captain_amazing
Footballguy
My wife's great uncle is serving life in prison for a murder he was convicted of back in the late 70s. It was a pretty well-known case - something that folks in New England who were living around then would surely know - but I don't want to say who as I don't know if my personal info can be traced from him. At any rate - my MIL just passed away recently, which has been really awful, as she was young (both my wife and I are in our late 20s), and she and her brother kept in touch with my wife's great uncle. Now that she's gone, my wife and I have been writing him and receiving letters, and are thinking of visiting him (she has once in her life). He likes staying in touch with his family and writes us pages in cursive that's so hard to read.
My question is: I feel like my wife's and my place is not to be his judge and jury, as he has already been convicted of his crime. He's really nice to us and seems interested in keeping in touch with us. I feel like it's OK that we afford him that, but sometimes feel like we are smacking his victim and their family in the face when we write him or think about going to see him. What is our role and what is appropriate for us to do/not to do? If it makes any difference (and I'm assuming not), he claims to be innocent of the crime.
Oh, and I've had a few, so please excuse the grammar or long-windiness of this post.
My question is: I feel like my wife's and my place is not to be his judge and jury, as he has already been convicted of his crime. He's really nice to us and seems interested in keeping in touch with us. I feel like it's OK that we afford him that, but sometimes feel like we are smacking his victim and their family in the face when we write him or think about going to see him. What is our role and what is appropriate for us to do/not to do? If it makes any difference (and I'm assuming not), he claims to be innocent of the crime.
Oh, and I've had a few, so please excuse the grammar or long-windiness of this post.
