FUBAR
Footballguy
Right, and frankly keeping players has a different logic than a new league. It might be illogical but nobody wants to be the guy who dropped a top player. And if you have gordon, you probably see him as having the talent to be a top player. You're usually much more inclined to accept the risk of keeping a player who might bust, or might boom, than of dropping him. The same happens with stocks.14 position players x 12 teams suggests something like 18 QBs, 60 RBs, 70 WRs, and 20 TEs kept. Obviously, those numbers would vary some, but the fact that he may be kept as one of 70-ish WRs kept in those leagues of yours doesn't really get at what has been discussed recently in this thread.
This tangent started when @jacobo_moses said he drafted Gordon in round 8 as WR44 in a 16 team dynasty IDP startup, then went on to draft Mitchell 8 picks later, meaning the Gordon pick was no later than pick #120. I have never played IDP, so hard for me to accurately forecast the IDP players drafted by that point, but I'd guess at the time of that Gordon pick there had been 43 WRs, 9 QBs, 28 RBs, 10 TEs (assuming TE required), 30 defensive players, or something like that. If true, I think that is a major overreach. YMMV.
Regardless, the conversation would have been quite different if it started with someone saying he drafted him as WR60+.![]()