Snorkelson
Footballguy
Let’s move on, shall we?
I thought of putting both SD backs in the same lineup for similar reasons.Give me all the SF rbs this week. My first run at a milly maker lineup had both breida and Morris.
The early game I had on cable was Min/SF. The run game looked good, Garappolo was just a turn over machine so nothing ever got going. Injurys also resulted in their third string right guard playing most of the game. Against a weaker Det rush defense, at home, and without the Jimmy G F-ups I could see both rbs going for over 100 with a TD. Marquis Goodwin was hurt in that game too. I expect Breida to soak up some of those targets next week.
Desean Jackson should be out this week which will make Godwin a great gpp play. He hasn't had a dud yet when Jackson's been out of the lineup.
In that same game, Nelson Agholor is another awesome discount play. He gets a cake matchup against Tampa's slot corner, he's a full 1/10 of a second faster in the 40, and Philly targeted him pretty heavily last week.
Have almost the same lineup except I have Keenum,M Gordon,Sanders and chargers D and no Kamara or LandryFirst glance at Gpp
Qb- T. Taylor
Rb- Kamara, Conner
Wr- Landry, Godwin, Agholor
Te-Kittle
Flex- Gurley
Def- 49ers
May switch out Agholor for a higher priced wr and go with a lower priced rb at flex. Thoughts?
My first thought was that it looked like a cash LU. But last week the chalk went off, soFirst glance at Gpp
Qb- T. Taylor
Rb- Kamara, Conner
Wr- Landry, Godwin, Agholor
Te-Kittle
Flex- Gurley
Def- 49ers
May switch out Agholor for a higher priced wr and go with a lower priced rb at flex. Thoughts?
It is a bit chalky especially at Rb. Will likely tweak it a bitMy first thought was that it looked like a cash LU. But last week the chalk went off, so
Yeah, my similar lineup is in a 3x and 5man league. GPP I'm thinking Foles ,Brees or Watson.My first thought was that it looked like a cash LU. But last week the chalk went off, so
I don't get the H-Value thing. I get better lineups using the value function.Alex Smith @7100 has Dodds' highest H-Value in the optimizer.
I haven't studied it enough to make a judgement. What's your opinion based on?I don't get the H-Value thing. I get better lineups using the value function.
I seen Best H-Value player + player B projected less than player C + player D projection. Obviously you don't want all the best value players if doesn't maximize your lineup score. H-value prevents that. Hasn't been as much of an issue lately as the best value players have also been the most expensive.I haven't studied it enough to make a judgement. What's your opinion based on?
Interesting.Alex Smith @7100 has Dodds' highest H-Value in the optimizer.
And even if Foles does suck again you know Agholor will get 10 catches to go with his 40 yards so his floor is around 9 points.Desean Jackson should be out this week which will make Godwin a great gpp play. He hasn't had a dud yet when Jackson's been out of the lineup.
In that same game, Nelson Agholor is another awesome discount play. He gets a cake matchup against Tampa's slot corner, he's a full 1/10 of a second faster in the 40, and Philly targeted him pretty heavily last week.
Never thought I would say it, but I am kind of missing PK for cash games. The flex put the focus on starting 3 RBs, so that means we are probably starting QBs that make you want to barf as you click the button next to their name to fit in those RBs. I miss least year when I could start Brady or Brees and feel decent about my chances in cash with the rest of my roster.I want to put Tyrod in for cash, but I probably should know better right? But then again he runs a lot so his fantasy value is rather high right? But then again he sucks at throwing the ball right?
idk what to do with him.
Most of my cash lineups right now have Alex Smith with some version of Melvin G, Conner, Sanders, Enunwa, Kittle AB, AP. I feel like I'm putting too much faith in Alex Smith to not screw it up though which is why I was looking at Tyrod.
I was actually a fan of using PK. The only one I think. Data showed they were no less predictable than most positions and DST too.KarmaPolice said:Never thought I would say it, but I am kind of missing PK for cash games. The flex put the focus on starting 3 RBs, so that means we are probably starting QBs that make you want to barf as you click the button next to their name to fit in those RBs. I miss least year when I could start Brady or Brees and feel decent about my chances in cash with the rest of my roster.
I came around on them last year. It was a good way to get a very low owned player in there for gpps, and after I read the article I referred to last week, I started using the PK-DT combo as well, and that helped me select some decent plays.I was actually a fan of using PK. The only one I think. Data showed they were no less predictable than most positions and DST too.
I hope so. I only piddled in week 1 because I was out of town with my kids for a long weekend at the beach with my extended family. Really the only thing I did was put together a quick place holder in about a half-dozen contests, then completely forget about it until shortly after kick-off of the Sunday early games. If I can get everything caught back up at work and around the house, I intend to ramp it up this week.I came around on them last year. It was a good way to get a very low owned player in there for gpps, and after I read the article I referred to last week, I started using the PK-DT combo as well, and that helped me select some decent plays.
I get that FD is still not ppr, but now it feels a bit too much like DK where you basically have to get 3 RBs in there for cash. Arguably DK gives you more options in the flex because of the ppr format, especially for gpps.
It's only 1 week, and the chalk destroyed last week, so maybe scores will come back to earth a little bit and other strategies will present themselves.
I like it.Cas LU to start: QB/ A. Smith, RB/ Peterson - Conner, WR/ A. Brown - J. Landry - E. Sanders, TE/ Kittle, FLEX/ L. Miller, DEF/ LAC.
Line-up Optimizer gives it 132 points.
I’m leaning Jets. Titans defense is nothing special right now. I know it was an odd game, but any self respecting team should be able to score on the Titans at home right now. Miami couldn’t.Any thoughts on Jets vs Redskins since they are same favorable price ($3700)? I don't expect a repeat from the Jets, but they should have positive momentum going into home opener, while the Dolphins are coming off that seven hour marathon game. Or, since I'm in the area, could just be brainwashed by local sports talk.
On DK I threw a $1 in tonight's SE showdown hoping for overlay. Using Boyd as my MVP
...and this won't do anything now that Green has 3TDs....
I am in there too. Tried Mixon at MVP, but using both Qbs, Tucker, and both Ds too for something weird.
Thanks. I'm going to stick with them. They were my 1st instinct and I usually do better with my initial line up than when I start tinkering/overanalyzing.I’m leaning Jets.
Re: 2 TEsI have done it before with the Pats, but do you guys think there is any value using 2 RBs on the same team this week for a gpp dart? Has to be 2 cheap guys - I keep staring at C.Thompson and AP as a possible combo. I figure that would be a pretty low owned LU build.
Also keep looking at what a TE in the flex would look like.
Here is a 2 TE LU I just threw together: Jimmy G - AP - D.Johnson - Brown - T.Hill - Gordon - Kittle - Cook - Wash.
I scored 114 and cashed $2KarmaPolice said:
I am in there too. Tried Mixon at MVP, but using both Qbs, Tucker, and both Ds too for something weird.
Fair enough. After I posted that and thought about it more, I think the ppr and pricing of DK make that pay off for certain weeks, but not sure FD is the place to do it except for gpp shots in huge gpps like that 25cent one where you have to beat 500K+ entries. Maybe more viable as prices of players go up?Re: 2 TEs
Dodds has two TEs valued at 18 or above and 21 rbs So your going to give FD 17-19% juice to pick a flex that’s projected to be inferior to 21 other players? Won’t say it will never work but the math says you’d have more fun taking a match to your dollar bills If this is a fun lottery ticket enterprise then ignore what I said
I guess to get people to stop hitching about kickers? As long as the rbs are underpriced they may have well as added a 3rd rbFair enough. After I posted that and thought about it more, I think the ppr and pricing of DK make that pay off for certain weeks, but not sure FD is the place to do it except for gpp shots in huge gpps like that 25cent one where you have to beat 500K+ entries. Maybe more viable as prices of players go up?
I think I am just rebelling a little bit over the idea of probably HAVING to start a RB in the flex week in and week out because of the scoring and format. If that's the case, what was the point of adding the flex?
I like those calls. I was staring at Houston too.For cash and cash+ this week I'm all in on Keenum,M Gordon,Sanders,Kittle and Brown if Ben plays.
Doing a few .25 gpps and some SE $1/$2. A hopefully low owned stack I like here is Watson,Hopkins,Miller
No, I get it, and you aren't coming across as rude. Keep in mind me also do different $ amount and volume. 0 chance I would do it in a Gpp with 10k or less entries, but when we are talking 500k+ in those 25 cent gpps.I guess to get people to stop hitching about kickers? As long as the rbs are underpriced they may have well as added a 3rd rb
im not trying to be be rude to you, just a light hearted attempt at some strategy discussion