What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[DYNASTY] Top 20 QB rankings (1 Viewer)

EBF

Footballguy
I probably won't do this for every position, but I thought I'd take a stab at an early set of dynasty QB rankings for 2008:

1. Tom Brady - His value will probably never be higher and it's possible that it will decrease considerably if Moss departs or declines at some point in the next year or two. But you really can't argue with a superstar coming off a season in which he threw 50 TDs and almost 5,000 yards. Those are video game numbers.

2. Peyton Manning - Even in a "quiet" year Peyton had 4,000+ yards and 30+ TDs. He's been more consistent than Brady and is probably a safer bet to remain an elite passer for the next 4-5 years.

3. Tony Romo - What scares me here is the inevitable decline of TO. What happens when Owens is finished? Crayton scares no one and Romo's value will almost certainly dip a little bit unless the Cowboys can land someone like Fitzgerald or Boldin to fill the void. That said, Jerry Jones is a solid owner and I'm sure he won't stand pat and allow his offense to sputter. So for now Romo belongs at QB3 even though he comes with a little more risk than the other elite dynasty QBs.

4. Ben Roethlisberger - I was tempted to rank him ahead of Romo, but his low number of passing attempts remains a little bit of a concern. Roethlisberger finished second in the NFL in passer rating and once again posted a yards per attempt average that ranks him among the best in the league (right up there with Brady, Favre, and Manning). At worst he should be a top 6-8 type QB for the forseeable future and he could even vault up into the elite ranks if he starts throwing it 470+ times per season.

5. Carson Palmer - For a while it looked like Palmer was going to become the next great one, but his QB rating has steadily dipped over the past two seasons since his career year in 2005. Which Palmer is the real one? The guy who threw 32 TDs in 2005 with a QB rating of 101.1 or the guy who threw 20 INTs last season? Palmer should still be considered a solid QB1 in most dynasty leagues, but it now looks like there's a realistic possibility that he's not quite the player we thought he was.

6. Matt Hasselbeck - What you see is what you get with Matt Hasselbeck. He's never going to be a guy who posts monster numbers and leads your FF team to a championship, but he's a solid performer who will play well enough to give you a chance to win most weeks.

7. Drew Brees - Brees finished with solid numbers in 2007, but I think his value is a little inflated since he threw the ball 200 more times than guys like Ben Roethlisberger and Jay Cutler. He should remain a quality QB1 going forward, but is a notch below some of the other young passers in terms of raw talent and upside.

8. Donovan McNabb - McNabb has struggled with injuries over the past few years and he doesn't have a great supporting cast to work with, but he's been a solid FF QB for a long time and I expect him to remain productive for several years.

9. Marc Bulger -Wow, what happened here? The wheels fell off this season and Bulger posted a pitiful 70.3 passer rating that's almost 20 points below his career average. I expect him to eventually bounce back. On the downside, the Rams are a runaway train with an uncertain future.

10. Jay Cutler - Cutler has quietly performed very well for the Broncos in his first two seasons. His 88.1 QB rating is very good for a young QB in his first full season as a starter. Right now he's a fringe FF starter who seems better suited as a dynasty backup with top 5-6 upside. He has breakout potential and could be much higher on most lists at this time next year.

11. David Garrard - Garrard is one of the most interesting dynasty QBs right now. He had a phenomenal year in 2007, finishing third in the NFL in QB rating with a solid yards per attempt average of 7.7 and a ridiculous TD:INT ratio of 6:1. When you look at points per week, he was nearly a top 10 QB last season despite the fact that he threw the ball half as many times as Drew Brees. He is flying under the radar right now, but if he continues to put up these kind of stats and starts throwing the ball a little more often then he could soon become a top 5-6 type. At the same time, Jacksonville looks like a run-first team and it remains unclear whether or not Garrard will ever be unleashed.

12. Matt Schaub - Schaub posted solid numbers in his first year as a starter. Houston looks like a team headed in the right direction and I think Schaub could eventually rise up to the level of someone like Matt Hasselbeck.

13. Vince Young - Vince Young is a talented player with upside, but all the excuses in the world can't erase his pitiful passing statistics. I think he should be viewed as an intriguing curiosity who probably won't ever give you the kind of passing numbers that it takes to make a great FF QB. The comparisons to Vick really don't seem that far-fetched when you consider the playing style and FF value of both players.

14. Derek Anderson - Put me in the camp that feels Anderson is overrated and destined to regress. You have to give him some credit for putting up solid stats in his first full year as a starter, but I was never impressed with his play and feel like his success was largely a result of his supporting cast and system. There's a chance that he'll actually improve and become a true franchise QB, but right now he's a sell high.

15. Eli Manning - Eli Manning is a bit of an enigma. He looks great at times and terrible at others. Unless things suddenly "click" for him, he's probably going to remain a solid backup in FF leagues who teases you with his streakiness.

16. Brett Favre - Favre had a great season in 2007, but how much longer can he really keep it up? He looked like he was finished as recently as two years ago. So while he might give you good numbers for another year or two, you also have to think the dropoff is imminent. His best value in dynasty leagues is as a temporary starter while you groom someone like Cutler or Schaub to take over in a year or two.

17. Matt Leinart - Leinart is probably going to be a bust, but he has a golden opportunity in Arizona and enough upside to warrant a gamble in this range.

18. Philip Rivers - Rivers is kind of like a modern day Troy Aikman. He doesn't have much upside in FF leagues and should be viewed as a backup who could fill-in and give you decent stats in a pinch.

19. Brady Quinn - First round QBs are always a crapshoot, but Quinn's performance at Notre Dame is impressive when you consider how bad the team was after he left. He has all of the physical tools needed to be a professional QB and will eventually get a chance to start. He's a good guy to target as a throw-in or cheap acquisition in dynasty leagues.

20. Trent Edwards - Buffalo looks like it's going to be a QB wasteland for the next few seasons, but Edwards showed enough flashes as a rookie to warrant mild optimism. Keep a close eye on his performance in 2008, as I think that will be a critical barometer towards gauging whether or not he's a true franchise QB or just another stop-gap solution.

OTHERS:

Jason Campbell - :rant:

Jamarcus Russell - Jamarcus Bust-ell. I don't get any good vibes from this guy on or off the field.

Aaron Rodgers - He'll be starting within two years. Good buy low. He's interchangeable with guys like Edwards and Quinn.

Jake Delhomme - Strictly a short-term backup.

Kevin Kolb - Another promising unknown who should get a chance some day.

Tarvaris Jackson - Showed some signs of life, but still has a long way to go.

Drew Stanton - See: Kevin Kolb

CONCLUSION:

Right now it looks like Brady and Manning are clearly the two guys to own. There's a pretty steep dropoff after those two, while the gap between the guys ranked 3-10 isn't all that huge. The most interesting QBs right now are Garrard, Schaub, and Cutler. They've all shown hints of becoming good FF QBs. I recommend drafting them as backups and hoping for the best. Lower in the rankings, there's another cluster of good risk vs. reward guys like Brady Quinn, Trent Edwards, Kevin Kolb, and Aaron Rodgers. I figure 1-2 of those guys will step up eventually.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about Kitna? Even at 35 he is not that old for even a dynasty league... I would put him between 8 and 10
Kitna has a few big things working against him:1. He's old.2. He's not very good.The possibility of an imminent decline coupled with the possibility of imminent benching makes a him a pretty weak dynasty option IMO. He might give you another good year or two, but you really can't count on him to be your QB1.
 
Well done. I either agree with each or at least see the logic.

The only minor tweaks I would make is to drop Quinn and Edwards from the top 20 and add TJackson and Campbell.

 
Well done. I either agree with each or at least see the logic. The only minor tweaks I would make is to drop Quinn and Edwards from the top 20 and add TJackson and Campbell.
Campbell has been in the league for three years and has failed to distinguish himself. He hasn't been a horrible bust, but he hasn't shown anything that would lead you to believe he has a bright future in FF. It's not a good sign that the Redskin offense got an immediate shot in the arm when Todd Collins took over. Jackson has some potential, but I can't see myself giving up Quinn or Edwards for him. He's the exact same thing he was when he came into the league: a raw athlete who may or may not ever develop into a competent pro passer.
 
What is your outlook on Losman?
With the constant demand for QBs in the NFL, it's all but assured that he'll get another chance to start again at some point in the next year or two. That said, he's never struck me as having the intangibles needed to be a great professional quarterback. I'm not too big on his long-term prospects, but you might as well keep him if you own him since his trade value is very low and there's an off chance that he'll emerge somewhere.
 
Nice list EBF and for the most part I am in agreement with these observations. Some areas where I differ:

I think you may have too much confidence in Romo. I wouldn't have him ranked above Brees or Palmer. I think Ben is better than Romo also.

I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.

I think your underestimating Rivers. He has many developing weapons in the passing game. This offense is moving forward. It won't continue to be all about LT.

 
Nice list EBF and for the most part I am in agreement with these observations. Some areas where I differ:I think you may have too much confidence in Romo. I wouldn't have him ranked above Brees or Palmer. I think Ben is better than Romo also.
I'm not all that high on Romo, but he did have a great year and he's been locked up to be the long-term starter in Dallas. I agree that Ben is the better talent, but this is one case where the situation really does seem to favor Romo (at least in the short term).I wouldn't really fault anyone for taking Palmer or Brees instead. Like I said, there's not a huge difference between the guys in the 3-10 range.
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
I mostly agree with you. I have him ranked below lots of guys who are usually ranked ahead of him.
I think your underestimating Rivers. He has many developing weapons in the passing game. This offense is moving forward. It won't continue to be all about LT.
You might be right. He probably deserves to be a few slots higher than where I have him, but he's still best suited to a backup role IMO. I wouldn't feel comfortable with him as my starter.
 
I like this list. I'm a little higher on Brees and Rivers, and a little lower on Hass and Garrard, but the rest is pretty close.

Brady

PManning

Palmer

Brees

Roethlisberger

Romo

McNabb

Bulger

Cutler

Hasselback

Rivers

Young

EManning

Leinart

Schaub

Garrard

Favre

Quinn

Campbell

Anderson

 
Good. Drive Leinart's value down.
Cards homer.Somebody didn't see Leinart at all this year. He was putrid.Flat out awful. Next to Alex Smith and Steve McNair, I don't know if I saw a worse non-rookie QB this year. Confused, hesistant, happy feet. Not only would I hesitate to put Leinart in the Top 20. I'd be selling Larry Fitzgerald as you'll fetch a fortune for him right now.This will not be the same fun and gunoffense with Leinart under center. It wasn't when he was there early this year and won't be in the future. Expect James and/or another RB to lead a more run-heavy offense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I put Jamarcus Russel at the bottom of the top 20. Starting QB in the league next year gets the keys to the car. The Raiders did all the right things with their 1st overall selection (after they finally got him signed) - they let him sit and eased him in at the end of the season. I'd love to have this guy on my bench in a dynasty just to see what happens...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brees is so much better then how you rate him, hes as young as Carson Palmer with a more proven track record, supporting cast and OL and yet he's lower?

i just dont get it :rolleyes:

 
Brees is so much better then how you rate him, hes as young as Carson Palmer with a more proven track record, supporting cast and OL and yet he's lower? i just dont get it :rolleyes:
Brees is QB7 on my list. That's pretty high. Can you justify ranking him over Roethlisberger, Romo, Hasselbeck, and Palmer? Sure.Can you justify ranking those guys over Brees? Yea, I think you can.After Brady and Manning, who you rank next becomes largely a matter of personal preference. Like I said, I wouldn't fault anyone for taking Brees as high as QB3. There's not a lot to differentiate the lower tier guys and their rankings will likely fluctuate over the next few years as they alternate having monster years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
QB is the hardest dynasty position to rank because in most leagues they aren't worth that much.

I agree with your 1st 3 but then I would go Palmer, Brees then Big Ben. I guess I like Hass next, but after him you can throw the rest in a bag and pick one out. Hard to get real excited about any of them or the offenses they are in.

 
EBF said:
CommuterMan said:
What about Kitna? Even at 35 he is not that old for even a dynasty league... I would put him between 8 and 10
Kitna has a few big things working against him:1. He's old.2. He's not very good.The possibility of an imminent decline coupled with the possibility of imminent benching makes a him a pretty weak dynasty option IMO. He might give you another good year or two, but you really can't count on him to be your QB1.
3. Mike Martz is gone, meaning Kitna's attempts are about to drop through the floor. Kitna's thrown 596 and 562 passes over the last two years (2nd and 4th in the league). The only QBs who have more passes in either year are Brees, Brady, and Palmer (this year) and Favre (last year). Do you think any other coordinator in the league is going to view Kitna as a 560+ attempt guy? Do you think Kitna is going to be a startable fantasy QB with only 480-500 attempts?
BroadwayG said:
Good. Drive Leinart's value down.
Leinart's doing a good enough of a job of that all on his own, no help required.
Biabreakable said:
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
You don't have to believe in VY, you only have to believe in running QBs. Nobody would confuse Daunte Culpepper or Randall Cunningham with HoFers, but they're probably the two best fantasy QBs of the past 20 years. In order for a passing QB to keep pace with a running QB having even a good season, the passing QB needs to have an AMAZING season. 2800/18/14 passing and 800/6 rushing is as good as 4400/27 passing in most scoring systems (or equal to a whopping 4800/27 passing in leagues where passing yards are 25 per point). Even if you're not a huge believer in Young, you have to believe that 2800/18/14 is achievable.
 
14. Derek Anderson - Put me in the camp that feels Anderson is overrated and destined to regress. You have to give him some credit for putting up solid stats in his first full year as a starter, but I was never impressed with his play and feel like his success was largely a result of his supporting cast and system. There's a chance that he'll actually improve and become a true franchise QB, but right now he's a sell high.15. Eli Manning - Eli Manning is a bit of an enigma. He looks great at times and terrible at others. Unless things suddenly "click" for him, he's probably going to remain a solid backup in FF leagues who teases you with his streakiness.16. Brett Favre - Favre had a great season in 2007, but how much longer can he really keep it up? He looked like he was finished as recently as two years ago. So while he might give you good numbers for another year or two, you also have to think the dropoff is imminent. His best value in dynasty leagues is as a temporary starter while you groom someone like Cutler or Schaub to take over in a year or two.17. Matt Leinart - Leinart is probably going to be a bust, but he has a golden opportunity in Arizona and enough upside to warrant a gamble in this range.18. Philip Rivers - Rivers is kind of like a modern day Troy Aikman. He doesn't have much upside in FF leagues and should be viewed as a backup who could fill-in and give you decent stats in a pinch.
Rivers has finished 9th and 15th his first two years starting, so I fail to see how he should be so low. Anderson was given free rein throwing the ball so he put up great stats, but I don't seem as a long-term starter in the league. Eli is still an enigma - you know the talent is there but he still hasn't progressed much. Favre had his best year in a decade, but he's still going to be 39 next year. Leinart is risky - on one hand he's shown nothing but on the other he has the best pair of WR's in the game.My ranking of these five would be Eli, Rivers, Leinart, Favre and Anderson.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You guys are right about Rivers. He should definitely be higher on my list. 14-15 seems like a better spot for him.

 
QB is the hardest dynasty position to rank because in most leagues they aren't worth that much.I agree with your 1st 3 but then I would go Palmer, Brees then Big Ben. I guess I like Hass next, but after him you can throw the rest in a bag and pick one out. Hard to get real excited about any of them or the offenses they are in.
I do think people have trouble ranking dyansty QBs, but it is probably worth it to try. I have no "study" to prove it, but it seems as though most of the bad dynasty teams that I have encountered, have a bad situation at QB. Unlike redraft where there is a good chance that you tape together QBs from the waiver wire, most of the lower level guys and developmental players are on rosters.
 
Biabreakable said:
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
You don't have to believe in VY, you only have to believe in running QBs. Nobody would confuse Daunte Culpepper or Randall Cunningham with HoFers, but they're probably the two best fantasy QBs of the past 20 years. In order for a passing QB to keep pace with a running QB having even a good season, the passing QB needs to have an AMAZING season. 2800/18/14 passing and 800/6 rushing is as good as 4400/27 passing in most scoring systems (or equal to a whopping 4800/27 passing in leagues where passing yards are 25 per point). Even if you're not a huge believer in Young, you have to believe that 2800/18/14 is achievable.
1. Culpepper had Moss and Cris Carter. So did Randall Cunningham and they threw for more than 2800/18/14 when they were top 10 Qbs.2. A Qb running for 800 yards and 6TD is a pretty lofty goal. Not saying VY cannot do it, but that is not what I would expect from him every season. Mike Vick who I consider one of the best if not the best running Qbs ever only rushed for 800 or more in two out of six seasons. He was close another time with 777. In those seasons where he ran for that many yards he did not score 6 or more TD but 3 and 2. His 2nd year in the league was his best rushing performance with 777 yards and 8TD. That is the closest he came to meeting your benchmark.3. Running Qbs are more prone to injury. Look at Culpepper now.Vince Youngs completion percentage 62.3% this season does give some reason to hope that he can develop as a passer. This is better than Vick ever did in that category. However VY interceptions of 17 is what is worrysome. If you play in a league where turnovers are not penalised then VY is a better option for you.Vince Young maybe will have a magic season or 2 where everything lines up and he stays healthy enough to finish in the top 10. But I bet he has some bad seasons mixed in there as well and the inconsistency and risk is not somthing I would want to deal with.
 
EBF said:
CommuterMan said:
What about Kitna? Even at 35 he is not that old for even a dynasty league... I would put him between 8 and 10
Kitna has a few big things working against him:1. He's old.2. He's not very good.The possibility of an imminent decline coupled with the possibility of imminent benching makes a him a pretty weak dynasty option IMO. He might give you another good year or two, but you really can't count on him to be your QB1.
3. Mike Martz is gone, meaning Kitna's attempts are about to drop through the floor. Kitna's thrown 596 and 562 passes over the last two years (2nd and 4th in the league). The only QBs who have more passes in either year are Brees, Brady, and Palmer (this year) and Favre (last year). Do you think any other coordinator in the league is going to view Kitna as a 560+ attempt guy? Do you think Kitna is going to be a startable fantasy QB with only 480-500 attempts?
BroadwayG said:
Good. Drive Leinart's value down.
Leinart's doing a good enough of a job of that all on his own, no help required.
Biabreakable said:
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
You don't have to believe in VY, you only have to believe in running QBs. Nobody would confuse Daunte Culpepper or Randall Cunningham with HoFers, but they're probably the two best fantasy QBs of the past 20 years. In order for a passing QB to keep pace with a running QB having even a good season, the passing QB needs to have an AMAZING season. 2800/18/14 passing and 800/6 rushing is as good as 4400/27 passing in most scoring systems (or equal to a whopping 4800/27 passing in leagues where passing yards are 25 per point). Even if you're not a huge believer in Young, you have to believe that 2800/18/14 is achievable.
:thumbup: Wow. It's like I posted before I did. As I was reading this thread I had mentally picked out 3 things I was going to reply about - not only did you hit all 3, but said almsot exactly what I was going to (although you used stats to back up your VY point - it's early, I was just going to make the general point...I don't do math in the AM.)Great post, as usual SSOG. It's people like you and EBF that make these boards so chock full 'o knowledge.
 
EBF said:
6. Matt Hasselbeck - What you see is what you get with Matt Hasselbeck. He's never going to be a guy who posts monster numbers and leads your FF team to a championship, but he's a solid performer who will play well enough to give you a chance to win most weeks.
Overall nice post, but I dont see how you can have a 32 year old "solid performer" ranked so highly. Baldy is coming off a career year and has no where to go but down. Obviously the Seahawks where forced to rely on him more due to their lack of a rushing game. Unless you expect them to go into next season with a washed up Alexander and a thoroughly mediocre Morris as RBs w/o addressing that position, then Hasselbeck's numbers should fall back to the 23-25 TD range.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF said:
6. Matt Hasselbeck - What you see is what you get with Matt Hasselbeck. He's never going to be a guy who posts monster numbers and leads your FF team to a championship, but he's a solid performer who will play well enough to give you a chance to win most weeks.
Overall nice post, but I dont see how you can have a 32 year old "solid performer" ranked so highly. Baldy is coming off a career year and has no where to go but down. Obviously the Seahawks where forced to rely on him more due to their lack of a rushing game. Unless you expect them to go into next season with a washed up Alexander and a thoroughly mediocre Morris as RBs w/o addressing that position, then Hasselbeck's numbers should fall back to the 23-25 TD range.
Agree here. I think you have to move Brees up probably to 5 and I would drop Ben to 6. I'm not sold on the coaches keeping the spread offense. Ben is more talented, but if they don't have him throwing in the red zone like this season, his TDs will drop.
 
EBF said:
6. Matt Hasselbeck - What you see is what you get with Matt Hasselbeck. He's never going to be a guy who posts monster numbers and leads your FF team to a championship, but he's a solid performer who will play well enough to give you a chance to win most weeks.
Overall nice post, but I dont see how you can have a 32 year old "solid performer" ranked so highly. Baldy is coming off a career year and has no where to go but down. Obviously the Seahawks where forced to rely on him more due to their lack of a rushing game. Unless you expect them to go into next season with a washed up Alexander and a thoroughly mediocre Morris as RBs w/o addressing that position, then Hasselbeck's numbers should fall back to the 23-25 TD range.
I probably have him a few slots too high.
 
Biabreakable said:
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
You don't have to believe in VY, you only have to believe in running QBs. Nobody would confuse Daunte Culpepper or Randall Cunningham with HoFers, but they're probably the two best fantasy QBs of the past 20 years. In order for a passing QB to keep pace with a running QB having even a good season, the passing QB needs to have an AMAZING season. 2800/18/14 passing and 800/6 rushing is as good as 4400/27 passing in most scoring systems (or equal to a whopping 4800/27 passing in leagues where passing yards are 25 per point). Even if you're not a huge believer in Young, you have to believe that 2800/18/14 is achievable.
1. Culpepper had Moss and Cris Carter. So did Randall Cunningham and they threw for more than 2800/18/14 when they were top 10 Qbs.2. A Qb running for 800 yards and 6TD is a pretty lofty goal. Not saying VY cannot do it, bu Rt that is not what I would expect from him every season. Mike Vick who I consider one of the best if not the best running Qbs ever only rushed for 800 or more in two out of six seasons. He was close another time with 777. In those seasons where he ran for that many yards he did not score 6 or more TD but 3 and 2. His 2nd year in the league was his best rushing performance with 777 yards and 8TD. That is the closest he came to meeting your benchmark.3. Running Qbs are more prone to injury. Look at Culpepper now.Vince Youngs completion percentage 62.3% this season does give some reason to hope that he can develop as a passer. This is better than Vick ever did in that category. However VY interceptions of 17 is what is worrysome. If you play in a league where turnovers are not penalised then VY is a better option for you.Vince Young maybe will have a magic season or 2 where everything lines up and he stays healthy enough to finish in the top 10. But I bet he has some bad seasons mixed in there as well and the inconsistency and risk is not somthing I would want to deal with.
1. Not in 2004, he didn't. And yes, Culpepper threw for more than 2800/18, but his rushing numbers were lower than what you'll likely get from Young, too. Randall Cunningham didn't have either Moss or Carter in Philly. He ranked 3rd in 1992 with 2775/19 passing, and 1st in 1987 with 2786/23 passing.2. Okay, so let's say 600/4 rushing instead of 800/6. Pair that with 2800/18 and that's still as good as 4000/24. Give the QB 3000/20 and suddenly you're looking at 4200/26. The numbers themselves are irrelevant, the important part is that mediocre passing + awesome rushing trumps awesome passing + mediocre rushing.3. It's conventional wisdom that running QBs can't be relied on long-term, but conventional wisdom is wrong. Look at how many years Randall Cunningham was a startable fantasy QB. Look at how many years Young was a startable fantasy QB. Culpepper finished four seasons as the #1 QB in fantasy football (including one season where he finished first despite ONLY PLAYING 14 GAMES). I'd rather have a guy who was #1 four times and then never played another down of football again than a guy who was #10 every year for 16 years. Running QBs last plenty long enough to allow you to dominate your league.
 
Biabreakable said:
I don't believe in VY. People were way too high on him last year and I don't see much reason to expect him to improve. The Titans defense carries that team.
You don't have to believe in VY, you only have to believe in running QBs. Nobody would confuse Daunte Culpepper or Randall Cunningham with HoFers, but they're probably the two best fantasy QBs of the past 20 years. In order for a passing QB to keep pace with a running QB having even a good season, the passing QB needs to have an AMAZING season. 2800/18/14 passing and 800/6 rushing is as good as 4400/27 passing in most scoring systems (or equal to a whopping 4800/27 passing in leagues where passing yards are 25 per point). Even if you're not a huge believer in Young, you have to believe that 2800/18/14 is achievable.
1. Culpepper had Moss and Cris Carter. So did Randall Cunningham and they threw for more than 2800/18/14 when they were top 10 Qbs.2. A Qb running for 800 yards and 6TD is a pretty lofty goal. Not saying VY cannot do it, bu Rt that is not what I would expect from him every season. Mike Vick who I consider one of the best if not the best running Qbs ever only rushed for 800 or more in two out of six seasons. He was close another time with 777. In those seasons where he ran for that many yards he did not score 6 or more TD but 3 and 2. His 2nd year in the league was his best rushing performance with 777 yards and 8TD. That is the closest he came to meeting your benchmark.3. Running Qbs are more prone to injury. Look at Culpepper now.Vince Youngs completion percentage 62.3% this season does give some reason to hope that he can develop as a passer. This is better than Vick ever did in that category. However VY interceptions of 17 is what is worrysome. If you play in a league where turnovers are not penalised then VY is a better option for you.Vince Young maybe will have a magic season or 2 where everything lines up and he stays healthy enough to finish in the top 10. But I bet he has some bad seasons mixed in there as well and the inconsistency and risk is not somthing I would want to deal with.
1. Not in 2004, he didn't. And yes, Culpepper threw for more than 2800/18, but his rushing numbers were lower than what you'll likely get from Young, too. Randall Cunningham didn't have either Moss or Carter in Philly. He ranked 3rd in 1992 with 2775/19 passing, and 1st in 1987 with 2786/23 passing.2. Okay, so let's say 600/4 rushing instead of 800/6. Pair that with 2800/18 and that's still as good as 4000/24. Give the QB 3000/20 and suddenly you're looking at 4200/26. The numbers themselves are irrelevant, the important part is that mediocre passing + awesome rushing trumps awesome passing + mediocre rushing.3. It's conventional wisdom that running QBs can't be relied on long-term, but conventional wisdom is wrong. Look at how many years Randall Cunningham was a startable fantasy QB. Look at how many years Young was a startable fantasy QB. Culpepper finished four seasons as the #1 QB in fantasy football (including one season where he finished first despite ONLY PLAYING 14 GAMES). I'd rather have a guy who was #1 four times and then never played another down of football again than a guy who was #10 every year for 16 years. Running QBs last plenty long enough to allow you to dominate your league.
1. Again Culpepper had Moss and CC. When VY gets a elite WR let me know. Chris Carter started his career in Philly where Buddy Ryan made the infamous statement that all CC does is catch TD's. I know. I owned both Qbs in dynasty during those times.2. Yes I understand the point of rushing yards being worth twice as much as passing yards in most scoring systems and how this is an advantage to a passing challenged Qb. But your scenario is not comparable to CPep or Randall who were good passing QBs.. unless VY improves as a passer then his career will follow the path of Mike Vick. Vick had some top 10 FF seasons. But that production was very unreliable from year to year. Ask anyone who owned Vick how comfortable they felt about having him be their starting QB.3. Now your comparing VY not only to CPep and Cunningham but also Steve Young?? When Vince Young PASSES for more than 12TD in a season let me know. All of the Qbs your comparing him to did every year they played. VY still hasn't thrown for more TDs than interceptions in a season yet much less become a passer of any of those 3 players caliber. VY will be lucky to play like McNair some day much less these 3 elite dual threat QBs of their times.
 
But your scenario is not comparable to CPep or Randall who were good passing QBs.. unless VY improves as a passer then his career will follow the path of Mike Vick. Vick had some top 10 FF seasons. But that production was very unreliable from year to year. Ask anyone who owned Vick how comfortable they felt about having him be their starting QB.
I had Vick in 2005 and 2006. Never had a problem starting him and loved his value. He only had a couple bad games those years and was top 5 in one, top 10 in the other. Young's completion % this year is better than 15 of Cunningham's 16 years. CPep did better in Minnesota, but you or I could throw to Moss and Carter too. I don't neccessarily disagree with your overall point, his INTs indicate a problem, but running QBs were undervalued a couple years ago. It's possible that Young is overhyped by some, but he's undervalued by many.
 
Biabreakable said:
1. Again Culpepper had Moss and CC. When VY gets a elite WR let me know. Chris Carter started his career in Philly where Buddy Ryan made the infamous statement that all CC does is catch TD's. I know. I owned both Qbs in dynasty during those times.2. Yes I understand the point of rushing yards being worth twice as much as passing yards in most scoring systems and how this is an advantage to a passing challenged Qb. But your scenario is not comparable to CPep or Randall who were good passing QBs.. unless VY improves as a passer then his career will follow the path of Mike Vick. Vick had some top 10 FF seasons. But that production was very unreliable from year to year. Ask anyone who owned Vick how comfortable they felt about having him be their starting QB.3. Now your comparing VY not only to CPep and Cunningham but also Steve Young?? When Vince Young PASSES for more than 12TD in a season let me know. All of the Qbs your comparing him to did every year they played. VY still hasn't thrown for more TDs than interceptions in a season yet much less become a passer of any of those 3 players caliber. VY will be lucky to play like McNair some day much less these 3 elite dual threat QBs of their times.
1. Again, not in 2004 he didn't. No Cris Carter in 2004. Randy Moss missed more games than he played in 2004. Culpepper's leading receiver in '04 was Nate Burleson.2. I owned Vick in '05 and '06, too, and I was very comfortable starting him. Perception was radically out of line with reality. He was a very reliable fantasy starter. Only three times in '05 did he fail to crack 12 points. Ditto that for '06.3. We're talking about Vince Young's upside warrents taking risks. I fail to see how that discussion is best served by assuming that he never develops as a passer. Will Young become Culpepper, Cunningham, or Steve Young? Probably not- those are three elite talents. CAN he? Yes, and there's no one else in the league that can make that claim. Vince Young has the highest upside of any fantasy QB in the NFL right now. As was discussed in F&L's Dynasty thread, at some positions (QB and TE, primarily), there's so little difference between high-serviceable and low-serviceable guys that you generally have to give big bumps for elite upside.
 
I thought it'd be worthwhile to show a consensus dynasty ranking at this point in time.

Here is the average of FantasyGuru (updated 1/10), Bloom (1/10), Tefertiller (1/3), and Fear & Loathing (1/9), each weighted 25%. I'm not divulging any proprietary info since no individual rankings are listed.

No Avg

01 01.3 Brady, Tom NE

02 02.0 Manning, Peyton IND

03 03.8 Romo, Tony DAL

04 04.0 Palmer, Carson CIN

05 05.0 Brees, Drew NO

06 05.5 Roethlisberger, Ben PIT

07 08.3 Hasselbeck, Matt SEA

08 09.5 Bulger, Marc STL

09 09.8 Cutler, Jay DEN

10 10.5 McNabb, Donovan PHI

11 11.5 Young, Vince TEN

12 12.3 Schaub, Matt HOU

13 13.3 Favre, Brett GB

14 13.5 Manning, Eli NYG

15 15.3 Anderson, Derek CLE

16 16.5 Garrard, David JAC

17 17.0 Campbell, Jason WAS

18 17.8 Rivers, Philip SD

19 18.0 Russell, JaMarcus OAK

20 18.5 Leinart, Matt ARI

21 20.8 Kitna, Jon DET

22 20.8 Delhomme, Jake CAR

23 23.8 Quinn, Brady CLE

24 25.3 Kolb, Kevin PHI

25 25.3 Edwards, Trent BUF

26 28.3 Rodgers, Aaron GB

27 28.8 Clemens, Kellen NYJ

28 29.3 Jackson, Tarvaris MIN

29 30.0 Stanton, Drew DET

30 31.0 Warner, Kurt ARI

31 32.8 Garcia, Jeff TB

32 33.3 Smith, Alex SF

33 34.8 Beck, John MIA

34 35.5 Croyle, Brodie KC

35 36.3 Culpepper, Daunte OAK

36 36.8 Losman, J.P. BUF

37 36.8 Leftwich, Byron ATL

38 37.0 Hill, Shaun SF

39 37.3 Pennington, Chad NYJ

40 38.5 Boller, Kyle BAL

 
3. We're talking about Vince Young's upside warrents taking risks. I fail to see how that discussion is best served by assuming that he never develops as a passer. Will Young become Culpepper, Cunningham, or Steve Young? Probably not- those are three elite talents. CAN he? Yes, and there's no one else in the league that can make that claim. Vince Young has the highest upside of any fantasy QB in the NFL right now. As was discussed in F&L's Dynasty thread, at some positions (QB and TE, primarily), there's so little difference between high-serviceable and low-serviceable guys that you generally have to give big bumps for elite upside.
:football: :lmao: After the elite QBs, why not take a risk with Young and ensure you get another, somewhat safer bet? I would love to get Young as the 11th QB and Garrard as the 16th. (FWIW, Garrard should be upgraded)
 
3. We're talking about Vince Young's upside warrents taking risks. I fail to see how that discussion is best served by assuming that he never develops as a passer. Will Young become Culpepper, Cunningham, or Steve Young? Probably not- those are three elite talents. CAN he? Yes, and there's no one else in the league that can make that claim. Vince Young has the highest upside of any fantasy QB in the NFL right now. As was discussed in F&L's Dynasty thread, at some positions (QB and TE, primarily), there's so little difference between high-serviceable and low-serviceable guys that you generally have to give big bumps for elite upside.
:lol: :goodposting: After the elite QBs, why not take a risk with Young and ensure you get another, somewhat safer bet? I would love to get Young as the 11th QB and Garrard as the 16th. (FWIW, Garrard should be upgraded)
Why take a shot on Young when you can take a shot on Cutler, Garrard, or Schaub? A QB doesn't have to be a flashy athlete to have a high ceiling in FF leagues.
 
3. We're talking about Vince Young's upside warrents taking risks. I fail to see how that discussion is best served by assuming that he never develops as a passer. Will Young become Culpepper, Cunningham, or Steve Young? Probably not- those are three elite talents. CAN he? Yes, and there's no one else in the league that can make that claim. Vince Young has the highest upside of any fantasy QB in the NFL right now. As was discussed in F&L's Dynasty thread, at some positions (QB and TE, primarily), there's so little difference between high-serviceable and low-serviceable guys that you generally have to give big bumps for elite upside.
:popcorn: :thumbup: After the elite QBs, why not take a risk with Young and ensure you get another, somewhat safer bet? I would love to get Young as the 11th QB and Garrard as the 16th. (FWIW, Garrard should be upgraded)
Why take a shot on Young when you can take a shot on Cutler, Garrard, or Schaub? A QB doesn't have to be a flashy athlete to have a high ceiling in FF leagues.
Because I agree with SSOG.FWIW, I also like Cutler about the same as Young. Partly because he has a WR. Two if Walker comes back to form and stats in Mile High.

 
I didn't mean to derail the topic on an argument with SSOG (which is generaly pointless because he never seems to listen) over VY. However at this point I think its clear that VY has no business being compared to CPep, Cunningham or Steve Young but instead should be compared to Vick. VY has not been as good running the ball as Vick was but due to the completion percentage of 62% he shows more promise in that area than Vick ever did. Vicks best was 56.4%. So after looking into the situation deeper I find more similarities between VY and the QB he was drafted to replace Steve McNair.

Vince Young:

2006 184cmp 357PA 51.5% 2199yards 12TD 13INT 83RA 552yards 7TD

2007 238cmp 382PA 62.3% 2546yards 9TD 17INT 93RA 395yards 3TD

Steve McNair:

1997 216cmp 415PA 52.0% 2665yards 14TD 13INT 101RA 674yards 8TD

1998 289cmp 492PA 58.7% 3228yards 15TD 10INT 77RA 559yards 4TD

1999 187cmp 331PA 56.5% 2179yards 12TD 8INT 72RA 337yards 8TD

2000 248cmp 396PA 62.6% 2847yards 15TD 13INT 72RA 403yards 0TD

2001 264cmp 431PA 61.3% 3350yards 21TD 12INT 75RA 414yards 5TD

2002 301cmp 492PA 61.2% 3387yards 22TD 15INT 82RA 440yards 3TD

I agree with where EBF has VY ranked. It's reasonable. It is not too optimistic while at the same time factors in his upside if he becomes even a shadow of what many people hope he can be.

My original comment was just my opinion about him. I don't believe in him so if I had him I would sell high. If I am looking to draft or trade VY percieved value is greater than I think he is worth.

 
I thought it'd be worthwhile to show a consensus dynasty ranking at this point in time.Here is the average of FantasyGuru (updated 1/10), Bloom (1/10), Tefertiller (1/3), and Fear & Loathing (1/9), each weighted 25%. I'm not divulging any proprietary info since no individual rankings are listed.
Thank you
 
3. We're talking about Vince Young's upside warrents taking risks. I fail to see how that discussion is best served by assuming that he never develops as a passer. Will Young become Culpepper, Cunningham, or Steve Young? Probably not- those are three elite talents. CAN he? Yes, and there's no one else in the league that can make that claim. Vince Young has the highest upside of any fantasy QB in the NFL right now. As was discussed in F&L's Dynasty thread, at some positions (QB and TE, primarily), there's so little difference between high-serviceable and low-serviceable guys that you generally have to give big bumps for elite upside.
:confused: :shrug: After the elite QBs, why not take a risk with Young and ensure you get another, somewhat safer bet? I would love to get Young as the 11th QB and Garrard as the 16th. (FWIW, Garrard should be upgraded)
Why take a shot on Young when you can take a shot on Cutler, Garrard, or Schaub? A QB doesn't have to be a flashy athlete to have a high ceiling in FF leagues.
Those are also guys I like. Most of my Vince Young arguments were to justify having him ranked right about where you have him ranked (personally, I'd take him behind Cutler and ahead of Garrard or Schaub, but I think VY/Garrard/Schaub is sort of a clusteryou-know-what, while Cutler is clearly ahead of them).
I didn't mean to derail the topic on an argument with SSOG (which is generaly pointless because he never seems to listen) over VY...I agree with where EBF has VY ranked. It's reasonable. It is not too optimistic while at the same time factors in his upside if he becomes even a shadow of what many people hope he can be.
I listen just fine. Sounds to me like we don't disagree at all. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought it'd be worthwhile to show a consensus dynasty ranking at this point in time.

Here is the average of FantasyGuru (updated 1/10), Bloom (1/10), Tefertiller (1/3), and Fear & Loathing (1/9), each weighted 25%. I'm not divulging any proprietary info since no individual rankings are listed.

No Avg

01 01.3 Brady, Tom NE

02 02.0 Manning, Peyton IND

03 03.8 Romo, Tony DAL

04 04.0 Palmer, Carson CIN

05 05.0 Brees, Drew NO

06 05.5 Roethlisberger, Ben PIT

07 08.3 Hasselbeck, Matt SEA

08 09.5 Bulger, Marc STL

09 09.8 Cutler, Jay DEN

10 10.5 McNabb, Donovan PHI

11 11.5 Young, Vince TEN

12 12.3 Schaub, Matt HOU

13 13.3 Favre, Brett GB

14 13.5 Manning, Eli NYG

15 15.3 Anderson, Derek CLE

16 16.5 Garrard, David JAC

17 17.0 Campbell, Jason WAS

18 17.8 Rivers, Philip SD

19 18.0 Russell, JaMarcus OAK

20 18.5 Leinart, Matt ARI

21 20.8 Kitna, Jon DET

22 20.8 Delhomme, Jake CAR

23 23.8 Quinn, Brady CLE

24 25.3 Kolb, Kevin PHI

25 25.3 Edwards, Trent BUF

26 28.3 Rodgers, Aaron GB

27 28.8 Clemens, Kellen NYJ

28 29.3 Jackson, Tarvaris MIN

29 30.0 Stanton, Drew DET

30 31.0 Warner, Kurt ARI

31 32.8 Garcia, Jeff TB

32 33.3 Smith, Alex SF

33 34.8 Beck, John MIA

34 35.5 Croyle, Brodie KC

35 36.3 Culpepper, Daunte OAK

36 36.8 Losman, J.P. BUF

37 36.8 Leftwich, Byron ATL

38 37.0 Hill, Shaun SF

39 37.3 Pennington, Chad NYJ

40 38.5 Boller, Kyle BAL
Thanks for putting that together :hophead: I have to say Kolb over Edwards is a bit troubling. Edwards looked just as good as many recent rookie QBs (Leinart, Young, etc) and had a decent completion % and interception %. I'm not saying he'll be a top 12 guy, but I think he showed enough as a rookie to warrant consideration over a 2nd rounder who hasn't played yet.

 
I like rushing yards from QB as much as the next guy. But a QB has had 800 rushing yards only 4 times (Vick twice, Douglas, and Cunningham). QBs have had 8 rushing TD 12 times and only 5 times in the past 25 years (McNair twice, Stewart, Culpepper, and Vick). IMO, it's pretty hard to predict monster rushing production from QB from year to year.

Of the 118 times a QB has had 300 fantasy points in a season using FBG scoring (that's 4 pts per passing TD), 9 of them had 500 rushing yards and 9 times someone had 6 or more rushing TD.

I have no problem starting a QB that gets decent production running the ball, in fact many times people will let those types of players fall in many drafts, but to get truly top shelf production the majority of the time it will come through passing production.

Of that same data set of 188 QBs, 55 QB had 4,000 passing yards and 102 times a QB had 3,500 passing yards. Similarly, 46 times a QB had 30 passing TD and 99 times had at least 25 passing TD.

I AM NOT arguing that passing QBs are more valuable than rushing QB, as people could very likely have had to draft these 118 QB way earlier on draft day than their running brethren. So 8th round running QB with 280 points could very well trump a 3rd round passing QB that scores 300.

I have not run any numbers, but I also suspect that running QBs may not fare as well in games that they DO NOT score a rushing TD. If that were indeed the case, your QB scoring could turn out to be above average in games where the QB runs it into the end zone and below average in games where he did not.

 
Vince Young at #11 is comical. Um, 9 TD's.

In a dynasty league, who wants a QB who scores 9 passing TD's. I could care less about any rushing TD's as those come and go. No QB consistently puts up a lot of rushing TD's. When Brett Favre had Driver and nothing for a few years (including Ferguson on the other side dropping passes and allowing INT's when the ball was throw his way), Favre put up 20+ TD's a year. Only last year did Favre not throw 20 and he still managed 18 with a inexperienced team.

Eli Manning has outplayed Young FFwise the past 2 years yet is behind him? What is the fascination with this bum?????

 
Vince Young at #11 is comical. Um, 9 TD's.In a dynasty league, who wants a QB who scores 9 passing TD's. I could care less about any rushing TD's as those come and go. No QB consistently puts up a lot of rushing TD's. When Brett Favre had Driver and nothing for a few years (including Ferguson on the other side dropping passes and allowing INT's when the ball was throw his way), Favre put up 20+ TD's a year. Only last year did Favre not throw 20 and he still managed 18 with a inexperienced team.Eli Manning has outplayed Young FFwise the past 2 years yet is behind him? What is the fascination with this bum?????
:goodposting: 2006 - Young outproduced Eli, at least in a few of my leagues. I won't bother arguing with the rest of your post, as you've ignored the arguments so far.
 
QB is the hardest dynasty position to rank because in most leagues they aren't worth that much.

I agree with your 1st 3 but then I would go Palmer, Brees then Big Ben. I guess I like Hass next, but after him you can throw the rest in a bag and pick one out. Hard to get real excited about any of them or the offenses they are in.
I do think people have trouble ranking dyansty QBs, but it is probably worth it to try. I have no "study" to prove it, but it seems as though most of the bad dynasty teams that I have encountered, have a bad situation at QB. Unlike redraft where there is a good chance that you tape together QBs from the waiver wire, most of the lower level guys and developmental players are on rosters.
Actually, this ('07) was an unusual year for QB points. Throwing them in a hat and pulling one out was not the case, however.The teams that managed to "pull out" Anderson and Farve way late (or, in Anderson's case "undrafted) did real well.; as did the teams that "pulled out Brady"at ADP #37....they did did real well, too.

In Z-Land scoring, Brady was off the charts....490 points. Nineteen of the top 50 scorers were QB's so the statement that they aren't worth much" holds zero water. That they aren't worth much relative to each other holds more water....the real question is what the spread is.

1. Brady vs. #2 QB delta 123 points

2. #2 QB to #3 QB delta is 28 points

3. #4 QB to #8 QB delta is 24 points

4. #8 QB to #12 B delta is 54 points

Where the "out of the hat" deal doesn't work is Brady, who's way off the charts in '07. The #2 QB in '07 is about the same as the #1 QB in '06....five points difference.

Where the big change comes in the difference makers at QB in '07 vs. '06. In '06 the #12 rated QB scored 228 points; in '07 the #12 rated QB scored 247 points. That's the bottom of the line....the Mendoza Line at QB's....below QB #12, the pickins are meager, in both years. If you didn't have a top 12 QB, you were probably giving away too many points to be considered a top team.

The big difference was the shape the curve takes in '07 vs. the shape of the curve in '06:

..QB......'06..........'07

#1.........372........490

#2.........312........367

#3.........305........339

#4.........302........325

#5.........296........316

#6.........268........312

#7.........264........302

#8.........253........301

#9.........236........282

#10.......229........262

#11.......229........251

#12.......228........247

When you check out the comparisons, you can interpret the results in any number of ways. You can draw conclusions that support jist about what ever you're looking to prove. However, there are a couple of inescapable conclusions:

1. There's more passing points in '07 vs. '06.

2. There's a bigger spread at the top in '07...if you had Brady you were a winner, kinda like having LT on '06.

3. The delta from spots #7 to #12 in '06 was pretty low (36 points), same in '07 (54 points).

4. The delta of the #1 QB in both years was significant, especially in '07 where is was off the charts.

5. The comparisions of the #6 through #9 rated QB's ('06 vs '07) shows a delta increase of + 50 points (+/-) per position when '07 is compared to '06.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
say what u must about Derek Anderson but any QB throwing 29TD's in there first year is damn impressive no matter how they got the 29. exactly how many QB's have thrown 29TD's or more in there first year of starting? not bad for essentially a rookie

 
I put Jamarcus Russel at the bottom of the top 20. Starting QB in the league next year gets the keys to the car. The Raiders did all the right things with their 1st overall selection (after they finally got him signed) - they let him sit and eased him in at the end of the season. I'd love to have this guy on my bench in a dynasty just to see what happens...
If you play in an opposite league where you get points for turning the ball over then Russell will be gold for the short time that he holds down the starting gig.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ninerfanatic492000 said:
say what u must about Derek Anderson but any QB throwing 29TD's in there first year is damn impressive no matter how they got the 29. exactly how many QB's have thrown 29TD's or more in there first year of starting? not bad for essentially a rookie
Actually, I think this is part of the problem with how most people evaluate dynasty QBs. Too much emphasis is placed on season stat totals and not enough emphasis is placed on actual effectiveness. A big part of the reason why Anderson was able to put up good numbers is because he was eighth in the NFL in pass attempts. But when you take a closer look at the numbers, he really didn't have an exceptional year. He finished outside the top 15 in QB rating and outside the top 10 in yards per attempt. He wasn't bad. But he wasn't great either. The best argument in favor of Anderson is that he's a young QB and it's possible that he'll actually improve. However, there are other young QBs outplaying him (Cutler, Schaub). That's why I rank those guys above him.
 
FInd it funny you call Jamarcus Russel a bust, yet have Brady Quinn in the top 20? Huh? Both had very little game action, yet you declare one a bust and one in the top 20 based on his body of work at Notre Dame?

 
FInd it funny you call Jamarcus Russel a bust, yet have Brady Quinn in the top 20? Huh? Both had very little game action, yet you declare one a bust and one in the top 20 based on his body of work at Notre Dame?
They're both young players so it's not like we have much evidence to go by aside from their college performance and early NFL returns. All we can really do right now is guess. I think Quinn has the edge for a variety of reasons.I've never been a big believer in Russell and I haven't been impressed with what I've seen from him on or off the field. Yea, he had a good season in 2006, but he benefitted tremendously from playing on a loaded team with two first round WRs and a third who will probably be a top 50-60 pick this year. I think it's somewhat telling that LSU didn't miss a beat after Russell left and actually had a better season than they did when he was their starter. Much of that is a result of LSU's excellent recruiting, but I still think it diminishes Russell's college achievements. Furthermore, Russell had the misfortune of being drafted by the Oakland Raiders. The Raiders seem to be turning things around, but as of right now I don't have a lot of faith in their ability to evaluate or nurture talent. Quinn, on the other hand, plays for a Browns team that seems poised to become a perennial playoff contender. They already have a Pro Bowl caliber WR and TE in place and a system that has yielded a useful FF QB (Anderson). Quinn had a better overall college career than Russell despite playing with a slightly inferior supporting cast. I think it's significant that Notre Dame plummeted in the standings after Quinn left. To me this indicates that Quinn may have been largely resposible for the team's success and that his individual success can't be attributed to the system he played in. I've been wrong about QBs before and I'm sure all be wrong again in the future, but I think the tea leaves favor Quinn and I would rather own him than Russell if given the choice. That's what it comes down to for me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top