to promote creationism. Whole Foods exists to sell food that isn't laced with tons of Round-Up, or pumped full of antibiotics, or coated with refined sugar. That's not a consequence of pseudoscience; it's a consequence of wanting to be healthy, ethically responsible, and environmentally conscious.
Last edited by a moderator:
Half of the article cites bits and pieces of out-of-context snippets of a British Medical Journal article that I can't read. And then the other half of the article is an interview between Newsmax (one of the least credible news sources in America) and Dr. Russell Blaylock. I've never heard of Russell Blaylock, so I looked him up. Per Wikipedia:
