What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty QB rankings (1 Viewer)

I would tend to agree, i have no problem with the people on the list.

However, I do feel Bulger should be in the top 6 or 7

especially with the added weapons

 
I would tend to agree, i have no problem with the people on the list.

However, I do feel Bulger should be in the top 6 or 7

especially with the added weapons

 
1. Manning

2. Palmer

3. Brady

4. Bulger

5. McNabb

6. Leinart

7. Brees

8. Young

9. Vick

10. Cutler

11. Manning

12. Hasselbeck

 
Trying to keep in mind DYNASTY.

It ends up being 13.

Manning

Palmer

Brees

Young

Leinart

McNabb

Brady

Rivers

Bulger

Roethlisberger

Romo

Cutler

Eli

 
1. Manning

2. Palmer

3. Brady

4. McNabb

5. Brees

6. Roethlisberger

7. Bulger

8. Vick

9. Hasselbeck

10. Young

11. Leinart

12. Rivers

Bubble:

Cutler

Romo

 
Roeth = QB SOD in 2007

Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason

 
1)Manning

2)Vick

3)Palmer

4)Young

5)Bulger

6)McNabb

7)Brady

8)Leinart

9)Brees

10)Roethisburger

11)Eli Manning

12)Leftwich

 
Roeth = QB SOD in 2007Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason
When a guy is everyone's "SOD" 4 months before the draft, he's no longer the steal of the draft.He's in fact hugely overrated. 3 FBG experts rank Big Ben AHEAD of Rivers in QB dynasty rankings. Despite the fact Rivers 1st year, was better then any of Ben's 3 years. So not only are people expecting a huge jump in Ben's production, it seems they see Rivers slipping despite the fact it was his 1st year as a starter.So no, he's not the steal of the draft. He's going to be vastly overrated come draft time. (and the cat is out of the bag, he was QB10 last year. Everyone and their brother are on Bens nutz this year)
 
Wow, oh how people forget about Hasselbeck.

Seems to be good value in a dynasty by the looks of these lists.

QB ranks

2003 - 4th

2004 - 13th

2005 - 5th

2006 - injured

 
1)Manning

2)Vick

3)Palmer

4)Young

5)Bulger

6)McNabb

7)Brady

8)Leinart

9)Brees

10)Roethisburger

11)Eli Manning

12)Leftwich
"Vick grossly over-rated by the out-of-your-mind-people as expected."
He was the #4 ranked QB last season per FBG's scoring and is just coming into his prime. He's only 26.
And now he has the premier talent of Joe Horn

if Vick isn't better than Manning

who will he blame?

 
:ptts: Young will be top 5 on most lists by the end of the year.Take another look at his last six games if you are wondering how I could think this. You'll find they put him in the top 5 QBs over this stretch in any scoring system. Oh, he also downright struggled through two of these six games. The sky is the limit for Young's fantasy value. Remember that he wasn't even supposed to be ready to play in the NFL last year. And all Vick comparisons should stop at the point where it's brought up that VY has improved as a passer consistently throughout his career, and that VY's work ethic and dedication are much greater than Vick's .It will be fun watching the Young bandwagon fill up as the season approaches. I expect him to help a lot of teams win fantasy titles this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason
Can you unpack this a bit? What makes them overrated? Manning ended up being overrated because he lacked the fire in his belly to really ratchet up and take it to the next level. Why do you see these three falling short of expectations?
 
Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason
Can you unpack this a bit? What makes them overrated? Manning ended up being overrated because he lacked the fire in his belly to really ratchet up and take it to the next level. Why do you see these three falling short of expectations?
I think there's a tendency around here to give young players a bit too much credit. Consider that almost half of the players listed in the initial poster's top 12 were first year starters (Romo, Rivers, Leinart, Young, Cutler). I feel like this is an abnormally promising group, but I'm not going to assume that they're all going to become consistent producers just because they played pretty well out of the gate. Breaking it down individually:

Leinart - I love Boldin and Fitz just as much as the next guy, but Leinart's rookie year was relatively mediocre. He has plenty of room to improve, but is he David Carr or Carson Palmer? We don't know yet.

Young - Has some superstar qualities, but his passing numbers leave a lot to be desired and the team has done nothing to address its weak receiving corps (although that's really a minor concern). It may be unfair to compare him to Vick, but a lot of things being said about Young right now were being said about Vick after his first year as a starter.

Cutler - Very solid passing numbers for a rookie QB. Looks like he could be a player, but I can't presently justify ranking him over guys like Hasselbeck, Bulger, and Roethlisberger.

Overall, QB is a position where I tend to be a little cautious. It's very hard to predict which guys will go on to become solid starters. That said, seeing as guys like Bulger and Hasselbeck are already what guys like Cutler and Leinart aspire to be, I can't really justify passing on the former for the latter.

These young guys are what I call speculative picks. They're not drafted based on actual production, but rather on speculation as to what they might eventually become.

Marc Bulger is a good QB. Matt Hasselbeck is a good QB. Jay Cutler might become a good QB.

There's definitely a place for speculative picks, but I don't like to make them when there are still solid vet options on the board. It's like passing on Todd Heap and Jeremy Shockey for Vernon Davis. Even if he pans out, he likely won't be more valuable than the safer guy you passed over.

Risk without reason = bad risk.

But that doesn't mean I don't see the potential of this bunch. I just think people are focusing too closely on the reward component of the risk vs. reward equation. It's the same problem I have with guys taking Maroney/Addai/D-Will/Drew/Bush so high.

 
Campbell is very underrated.

His numbers as a starter project to top 10 this year. That coupled with the fact that Gibbs will let him loose a bit = undervalued.

 
Campbell is very underrated.His numbers as a starter project to top 10 this year. That coupled with the fact that Gibbs will let him loose a bit = undervalued.
GB not accounting for 2nd year slumps.Big Ben and Eli are 2 cases in point.Haven't done a study, but I bet after about 5-8 starts, defenses catch up with new QBs.Romo, VY and other new QB supporters be forewarned. I like VY, but I'm waiting a year to be a real buyer. He'll be overvalued this year, undervalued next.
 
Campbell is very underrated.His numbers as a starter project to top 10 this year. That coupled with the fact that Gibbs will let him loose a bit = undervalued.
GB not accounting for 2nd year slumps.Big Ben and Eli are 2 cases in point.Haven't done a study, but I bet after about 5-8 starts, defenses catch up with new QBs.Romo, VY and other new QB supporters be forewarned. I like VY, but I'm waiting a year to be a real buyer. He'll be overvalued this year, undervalued next.
Sure, a 2nd year slump could be the case. Fact is that he didn't get a chance to even throw all that much last season year. Campbell is being ranked in the 20's... think that is undervalued when he has performed as well as Cutler, etc.Fantasy-wise, hasn't Ben gotten better every year?ETA - I never said he would BE a top 10 QB, I said his numbers projected there... I think he'll definitely hit the top 15 range.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF said:
Roeth = QB SOD in 2007Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason
Leinart had an average of 14 points a game last year once he was the starter. That would have ranked him #12 (242 points scored in my scoring system). With a full offseason and a healthy Fitz for the whole year I would be shocked if he wasn't top 10 next year.
 
Campbell is very underrated.

His numbers as a starter project to top 10 this year. That coupled with the fact that Gibbs will let him loose a bit = undervalued.
GB not accounting for 2nd year slumps.Big Ben and Eli are 2 cases in point.

Haven't done a study, but I bet after about 5-8 starts, defenses catch up with new QBs.

Romo, VY and other new QB supporters be forewarned.

I like VY, but I'm waiting a year to be a real buyer. He'll be overvalued this year, undervalued next.
Sure, a 2nd year slump could be the case. Fact is that he didn't get a chance to even throw all that much last season year. Campbell is being ranked in the 20's... think that is undervalued when he has performed as well as Cutler, etc.

Fantasy-wise, hasn't Ben gotten better every year?

ETA - I never said he would BE a top 10 QB, I said his numbers projected there... I think he'll definitely hit the top 15 range.
Haven't checked the math, but didn't Ben have a bad year last year?
 
EBF said:
Roeth = QB SOD in 2007Cutler, Leinart, Young = Collectively overrated ala Eli Manning circa 2006 preseason
Leinart had an average of 14 points a game last year once he was the starter. That would have ranked him #12 (242 points scored in my scoring system). With a full offseason and a healthy Fitz for the whole year I would be shocked if he wasn't top 10 next year.
It may not be Leinart, but I'd expect defenses / DCs / players learn the 2nd yr QB's tendencies and defend them better. I'd expect a perceived drop in their value in year 2 - not all QBs, but some.Then I'd be a buyer on them.Eli Manning may be a strong buy now. he's certain to be the QB again this year and for years to come, and Toomer is back (and was very underappreciated).
 
I'm with EBF in regards to the rose colored glasses on the young Qbs being in the top 12 this year. Not all of them can or will be.

They are a promising group but there are still growing pains ahead.

Rivers and Vince Young do not have the weapons to compete with many of the other QBs in the league. I find it harder to discount Leinart and Cutler because of the weapons they have available to them. And yes I do realise that Rivers has Gates and LT. That is a lot of easy completions for him. But I do not see a WR for Rivers to build on his numbers available. And we all know Norv Turner likes to run his offense through the RB. The Chargers put on a clinic offensivly last year. I don't see thier offense being able to maintain that pace in 2007.

Romo slowed down and started making more mistakes as the season wore on. That may continue. It is uncertain if TO's hand will still be an issue or not. I do like the complimentry WRs the Cowgurls have so perhaps they will use them more and Romo will stay steady or slightly improve from last year. But that is by no means a given and I am not counting on it.

I think people may have too much faith in McNabbs health also. Stallworth really helped him last year but he is gone as well.

There are some Qbs who will not be ranked high for dynasty but are likely to perform better than many of these Qbs in 2007 such as Jon Kitna and possibly Favre.

I guess it depends on what is meant by dynasty rankings for these Qbs? This keeps drawing me back to the same questions. How do you determine a players ranking/value/worth in dynasty?

These young Qbs may be worthy of top 12 ranking if your taking a long view of things like 3 years of production or more even if they do not crack the top 12 in 2007. But I don't think people posting rankings here are all talking the same language.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Campbell is very underrated.

His numbers as a starter project to top 10 this year. That coupled with the fact that Gibbs will let him loose a bit = undervalued.
GB not accounting for 2nd year slumps.Big Ben and Eli are 2 cases in point.

Haven't done a study, but I bet after about 5-8 starts, defenses catch up with new QBs.

Romo, VY and other new QB supporters be forewarned.

I like VY, but I'm waiting a year to be a real buyer. He'll be overvalued this year, undervalued next.
Sure, a 2nd year slump could be the case. Fact is that he didn't get a chance to even throw all that much last season year. Campbell is being ranked in the 20's... think that is undervalued when he has performed as well as Cutler, etc.

Fantasy-wise, hasn't Ben gotten better every year?

ETA - I never said he would BE a top 10 QB, I said his numbers projected there... I think he'll definitely hit the top 15 range.
Haven't checked the math, but didn't Ben have a bad year last year?
Finished top 10, 3500+ yards
 
#1 Manning

#2 Palmer

#3 McNabb

#4 Bulger

#5 Rivers

#6 Brady

#7 Brees

#8 Smith

#9 Culpepper

#10 Romo

#11 E. Manning

#12 Roethlisberger

 
Wow Hasselbeck no higher than #9 on these lists so far, and not even in some top 12s??

I'd really like to see the argument.

 
Bulger is way low in most of these rankings. How do you take a guy who is yearly a top-5 fantasy QB on an already powerful offense with a great receiving back, add two more receiving weapons in Drew Bennett and Randy McMichael to that same equation, and not project him top-3?

I guess he is a little older than the others but, at least for the foreseeable future, guy is as good as anyone out there.

 
Agreed. Youth is overvalued at the QB spot in dynasty leagues.

Middle aged QBs are undervalued in dynasty leagues.

Rookies and second year QBs are still hoping to become the middle aged producers, not the other way around.

Let another team be the farm team of the league.

By the time owners figure out they've got Leaf, Akili, Harrington, Couch, or Carr. It's too late.

You can always trade these same owners a mid to late first round rookie pick for the guys that do become middle-aged producers. Rinse and repeat.

 
In tiers:

1)Manning

2)Palmer

3)McNabb

4)Brady

5)Brees

6)Bulger

7)Young

8)Vick

9)Roethlisberger

10)Hasselbeck

11)Rivers

12a)Eli Manning

12b)Leinart

I'll answer JR's question with a question. How many of the 9 in front of Hass would you drop below him? Why? I suppose I could see him above Ben, but that's it.

 
1. Peyton Manning

2. Carson Palmer

3. Drew Brees

4. Tom Brady

5. Donovan McNabb

6. Michael Vick

7. Matt Hasselbeck

8. Vince Young

9. Marc Bulger

10. Ben Roethlisberger

11. Phillip Rivers

12. Matt Leinart

 
Mr. Peterson said:
FBGPoker said:
1)Manning

2)Vick

3)Palmer

4)Young

5)Bulger

6)McNabb

7)Brady

8)Leinart

9)Brees

10)Roethisburger

11)Eli Manning

12)Leftwich
"Vick grossly over-rated by the out-of-your-mind-people as expected."
i would not put him #2 but his legs makes him top 12
 
FBGPoker said:
1)Manning2)Vick <--------------- :shock: 3)Palmer4)Young5)Bulger6)McNabb7)Brady8)Leinart9)Brees10)Roethisburger11)Eli Manning12)Leftwich
HILARIOUS!!!!!!! Based on what???? C'mon, give us your insight? It has to be pure comedy.
 
FUBAR said:
And now he has the premier talent of Joe Hornif Vick isn't better than Manningwho will he blame?
The blame this year will fall on Joe Horn himself. The obvious reason for Vick's continued failure and the drop in Horn's numbers will be that he has lost a step, not that Vick can't get him the ball.
 
In tiers:1)Manning2)Palmer3)McNabb4)Brady5)Brees6)Bulger7)Young8)Vick9)Roethlisberger10)Hasselbeck11)Rivers12a)Eli Manning12b)LeinartI'll answer JR's question with a question. How many of the 9 in front of Hass would you drop below him? Why? I suppose I could see him above Ben, but that's it.
Roethlisberger and Vick for sure, probably Bulger, maybe McNabb. I would have expected 10 to be a low end ranking for Hasselbeck.A year ago, there was a thread like this for re-draft preseason and I remember consensus was that Hasselbeck was #3, with the most convincing argument put forward that he was a "safe" pick. He may not finish 3rd in pts, but he was the most likely to be in that range. In hindsight, well . . . but, applying the same logic to this ranking, I'd guess a few of the guys ahead of Hasselbeck rank higher on potential and that Hasselbeck will finish in the middle of such a pack.
 
I don't get why everyone is so in love with Vince Young:

12 TDs 13 INTs.

184-357, 2199 yards (51.5% completion)

Most importantly, 66.7 Qb rating (30th in the NFL)

Those with higher QB ratings:

Joey Harrington

Charlie Frye

Brad Johnson

Jake Plummer

Rex Grossman!

The ones who qualified who he was ahead of?

Andrew Walter & Bruce Gradowski.

People need to get off this train before it derails. I wouldn't touch him with a 10-foot pole. Dynasty-wise? Maybe 20th or so for Young?

My list would go something like this (with tiers):

1. Peyton Manning

2. Carson Palmer

3. Donovan McNabb

4. Drew Brees

5. Tom Brady

6. Michael Vick

7. Marc Bulger

8. Matt Leinart (all about those WRs)

9. Matt Hasselbeck

10. Philip Rivers

11. Ben Roesthlisberger

12. Jay Cutler

13. Eli Manning (let's not give up on this guy just yet)

14. Tony Romo

15. J.P. Losman

16. Alex Smith

It's at this point I'd consider a guy like Young, along with Byron Leftwich, Daunte Culpepper, Damon Huard, Jason Campbell and the '07 rookies. Maybe Delhomme too, but I think he's on the way out in Carolina.

But those with Young in the top 4 and 5 need a reality check.

 
GB not accounting for 2nd year slumps.

Big Ben and Eli are 2 cases in point.
Didn't both guys get to the playoffs in their 2nd yr in the league and didn't one of them become the youngest QB ever to win a SB in 2005. :shrug:

And how come so many of you have Vick in the same class or even over Guys like Bulger and Brady...

I know he's 26 (about 4 yrs younger than Bulger); but as a passer - he stinks.

W/ his wreckless running style.. don't expect him to last longer than those guys either.. I expect him to be done in about 3 too 4 yrs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top