Do you mean Castillo?Good point here. Certainly didn't trust Mikell, and used him much more in the box. We'll see if that's a trend with McDermott; Jarrett certainly more capable in coverage than Mikell.One thing about the Eagles, they really don't play a strong or weak/free safety. They're very "even" and will use either safety (if they trust them both) interchangeably.Agreed. "Reached" a couple of rounds early for him, maybe, but he's the presumptive SS here and a much better bet for tackles than Rahim Moore.Well, the Eagles really were serious about moving on from Mikell. Jarrett should be your #1 fantasy safety.
I guess if Danny Woodhead can do what he did in that offense, a guy like Vereen could do something. I might be looking at it backwards, who knows. But unless it's a RB heavy league, there are 8 guys I like more than Vereen, maybe more in PPR.Things rarely look very clean on draft day for the top 10-15 fantasy players. If you liked Vereen pre-draft, it's a good spot for him. If you didn't, don't worry about it.I don't know if Vereen can be a special/impact back, but I do know that the Patriots do not have a special/impact back on their roster, so if he can be, nobody is going to stand in his way.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
Ugh, yeah. Getting a little scattered between all these threads and discussions. Thanks.Do you mean Castillo?Good point here. Certainly didn't trust Mikell, and used him much more in the box. We'll see if that's a trend with McDermott; Jarrett certainly more capable in coverage than Mikell.One thing about the Eagles, they really don't play a strong or weak/free safety. They're very "even" and will use either safety (if they trust them both) interchangeably.Agreed. "Reached" a couple of rounds early for him, maybe, but he's the presumptive SS here and a much better bet for tackles than Rahim Moore.Well, the Eagles really were serious about moving on from Mikell. Jarrett should be your #1 fantasy safety.

Impossible to not move your head to the beat of those NFLN Play:60 commercials. Just hope I don't look as dumb as Arthur Blank while I'm doing it.

I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
But... easy to see either Woodhead or BJGE not there in the future when Vereen is still there.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
Was thinking the exact same thing.Little could become a Marshall-like force. No one blocking him in Cleveland. I think he might be your WR3 in this rookie draft when the dust settles.
Brandon Harris may not be much better than what they have in the long run...ETA: Agree with Mayock, though, that Harris was the last guy with a chance to start for the duration of his rookie contract.Corner now for Houston?
I see your point, I guess I'm just not a huge Vereen fan. When I saw you say he might go up to 1.06, that's kind of where I didn't agree with you, as I seem him more around the 1.10 spot. But there is no question that the Patriots are a system in which a RB can succeed. I might be overrating Woodhead and BJGE just a little bit.Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
Impossible to not move your head to the beat of those NFLN Play:60 commercials. Just hope I don't look as dumb as Arthur Blank while I'm doing it.
at picturing you, Jene. On the plus side for you, I doubt I'd look much better. 
HarrisCorner now for Houston?
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
What did the pats get?
MikeReiss Mike ReissPatriots trade the 60th overall pick to Houston. Acquire a third-rounder (73) and a fifth-rounder (138).
Little could become a Marshall-like force. No one blocking him in Cleveland. I think he might be your WR3 in this rookie draft when the dust settles.
Little is very good after the catch, which is ideal for a West Coast offense. Little is probably going to be my #1 target this draft.I've got a face made for the Audible and the feet of, well, I could've been a body double for a Sopranos' scene where they dump a guy over the side of the boat.Impossible to not move your head to the beat of those NFLN Play:60 commercials. Just hope I don't look as dumb as Arthur Blank while I'm doing it.at picturing you, Jene. On the plus side for you, I doubt I'd look much better.
![]()
You mean they're complimentary, correct?I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
They might be able to mask a lot of those defensive needs with some average CBs and LBs in free agency because of the pass rush they will be able to generateCant believe DET takes Leshoure just a year after taking Best early + so many defensive needs
Sig, the pats already have a stable of part time backs. They have pieces to a running game that when you put them all together is pretty effective.But why draft pieces like you already have when you can draft a full one player. This doesn't make any sense to me.Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
agreed, with possible exception of Ingram over Green... still mulling that one overI had a pick in 10-15 range reserved for Little in a lot of leagues as I warm to him more every time I watch the film. Looks like that plan might be blown up.Nothing has happened to change the top 5 IMO.Green, AJ CIN WRIngram, Mark NOS RBJones, Julio ATL WRLeShoure, Mikel DET RBWilliams, Ryan ARI RBTop 5 is still a nice place to sit in this rookie draft.Love the Little pick, I think he might be my #6.
I'm willing to talkWish I would have traded 1.4 when I was getting offers. Now it looks like a guessing game as to who is in a better situation. Add 1.6 into it and I am lost

Probably because you're not realizing that the Patriots probably don't think they're drafting another "piece."Sig, the pats already have a stable of part time backs. They have pieces to a running game that when you put them all together is pretty effective.But why draft pieces like you already have when you can draft a full one player. This doesn't make any sense to me.Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanksVereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
I wholeheartedly agree. A utility back in the 2nd round? No. Woodhead is a utility back (free agent by the way). BJGE is a chain mover (free agent). Vereen is a potential lead back. You have to watch him run. He has balance, excellent leg strength for his 210-pound frame and burst to generate nice gains. This is a guy I said two months ago could actually have a better career than Jahvid Best although he's doesn't have the high-end talent of Best as an open field weapon.They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I guess we will see. I think they passed on a complete back. Furthermore, they probably could have gotten vereen a good deal later then where they got him. They still need a pass rusher. Vereen couldn't have been a RB that was next on many teams boards.They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
It's close with those two. Clearly Green in PPR, and in non-PPR I'd probably say it's so close that you can go with "need."I have 1.09 in one league, ear-marked for Little, but I'm not sure I can count on it happening. Probably have to wait and see where these other mid-tier RB/WR's go (Hunter, Murray, Hankerson, Cobb, et al).agreed, with possible exception of Ingram over Green... still mulling that one overI had a pick in 10-15 range reserved for Little in a lot of leagues as I warm to him more every time I watch the film. Looks like that plan might be blown up.Nothing has happened to change the top 5 IMO.Green, AJ CIN WRIngram, Mark NOS RBJones, Julio ATL WRLeShoure, Mikel DET RBWilliams, Ryan ARI RBTop 5 is still a nice place to sit in this rookie draft.Love the Little pick, I think he might be my #6.
I do hope you guys are right as a pats fan. Maybe he is more of a complete back than leshoure. Or maybe they didn't like something about leshoure after working him out.I wholeheartedly agree. A utility back in the 2nd round? No. Woodhead is a utility back (free agent by the way). BJGE is a chain mover (free agent). Vereen is a potential lead back. You have to watch him run. He has balance, excellent leg strength for his 210-pound frame and burst to generate nice gains. This is a guy I said two months ago could actually have a better career than Jahvid Best although he's doesn't have the high-end talent of Best as an open field weapon.They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
If the Rams wanted to improve the passing attack this was the way to do it.Little could become a Marshall-like force. No one blocking him in Cleveland. I think he might be your WR3 in this rookie draft when the dust settles.Little is very good after the catch, which is ideal for a West Coast offense. Little is probably going to be my #1 target this draft.