Been trying. He is garnering very little interest in my Dyansaty league. Tried to get a first round pick from the LJ owner in next year's rookie draft and was laughed at. I was offered Ike Bruce and Bobby Engram for him. Thats the best offer I have gotten and there is just no way I do that deal.Lining up at FB apparently is not good for one's value as a RB. Nobody really wants to hear about how that was a one-time deal. They only want to point out how effective Dunn has been.I'm curious what his fantasy value is.
I'm hoping he comes out with a nice game this sunday on prime time. It would make it a lot easier to move him.Been trying. He is garnering very little interest in my Dyansaty league. Tried to get a first round pick from the LJ owner in next year's rookie draft and was laughed at. I was offered Ike Bruce and Bobby Engram for him. Thats the best offer I have gotten and there is just no way I do that deal.Lining up at FB apparently is not good for one's value as a RB. Nobody really wants to hear about how that was a one-time deal. They only want to point out how effective Dunn has been.I'm curious what his fantasy value is.
Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Graham does seem like a guy that epitomizes what it means to be more valuable to his current owner than to any other owner. I personally want to stay as far away from him as possible but an owner of him in one of my leagues found him valuable enough to offer him and JT O'Sullivan for Ocho and Turner. I am hurting at QB...but not that badly (in my eyes).I offered him for Jeff Garcia who i wanted for a one week fill in and was laughed at.It seems Graham is the laughing stock of FF.
Even as a Graham owner i find myself just wanting to get rid of him, so i don't even think his own owners really like him.It's almost annoying having him on my team to the point i want to cut him just to get him off the roster.Graham does seem like a guy that epitomizes what it means to be more valuable to his current owner than to any other owner. I personally want to stay as far away from him as possible but an owner of him in one of my leagues found him valuable enough to offer him and JT O'Sullivan for Ocho and Turner. I am hurting at QB...but not that badly (in my eyes).I offered him for Jeff Garcia who i wanted for a one week fill in and was laughed at.It seems Graham is the laughing stock of FF.
I offered Graham for Evans today but still haven't heard back.Would a guy like Lee Evans be fair value for him?
Wow. Garcia is not even rostered in my league - 12 team, 22 roster spots, dynasty. I realize that he should probably be on a roster - maybe even my own - but Graham for Garcia is an extrememly lopsided offer IMO in favor of the guy getting Graham. And he laughed at the offer?I offered him for Jeff Garcia who i wanted for a one week fill in and was laughed at.
It seems Graham is the laughing stock of FF.
He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
It is one of those cases that I wish I didn't already own him so I could buy low in a steal.He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
Yep, pretty much a huge buy low candidate in my book. But I also have him already. Actually, my whole team qualifies as "buy low". (1-5 ARRRGH!)It is one of those cases that I wish I didn't already own him so I could buy low in a steal.He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
I dont think you have to give up Roethlisberger straight up for Graham. At least not with most Graham owners. That seems like a steep price for an undervalued underappreciated RB coming off an 11 yard game in which he played FB. Dont get me wrong - I like Graham a lot going forward, and I am not saying that it is a horrible trade. I just think that you may be able to get him for less. Good time to buy low IMO, and Big Ben does not seem low enough.Wow... I am surprised with the amount of people down on Graham. I was thinking of trading Rothlisberger to get Graham. Graham has only had one game where he scored under 10 points in my league. Also, Graham's schedule looks nice and the Buccs just signed a full back. Upcoming schedule has Seattle, KC, and Detroit before week 12. His playoff schedule is not terrible either, with a home game against Carolina and week 15 against Atlanta.
He is on a team without much offense. He has had a couple off games. He played FULLBACK last week.All those push toward his value being depressed. The guy is a big time buy low, but if you are looking to get value by trading him away, good luck.I traded for Graham a couple weeks ago (Turner after his big game and something minor for Braylon Edwards before his bye and Graham). His value is LESS now I would presume, and the guy gave him to me without much thought a few weeks back. I have three viable RBs in that league and would trade one, but I have to admit, I need to see a little more of Graham the fantasy back rather than Graham the great football player before I myself am confident enough to trade away one of my other guys, and I won't trade Graham because he is so undervalued right now.Wow... I am surprised with the amount of people down on Graham. I was thinking of trading Rothlisberger to get Graham. Graham has only had one game where he scored under 10 points in my league. Also, Graham's schedule looks nice and the Buccs just signed a full back. Upcoming schedule has Seattle, KC, and Detroit before week 12. His playoff schedule is not terrible either, with a home game against Carolina and week 15 against Atlanta.
He should be able to step right in but I'm not 100% sure.I know the Bucs signed Jameel Cook....is he ready to play Sunday night? I am forced to play Dunn this weekend, and will be much more optomistic about his chances if Graham is blocking again.
Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
Graham scored 13.8 points last week in my PPR league. In 6 games, only once has he scored fewer than 13 fantasy points.Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
just dumped him for Warrick Dunn..I'm sure Graham now goes off this weekend for 130 and 3 tds...I'm curious what his fantasy value is.
The mistake about the "goose egg" game has been covered, so I wanted to jump into your first statement.The number of games Graham has played vs. other runners is irrelevant. Graham is #22 in the league in carries, yet is fantasy #12 in points. He's not a threat to regularly catch the ball, so the fact is ( from that simple metric ) that he is simply outplaying at least 10 other RBs.Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
OMG that is funny.I can't give him away. In one league a guy told me my trade offer which included other players would've been more appealing had Ernesto not been included at all. Apparently, his presence has negative value!!!
Point taken about Graham's goosegg game being a few weeks ago now. I recalled he went 5 carries for 11 yards on Sunday, and incorrectly assumed his point total for the week was poor, which it almost always will be given that amount of work.Graham scored 13.8 points last week in my PPR league. In 6 games, only once has he scored fewer than 13 fantasy points.Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
Of course the number of games Graham has played vs. other runners is relevant, especially in the middle of the year when bye weeks have hit some guys but not others. That's why PPG is the number to look at. Rate stats > counting stats.That side to side movement business is what's irrelevant. In fantasy football, it's not how, it's how many. And in the how many column, Graham ~= McClain (on a per-game basis).The mistake about the "goose egg" game has been covered, so I wanted to jump into your first statement.The number of games Graham has played vs. other runners is irrelevant. Graham is #22 in the league in carries, yet is fantasy #12 in points. He's not a threat to regularly catch the ball, so the fact is ( from that simple metric ) that he is simply outplaying at least 10 other RBs.Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
Now, I'm not saying someone should expect to get Marshawn Lynch straight up for Graham or anything, but your post is a fairly clear example of why Graham owners can't get decent value for him from non-owners. He's like a poor man's Clinton Portis in FF terms. Owners think he's great, but the trade value for him just isn't there. As a result, the general consensus in here is probably a good one. Graham is a good buy, but not a good sell.
As well, that comparison to McClain is just silly. Graham may not have the best side to side movement in the NFL, but he at least has **some** ability in that area, which La'Ron really doesn't.
Is Graham worth more thanAddaiOf course the number of games Graham has played vs. other runners is relevant, especially in the middle of the year when bye weeks have hit some guys but not others. That's why PPG is the number to look at. Rate stats > counting stats.That side to side movement business is what's irrelevant. In fantasy football, it's not how, it's how many. And in the how many column, Graham ~= McClain (on a per-game basis).The mistake about the "goose egg" game has been covered, so I wanted to jump into your first statement.The number of games Graham has played vs. other runners is irrelevant. Graham is #22 in the league in carries, yet is fantasy #12 in points. He's not a threat to regularly catch the ball, so the fact is ( from that simple metric ) that he is simply outplaying at least 10 other RBs.Saying Graham is the #12 RB obscures the fact that he's played more games than roughly half the RBs. On a ppg basis, he's #21 and McClain's #22 (despite splitting time with McGahee and basically getting no carries last game). I think the Graham-McClain comparison is just about perfect.The bottom line is that outside of MJD, the market for RBs that get less than 50% of their team's carries is pretty soft. Just way too much exposure to the sort of goosegg game both guys just had last Sunday.Buckna said:He's the # 12 RB despite splitting time with Dunn and basically getting no carries last game. Safe to say he is worth a lot more to the team starting him than the pittance most other owners are willing to offer in trade as evidenced by this thread.Depends entirely on your definition of fair value. Like you said yourself, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does.Perhaps the EG owners are wrong, and everyone else is right, and fair value is what all these EG owners are feeling insulted by.Graham is one of those guys you will never ever get fair value for. With Dunn in the mix, and Caddy's return looming nobody wants to take the chance. Even if Caddy is put on IR, there is always the question he may return. Not to mention, Graham was a nobody last year. If he would have been an early draft pick people would probably be singing a different tune. The fact is that a guy like EG will ALWAYS have to prove himself.
Your best bet is to either keep him, or package him. But, nobody is going to see EG's value the way an EG owner does. I own him in a league, but would shy away for trading for him.
Not to mention, he is in a dreaded RBBC.
Take away the Dunn-less 2007, and this guy starts looking a lot like LeRon McClain.
Now, I'm not saying someone should expect to get Marshawn Lynch straight up for Graham or anything, but your post is a fairly clear example of why Graham owners can't get decent value for him from non-owners. He's like a poor man's Clinton Portis in FF terms. Owners think he's great, but the trade value for him just isn't there. As a result, the general consensus in here is probably a good one. Graham is a good buy, but not a good sell.
As well, that comparison to McClain is just silly. Graham may not have the best side to side movement in the NFL, but he at least has **some** ability in that area, which La'Ron really doesn't.