Mortimer Ichabod
Footballguy
Does Andy Reid flip flop again after Kolb roasting Atlanta today?
Good point. I watched the game and Kolb had it pretty easy out there today. Falcons were suckers for every wrinkle Philly threw at them... trick plays, fake end-arounds, etc.I didn't see the game, but did Kolb face any pass rush during the game? The one advantage Vick (seemingly) gives Philly is the ability to make something out of nothing when the pocket collapses. Was Kolb under duress during the game or was it smooth sailing for the Philly O-Line?
Why? It hasnt seemed to affect Kolb to much in his past 2 starts.With the offensive line you almost have to put Vick back in.
The answer may come from over Ried's head.Kolb is Reid's QB. It's who he decided to stake his coaching future on by trading McNabb. It's who he wants to succeed there for that reason. Vick is manna from heaven. His play was surprisingly excellent, but he's still more of a free-lancer. I think Andy, if he has any bias at work, will have the bias that seeks to demonstrate his wisdom in picking Kolb over McNabb, which means that Kolb would be his preference over Vick. That's only reinforced by Kolb fitting the prototype for Reid's offense given Kolb's style as a pocket passer.
If I were Kolb I would want to be traded out of there. He got knocked out of the first game of the season due to injury, and Reid said over and over again publicly that Kolb would remain the starting QB when healthy. Reid then took away that support and changed his mind. I'd never trust my coach again.Also, having Kolb perform the way that he did would really raise his trade value if they were looking to go that route.
I doubt it That's one team that I've never seen meddle in coaching decisions such as this one.The answer may come from over Ried's head.Kolb is Reid's QB. It's who he decided to stake his coaching future on by trading McNabb. It's who he wants to succeed there for that reason. Vick is manna from heaven. His play was surprisingly excellent, but he's still more of a free-lancer. I think Andy, if he has any bias at work, will have the bias that seeks to demonstrate his wisdom in picking Kolb over McNabb, which means that Kolb would be his preference over Vick. That's only reinforced by Kolb fitting the prototype for Reid's offense given Kolb's style as a pocket passer.
I've seen this thought about trading Kolb come up in other threads...I can't see it as Vick is not under contract beyond this season. Kolb and Kafka are. I don't think they would go into the offseason with Kafka being the only QB under contract, especially after all they've done to get Kolb to this point.I have a feeling that they will keep Vick out until after their bye week. Just to take a longer look. They will activate him as a backup just in case. Kolb did throw one critical interception that could have cost them the game.
I also think that they could stick with Kolb... maybe they were even just giving him more time to recover after his concussion, as they had just been under fire for how they handle concussions.
However, I think that they will put Vick back in when healthy.... if not only because he has flip flopped so much, that he doesn't want to do it again. Also, having Kolb perform the way that he did would really raise his trade value if they were looking to go that route.
In other words.... I don't have a clue.
Also, Vick won't sign an extension absent a clear indication that he's the starting QB. He wants to start now and will test the FA waters for a contract if Kolb remains the starter.I've seen this thought about trading Kolb come up in other threads...I can't see it as Vick is not under contract beyond this season. Kolb and Kafka are. I don't think they would go into the offseason with Kafka being the only QB under contract, especially after all they've done to get Kolb to this point.I have a feeling that they will keep Vick out until after their bye week. Just to take a longer look. They will activate him as a backup just in case. Kolb did throw one critical interception that could have cost them the game.
I also think that they could stick with Kolb... maybe they were even just giving him more time to recover after his concussion, as they had just been under fire for how they handle concussions.
However, I think that they will put Vick back in when healthy.... if not only because he has flip flopped so much, that he doesn't want to do it again. Also, having Kolb perform the way that he did would really raise his trade value if they were looking to go that route.
In other words.... I don't have a clue.
I understand the speculation that it could, but there is NO WAY the decision comes from anyone other than Reid. Just like the decision to sit Kolb and name Vick the starter was decided between Kolb and Reid. That was all done before a phone call to brass that left them speechless that Andy was making the move at that time. Trust me- this is Andy's team FIRST.The answer may come from over Ried's head.Kolb is Reid's QB. It's who he decided to stake his coaching future on by trading McNabb. It's who he wants to succeed there for that reason.
Vick is manna from heaven. His play was surprisingly excellent, but he's still more of a free-lancer.
I think Andy, if he has any bias at work, will have the bias that seeks to demonstrate his wisdom in picking Kolb over McNabb, which means that Kolb would be his preference over Vick. That's only reinforced by Kolb fitting the prototype for Reid's offense given Kolb's style as a pocket passer.
It looks like it happened that way, but it didn't.If I were Kolb I would want to be traded out of there. He got knocked out of the first game of the season due to injury, and Reid said over and over again publicly that Kolb would remain the starting QB when healthy. Reid then took away that support and changed his mind. I'd never trust my coach again.Also, having Kolb perform the way that he did would really raise his trade value if they were looking to go that route.
it doesn't. Before the game against atlanta, kolb wasn't looking at jackson much. Kolb likes to spread the ball around anyways. so maclin, celek, weaver and avant should be able to pick up the slack. main issue is that there is no home run threat.How much does the loss off DJax effect Kolb if he starts next week?
Weaver is out for the year with a torn ACL.it doesn't. Before the game against atlanta, kolb wasn't looking at jackson much. Kolb likes to spread the ball around anyways. so maclin, celek, weaver and avant should be able to pick up the slack. main issue is that there is no home run threat.How much does the loss off DJax effect Kolb if he starts next week?
sorry i meant mccoy.Weaver is out for the year with a torn ACL.it doesn't. Before the game against atlanta, kolb wasn't looking at jackson much. Kolb likes to spread the ball around anyways. so maclin, celek, weaver and avant should be able to pick up the slack. main issue is that there is no home run threat.How much does the loss off DJax effect Kolb if he starts next week?
I almost think he has to. Mike Vick got the nod by playing well while subbing for an injured Kevin Kolb... so by Reid's standard it would appear that Kolb has earned it back.
I think this is a very overlooked thing, I do not think its a coincidence that Kolb has played well in every game except the one where he was being dragged in and out to bring Vick in.coltsnut said:Even if Kolb remains the starter, I see Vick eating into his production BIG TIME. He will get at least 10 plays in and some of them will come around the goaline. That not only takes away stats from Kolb, but messes with his rhythm and focus.
I think he'll stick with Kolb, but I can see this happening if the o-line is a recurring problem. The thing is, given Reid's stubbornness and the link between his QB talent evaluation and his reputation, this will take weeks to play out before another switch is made (ignoring potential injuries, etc.). Kolb is the starter for at least the next two games IMHO, and obviously beyond that if he continues to be successful.As I said in another Kolb thread:
Kolb is dependent on the play of his O-Line. If they are good (as they were yesterday), he is good. If they are bad (as they were against Green Bay), he is bad. The O-Line has been more bad than good this year.
This is not the case with Vick. He can play well (and has) when the O-Line is playing poorly because of his legs.
Therefore, I think Vick becomes the starter again, but only when he is fully healthy.
However, Kolb has shown enough to allow the Eagles to stick with their plan of him as QB of the future. In the offseason, Vick will be allowed to sign a rich deal with another team, Kolb will become the undisputed starter, and the O-Line will be addressed, particularly at C and RG.
They should definitely bring Bret Favre in as a consultant to help with this decision!Buddy Ball 2K3 said:Its gonna be Vick. Wait, its Kolb.No, its gonna be Vick. I am sure of it.Ok the more I think as I type this the more I think its gonna be Kolb... ok maybe Vick.
I agree with this assessment. Vick and Kolb are both great QBs, but Kolb does not like Vick hanging around (unlike McNabb). There are a few football positions that work well with a rotation, but IMO QB is not one of them.With the number of NFL teams that need a solid franchise QB, the Eagles have a high value trade-able asset in Vick. If you start Vick when he is less than 100% (and against good defenses) his trade value will go down. I am not sure what Reid will do this year, but it has worked out really well so far. Kolb had a few extra weeks to heal from his concussion, and now Vick should have a few extra weeks to heal from his injury. There is no sense in rushing Vick back, even if Reid goes with Vick for this year.I think this is a very overlooked thing, I do not think its a coincidence that Kolb has played well in every game except the one where he was being dragged in and out to bring Vick in.coltsnut said:Even if Kolb remains the starter, I see Vick eating into his production BIG TIME. He will get at least 10 plays in and some of them will come around the goaline. That not only takes away stats from Kolb, but messes with his rhythm and focus.
I saw that, and must say I was very shocked considering his involvement with Vick.Also - not sure if anyone else saw Dungy last night discussing the Kolb/Vick situation, but he feels Reid will go with Kolb.
I feel pretty confident in saying, Kolb would have lit up Detroit and Jacksonville to.Kolb had it made yesterday. The o-line gave him plenty of time and Atlanta's pass rush is pretty bad. Vick would have had a big game too.
You're expecting a personal bias from Dungy on this given his relationship with Vick, but he was commenting upon another coach's evaluation. Unless you're suggesting that Dungy predicting Vick would be the starter would influence Reid's decision, I don't see how Dungy's relationship with Vick is in any way relevant to his comments.I saw that, and must say I was very shocked considering his involvement with Vick.Also - not sure if anyone else saw Dungy last night discussing the Kolb/Vick situation, but he feels Reid will go with Kolb.
And Vick would have lit up San Fran.What's your point?Vick is still better.I feel pretty confident in saying, Kolb would have lit up Detroit and Jacksonville to.Kolb had it made yesterday. The o-line gave him plenty of time and Atlanta's pass rush is pretty bad. Vick would have had a big game too.
I think this has been offered many times, and some folks have speculated that's what Reid will do. I think it's also been pointed out that this is probably not a good idea, because the effect on the rhythm and flow of the 'passing' QB - Kolb, is negative.What you would end up with is Kolb performing inconsistantly due to this, and Philly fans screaming for Vick.The other thing I wanted to address was that someone mentioned Kolb's interception, and he was lucky not to have more. I couldn't disagree more.The pass that was picked was an excellent defensive play, where the CB jumped to get a hand on it and it bounced around before being caught. Regardless... there was another play where a pass should have been picked off. Kolb is going to make mistakes, all good QBs do their first year starting.It is what he does with the learning of those mistakes that will decide whether he becomes a really good QB or not. Flip-flopping QB's in and out does not lend itself to improving that learning... especially if you don't give a guy a chance to go right back out there and make up for that mistake, but he has to sit and stew about it while another QB is leading the team. It also can wreck the locker room chemistry. A franchise QB needs to be a locker room leader, not a co-leader.It never works. Show me one time in the modern era where it has? Co QBs leading a team to the superbowl.Here is a thought. Why not use both? Two totally different looks that the defense has to worry about.