For those that haven't actually heard the voice mail,
here it is.
Many of us out here are interested in the truth, and hearing the voicemail helps. Also hearing Tannehill speak, seeing Hartline's response and looking at the situation as a whole should have changed people's view a bit from the time this thread started.
Listen to that voicemail again. I think many of us played sports here. I have to imagine that hearing that voicemail reminds you of
that guy who used to be on your team. The guy who most knew wasn't the brightest bulb in the room, loved to start s*#t with anyone he didn't deem "cool" but was actually a good teammate because when you told Biff to do something then "Biff go do it!"
It sounds like Incognito is dumber than horses*#*t and did something stupid and got caught. Listening to the voicemail, though - I don't hear any malice. I hear a blockhead. I also hear the type of guy that would be a bully and take it overboard.
Threads like these often find people backing themselves into a corner with a specific opinion and then when information changes they are so entrenched that it really hurts their pride to change stances. If you're honest though, information (and opinions) are changing.
So far, it looks like both the guys, Martin and Incognito, have "issues", but at opposite ends of the spectrum. Incognito is probably a psycho bully based off of a LONG history of him since high school getting in trouble. If what has come out recently about Martin is true then he could have issues as well - or he could just be a conniving little pr*ck.
Either way, Incognito tried to pull his bully shtick on the wrong guy. He's gotten in trouble for it before, gotten kicked off teams - yet he never learned. Well, now there's another "lesson" coming his way - maybe the hardest lesson of all. What he did was wrong. Maybe it was done out of ignorance, but it doesn't matter.
It sounds like most of his teammates dealt with it and laughed it off. But maybe it wasn't directed at them. I bet if big-dumb-oaf-guy decided to focus on you with his bully shtick then it could be quite annoying. And he screwed with the wrong guy in Martin - whether he's the soft Shrek some think he is or a sneaky little rat like other's think, he's Incognito's next wake up call.
Step back and look at what's out there. No one knows what's happened, but if you peek out from behind your own agenda here, it sure looks like it could be not quite what it seemed to be early on.
So far it looks like Incognito may not be as bad as many think, Martin may not be as good as others think, and you can't ignore the history of both players here. Martin doesn't really have anything outstanding that's come out yet about his past, while Incognito is the essense of the "where there's smoke there's fire" maxim.
Should get interesting here.
that seems like a reasonable and impartial summing up...
it is a good reminder that, if incognito is kicked off the dolphins, it will be after also being kicked off nebraska and oregon in college and STL in the pros... so he has a known history...
its hard to see how martin has as checkered a past and resume?
but as you said, new facts come to light...
in an earlier post, i intended (meaning did purposefully, not meant to) to first say that martin may have sent mixed signals...
after trying to think of non-sinister reasons for martin's behavior, i wasn't endorsing the idea it is impossible he could share culpability, though it may have seemed that way due to the emphasis...
it just didn't seem necessary to elaborate that laughing at the n word may have meant he didn't mind... to me, that falls into the catefory of information everybody already possesses... of course, that COULD be damaging...
i was just trying to think if it were possible that he could have been surprised by the reaction of laughter, and went along with it... but still harbored resentment on the inside, which others may not have known...
to extend that, if he even thought of showing others within the locker room similar things in the future, but had already been met with laughter the first time... would he be more or less likely to follow up? yet for some, his not following up is treated as evidence of sinister motives?
i can conceive of the possibility that martin had as much or more culpability than incognito, when more facts come to light, we are awaiting independent consul ruling, though in the earlier case of new orleans, there was found to be a pattern of closing ranks, a culture of silence and obstructing the investigation (all for obvious reasons probably not necessary to get into in this context)... but because martin doesn't have as disturbing and lengthy a history of being a problem as incognito, i have not emphasized trying to exonerate incognito during the dialogue... until i'm more convinced martin engaged in wrong doing (made up bullying, he doesn't really believe it, just being vindictive and taking out revenge on incognito for "petty" frustrations like calling him a half breed and saying he would slap the #### out of his mother, etc.), i'm not comfortable villifying or demonizing him...
maybe it seems like i am doing that to incognito, but it is just stating a fact that there is a pattern of instability, volatile behavior and not being accountable in incognito's background (like you said, he has been kicked off many teams, i'm not making this stuff up or speculating about his past)... his peers said he was the dirtiest player in the NFL... in the absence of that kind of pattern in martin's background (getting kicked off of multiple teams), i'd prefer to wait before ascribing sinister motives to martin... but it doesn't mean i never will, presented with additional evidence and having time to think about it...
* obviously everybody looks at the world and responds to it from their unique background and history that shaped them... i haven't listened to the message yet, but will next... but i do know of a case of former co-workers who were subjected to several "joking" death threats by another co-worker... like coming back later and shooting people, ha ha kind of thing... they did seem to be in a joking manner and context based on the description... but they weren't amused... and the "joke" death threats might have taken on a different meaning and concern when the individual in question was later fired (not for that).