What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Draft Chat With our Draftniks Matt Waldman and Sigmund Bloom Tonight D (1 Viewer)

If Best cant' stay healthy, Leshoure might put Best in a "Reggie Bush" role pretty quick. Great pick for the Lions, who I am falling in love with.

As a Titans fan with a scary rookie qb, I need options....

 
Well, the Eagles really were serious about moving on from Mikell. Jarrett should be your #1 fantasy safety.
Agreed. "Reached" a couple of rounds early for him, maybe, but he's the presumptive SS here and a much better bet for tackles than Rahim Moore.
One thing about the Eagles, they really don't play a strong or weak/free safety. They're very "even" and will use either safety (if they trust them both) interchangeably.
Good point here. Certainly didn't trust Mikell, and used him much more in the box. We'll see if that's a trend with McDermott; Jarrett certainly more capable in coverage than Mikell.
Do you mean Castillo?
 
Impossible to not move your head to the beat of those NFLN Play:60 commercials. Just hope I don't look as dumb as Arthur Blank while I'm doing it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
Things rarely look very clean on draft day for the top 10-15 fantasy players. If you liked Vereen pre-draft, it's a good spot for him. If you didn't, don't worry about it.I don't know if Vereen can be a special/impact back, but I do know that the Patriots do not have a special/impact back on their roster, so if he can be, nobody is going to stand in his way.
I guess if Danny Woodhead can do what he did in that offense, a guy like Vereen could do something. I might be looking at it backwards, who knows. But unless it's a RB heavy league, there are 8 guys I like more than Vereen, maybe more in PPR.
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.

You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.

I think they're just out thinking themselves now.

 
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.
 
Someone make an argument why Vereen can't be an every down back? Because he's 210 pounds? I think this talk is premature.

Best still a nice value in PPR leagues now. Obviously his perceived value (preseason) goes down because not projected to be sole starter, but we need to see if Leshoure can show the patience and after contact skills.

Greg Little to Browns...smarts by Holmgren - might get the better WR after trading away Julio Jones. Some risk, but not that much with those picks and getting Little.

 
Well, the Eagles really were serious about moving on from Mikell. Jarrett should be your #1 fantasy safety.
Agreed. "Reached" a couple of rounds early for him, maybe, but he's the presumptive SS here and a much better bet for tackles than Rahim Moore.
One thing about the Eagles, they really don't play a strong or weak/free safety. They're very "even" and will use either safety (if they trust them both) interchangeably.
Good point here. Certainly didn't trust Mikell, and used him much more in the box. We'll see if that's a trend with McDermott; Jarrett certainly more capable in coverage than Mikell.
Do you mean Castillo?
Ugh, yeah. Getting a little scattered between all these threads and discussions. Thanks. :bag:
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
 
I like Little a lot. McCoy needs weapons. This could be good for him. I think Little is underrated and if they can get him to play hard, he could surprise.

 
Little could become a Marshall-like force. No one blocking him in Cleveland. I think he might be your WR3 in this rookie draft when the dust settles.

 
Nothing has happened to change the top 5 IMO.

Green, AJ CIN WR

Ingram, Mark NOS RB

Jones, Julio ATL WR

LeShoure, Mikel DET RB

Williams, Ryan ARI RB

Top 5 is still a nice place to sit in this rookie draft.

Love the Little pick, I think he might be my #6.

 
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
But... easy to see either Woodhead or BJGE not there in the future when Vereen is still there.
 
Wish I would have traded 1.4 when I was getting offers. Now it looks like a guessing game as to who is in a better situation. Add 1.6 into it and I am lost

 
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.
I see your point, I guess I'm just not a huge Vereen fan. When I saw you say he might go up to 1.06, that's kind of where I didn't agree with you, as I seem him more around the 1.10 spot. But there is no question that the Patriots are a system in which a RB can succeed. I might be overrating Woodhead and BJGE just a little bit.
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...
 
Impossible to not move your head to the beat of those NFLN Play:60 commercials. Just hope I don't look as dumb as Arthur Blank while I'm doing it.
:lmao: at picturing you, Jene. On the plus side for you, I doubt I'd look much better. :)
I've got a face made for the Audible and the feet of, well, I could've been a body double for a Sopranos' scene where they dump a guy over the side of the boat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
You mean they're complimentary, correct?
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...
They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.
 
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.
Sig, the pats already have a stable of part time backs. They have pieces to a running game that when you put them all together is pretty effective.But why draft pieces like you already have when you can draft a full one player. This doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Nothing has happened to change the top 5 IMO.Green, AJ CIN WRIngram, Mark NOS RBJones, Julio ATL WRLeShoure, Mikel DET RBWilliams, Ryan ARI RBTop 5 is still a nice place to sit in this rookie draft.Love the Little pick, I think he might be my #6.
agreed, with possible exception of Ingram over Green... still mulling that one overI had a pick in 10-15 range reserved for Little in a lot of leagues as I warm to him more every time I watch the film. Looks like that plan might be blown up.
 
Vereen's value plummets on the Patriots, imo. Not a great spot for him in fantasy purposes.
One week it's Woodhead,, one week its BGE, one week it's Vareen.....no thanks
This is kind of how I see it Sig. So many weapons there, that Vereen will never be a bellcow. Lots of guys I like more than him.
Yes, but we knew that coming in (not a bellcow). I think his value still goes up as he lands on a team that is great at running the ball that also presents a lot of scoring opportunities. Some overthinking going on here. Good talent in good offense = what you want in dynasty leagues. Where would you have rather he landed? Maybe Miami or Washington for situation, but if Vereen is not a bellcow in NE, he's not one there either, so you have him in a limited role on a team that isn't as good at running the ball.
Sig, the pats already have a stable of part time backs. They have pieces to a running game that when you put them all together is pretty effective.But why draft pieces like you already have when you can draft a full one player. This doesn't make any sense to me.
Probably because you're not realizing that the Patriots probably don't think they're drafting another "piece."
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...
They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.
I wholeheartedly agree. A utility back in the 2nd round? No. Woodhead is a utility back (free agent by the way). BJGE is a chain mover (free agent). Vereen is a potential lead back. You have to watch him run. He has balance, excellent leg strength for his 210-pound frame and burst to generate nice gains. This is a guy I said two months ago could actually have a better career than Jahvid Best although he's doesn't have the high-end talent of Best as an open field weapon.
 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...
They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.
I guess we will see. I think they passed on a complete back. Furthermore, they probably could have gotten vereen a good deal later then where they got him. They still need a pass rusher. Vereen couldn't have been a RB that was next on many teams boards.
 
Nothing has happened to change the top 5 IMO.Green, AJ CIN WRIngram, Mark NOS RBJones, Julio ATL WRLeShoure, Mikel DET RBWilliams, Ryan ARI RBTop 5 is still a nice place to sit in this rookie draft.Love the Little pick, I think he might be my #6.
agreed, with possible exception of Ingram over Green... still mulling that one overI had a pick in 10-15 range reserved for Little in a lot of leagues as I warm to him more every time I watch the film. Looks like that plan might be blown up.
It's close with those two. Clearly Green in PPR, and in non-PPR I'd probably say it's so close that you can go with "need."I have 1.09 in one league, ear-marked for Little, but I'm not sure I can count on it happening. Probably have to wait and see where these other mid-tier RB/WR's go (Hunter, Murray, Hankerson, Cobb, et al).
 
The success of WRs Brandon Tate, Hakeem Nicks and Greg Little at Carolina really says something about QB TJ Yates. I am interested to see who picks him and when he'll go.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hard not to see Mouton as a reach. Most gave him a 5th round grade or later. Lots of uncertainty inside in SD, though. Cooper and Burnett free agents and likely gone. Siler a free agent, too. Last year's third round ILB target (Donald Butler) recovering from Achilles injury.

Second round pick makes him a favorite to be considered a starter and every-down player, though.

 
I just cant get behind this vereen pick. I know he's a nice player with a 3rd down skill set, but why pass on leshoure there. He has an every down back skill set.You take essentially a gadget player instead of a bell cow.I think they're just out thinking themselves now.
I think his strengths (and weaknesses) probably overlap with BJGE.
Leshoure's? Yes probably, but vereens overlap with woodheads.BJGE is a different subject altogether. This forum is filled with posts about how he's average to below average. Leshoure HAS to be more talented right? He's the #2 RB on most teams boards, and in most scouts rankings...
They don't really want a lot more from BJGE other than to get what's there to get. He doesn't make extra yardage himself and is not terribly elusive. I agree that LeShoure is probably more talented than him, but if they don't think Leshoure is a dynamic/elite runner, I can understand them "standing pat" with BJGE as the thumper role.And again, I doubt NE takes Vereen here slotting him as the 3rd down RB role - obviously posters here disagree, but I don't think they take a RB here unless they see him as being a very significant contributor.
I wholeheartedly agree. A utility back in the 2nd round? No. Woodhead is a utility back (free agent by the way). BJGE is a chain mover (free agent). Vereen is a potential lead back. You have to watch him run. He has balance, excellent leg strength for his 210-pound frame and burst to generate nice gains. This is a guy I said two months ago could actually have a better career than Jahvid Best although he's doesn't have the high-end talent of Best as an open field weapon.
I do hope you guys are right as a pats fan. Maybe he is more of a complete back than leshoure. Or maybe they didn't like something about leshoure after working him out.
 
Matt, I agree on Vareen. He's had heavy workload games where he appeared to be the type to get stronger and wear down a defense. Not many, but enough to respect him as more than change of pace. Still, NEs feature back is basically a change of pace from the constant changing of paces.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top