I think Harris has looked good when given the chance. He has a hip injury right now, but he said he will play Sunday.I think that Williams is more talented, and more suitable for the outside - Harris hasn't really impressed when he has been given the chance - and a report surfaced today that said that Williams would be the starter if Miles is out.
I am going with Austin or Williams (if Austin is still out) . . .Anyone have high hopes for Terrence Williams this week?
Denver's surely gonna double team Dez often and Denver LBs will be all over Witten.
And since my prediction is they have to keep up with Peyton and his crew in scoring, Romo will have to throw for at least 3 TDs to keep it close.
Will T Will be a benefactor in at least one of those TDs?
Thoughts?
Dwayne Harris (hip) was downgraded from "full" to "limited" on Thursday.
It's likely just a precaution after Harris played through the injury in Week 4, though it's possible he tweaked it in Wednesday's practice. Even in the absence of Miles Austin, Harris was the Cowboys' clear No. 3 receiver last Sunday, catching just one pass as rookie Terrance Williams monopolized snaps opposite Dez Bryant.
Same, ####### huge!I'm so happy I benched Bowe for Williams.
Yes. for now.Gravy train over next week when Austin returns to the lineup?
Considering dropping Givens for him, but the targets - as you referenced - gives me pause. Still, good game for the rook.He ended with only 4 targets which makes his performance all the more unbelievable. I won't go as far to say it was a fluke but I was sure hoping for more targets to help solidify long-term value.
I dropped Givens for him before last Sunday.Considering dropping Givens for him, but the targets - as you referenced - gives me pause. Still, good game for the rook.He ended with only 4 targets which makes his performance all the more unbelievable. I won't go as far to say it was a fluke but I was sure hoping for more targets to help solidify long-term value.
He has certainly sucked thus far. He did lead Wr's in targets this game....yeah, I know; I'm grasping here. I just am a believer in his talent, but clearly he hasn't been a fit for this offense thus far. It is very frustrating.I dropped Givens for him before last Sunday.Considering dropping Givens for him, but the targets - as you referenced - gives me pause. Still, good game for the rook.He ended with only 4 targets which makes his performance all the more unbelievable. I won't go as far to say it was a fluke but I was sure hoping for more targets to help solidify long-term value.
I have no idea what Williams ends up doing, but Givens appears to be somewhere around the 5th or 6th option for Sam Bradford. That just doesn't seem like a guy to own.
He has certainly sucked thus far. He did lead Wr's in targets this game....yeah, I know; I'm grasping here. I just am a believer in his talent, but clearly he hasn't been a fit for this offense thus far. It is very frustrating.I dropped Givens for him before last Sunday.Considering dropping Givens for him, but the targets - as you referenced - gives me pause. Still, good game for the rook.He ended with only 4 targets which makes his performance all the more unbelievable. I won't go as far to say it was a fluke but I was sure hoping for more targets to help solidify long-term value.
I have no idea what Williams ends up doing, but Givens appears to be somewhere around the 5th or 6th option for Sam Bradford. That just doesn't seem like a guy to own.
Yeah, I like him. I just ran out of patience (a habit I've often paid dearly for)He has certainly sucked thus far. He did lead Wr's in targets this game....yeah, I know; I'm grasping here. I just am a believer in his talent, but clearly he hasn't been a fit for this offense thus far. It is very frustrating.I dropped Givens for him before last Sunday.Considering dropping Givens for him, but the targets - as you referenced - gives me pause. Still, good game for the rook.He ended with only 4 targets which makes his performance all the more unbelievable. I won't go as far to say it was a fluke but I was sure hoping for more targets to help solidify long-term value.
I have no idea what Williams ends up doing, but Givens appears to be somewhere around the 5th or 6th option for Sam Bradford. That just doesn't seem like a guy to own.
Aside from GB, I don't see any evidence from WAS's previous games to suggest that the forth option in a passing attack (which he could conceivably be) is guaranteed any type of real production. I mean, it's definitely possible but I truly wouldn't feel very confident starting him. Judging by these stats..It's Washington people - if you cant start a third WR from the same team against the Skins - then you can never start one . . . remember Laurent Robinson in 2011??